Noah Syndergaard’s Comps Imply Ace Potential

After falling to 2-0 against the Royals and their high-contact ways, the Mets will turn to rookie Noah Syndergaard for game 3 tonight. After disappointing outings from both Matt Harvey and Jacob deGrom, the Mets are hoping he’ll pitch like he has all season long, and keep his team within striking distance of a World Series title.

I last wrote about Syndergaard when he was called up back in May. Heading into the year, KATOH pegged him for 11.5 WAR through age 28, which was the second highest forecast among pitching prospects, and sixth highest overall. Although he posted an unremarkable 4.60 ERA in a full season at Triple-A in 2014, Syndergaard’s near-30% strikeout rate pushed his KATOH forecast to elite levels. A pitcher’s minor league strikeout rate is a very strong predictor of big league success, and Syndergaard’s was the highest of any Triple-A pitcher at the time of his call up. All while being one of the youngest pitchers at the level.

Thus far, Syndergaard’s lived up to KATOH’s high expectations — and then some. He maintained his near-30% strikeout rate in his rookie season, and actually improved his walk rate at the highest level. The end result was a 3.24 ERA and 3.25 FIP — both figures tops among rookies with at least 130 innings pitched. Those numbers don’t even consider the stellar job he’s done in this year’s postseason: a 1.44 FIP with a 38% strikeout rate against some of the best hitters the National League had to offer.

As I often do for young players, I generated a list of comps for Syndergaard’s 2015 season by way of some Mahalanobis distance calculations. This time in particular, I considered the stats that go into the SIERA formula, which does a good job of predicting run prevention. But the stats are only part of what makes Syndergaard so impressive. Perhaps more exciting than the stats themselves are the pitches Syndergard uses to generate them. Most notably, he wields a fastball that can touch triple digits. So, rather than ignore this piece of information, I added a parameter for fastball velocity to my analysis to account for the fact that he throws extremely hard.

Below are the pitchers who were most similar to Syndergaard in terms of stats and stuff, ranked from most to least similar. I considered all player seasons between ages 21 and 23 with over 500 batters faced. I included z-scores (centered to league average) for the key parameters, so you can see exactly how these pitchers’ seasons differed from Syndergaard’s. So 0 is average, positive numbers are above average, and negative numbers are below average.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Noah Syndergaard’s Mahalanobis Comps
Rank Season Name Age ERA- xFIP- z-K% z-BB% z-GB% z-FBv Mah Dist
0 2015 Noah Syndergaard 22 88 75 1.6 -1.2 0.2 1.8 0.0
1 2011 Clayton Kershaw 23 62 74 1.9 -1.0 -0.6 0.7 12.1
2 2010 Mat Latos 22 79 80 1.5 -0.9 -0.3 0.9 12.7
3 2011 Madison Bumgarner 21 89 80 0.9 -1.3 0.4 0.1 15.2
4 2014 Gerrit Cole 23 104 88 0.8 -0.3 0.8 1.3 15.2
5 2012 Chris Sale 23 72 78 1.1 -0.7 0.2 0.0 17.0
6 2012 Stephen Strasburg 23 80 72 2.3 -0.3 -0.1 1.4 17.2
7 2006 Jeremy Bonderman 23 89 78 1.2 -0.6 0.8 1.0 18.1
8 2012 Madison Bumgarner 22 92 88 0.6 -1.1 0.3 -0.2 18.8
9 2013 Patrick Corbin 23 88 92 0.2 -0.8 0.3 0.1 23.1
10 2014 Marcus Stroman 23 94 84 0.1 -1.1 1.6 0.6 23.7
11 2005 Rich Harden 23 60 77 1.5 0.1 0.0 1.7 23.8
12 2007 Cole Hamels 23 74 75 1.5 -1.3 -0.5 1.6 23.9
13 2003 Colby Lewis 23 152 110 -0.3 1.6 -0.5 -0.3 24.4
14 2009 Brett Anderson 21 94 81 0.5 -1.3 1.8 0.5 24.5
15 2004 Jake Peavy 23 57 79 1.8 -0.5 -0.5 2.0 24.6

Here’s a glimpse at how these players’ careers progressed.

Noah Syndergaard’s Mahalanobis Comps
Rank Season Name Next Season WAR Highest WAR
0 2015 Noah Syndergaard ? ?
1 2011 Clayton Kershaw 5.9 8.6 (2015)
2 2010 Mat Latos 3.8 4.8 (2013)
3 2011 Madison Bumgarner 3.1 5.1 (2015)
4 2014 Gerrit Cole 5.4 5.4 (2015)
5 2012 Chris Sale 4.9 6.2 (2015)
6 2012 Stephen Strasburg 3.3 4.4 (2014)
7 2006 Jeremy Bonderman 2.8 5.6 (2006)
8 2012 Madison Bumgarner 3.8 5.1 (2015)
9 2013 Patrick Corbin Injured 3.5 (2013)
10 2014 Marcus Stroman Injured 3.0 (2014)
11 2005 Rich Harden Injured 4.4 (2008)
12 2007 Cole Hamels 4.7 4.9 (2011)
13 2003 Colby Lewis 0.1 4.7 (2010)
14 2009 Brett Anderson 2.5 3.5 (2009)
15 2004 Jake Peavy 5.5 6.7 (2007)

There are some excellent careers in there! Almost all of these pitchers eclipsed the 4 WAR mark at various points of their careers, while five of the top seven (six of the top eight if you count Bumgarner twice) had 5+ WAR seasons. Furthermore, a few of the pitchers near the top are just now hitting their primes, so the “Highest WAR” column might actually be selling some of them short. Syndergaard is keeping good company, to say the least. Here’s a look at the first few of these pitchers’ career trajectories by cumulative WAR.

Before you start campaigning for Syndergaard’s Hall of Fame induction, I should note that this method isn’t exactly a foolproof one in forecasting a player’s future. Regardless of how similar these comps are, they are just a narrow selection of players who happened to perform similarly to Syndergaard at s similar age. This is a small sample size, and as we all know, strange things can happen in small sample sizes. However, this serves the purpose of putting some faces to the possible career trajectories for the 22-year-old. And at the very least, it provides us with a list of names that’s fun to look at. This particular list is especially fun for Mets fans, who could really use something fun right now.

Syndergaard is easily one of the most exciting pitchers in baseball, and likely has the highest upside of the Mets’ harem of promising, young starting pitchers. Kiley McDaniel, our erstwhile lead prospect analyst, gave Syndergaard a 70 FV (on the 20-80 scale) in his in-season update. No other pitcher who reached the majors in 2015 received such a favorable grade, nor did any current pitching prospects.

In his rookie season, Syndergaard was a very good 22-year-old with knock-out stuff. That certainly came in handy for the Mets this season, but Syndergaard’s 2015 was just a taste of what he might be capable of down the road. History shows that pitchers like Syndergaard often develop into top-of-the-rotation starters capable of adding five or six wins to his team’s ledger in a year.

Stats aside, you get the feeling that Syndergaard has that sort of upside when you watch him pitch. In addition to his fastball, he wields a pretty nasty curveball and has recently added a slider to the mix. So far this October, he’s parlayed those pitches into an ace-like performance. And the Mets are hoping the one they call Thor taps into that ace potential tonight to keep them from the brink of elimination.





Chris works in economic development by day, but spends most of his nights thinking about baseball. He writes for Pinstripe Pundits, FanGraphs and The Hardball Times. He's also on the twitter machine: @_chris_mitchell None of the views expressed in his articles reflect those of his daytime employer.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Weeping Jays Fan
10 years ago

*Sheds single tear while staring longingly into the distance*

Frito Bandito
10 years ago

Ra Dickey and josh fucking thole

-______-

ZenMadman
10 years ago
Reply to  Frito Bandito

Don’t forget Mike Nickeas!

joser
10 years ago
Reply to  Frito Bandito

Good news! The guy who made that trade is no longer with Toronto, and the new guy clearly thinks trades like that are a bad idea. Jays fans can now look forward to several years of Indians-esque rebuilding, also known as non-contention, also known as “that thing the Leafs do every year.”

Travis d'Arnaud
10 years ago

His fastball stings my hand so good.

Colby Lewis
10 years ago

Holy crap.

ArmSideRun37
10 years ago

Pretty awesome for such an electric arm to be a strike thrower at such a young age.

Matt P
10 years ago

“Most notably, he wields a fastball that can touch triple digits. So, rather than ignore this piece of information, I added a parameter for fastball velocity to my analysis to account for the fact that he throws extremely hard.”

There’s a potential problem with doing it like that if you didn’t take pitching hand into account. Righties throw the ball faster than lefties and therefore taking that into account will make Thor’s fastball less impressive while making Kershaw, Bumgarner and Sale’s fastball more impressive. If those lefties get knocked out then that makes the chart look less impressive. Still good but not great.

MH
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt P

Well I’m not sure you outright remove those guys. Velocity is just one parameter, and it’s actually the one that’s least similar when looking at the lefties. Noah’s FB was more than 1 SD better than any of theirs, while the rankings on run estimators (ERA-, xFIP-) and peripheral rates (K%, GB%, BB%) are all much closer. If anything, a simple adjustment for FB velocity may increase the similarity scores with the lefties.

MH
10 years ago
Reply to  Matt P

The correct way to do it would probably be to isolate the z-scores to pitcher handedness, which again, would likely produce much more similar looking results. And yes, this does make Noah look slightly “less impressive” by comparison, but it wouldn’t do much to change the overall analysis here.

MH
10 years ago

Isolate the z-scores on velocity to pitcher handedness, that is. Isolating the run estimators and peripheral rates to handedness probably wouldn’t have a meaningful impact unless there’s some sort of significant difference between the results lefties and righties are getting in the majors.

steve
10 years ago

Well all I’ve got this postseason from afar reading about the Mets pitchers is barring injury (and that’s the case with any player and any team) they may not win this year but it’s not likely to be a one time thing for them making it this deep into the postseason.

joser
10 years ago
Reply to  steve

Yeah, that’s been pretty much the narrative since it became evident the Nationals were cratering and even Harper’s heroics wouldn’t save them. The Mets weren’t expected to contend this year precisely because so much of their talent was fresh off the farm, but they were expected to contend soon and for a while thereafter, precisely because they’d acquired / hung onto so much talent fresh off the farm.

BipMember since 2016
10 years ago

Sorry for derailing this thread, but I would like to remark that the inclusion of Clayton Kershaw on any by-age graph tends to warrant at least one “holy crap Clayton Kershaw”

MikeS
10 years ago
Reply to  Bip

I looked at this graph and thought “Clayton Kershaw, holy shit!” I mean, I knew he was probably the best in baseball, but 47 WAR at 27? Holy Shit!

PBeeston
10 years ago

AA including Syndergaard in Dickey trade one major error that lead to Shapiro assuming baseball decision control from next GM.

Cat Latos
10 years ago
Reply to  PBeeston

If that one trade was the downfall, then uh… ya, AA made the right choice to move on. Aaron Sanchez hadnt developed liked they hoped. At the time of the trade Sanchez was the superior prospect. Life goes on, and Josh Donaldson is a Blue Jay.

Noah Baron
10 years ago
Reply to  Cat Latos

Sanchez was the superior prospect, but should he have been?

Syndergaard had a higher strikeout rate and a much lower walk rate than Sanchez did. I think this is why Alderson and company targeted Syndergaard and not Sanchez.

Perhaps AA should have had the foresight to not include Syndergaard based on his ridiculous peripherals, despite what internet prospect rankers thought at the time.

Josh
10 years ago

I also think he is likely to have an injury-plagued career. Fast foward to 2020 when he is back from his second TJ surgery and trying to make the Marlins rotation. Another what if?