Old Blood: Phillies Re-Sign Kyle Schwarber

Bill Streicher-Imagn Images

No player, not even Bryce Harper, has personified the Phillies’ recent run of four straight trips to the postseason more than Kyle Schwarber. Faced with the prospect of losing their signature slugger to the division rival Mets, Philadelphia instead retained Schwarber on a five-year, $150 million deal, news of which enlivened the Winter Meetings here in Orlando on Tuesday.

Schwarber, who turns 33 on March 5, hit .240/.365/.563 and led the National League with 56 home runs and 132 RBI while playing in all 162 games in 2025. He set career highs in home runs, RBI, games played, slugging percentage, wRC+ (152), and WAR (4.9). The last of those marks owed plenty to manager Rob Thomson’s limiting him to eight games in left field, where he’s a major liability, having totaled -37 FRV and -34 DRS in 2022–23. Only Shohei Ohtani took more plate appearances as a designated hitter in 2025 than Schwarber’s 687.

Schwarber’s season — which propelled him to a second-place finish in the NL MVP voting behind Ohtani (who won unanimously) — may have been a career year, but it was no fluke. Thanks to his ongoing work with hitting coach Kevin Long, who joined the Phillies just a few months before Schwarber signed his four-year, $79 million deal with them in March 2022, he has evolved from a pushover against lefties into a top threat in those matchups. From 2015–21 with the Cubs, Nationals, and Red Sox, Schwarber hit just .214/.324/.361 (86 wRC+) in 584 plate appearances against lefties, making 100 PA against them just twice and topping a 100 wRC+ against them only in the last of those seasons, during which he bounced from Washington to Boston. He has topped 200 plate appearances against lefties in all four of his seasons with the Phillies, and he was an above-average hitter against them in each of the last three. Over the past two years, his 524 plate appearances against lefties led the majors, while his 157 wRC+ (.275/.385/.547) and slugging percentage both ranked second behind Yordan Alvarez (albeit in just 247 PA). By comparison, he hit .244/.365/.525 (143 wRC+) against righties in that span.

As The Athletic’s Matt Gelb detailed in May, with Long’s help, Schwarber has overcome his fears when stepping in against the game’s best lefties. He’s taken to donning a C-Flap helmet and additional body armor for those plate appearances, and has adjusted his mindset as well as his mechanics:

Whenever Schwarber is in the cage with Long before a matchup against a tough lefty, Schwarber says the line. Be prepared to die. It must be a coincidence that few lefty hitters can match the success he’s enjoyed since adding the face guard.

“I mean, the mind’s a powerful thing, right?” Schwarber said. “You tell yourself one thing, and the next thing you know, you’re having success. But I feel there are a lot of different things, too, that went into that.”

…“It’s work,” Long said. “It’s willing yourself. It is understanding what a lefty is trying to do to you. Understanding the angles. Understanding what pitches do against lefties. He’s got a really good grasp on it. He’s shortened his swing since the time I met him to where he is now.”

Statcast’s bat-tracking data goes back only as far as the second half of 2023, but since then, Schwarber’s average swing length has decreased from 7.9 feet to 7.5 without compromising his bat speed, which averaged 77.3 mph in 2025, placing him in the 98th percentile. This past season, he hit the ball harder than ever, setting highs in average exit velocity (94.3 mph), barrel rate (20.8%), hard-hit rate (a major league-high 59.6%), xSLG (.601), and xwOBA (.414) — all good for the 98th percentile or higher — and he maximized that impact by trimming his strikeout rate to the lowest it had been since 2021 (27.2%).

The big question is whether Schwarber’s maturation as a hitter can offset the gravitational effects of the aging curve, as this contract covers his ages 33–37 seasons. ZiPS is quite pessimistic; here’s the projection supplied by Dan Szymborski:

ZiPS Projection – Kyle Schwarber
Year BA OBP SLG AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO SB OPS+ WAR
2026 .223 .342 .493 560 97 125 20 1 43 109 96 194 7 126 2.7
2027 .214 .333 .461 518 84 111 18 1 36 94 87 183 6 115 1.8
2028 .206 .325 .429 471 72 97 16 1 29 78 78 170 5 105 1.0
2029 .199 .316 .403 417 59 83 14 1 23 63 67 155 4 95 0.3
2030 .192 .310 .382 359 49 69 12 1 18 50 57 139 3 88 0.0

In case you’re wondering, that projection gets Schwarber to 489 home runs (he has 340), with ZiPS estimating his odds of reaching 500 at a healthy 48%. I’ll kick the Hall of Fame chatter can down the road while pointing out that the ZiPS contract suggestion for Schwarber’s projection is just $50 million. While his actual contract was always going to be well above whatever a strict projection-based valuation suggested, this deal blows past the figures from our Top 50 Free Agents list, where Schwarber ranked sixth. Ben Clemens forecasted just a $105 million commitment over three years ($35 million AAV), while our median crowdsource estimation came in at $112 million over four years ($28 million AAV). MLB Trade Rumors expected him to sign for five years and $135 million ($27 million AAV) and noted that this deal is the biggest free agent guarantee ever for a position player entering his age-33 season or later, far surpassing the $92 million Josh Donaldson received from the Twins in 2020 — and that was for four years.

Hell, the Pirates — the Pirates! — reportedly offered Schwarber a four-year contract worth around $120 million, according to The Athletic’s Ken Rosenthal, while the Reds (for whom Schwarber grew up rooting), Giants, Mets, Orioles, and Red Sox are among the teams known to have checked in on him. Such widespread interest was anticipated given that Schwarber is arguably the best pure hitter on the market and has a great clubhouse reputation as well. As Clemens wrote:

If you try to approximate Schwarber’s market based on the WAR projections you see above, you’re going to come up short. Teams are no dummies, and that number doesn’t do a good job of capturing Schwarber’s total value. He’s one of the best 15 or so hitters in the majors, and defensive ability matters far less when that’s the case. Someone has to play DH for every team, and Schwarber represents an upgrade for every team save the Dodgers and perhaps the Astros.

When it comes to pure offense, Schwarber is probably the best guy on the market, and if it’s not him, it’s the guy below him [Pete Alonso, no. 7 on our list]. That gives him a strong negotiating position. You can’t replicate Schwarber in the aggregate with two so-so hitters. You can’t fake a 50-homer DH. Teams might be risk-averse in the extreme these days, but there isn’t exactly a lot of risk in “will Kyle Schwarber hit next year?” The bigger risk, in fact, might be missing the best bat on the market when you’re trying to win now.

Only Schwarber’s age kept him from ranking higher on our list. Indeed, beyond the usual age-related concerns, one issue with regards to retaining him is the extent to which he’ll prevent Harper — who’s 33 years old himself and declined in the field in 2025, his second full season as a first baseman — from sliding into the DH slot down the road.

That’s just one more concern for a team that had the worst ranked defense among the 12 playoff participants this past year, and was bounced from the Division Series in four games by the Dodgers, due in part to defensive lapses. Again, though, the Phillies are already keeping their biggest defensive liability off the grass while retaining their most productive hitter, and it’s up to president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski to figure out how they can improve elsewhere. Catcher J.T. Realmuto, whose defense has declined considerably, is a free agent, and the outfield needs a significant makeover; Dombrowski is looking to find a trade partner for right fielder Nick Castellanos, who has netted just 0.8 WAR over the past four seasons and is owed $20 million in 2026, the final year of his deal. Beyond that, Ranger Suárez is a free agent, Zack Wheeler is out past Opening Day following surgery to alleviate thoracic outlet syndrome, and Aaron Nola is coming off a 6.01 ERA, so the rotation could use substantial bolstering as well.

With Schwarber in place, the Phillies have checked one item off their shopping list, perhaps the biggest one. For at least the near term, this reunion promises to be an entertaining one as he launches more baseballs into the stratosphere. To keep the Phillies in the playoff hunt, however, will take even more than that.





Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.

93 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cashgod27Member since 2024
20 days ago

I don’t care what anyone says: this is a great deal. The WAR is misleading because, from a team-building perspective, it doesn’t matter one iota that he’s a DH. If not him, you’d just be giving those DH at-bats to a worse DH. I don’t have the exact math down, but he was worth 2.5 (b)WAA at DH, where the average DH would probably be worth around -1. That gets Schwarber to be worth about 3.5 more wins than the average DH, which makes $30 million a year a bargain with the price of one WAR, not WAA, being around $10 million in free agency.

Even stripping all that away, right now Schwarber is a top 10 hitter in baseball at the absolute worst, in addition to being an excellent clubhouse guy. I would be willing to pay $40 million AAV for him (and the Mets were, too!). The last year or two is probably going to be rough, but the Phillies probably weren’t going to be good in 2030 anyway, so who cares?

jdbolickMember since 2024
20 days ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Even stripping all that away, right now Schwarber is a top 10 hitter in baseball at the absolute worst

Schwarber was a top ten hitter by wRC+ in 2025, but he was 20th in 2024 and 48th in 2023, so he’s definitely not top ten at the absolute worst.

The key to this deal is if Schwarber ages according to the league aging curve, as the average wRC+ drops like a piano off of a cliff at age 35, or if he can be an exception to the rule like Nelson Cruz.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
20 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

The bigger key to understanding this deal, from a WAR perspective, is the fact that fWAR positional adjustments are based on napkin math from a quarter century ago and ignore any and all subsequent research.

One such example is the empirically proven existence of a “DH penalty.”

This is, of course, excluded from the same FanGraphs WAR framework which argues “Double, Sac Fly, Pop Up” is a FAR more valuable sequence of events from a reliever entering a bases loaded, one out situation than “GIDP.”

Last edited 20 days ago by Cool Lester Smooth
Sporter's Five HorsesMember since 2014
20 days ago

I think this is a good point, and an important one! I understand that a refresh would likely be a frustrating analytical not to mention technical endeavor, but consider the following thought experiments that frame the concept of value for position players:

  1. Are positional adjustments dynamic or static YoY?
  2. Should positional adjustments be captured in defensive value, offensive value, or the aggregate of the two?
  3. If they are captured in offensive or aggregate value as opposed to just defensive, why? Position fluidity is relatively high, so why should the concept of economic scarcity carry over? I’d argue it should not! If a defensive position is more valuable than another, then the pros or cons of a player’s skill at that position should be captured in the defensive value there and nowhere else. Where they slot in the field has no impact on their occupying 1 of 9 spots in the batting lineup
jdbolickMember since 2024
20 days ago

The bigger key to understanding this deal, from a WAR perspective, is the fact that fWAR positional adjustments are based on napkin math from a quarter century ago and ignore any and all subsequent research.

Except that I’m not talking about WAR and I’m quite sure the Phillies don’t care about WAR. They care about what Schwarber’s offensive production is going to be. If his wRC+ next season is over 140 then they will be ecstatic with the price they paid. If it’s 130, they will be worried but not overly so. If it’s 118 like his 2023 season, they will be in full panic mode.

It’s not unprecedented for a late career surge to be maintained in a player’s mid-30s, which is why I mentioned Nelson Cruz, but it is more common for hitters of that age to decline. We’ll just have to wait and see.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

Fair point!

Baseball_is_Cool_123Member since 2024
20 days ago

What’s the best study proving the DH penalty? I’m sure they tried to control for this but would seem any measurable difference between offensive performance while DHing vs. playing the field would be explained by the fact that a player DHing is much more likely to be nursing an injury. Again, I’m sure they try to account for this but it seems borderline impossible to do so. Is there a best study or two to read through?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
19 days ago

Jeff Zimmerman’s Positional Adjustments study from nearly a decade explicitly accounts for injuries, etc:

https://tht.fangraphs.com/re-examining-wars-defensive-spectrum/

It comes to roughly 5 runs a year, for players who normally DH, as opposed to 9 runs for players who normally play the field…which means that a DH should essentially be treated as an average defensive 1B, if you’re trying to value him empirically.

Baseball_is_Cool_123Member since 2024
16 days ago

Thanks for providing this. It is a good piece and I think I remember reading it at the time it was published. However, the DH penalty portion is still entirely unconvincing to me for the same reason: players DHing are much more likely to be nursing injuries. Jeff seems to separate healthy and not healthy based on whether there was DL time—but often during any season players will DH while nursing an injury when 1) They do not go the DL in that season, and 2) The injury is at no point mentioned to the media or public. So I think this is basically an intractable problem (though I could be missing something). It wouldn’t surprise me, intuitively, that there could be a small DH penalty due to players not being as active in the game moment to moment, but the overall impact must necessarily be less than in this piece, due to the fact that there’s 100% injury-induced underperformance that is not being accounted for. Again, I could be off base / missing something and if so am happy to adjust—but this seems to be the case.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
15 days ago

I totally get where you’re coming from…which is why I’d only use that 5 run penalty from players who *do* DH regularly (look at Yordan, JD, or Vladito’s splits!) rather than trying to create some sort of weighted average that includes folks nursing something.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
20 days ago
Reply to  cashgod27

from a team-building perspective, it doesn’t matter one iota that he’s a DH

Probably it mattered more a couple years ago, when the roster was more clogged with no-glove-all-bat guys and Schwarber wasn’t obviously head and shoulders above the rest of them (and Castellanos wasn’t just a sunk cost). But now, I agree, it doesn’t matter, and the Phillies are in pure win-now mode. This is one of those “I’m probably not going to be in charge by the time we get to the bad years” contracts for Dombrowski.

Adam SMember since 2016
19 days ago

It doesn’t appear to matter today. But it means Bryce Harper can’t take a day off and DH nor could Kyle Tucker if they sign him or any other strong bat. And heaven forbid, Harper gets hurt and can only DH like a few years ago, forcing him to the bench or Schwarber to LF.

darren
20 days ago
Reply to  cashgod27

Wouldn’t the average DH, at least in theory, be worth about 2 WAA? Using your math and adding 1 WAR to each year of the deal they’re paying $150 mil for 10.8 WAR. Even with that charitable accounting it still comes out as only okayish.

PhilMember since 2016
20 days ago
Reply to  darren

You would expect that the average DH would be worth 0 WAA (Wins above average).

Jay
20 days ago
Reply to  Phil

What you would expect does not necessarily bear on the reality based on data. Overall, I would expect the average DH to be a below-average player. Most teams don’t have a premium hitter at that position, few if any DHs contribute value on the bases, and all of them have below-average defensive value.

I don’t have the figures for average value, but I can tell you that min 400 PA, the median baserunning value in 2025 was -0.3, and the median positional value was -0.9. For the 21 hitters with 250 PA as a DH, the medians are -0.7 and -10.6, so that’s a value deficit of 10 runs for everything done without a bat. (Median batting is +9.1. )

The real full-time DHs can rack up -14 positional value, and a few get to -17. I notice that Schwarber racked up -2.6 in defensive skill, and which is pretty incredible for only 8 games in the field, suggesting he could put up a -50 as an everyday outfielder. (Seems hyperbolic, but he also was -32.4 over the previous two seasons in just 108 starts.)

Now that’s just one extreme data point, but it exemplifies the idea that a full-time DH is likely to find one or more ways to be below-average.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
20 days ago
Reply to  darren

That difference between theory and reality has been empirically documented – it’s called “the DH penalty.”

fWAR ignores it.

jdmMember since 2023
20 days ago
Reply to  cashgod27

I thought the point of WAR was to render positional considerations irrelevant?

The goal for teams is to put the best team on the field and we proxy this by their aggregate WAR. If whatever team you root for actually accumulates the most amount of WAR across the league, then they *should* be the team with the highest odds to win it all. I get the sentiment of wanting an impact bat especially given the scarcity of them. But I don’t see how the league average DH can ever amount to -1 WAR?

By construction, the WAR levels are subject to a replacement level player (AAA or equivalent) meaning that theoretically every DH *should* contribute positive WAR to his team (assuming WAR distributions aren’t extreme for a second) or they would get replaced and become the new definition of replacement level. In your assumption of a league wide average of -1 WAR this means that DH would contribute -25.5 WAR (29 DHs graded out at -1 and Schwarber’s 3.5). So just based on WAR’s construction this seems a little far fetched.

Looking at the league wide DHs stats in the leaderboards and I see they contributed ~ 66 WAR for ~ 30 DHs or 2.2WAR/DH. I think it’s fair to subtract the demigods of Ohtani, Judge, and Schwarber to get to 43 WAR or 1.6 WAR/DH. Sure there are going to be some rounding errors but the order of magnitude won’t be that significant.

And my last comment is that if you look at Schwarber’s value section (towards the bottom) and you add up the defensive value and the positional replacement for the past couple of years you’ll clearly see there’s no better place for him than DH. That doesn’t change the contributions his bat makes but it does discount them because it has the lowest barriers to entry. And there is a real cost associated with having a DH only on your team – Harper can’t move from 1B -> DH so now instead of pursuing the best 1B bat the Phillies have to sacrifice that productive bat to get a player who’s defensively capable at whatever their vacancies are.

In some sense, it’s almost as if Schwarber’s defensive limitations constrain the Phillies capacity to buy other good bats and the positional adjustment attempts to reflect this cost.

Anyways, I’m a big fan of Schwarber and I hope he does well but expecting him to be 3.5 WAR better than the league average DH is incredibly rosy scenario (maybe you meant replacement level which isn’t so far fetched). But when you claimed WAR is misleading, then arbitrarily assigned WAR values to his entire comp set, then use that hypothetical WAR differential, so you could then be able to use the empirical $/WAR estimates (based on WAR) I couldn’t stop myself from responding to the subsequent claims. Sorry for the diatribe but I hope Schwarber works out for you guys

Yer Main GuyMember since 2024
20 days ago
Reply to  jdm

Reminder. The positional adjustment isn’t about hitting, it’s about fielding. The reason it’s like -15 or -17.5 for a DH is just that the player is doing nothing compared to his teammates, who are fielding. It impacts the “def” side and isn’t about finding a replacement level of DH bats in the league. I think people often get that wrong.

Sporter's Five HorsesMember since 2014
20 days ago
Reply to  Yer Main Guy

I’m not so sure this is true? Keep in mind defensive value in WAR is relative to avg for the position. And that the positional adjustment is not isolated to defense. Someone with a firmer understanding please confirm or deny but the adjustments seem blunt caricatures that might be close to double counting.

WAR = (Batting Runs + Base Running Runs + Fielding Runs + Positional Adjustment + League Adjustment +Replacement Runs) / (Runs Per Win)

Yer Main GuyMember since 2024
19 days ago
Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  Yer Main Guy

The issue is absolutely that the positional adjustment doesn’t account for the impact of playing a position on offensive performance, when we have studies showing that the average “full-time” DH improves by 5 offensive runs when they play the field and vice versa.

Jeff Zimmerman’s article from a decade ago uncovered that the reason Andres Giminez/Anthony Volpe types seem “undervalued” on a $/WAR basis is that public facing WAR models are giving them an inappropriately large boost while giving corner OFs an inappropriately large penalty:

https://tht.fangraphs.com/re-examining-wars-defensive-spectrum/

It would be great to see a follow up, now that we have a full decade of Statcast fielding data.

Last edited 19 days ago by Cool Lester Smooth
Yer Main GuyMember since 2024
19 days ago

Thanks for the link. I read that a while back and forgot about it. It’s great. Either way I think WAR’s biggest issue is the lack of updates to those values.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  Yer Main Guy

Agreed!

I think rWAR’s adjustments get *closer* than fWAR’s…but I deeply prefer the *model* fWAR uses, even as it’s literal decades out of date.

jdmMember since 2023
19 days ago

I hadn’t come across this article but that does make sense, I remember reading about how pinch-hitters underperform compared to their average but didn’t know it was extended to DH. An update with all these new metrics would be a nice update to WAR.

jdmMember since 2023
19 days ago
Reply to  Yer Main Guy

Yup, if I remember the tango tiger blog that I read forever ago, he basically compared multipositional players defensive performance at each position and used the difference in runs saved between the positions to quantify “how many defensive runs better/worse would a player be if he were forced to play a different position.” Theoretically, if every DH were moved to 1B then their positional adjustment would go from -17.5 -> -12.5 but on average they would produce -5 runs (so WAR can be invariant of what position any player plays at).

Of course these estimates were empirical averages based on the dataset tango used, but for each individual player practically it will vary quite a bit.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  jdm

Yep – and it’s based on 3 years of data from the 2005 version of UZR.