On Free Plays and the Plays That Never Happened

MLB defensive shift
Arizona Republic

Look, this might not happen at all, but that’s okay. The not happening is kind of the point. We’re a week and a half into the regular season, and while we’ve seen plenty of pitch clock violations, we’ve yet to see a shift ban violation. That makes sense. Tardiness is much more common than trespassing. People get in trouble for being late all the time, even in industries that don’t have timing operations administrator positions to fill. Once we do see a shift ban violation — whenever it is that a shortstop or a second baseman finally forgets that the outfield grass and the dirt behind second base are in fact lava — we’ll enter into a new era of baseball that didn’t officially happen.

One of the things that makes baseball different from other sports is that every single play counts. I always liked the purity of that. If you saw something happen on a baseball field, that thing got written down by the official scorer (unless the official scorer position also needed to be filled). Even if a call got overturned on review, the review was just helping the umpires decide what happened on that play. It didn’t nullify the entirety of the play.

Say a runner stole second base, and the opposing manager ambled out to talk it over with the home plate umpire, then all the umpires trundled over to a spot in the middle of the infield to caucus as the Final Jeopardy music floated out over the public address system, and finally the crew chief called the runner out due to batter interference. That call was still a result of the batter’s action during the play. It was a little bit messy. It didn’t fit into a neat box. But it still happened. It went into the scorebook and the public record and got inscribed in the Book of Life. A hundred years from now, nerds like us will be able to find it in the Retrosheet data and run statistical analyses on it. Baseball doesn’t replay third down or give the offense a free play because of a neutral zone infraction. The umpires don’t wait to see how things play out before deciding that the striker was offside a minute ago.

That’s not to say that no play has ever been nullified. I can think of two prominent instances off the top of my head. On his new Substack, Sam Miller recently wrote about the time a Randy Johnson fastball obliterated a mourning dove during spring training. Umpire Alfonso Márquez decided that the pitch never happened, “which means Randy Johnson didn’t hit a bird with a pitch; he hit a bird with a throw.” Sam even punctuated the piece with screenshots of the pitch going backwards in time, un-happening.

Five frames of Randy Johnson's pitch hitting a mourning dove. The first is a cloud of feathers, the last is the last frame before the ball hits the bird.

I’m guessing you remember the Pine Tar Incident. We’re all nerds here. George Brett hit a home run, but umpire Tim McClelland decided that, due to excessive bat stickiness, the home run never happened. Brett had instead made the third out, ending the game. What you might not remember is that four days after the home run happened and then didn’t happen, American League president Lee MacPhail resurrected it. It was the third out that hadn’t happened, and the game continued at a later date without Brett, whose ejection due to excessive screaming was never in danger of un-happening. (It would also continue without Gaylord Perry, who was so thoroughly devoted to the craft of concealing sticky substances that one imagines he was merely acting on muscle memory when he gave Brett’s bat to a bat boy and instructed him to hide it in the clubhouse.)

George Brett screaming and running out of the dugout with his arms in the air.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

I’m sure there have been other plays, whole games even, that didn’t officially happen for various reasons. Feel free to tell me about them in the comments. The difference is that they’re largely like the Pine Tar Incident and the time Randy Johnson smoked that bird: incidental, edge cases, not the direct intention of the committee that designed the rules.

That’ll change the first time an infielder gets busted for positioning himself in no man’s land. Here’s how The Sporting News summarized the new rule: “If one side of the infield has three infielders or an infielder has a foot on the grass on a ball put in play, batters can pick up their previous at-bat with a ball added to the count OR take the play as it is.” It’s a free play, the same as football. The offense can either accept or decline the penalty, depending on the result of the play (though surely they’d never bother challenging a play that benefitted them).

There were a few shift ban violations during spring training, including one game with two of them. Both violations were called in the moment by umpires, rather than being challenged by the victimized teams. On March 27, the Pirates were transgressed against the exact player you’d expect to precipitate a shift violation: Joey Gallo. There’s no footage of the actual offense, but if you watch the video of the pitch that didn’t happen, right before Rich Hill’s trademark grunt, you can clearly hear an umpire shout, “Violation!”

The Twins got called for their violation in the third inning, and once again there’s no footage of the offending player. Pittsburgh’s broadcast team wasn’t sure which player was at fault, and Minnesota’s radio team didn’t even know what had happened until later in the inning. The call nullified a strikeout, but pitcher Joe Ryan took it very much in stride, taking a deep breath and re-retiring batter Ji Hwan Bae on a fly ball to center.

Maybe this is a good thing. Maybe a big league game where the floor is lava and a batter gets to demand a do-over will feel a little bit more like the wiffle ball games we played as kids. Or maybe it’ll just be another little technicality to worry about, like when a soccer player waits to celebrate a goal until they’ve turned around and made sure the assistant referee isn’t going to call the whole thing back, or when the announcer has to yell, “No flags!” at the end of a kickoff return so you know it’s ok to get excited about the exciting play you just saw — a tiny little injection of bureaucracy into an otherwise joyous moment. But probably it won’t matter much. Players will make sure to stand an inch or two from the lava, and violations won’t happen at all. That’s okay. The not happening is kind of the point.





Davy Andrews is a Brooklyn-based musician and a writer at FanGraphs. He can be found on Bluesky @davyandrewsdavy.bsky.social.

21 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sphenreckson
3 years ago

Are we not counting rainouts before the 5th inning? I think they count now, but for decades and decades, they were just erased.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sphenreckson

Jimmie Foxx famously lost 2 HR in 1932 leaving his season total at 58 rather than a Ruthian 60

Left of Centerfield
3 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Wow, I never knew that! Will have to read more about it.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
3 years ago

I’m not seeing the benefit of giving the batting team an option. I can see making it reviewable but this seems pointless

jasonl
3 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

Kolten Wong once homered on a balk call. The Cardinals I believe technically had the option of taking the HR or the balk, obviously took the HR

Rex Manning DayMember since 2022
3 years ago
Reply to  Ivan_Grushenko

I mean, if you don’t give the batting team the option, then they could be punished for their opponent’s violation. If Joey Gallo hits a home run over an illegal shift, forcing him to re-do that pitch is basically rewarding the fielders for breaking a rule.

Fun fact: The batting team gets this same choice in the event of catcher’s interference.

NobleHelium
3 years ago

In that case, plays could already be nullified by catcher’s interference. Unless the argument is that catcher’s interference is part of the play, in which case a shift violation can also be viewed as part of the play. It’s not such a big change after all.

Doug Weerts
3 years ago

An interesting violation happened to Elvis Andrus of the White Sox yesterday. He had his heals on the grass when playing second. It was clearly a violation. It will be harder for players who are used to playing deeper. I like the rule changes but think there will be some amusing calls like that one. Old habits are hard to break. Just waiting for the center fielder or right fielder to move way in like a shift. Teams like the Diamondbacks should do it regularly with their speed in the outfield!

cavebirdMember since 2018
3 years ago
Reply to  Doug Weerts

Yes—it just happened yesterday. Led to an unearned walk.

MikeSMember since 2020
3 years ago

One of my biggest complaints with the NFL is that any time I see something cool, my first thoughts are always “are there any flags” and “will there be a replay?/was it really a catch?” Instead of “WOW!” The fact that they automatically review every touchdown and turnover doesn’t help. My friends who watch soccer say they now feel the same way about VAR. It sucks some of the spontaneous joy (and heartbreak) out of the game. I hope MLB never gets to that point.

Last edited 3 years ago by MikeS
soddingjunkmailMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

It’s largely an unpopular opinion, but I can’t stand replay. I’d eliminate it entirely.

MikeSMember since 2020
3 years ago

I completely agree with you. It is a great example of letting perfect be the enemy of good enough. It slows any game down and doesn’t change things enough to justify that. You stop a game for 3 – 5 minutes, then sometimes get the call wrong anyway.

bly
3 years ago

Replay is great, it should just be limited to 15 seconds. If you can’t figure it out the first time through the tape at 1/2 speed, I don’t care.

guyarrigoniMember since 2024
3 years ago

Phil Regan experienced a series of events that didn’t happen To cite my memory and quote the Baltimore Sun: … in August 1968, the late umpire Chris Pelekoudas was determined to catch Regan [throwing a spitter], who then pitched for the Chicago Cubs. Or at least make it more difficult for Regan to get people out.
Pelekoudas could not find any evidence of foreign substances, but, based on the odd flight of Regan’s offerings to the Cincinnati Reds, he told the right-hander to stop throwing illegal pitches.
Then Pelekoudas starting calling balls on pitches he deemed illegal — even if the batter swung. Mack Jones flied out, but Pelekoudas called him back to the plate and ordered Regan to pitch to him again.
Cubs manager Leo Durocher, whose biography was titled “It Ain’t Cheating If You Don’t Get Caught,” was thrown out. So were catcher Randy Hundley and outfielder Al Spangler.
They said it was sweat, not Vaseline, that caused the funny flight of Regan’s pitches.
Regan stayed in the game and got Jones out. But when Pete Rose struck out on a 3-2 pitch, Pelekoudas called Rose back to the plate, and Rose singled to right.

Rex Manning DayMember since 2022
3 years ago

This is a lovely article and so I don’t want to just poke holes in it, but…I just don’t see how this new rule is actually all that different?

Like, it seems that the argument here is that the batter’s interference example isn’t a “do-over” because (a) it’s a result of what happened on the field and (b) the play’s result wasn’t erased but rather changed; i.e., the runner was out instead of safe, but the pitch didn’t have to be replayed.

But (a) clearly also applies to the field-position violation. The changed outcome of the play is still a result of what happened on the field; the fielder was breaking a rule on the play, which changed the result. This is exactly what happens in the batter interference example, where a play that appeared to end one way actually ends another because a player broke a rule.

As for (b), a field-position violation doesn’t force a full do-over either; if the offense “accepts” the penalty, then a ball is added to the batter’s count. If the play was simply wiped from the books and re-played, then the count would be the same the second time around. But it’s not, because the violated play still happened; it just had a different result than expected.

There is, however, a type of “full do-over” that does essentially erase a play, and it happens every single game, whenever a batter fouls off a pitch with 2 strikes. For all intents and purposes, 2-strike fouls don’t occur. They don’t affect the batter’s count or the number of outs, and if any runners moved on the pitch, they have to go back. Hit a 2-strike foul and you get a straight-up do-over of that pitch.

2-strike fouls don’t even show up in most box scores. They are about as fully erased as you can get in a major sport. Of course, they are recorded in the granular game data, so they’re not actually erased; statisticians can still look them up and analyze them to their heart’s content. And the same will be true of field-position violations. They may not show up in every box score, but they’ll be in the data somewhere for nerds to analyze them. And they’ll almost certainly be easier to find than 2-strike fouls.

Last edited 3 years ago by Rex Manning Day
Lanidrac
3 years ago

It’s still esssentially a do-over in the sense that nothing that happened on the field actually mattered. Adding a ball to the count cannot normally be considered the result of a ball hit in play.

As for the two-strike foul, while you’re techinally correct that it’s a do-over play, it’s also something that usually can be determined to have happened immediately, and on the semi-rare occasions of a close call with fair territory, it’s still the entire focus of the play and nobody’s even thinking about how the batter avoided a strikeout on that pitch. Even on a replay to determine whether or not a batter tipped it after getting rung up, it’s not the same kind of anguish as seeing an otherwise exciting play being nullified because of an out-of-focus violation you didn’t even know happened until after the play was already over.

Last edited 3 years ago by Lanidrac
Rex Manning DayMember since 2022
3 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Of course what happened on the field actually mattered; one of the fielders broke a rule, which affected the result of the play.

And there has never in the history of infield shifts been an exciting play that the batting team would want to undo. If an infield shift results in an out, it is almost by definition because of a boring play by a fielder who barely had to move.

Lanidrac
3 years ago

No, it affects the count, NOT the result of the play itself, so no, what happens on the field itself DOESN’T matter.

Meanwhile, every time an overshift led to a web gem (which still happened regularly, especially when the violations going forward are only going to be slight, anyway) was obviously an exciting play that the defense wouldn’t was nullified. It doesn’t even have to be an exciting play in itself to be crushed at having to get an out all over again, especially if it’s something like a pop-up with the bases loaded and nobody out, or the third out by any method with the bases loaded.

Last edited 3 years ago by Lanidrac
Jason BMember since 2017
3 years ago

That bird though. Frame 5, just out for a flight. Frame 4, contact! Frame 3, this flight went terribly terribly wrong. Frame 2-1, the ugly aftermath.

Six Ten
3 years ago

I think it’s weird that balls not in play, as in the Joe Ryan strikeout, can be retaken due to illegal shifts.

By way of (stretched) comparison: in soccer, a missed penalty is retaken if the defending team encroached into the penalty area only if their encroachment is ruled to have interfered with another player’s opportunity to score, whether that’s the kick taker or someone else rushing into the box after the kick. If the kicker never sees the encroacher and just misses the goal completely, it’s as if there was no encroachment. And that seems pretty fair, the encroacher didn’t affect anything.

So it is with a strike (or ball or home run). I suppose technically you could say the position of the defender affected the view of the hitter, but that seems so vanishingly unlikely unless it’s a middle infielder standing out there with a laser pointer, but I’m pretty sure that’s gonna get you kicked out of the game no matter where you’re standing.

At the risk of overcomplicating the rule, the violation should be called only if the ball is in play in some way (a batted ball, a passed ball or dropped third strike, a stolen base attempt, etc.).

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

Then again, in football, penalties get called all the time even if the violation didn’t actually affect the result of the play. You could have holding in the backfield after a pass is already completed 20 yards downfield, and they’ll still call it. (While some penalties like the faskmask are safety issues that always need to be called, many others like my holding example are not.)

I think the idea is to get the players in the right mindset to minimize future violations that potentially will affect the play.

Last edited 3 years ago by Lanidrac