Padres Order a Cole Hamels Reboot

On October 27, 2008, I lay sprawled on the carpet in front of the television, watching as Cole Hamels twirled yet another postseason masterpiece. My new puppy sat calmly by my side, having finally learned the rally towel was my toy, not his. Hamels pitched six innings that night; he could have gone deeper were it not for a 48-hour rain delay, but his efforts proved to be enough. Two days later, I was jumping with joy into my father’s arms as Hamels clutched the World Series trophy in his.
Fifteen years later, the living room carpet is long gone. The TV remains, although it’s wildly out of date. That new puppy is now officially geriatric, with greying fur and two bad hips. My father would prefer I no longer jump into his arms; he gets enough of a workout carrying our 50-pound dog up and down the stairs.
Forty different players took the field for the Phillies in 2008. Thirty-nine have since retired. Hamels, however, isn’t quite ready to submit to the passage of time. On Thursday afternoon, the veteran left-hander signed a minor league deal with the Padres and will head to Peoria as a non-roster invitee, hoping to make his way back to the big leagues at 39 years old.
Hamels last pitched in a major league ballgame in 2020. He made one start that year, tossing three mediocre innings in September before returning to the IL. Triceps tendinitis held him out for most of the season, and shoulder issues took him out in the end. Various setbacks have kept him on the shelf ever since. He attempted a comeback with the Dodgers in 2021 but couldn’t get his body to cooperate. In 2022, he chose to bide his time instead, receiving treatment for shoulder, knee, and foot problems. Now, the four-time All-Star says he’s pain-free for the first time in years. If that really is the case, it’s promising news.
The last time Hamels was healthy, he was quite good. Over the first three months of the 2019 season, he made 17 starts, averaging nearly six innings per outing. His 2.98 ERA ranked fifth in the National League, and his 3.59 FIP ranked tenth. His four-seam velocity was down a smidge, but his cutter velocity was up, and both pitches were getting the job done. Most importantly, his changeup, long his best pitch, was looking sharp and working wonders.
Hamels missed the next five weeks with a torn oblique, and when he returned, he simply wasn’t the same. His velocity was down, his control was shaky, and the results were abysmal. In ten more starts, he barely managed four innings per outing. His 5.29 FIP only looked passable next to his 5.79 ERA. After the season, he acknowledged that he came off the injured list too soon and overworked his left shoulder trying to regain velocity and protect his ailing oblique. The same shoulder has given him problems ever since.
So yes, the last time Hamels was fully healthy, he was an excellent starting pitcher. There’s nothing false about that statement. And yet, the last time Hamels was fully healthy doesn’t tell us much about what to expect the next time he returns to full strength. He hasn’t pitched meaningful innings in over three years, and he’s reached an age where the vast majority of players choose to throw in the towel. We can talk about his past performance until the cows come home, but until he actually starts pitching, it’s anyone’s guess what he’ll look like in 2023. The last time he was fully healthy, he was an excellent starting pitcher; he was also four years younger and the picture of perfect health. Time is a fickle thing.
Ultimately, if Hamels can make it to the majors at all in 2023, he should consider the year a success. Anything else is just icing on top. In the last two decades, only one pitcher has returned after more than two years away to start even a single game at age 39-plus: Bronson Arroyo. And while Arroyo was merely eating innings for a last-place Reds team, Hamels would be pitching meaningful games for a powerhouse Padres squad.
These days, when one thinks about a 39-year-old star pitching making a comeback from injury, it’s hard not to draw comparisons to Justin Verlander. I’ll nip that in the bud right now — 2022 Verlander is a poor comp for 2023 Hamels — but Verlander’s story is still a good reminder that pitchers don’t just turn to dust in their late thirties. Indeed, we happen to be in the midst of a pretty great era for older starting pitchers. Starters age 36 or older combined for 23.6 WAR in 2022, the most since 2007, when such pitchers threw twice as many innings as they did last year. On a per-inning basis, then, 2022 produced the highest WAR in this age group since 2003. Moreover, eight different starters age 36 or older threw at least 100 innings last season, the most since 2015. All eight of those pitchers are returning for 2023, and Hamels is hoping to join them:
| Pitcher | 2023 Age |
|---|---|
| Rich Hill | 43 |
| Adam Wainwright | 41 |
| Justin Verlander | 40 |
| Zack Greinke | 39 |
| Charlie Morton | 39 |
| Max Scherzer | 38 |
| Johnny Cueto | 37 |
| Corey Kluber | 37 |
Despite their seemingly overflowing roster, the Padres will have a spot for Hamels if he earns it. Until recently, San Diego was ready to enter the season with two converted relievers at the back of the rotation (Nick Martinez and Seth Lugo) and little depth behind them. Even with new signing Michael Wacha in the mix, Bob Melvin is still planning to give Martinez and Lugo a shot to start ballgames; the Padres will use a six-man rotation at times this season.
If Hamels forces his way onto the roster, he could supplant either Martinez or Lugo in the six-man cycle. Whichever one he replaces can move back to the ‘pen, giving the Padres another strong arm for their already-excellent relief corps. And while neither Martinez nor Lugo would be too thrilled with such a move, they’ll both get their chance to start at some point this season. The Padres are going to need more than six starting pitchers — last year they used 12 — so carrying seven big-league quality starters is hardly a surplus of depth:
| Pitcher | 2023 Age |
|---|---|
| Yu Darvish | 36 |
| Joe Musgrove | 30 |
| Blake Snell | 30 |
| Michael Wacha | 31 |
| Nick Martinez | 32 |
| Seth Lugo | 33 |
| Cole Hamels | 39 |
Hamels has earned over $200 million in his major league career. This year, he’ll be playing for peanuts. He’s already pitched a no-hitter, an immaculate inning, and the winning game of the World Series. He’s accomplished just about everything he could hope to, and no one would call him a quitter if he chose to call it a career. So when he takes the mound this spring, he won’t be doing it for the money or the glory. He no longer has anything to prove. This is just a man who loves to pitch.
In due course, the TV in my childhood home will turn off for the last time. Eventually, my mother will buy a new rug, and someday, Hamels will retire. But in 2023, the man they call Hollywood will attempt to turn back the clock. If he succeeds, my geriatric dog and I will be ready and waiting to watch.
Leo has written for FanGraphs, MLB Trade Rumors, Baseball Prospectus, and Lindy’s Sports. You can follow him on Bluesky @leomorgenstern.bsky.social.
Nice article. I really do want to see him make it back. I always respect someone who wants to go out on their own terms, rather than be forced out. A non-roster invitee who wants to prove it to himself, rather than just fade away as people expected him to do.
unrelated, but this article made we want to seek out who had the most immaculate innings in mlb history. there are three pitchers that have 3, tied for the top: sandy koufax, chris sale, and max scherzer
“2023 Hamels is a poor comp for 2022 Verlander”. Verlander looked like he was done, right before we found out he wasn’t. That could be Hamels. No one knows.
The difference is that Verlander was able to get guaranteed $50M from the Astros while Hamels had to settle for a minor league deal.
Doesn’t mean Hamels is absolutely cooked or Verlander was bound to bounce back, but the huge gap in their contract surely reflects more than their just career numbers prior to injury.
I didn’t say Hamels was a perfect comp for Verlander. I said that both looked done. Yes, the Astros gave JV that deal. Did it seem outrageously optimistic when he got it-and was JV’s CY return at his age historically unprecedented? Yes and yes.
Verlander is both way better at his peak than Hamels ever was (his 6.1 WAR in 2022 was his 7th highest total, but would have been Hamels’ best year by a full win) and was also very good much more recently. If Hamels can return to 2017-2019 form, which would be quite remarkable, he would be an effective back-end rotation piece – an innings eater – a veteran presence, if you will.
Past that, Verlander had a known injury with fairly known recovery rates. It was a single injury, however. Hamels seems to the unbiased observer to just have an arm that has thrown its last good baseball. After years of failed comebacks, it would be foolish to bet on Hamels. I admire him trying once again. Especially with no guaranteed payday, his perseverance is laudable. But the smart money is on a March presser announcing his retirement after it becomes clear he just doesn’t have it anymore.
He put up over 9 rWAR in 480 innings from 2017-2019.
He was pitching like a #2, when he was on the mound.
If you buy that FIP-ERA and then also do a little squinting then I guess you could call him a fringe #2. On that 2017 Rangers team, you could call him a two. If you have less faith, then he’s a 3-4. Put it this way: In 2018, no teams’ fans would be anything less than a nervous wreck if Hamels were starting a playoff game for them, even with his history.
In Hamels’ last 10 seasons, his ERA was 0.31 lower than his FIP, and he outperformed his FIP in all but one of those years.
If you want to call him a strong #3 during those years, I won’t quibble…but if he was “getting lucky,” it was against the baseline of how much he usually outperforms his FIP.
Hamels has been injured for so long he’s about ready to be on the Hall of Fame ballot. The number of questions Hamels is facing is several times greater than that of Verlander, and Verlander faced a fair number of questions himself.
You’re beating up a straw man. I didn’t say they were comparable in any overall sense, just that they’re both old guys who had been out long enough that comebacks looked dicey at best.
No, you’re moving the goalposts. You said “Verlander looked like he was done, right before we found out he wasn’t. That could be Hamels.” How is that not comparing them in an overall sense? You’re clearly trying to draw a line between the two, but then when other people point out what you’re obviously doing, you deny it. Strange behavior.
The idea that pointing out the obvious would be called “strange behavior” is itself strange.
What you’re doing here is what dumb people typically do when presented with an analogy. They attack not the point being made within the analogy, but a straw man-point (-s) not being made. I simply said that both are old dudes who looked done. I explicitly didn’t say they were otherwise comparable.
I think there’s actually a pretty clean comp for what Hamels is trying to do:
Andy Pettitte, 10 years ago.
…and if he’s similarly successful, he’ll crack 50 JAWS.
(He’s actually already there by RA9-WAR)
I mean if you believe that the same Hamels that pitched 4 years ago is the same one that will be pitching today minus whatever he’s lost from age related decline then sure.
I took him as the last pick in my dynasty draft a couple weeks ago for 50 players. Worth a shot, but he’s got a lot going against him and a lot to prove
Will be interesting to see how he does. I have a lot of respect for anyone who is doing it purely for the love of the game.
Another comp would be Bartolo Colon
My HOF support will have to wait
I was just happy to hear the dog was still alive at the end of this story.
It’s made clear in the second paragraph, but still upvoting the sentiment.
Analogy-used to find what is common in two ideas. It does not mean that the two ideas are comparable in other, unnamed respects. Hamels/Verlander.
‘02 draft woot woot
What a beautifully written first two paragraphs of this article, Leo. The rest wasn’t too shabby either, but, wow, that set up. 😊
Great piece, Leo!
We’ll see what Hollywood has left in the tank.