On Comfort, Perfect Games, and Domingo Germán

Content warning: This story contains details of domestic abuse.
Professional sports are enthralling for the action they produce on the playing field. Highlights of home runs, slam dunks, and touchdowns can create lifelong relationships between fans and the sports they enjoy. Yet it’s necessary to remember that sports are situated within the world around them, and often mirror wider trends within it.
It’s easy to think of baseball players as little figures on a screen who appear at 7:00 every night, run around for a few hours while being televised live, and blink out of existence until the next evening when network cameras are back on. It seems that the closer we get to perfectly measuring a player’s value on the diamond, the more we detach the dots on the television from real people who, like us, have lives even after the camera operators go home for the night. People with hobbies, homes, and families, people who matter to other real people besides the fans on the other side of the screen with emotions, bragging rights, or even money staked to what the little humanoid figures do. Every baseball player possesses the same traits that make those watching at home human, and with that unfortunately comes the capacity to cause indescribable harm to others.
Last Wednesday night in Oakland, Domingo Germán threw the 24th perfect game in AL/NL history. Four years ago, he also served what was at the time the fourth-longest suspension under the joint MLB/MLBPA domestic violence policy, missing 81 games across 2019 and 2020. Reporting from The Athletic after his 2021 reinstatement detailed the actions that led to his suspension:
In September 2019, Germán and his girlfriend attended a charity gala held by then-teammate CC Sabathia. Many of Germán’s 2019 teammates were also there with their families. Germán slapped his girlfriend at the event, sources said, but the MLB investigation focused primarily on what happened at his home later that night.
According to multiple league sources, including a person with knowledge of the MLB investigation, Germán was intoxicated and became physically violent toward his girlfriend until she hid in a locked room. The victim is said to have contacted the wife of another Yankees player, and the couple drove to Germán’s home late at night. The victim remained with the teammate’s wife, while the player attempted to calm down Germán, who is said to have been angry and belligerent.
Germán’s actions didn’t occur when he was a set of pixels on a monitor, but when he was a human being directly impacting the lives of other human beings. When the details of his violence were revealed, Germán faced near-universal condemnation, and for good reason. Teammates like Zack Britton and Luke Voit were strongly critical of Germán and stressed the importance of him reforming himself and his life. Earlier this year, Germán spoke about his efforts to move forward, of counseling and learning to communicate better, and he praised his teammates in helping him be a more accountable player and person. And yet his actions to make his now-wife feel safe going forward will be taken by Germán the complete person – the human who spends a considerable majority of his life away from public view. And this can be scary for fans who can only evaluate him through the lens of his occupation and what he decides to share in interviews, who don’t get to track his personal improvements when the cameras are turned off.
The National Domestic Violence Hotline reports that more than one-third of women and one-fourth of men have experienced intimate partner violence in their lives. The abuse that Germán committed isn’t a vague “off-field issue” that he was suspended for, it’s a lived experience for over 12 million people each year. The continued presence of players who have served these suspensions sits uncomfortably with the goal of making survivors feel like they have a place in baseball. But when considering the safety and well-being of domestic abuse survivors, most experts believe that “zero tolerance” policies pose a greater danger than the alternative by reducing the likelihood of a survivor seeking help from the proper channels. It’s quite difficult to balance the knowledge that removing these players from the sport entirely could lead to poor outcomes on all sides with the understanding that their on-field accomplishments grant them a level of personal elevation that feels inappropriate given their prior acts of violence.
My primary background is in education, and there’s an important word that comes up in discussions of how to teach and learn about difficult topics: comfort. Specifically, the most crucial question for any educator to consider is “whose comfort is being prioritized?” Answering this is often key to understanding the broader power dynamics at play between different groups. Baseball is an occupation for some, and a source of entertainment for millions. But to MLB, baseball is also a brand, and it’s a brand best consumed when its viewers don’t consider who their decisions provide comfort and power to. MLB wants us to depersonalize the pixels we see on the screen from the humans that exist after they go home for the night, people with the capacity to build families and lives, but also to hurt others.
Given its druthers, I imagine the league would prefer we be able to celebrate Germán’s achievements independently of his transgressions as a person. The articles commemorating the perfect game on MLB’s official website didn’t really attempt to reconcile his record of domestic violence with his on-field accomplishments; the game story mentioned the incident but quickly turned its attention to Germán’s subsequent inconsistency on the mound. But inherent to the moment are difficult, necessary questions about how two such incongruous realities can converge in an individual, and who gets to feel comfortable. How should baseball media address this accomplishment? On the one hand, praise for abusers may force survivors to see people they view as monstrous deified in online spaces, or at the very least given credit for a character commensurate with their abilities on the diamond. However, it’s also necessary to consider the pitfalls of zero tolerance policies, all while acknowledging that abusers shouldn’t be automatically granted redemption for completing a league-mandated suspension. How should teams evaluate the behavior of players after they have served a domestic violence suspension beyond them simply not reoffending? With the work done to grow and change necessarily occurring beyond our view, how do fans of the sport assess these players as people going forward? How can the league improve the way it handles these situations, especially in ways that center the safety and well-being of survivors?
Needless to say, Germán’s perfect game will leave behind a complicated legacy. In addition to being the first perfect game in over a decade, Germán is the first Dominican-born pitcher to achieve this feat. With over a 10th of the major league player population and a meaningful portion of its fanbase hailing from the Dominican Republic, it seems reasonable for his community and his country to take pride in his accomplishments, especially when considering the factors that have historically prevented international amateur signees and other players of color from making careers as starting pitchers.
Most of our prescriptions here hinge on whether or not Germán, or other players who have committed domestic violence, should have a place in the sport at all after their offenses. It’s uncomfortable watching these players on the field knowing what they’ve done away from it, and it’s uncomfortable to accept that immediately writing off all cases as irredeemable would only be counterproductive to the goal of preventing future violence. It’s also impossible to deny that Germán’s perfect game was an event of significance for many, from his community to his country to the many fans watching who don’t know what players are like when they’re not just pixels on a screen. There are many reasons to celebrate the Germán on the television broadcast, one of few hurlers to achieve perfection. But after the lights go out in the Oakland Coliseum and the players leave for the night, we must grapple with the uncomfortable imperfection of the person behind the perfect pitcher.
Kyle is a FanGraphs contributor who likes to write about unique players who aren't superstars. He likes multipositional catchers, dislikes fastballs, and wants to see the return of the 100-inning reliever. He's currently a college student studying math education, and wants to apply that experience to his writing by making sabermetrics more accessible to learn about. Previously, he's written for PitcherList using pitch data to bring analytical insight to pitcher GIFs and on his personal blog about the Angels.
Why are you bringing up something that happened years ago when he has taken steps to better himself? He did something awful. I’m glad for his wife’s sake and for his sake that he seems to have made improvements. I hope he learned from the past and he never does anything like that again. I think you should celebrate the great game he pitched and get over yourself.
Seems like you didn’t read the article. I feel like it answers your question quite well!
I’d only add that I appreciate how and when FG writers decide to broach these topics. I haven’t always agreed (probably a good sign), but I walk away thinking in more ways than I used to, even if it doesn’t help me find resolution (as Kyle notes at the end); I don’t know if it makes me a *better* person, but it doesn’t make me *worse*
Great article.
Thanks for writing this, Kyle. A good piece of writing that grapples with uncomfortable contradictions without trying to reach any pat answers. This feels like the key question:
How indeed? I very much wanted to see my favorite team dump Marcell Ozuna after he was suspended for hurting his wife, but they didn’t. Even if they had, he probably would have caught on elsewhere and continued to play, so my desire was really about my comfort as a fan of a particular team and doesn’t represent any kind of solution for the league or fans as a whole.
The work of transformation and repair after having harmed someone is so personal that it’s not realistic to expect it to play out where we can see it. Even so, I’m bothered when I see other players treat DV perpetrators as teammates in good standing after they’ve served their suspensions. Perpetual ostracization won’t fix anything, but the impression I get is that the players (and certainly the businesses who employ these perpetrators) don’t really see DV as a big deal, and are most concerned with mitigating the bad PR that these incidents cause.
Why would you release someone for lifting their hands to cover themselves from getting hit? Seems like a weird reason to me. Glad the Braves did the right thing and didn’t act impulsively like fans seem to do.
Shut the fuck up. You have nothing useful or interesting to say.
I am on fire with the downvotes lately though lol
Agreed. I’ve wondered about this too, and while I don’t know how it would work, until teams are penalized for their players’ transgressions, I’m not sure we’ll see real change. If a lower CBT/forfeit of draft picks, playoffs, etc. were a consequence of certain egregious behaviors, I don’t think we’d see bidding wars for guys like Bauer or players like Ozuna and German slide right back onto the roster.
I believe in second chances, but that second chance doesn’t–and perhaps shouldn’t–happen as a celebrated figure on a playing field.
How should a team evaluate the behavior of players after they’ve served a suspension? I think we see teams do that by whether a player remains with the team.
There have been 16 players suspended under the policy since it went into effect in August 2015. Some players were almost immediately traded, DFA’d, or released after their suspension was served.
By my count:
Only three teams, the Braves, Dodgers, and Yankees, have had two players suspended under the policy. The Braves traded Héctor Olivera for Matt Kemp and cash to the Padres, who DFA’d and released him. The Braves kept Marcell Ozuna. The Dodgers DFA’d and released Trevor Bauer, but kept Julio Urias. The Yankees kept both Chapman and Germán.
Of the players that were kept by their original teams, Germán’s suspension was the longest at 81 games, Chapman’s second at 30 games, and the rest were 20 games or 15 games.
Where players were kept and returned to their teams, none of them challenged their suspensions, and most expressed some sort of remorse in statements or to reporters. Under the policy, all players would probably have been required to complete a treatment plan involving counseling and education.
In general, the worst cases get released by teams, though some teams are willing to sign other people’s problems. That generally doesn’t work out in the long term.
The less severe cases are the ones where teams are more likely to keep the player and continue the evaluation process.
I appreciate that you are attempting to look at the nuances of this type of situation. It is often easy and more comfortable to take a more extreme position: either ignore/brush it aside or assert that no punishment or castigation could possibly be too far.
I think one of the hardest things with DV situations that make them feel worse than a barroom fight or the like is that we know there is likely a pattern here. This was almost surely not the first time German had hit a woman and there is also a decent chance it wasn’t the last.
To me, in general, the right thing to do when a player does something wrong off the field is to punish them fairly and then let them continue their career, unless a fair punishment is banishment for life. But that feels too simplistic in cases of DV, because it is way too easy to imagine that the thing the person is being punished for is still happening, and of course it is terrifying and awful.
In the end, there simply cannot be a perfect solution (pun intended). No matter what, things will be a bit dirty and moving forward will feel a icky. This isn’t the shift or four hour baseball games. There’s no “rules committee” that can fix it.
This gets to the heart of the matter. There are a lot of people who have done terrible things who have reformed, and in those scenarios you really need to believe that they’ve gone straight. But the record for rehabilitating domestic abusers is pretty abysmal, and usually it’s just that we never hear about it again. There are some success stories, especially if someone has a substance abuse problem that they manage to kick, but it’s not especially common. It’s nice to hear that German appears to have changed his life and behavior but it’s also hard to not be a little skeptical.
I don’t really have an opinion on German, this isn’t an obvious case like Trevor Bauer where he has shown no remorse and will probably be a dirtbag until the end of time. Nor is this a case like Michael Vick, a guy who did some horrible things and not only went to prison but appears to have truly repented.
Kyle, very good perspective on a complicated topic. Thank you for writing this.
I prefer to let baseball judge baseball offenses, and the legal system judge what it can judge.
I have no doubt that it’s incredibly uncomfortable to see someone who committed domestic violence perform, and all fans certainly should have the right to express their opinions about that (or pressure their teams not to sign such a person.) The logic does extend to other crimes, as well as non-crimes, and has been used to argue for exclusion on the basis of drugs or alcohol, or distasteful political views like Nazism or Communism. Endorsing the slaughter of millions makes many uncomfortable as well.
To some degree yes, but taken to an extreme this kind of Critical Theory claim becomes that popular fake quote ascribed to Voltaire (but actually said by a neo-Nazi) about whom you’re not allowed to criticize. (Understandable, as Critical Theory is indeed in tension with liberalism and in many ways more compatible with both Hegel and Nietzsche. кто кого?, kto kogo?)
In the end, I don’t think most people’s views on exactly what the sort of thing that should result in exclusion are based on sophisticated power dynamics. It’s either based on some view of absolute morality (drawing a bar and excluding everything over the limit according to one’s personal ranking), or based on how it affects one’s preferred groups. In any particular case, most (though not all) of those professing allegiance to some noble principle would change their mind if the particulars changed.
I guess my issue with the coverage of German is that by all accounts, he has attended counselling. Given the information provided by him and those close to him, he has made genuine efforts to atone for his past errors and become a better person going forward. And he has kept his record clean in the 4 years since the incident, which would indicate significant progress. Yet, despite these efforts, when he achieves something as significant as the perfect game he just pitched, media seems to largely treat in the same light as abusers who have made no efforts to correct their behavior and simply bought off their accusers.
At a certain point, for those who acknowledged their errors and took actions to correct them, there needs to be a path to removing the scarlet letter from future coverage of their achievements, or at least a way to differentiate them from those players who have made no effort to reform.
I don’t know that some ‘removal’ of the scarlet letter is necessary. This stuff resolves itself over time. His incident was in 2019, it’s now 2023. It’s fair for the incident to come up again since it’s his first real notable achievement since the incident. If it was a decade ago and he’d had no poor headlines since I don’t think the media at large would even mention it (i.e. resolved over time).
That said, there are always going to be people who will never let something go and it’s more difficult with public figures who none of us know personally.
Everyone deserves a second chance, not everyone gets one. He got one and it seems he’s working on his issues. We can’t give people second chances and consistently doubt whether it was/is right or wrong. Being a person that got my second chance after a decade of drunkenness, I know people still doubt me almost 7 years later. I still doubt people that are in similar situations myself. We all judge, but our judgements are usually based on assumptions, and we know what assumptions do.
I hope Trevor Bauer keeps being generally mediocre over in Japan, because the takes that will be written if he returns to MLB will be scorching.
Sounds like another iteration of the “can I like the art but for the artist?” For this reader, a perfect game is something to be celebrated for nothing more or less than the on field artistry. On that measure, Domingo’s perfect game should be celebrated.
Which writer actually knows the person behind the persona? Has he atoned and learned from his lesson? What does his wife/girlfriend say? Which of us are good enough to judge others, esp given the limited knowledge we have of the public person? Who is keeping their dark side hidden from the public eye, yet perhaps more abusive in real life?
Do all you force your friends to submit to a morality test? Are we ready to start burning books by Hemingway or art by Picasso? It’s time the woke police stopped writing about the behaviour of others in such a high minded way.
“Why do you see the speck that is in your brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?”
Please, write about baseball.
Should have stopped after your first paragraph.
Given that many professional athletes and I disagree on a lot of things, I’ve learned to root for laundry and events. That said, I hope, always, the teams I root for don’t bring in players that are not what I’d hope they are. It is very hard to watch any entertainment and not have the unfortunate opportunity to watch people we might not like. I appreciate that you took a nuanced look here.
I don’t think he’s a very good person or pitcher.
He’s not, but he pitched a perfect game, which is what this article is trying to talk about.
I think that if a site dedicated to baseball analysis doesn’t publish numerous articles with a detailed breakdown of such a rare and impressive event as a perfect game, regardless of the person who threw it, then this is a truly depressing indictment of the current status and meaning of free speech. To me, free speech is not just about legal protection, but that you shouldn’t fear that you will be boycotted, canceled, attacked or trolled for simply expressing non-hateful/non-violent opinions. If authors are afraid to discuss a perfect game because they worry that people will interpret it as sign that they support domestic abusers, then in the big picture we have to try to change this societal plague that is hindering honest and productive public discourse. If we never talk about the things we find offensive, and never let opinions that offend us be discussed in public without attacking the person expressing that opinion, then those people will never feel respected and will never be open to changing their minds, and subsequent generations will not go through the process of thinking about these issues and understanding why certain ideas and actions are harmful or offensive. But for a more practical and tangible way forward in sports writing, perhaps the goals and writing styles of authors need to be more flexible. I realize that we are in an era where the media and general public are incapable of acknowledging that even people who have done bad things are not all bad, and there is seemingly a new rule that you are not allowed to say anything nice about someone who has done something bad, or else you will be judged as almost as bad as that person, but the player’s character off the baseball field is really not even relevant to an article about what happened during a baseball game unless the author is incapable of discussing baseball without conflating baseball superlatives and character judgments. Or maybe it is just the authors’ collective fears that they, too, will be attacked for simply complimenting a player’s performance even if they say nothing positive about his character, because that player has been judged as evil. That is both a judgment of the readership of the site and an insecurity about the author’s writing abilities. I’m a big fan of many of the writers on this site, but honestly I am quite annoyed that so far no one has given an objective, detailed analysis of this perfect game. I’m a baseball fan. I like to watch baseball and read analysis of what actually happened during games. Off-the-field stuff is rarely interesting to me, and never more interesting than discussing the actual games. Please, someone write an analysis of the perfect game!
1. I’d like to make it very clear that the decision to write about this aspect of Germán’s perfect game was entirely mine. I wasn’t pressured to write or not write about any given topic by anyone here at FanGraphs, nor was I afraid of external criticism. I don’t decide who or what to write about based on fears of being “boycotted, cancelled, attacked, or trolled”.
2. The first amendment says the federal government can’t stop you from saying things, not that you can’t be called out by individuals for bigoted or problematic speech.
3. There are other places on the Internet that have discussed the perfect game in more sabermetric depth, but in the course of watching the game I didn’t see anything in his approach that was all that insightful – he landed a lot of curveballs in the zone and the A’s couldn’t do anything about it. It was a great-pitched game, but certainly not one of the 24 best pitching performances in history (and nor were most perfect games). If you want to read “detailed analysis” of players from me, go read about Taylor Clarke, Austin Slater, or any of the other players who are incredibly interesting despite not being in a national spotlight like Germán.
4.
I explicitly wrote about why this statement is false. A couple passages from my piece are pasted below:
Thanks for the response. I think you kinda missed the points I was trying to make, but I practice what I preach, so I will respectfully disagree and stand by my original comment. I only want to clarify that the concept of freedom of speech and the American constitution’s first amendment are not synonyms; the latter is merely one particular country’s interpretation of the concept within the specific realm of the law. To be clear: I was not specifically criticizing you for your article. But there doesn’t seem to be any public section to make comments/discuss topics other than commenting on articles, and your article is the first and only one to mention the perfect game. As a paying member, I think a perfect game deserves analysis on this site; it doesn’t have to be a celebration of the player filled with hyperbole and praise. Keep up the good work and keep expressing your opinions! 😉
Aside from everything else, it’s not uncommon for Fangraphs to not have an article about newsworthy items. I won’t mention examples, because my point is to say that you shouldn’t get worked up. Sometimes there is nothing more interesting about a perfect game than that it happened. Honestly I’d much prefer not to see some attempt to force some narrative.
So you want analysis of the perfect game that’s fine. But this portion of your comment makes legitimately no sense because this article is the exact space you claim to want. A place to talk about things we find offensive. It does a great job of looking at why German’s perfect game and the spotlight it puts him under could be harmful and without articles like this the majority are never going to think about the potential impact.
It’s also not the job of others to make someone open minded and it has nothing to do with ‘feeling respected.’ It requires emotional maturity, empathy, self-awareness, and the ability to think critically, things that are greatly lacking in American society.
Thank you for your perspective ..My team team is good about not hiring DV perpetrators. Good thing as I am a relentless booer of these players.
Not a bad troll attempt but still left the evidence everywhere.
I want to know 2 things. Is he the worst pitcher to have a perfect game? And are the 2023 Athletics the worst team to fall victim to a perfect game? I suspect we are not seeing the pinnacle of baseball history here with the confluence.
I can answer the first one: Phillip Humber accrued 1 career war, Dallas Braden 5.0, and Charlie Robertson 6.4. German sits comfortably ahead of Humber at 4.1, and it wouldn’t surprise me if he ends up well ahead of the other two.
For the latter question, I would guess so but can’t easily confirm from my phone.
It’s Humber, and at this point that is pretty unquestionable
When I worked on domestic violence in the legal system over a decade and a half ago, we often talked about the possibly conflicting goals in resolving domestic violence situations.
The primary, and overriding goal, is stopping the abuse from happening anymore. Sometimes that means getting people out of those situations. Some relationships can’t be continued, and getting people out of those relationships is the easiest way to break the cycle.
But people who are married sometimes don’t want to end it. Often, it means that punishment has to take a backseat in these situations. Yes, we want to punish people for the harms they cause, but ending the violence and getting the offender to conform their behavior to what society expects takes priority.
The MLB/MLBPA Joint Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Child Abuse Policy is a reasonable attempt to balance these tensions, properly sanctioning bad behavior through suspensions, while providing treatment or other interventions.
It’s uncomfortable watching players who’ve been subject to DV suspensions succeed on the field, but it would be even more uncomfortable if we raised the stakes even higher. One reason why abused victims don’t speak out is because the consequences to the offenders can be ruinous, and that can make their situation worse.
These are often messy situations, and there aren’t easy answers.
I used to work in this area too (what seems like a lifetime ago now…two decades?). This is spot on.