Player Development Case Study: Slap Hitters
Most statistical research is done by looking at large populations and immense data sets to find trends and patterns, but case studies can also be very useful when one wants to look at a particular context. That’s what I would like to do here. Instead of looking at minor league players in general, I would like to use certain scouting profiles to examine current major-league players and how they performed in the minors to see if there are patterns we can find that will help us highlight prospects. Today, I’ll take a look at slap hitters.
When we talk about slap hitters, we generally mean smaller (in height) and/or slighter (in build) players who prefer to use their speed to get on base. What this usually means is sacrificing power by using less torque and a line-drive swing to put the ball on the ground and spray line drives. The hope is that the player posts a higher BA and OBP while making an impact on the bases by stealing and taking the extra base to offset the presumed lack of power. Let’s look at some examples.
Jose Reyes – 107 career wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 17 | APPY | Rk | 49 | 159 | .250 | .359 | .318 | 23% | 13% | .068 | .347 |
| 2001 | 18 | SALL | A | 108 | 435 | .307 | .337 | .472 | 16% | 4% | .165 | .363 |
| 2002 | 19 | 2 Lgs | A+-AA | 134 | 622 | .288 | .343 | .444 | 12% | 7% | .156 | .322 |
| 2002 | 19 | FLOR | A+ | 69 | 327 | .288 | .353 | .462 | 11% | 9% | .174 | .312 |
| 2002 | 19 | EL | AA | 65 | 295 | .287 | .331 | .425 | 14% | 5% | .138 | .333 |
| 2003 | 20 | IL | AAA | 42 | 181 | .269 | .333 | .356 | 14% | 8% | .087 | .319 |
Jose Reyes is up first. The switch-hitting shortstop moved through the minors quickly and as a very young man. He was able to maintain batting averages in the .280-.300 range by making a lot of contact and sustaining BABIPs in the .310-.330 range. Unlike many of the other players on this list, Reyes was already beginning to show signs of power, but he was also unable to draw many walks – something that plagued him early in his career.
Brett Gardner – 100 wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 21 | NYPL | A- | 73 | 335 | .284 | .377 | .376 | 15% | 12% | .092 | .329 |
| 2006 | 22 | 2 Lgs | A+-AA | 118 | 529 | .298 | .395 | .370 | 17% | 13% | .072 | .373 |
| 2006 | 22 | FLOR | A+ | 63 | 278 | .323 | .433 | .418 | 18% | 15% | .095 | .414 |
| 2006 | 22 | EL | AA | 55 | 251 | .272 | .352 | .318 | 16% | 11% | .046 | .331 |
| 2007 | 23 | 2 Lgs | AA-AAA | 99 | 448 | .281 | .369 | .378 | 17% | 12% | .097 | .347 |
| 2007 | 23 | EL | AA | 54 | 241 | .300 | .392 | .419 | 13% | 14% | .119 | .357 |
| 2007 | 23 | IL | AAA | 45 | 207 | .260 | .343 | .331 | 21% | 10% | .071 | .336 |
| 2008 | 24 | IL | AAA | 94 | 426 | .296 | .414 | .422 | 18% | 16% | .126 | .374 |
Next up is Mr. Gardner. Gardner struck out a bit more than Reyes, but he was also able to obtain BABIPs in a higher range – generally .330-.375. Continuing with the contrast, the lefty outfielder couldn’t hit for the power of Reyes, but he did a much better job of drawing walks, which has become one of Gardner’s greatest offensive assets. While there aren’t too many similarities between Gardner and Reyes, they held fairly low K%, didn’t have K% that worsened as they moved up, and maintained high BABIPs.
Michael Bourn – 92 wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 20 | NYPL | A- | 35 | 153 | .280 | .404 | .296 | 18% | 15% | .016 | .361 |
| 2004 | 21 | SALL | A | 109 | 510 | .315 | .431 | .467 | 17% | 17% | .152 | .391 |
| 2005 | 22 | EL | AA | 135 | 614 | .268 | .348 | .364 | 20% | 10% | .096 | .337 |
| 2006 | 23 | 2 Lgs | AA-AAA | 118 | 535 | .277 | .356 | .385 | 19% | 10% | .108 | .342 |
| 2006 | 23 | EL | AA | 80 | 361 | .274 | .350 | .365 | 19% | 10% | .091 | .336 |
| 2006 | 23 | IL | AAA | 38 | 174 | .283 | .368 | .428 | 19% | 11% | .145 | .356 |
Bourn looks a bit more like Gardner – higher walk rates, low ISO, and very high BABIPs. The speed that these hitters typically display will help with the BABIPs – that makes sense given that guys who just slap the ball around without any speed would probably just hit into a lot of groundouts. Bourn was hitting for a bit more power than Gardner, but Gardner was striking out less and walking a bit more.
Gregor Blanco – 90 wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | 18 | SALL | A | 132 | 570 | .271 | .392 | .385 | 21% | 15% | .114 | .352 |
| 2003 | 19 | CARL | A+ | 126 | 527 | .271 | .357 | .375 | 22% | 10% | .104 | .351 |
| 2004 | 20 | CARL | A+ | 119 | 495 | .266 | .339 | .401 | 23% | 9% | .135 | .344 |
| 2005 | 21 | SOUL | AA | 123 | 486 | .252 | .367 | .384 | 26% | 15% | .132 | .351 |
| 2006 | 22 | 2 Lgs | AAA-AA | 139 | 629 | .290 | .403 | .360 | 17% | 15% | .070 | .368 |
| 2006 | 22 | SOUL | AA | 66 | 302 | .287 | .397 | .375 | 19% | 14% | .088 | .371 |
| 2006 | 22 | IL | AAA | 73 | 327 | .294 | .408 | .346 | 16% | 16% | .052 | .366 |
| 2007 | 23 | IL | AAA | 124 | 545 | .282 | .369 | .362 | 16% | 12% | .080 | .340 |
Blanco is an interesting case. You’ll notice high K rates and more power in the lower levels and his first trip to AA, but he rapidly changes the next season, sacrificing significant power for a much better contact rate. At that point, Greg White begins to start fitting the Bourn/Gardner mold of the .280 batting average with a high walk rate and relatively high strikeout rate, though his rates were finally below 20%. Those BABIPs get really high as well – .340-.370.
Juan Pierre – 85 wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 20 | NORW | A- | 64 | 290 | .352 | .399 | .402 | 4% | 7% | .050 | .368 |
| 1999 | 21 | SALL | A | 140 | 648 | .320 | .366 | .390 | 6% | 6% | .070 | .340 |
| 2000 | 22 | 2 Lgs | AA-AAA | 111 | 506 | .331 | .380 | .388 | 5% | 7% | .057 | .351 |
| 2000 | 22 | SOUL | AA | 107 | 489 | .326 | .376 | .380 | 5% | 7% | .054 | .346 |
| 2000 | 22 | PCL | AAA | 4 | 17 | .471 | .471 | .588 | 0% | 0% | .117 | .471 |
Pierre and Ben Revere, who is up next, share more in common with each other than the rest of the group. The elder lefty outfielder almost never struck out, and he walked little but more than he struck out. Pierre, however, demonstrated zero power with ISOs frequently in the .050s, but he had his excellent contact rates and high BABIPs – again in the .340-.360 range – to fall back on.
Ben Revere – 81 wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 19 | GULF | Rk | 50 | 216 | .325 | .388 | .461 | 9% | 6% | .136 | .363 |
| 2008 | 20 | MIDW | A | 83 | 374 | .379 | .433 | .497 | 8% | 7% | .118 | .416 |
| 2009 | 21 | FLOR | A+ | 121 | 517 | .311 | .372 | .369 | 7% | 8% | .058 | .333 |
| 2010 | 22 | EL | AA | 94 | 406 | .305 | .371 | .363 | 10% | 8% | .058 | .342 |
| 2011 | 23 | IL | AAA | 32 | 141 | .303 | .338 | .364 | 8% | 4% | .061 | .325 |
| 2012 | 24 | IL | AAA | 23 | 101 | .330 | .360 | .340 | 6% | 4% | .010 | .352 |
The Man With Zero Career Major-League Home Runs also had excellent contact rates while not walking a lot or hitting for much power. Once Revere made it to the upper minors, those ISOs fell to around .060, but he still had BABIPs in the .320-.350 range.
Emilio Bonifacio – 79 wRC+
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 18 | PION | Rk | 54 | 172 | .199 | .298 | .219 | 25% | 10% | .020 | .282 |
| 2004 | 19 | MIDW | A | 120 | 450 | .260 | .306 | .319 | 27% | 6% | .059 | .368 |
| 2005 | 20 | MIDW | A | 127 | 591 | .270 | .341 | .330 | 15% | 9% | .060 | .325 |
| 2006 | 21 | CALL | A+ | 130 | 608 | .321 | .375 | .449 | 17% | 7% | .128 | .386 |
| 2007 | 22 | SOUL | AA | 132 | 596 | .285 | .333 | .352 | 18% | 6% | .067 | .349 |
| 2008 | 23 | 2 Lgs | AAA | 93 | 438 | .314 | .361 | .397 | 16% | 7% | .083 | .377 |
| 2008 | 23 | PCL | AAA | 85 | 402 | .302 | .348 | .387 | 16% | 7% | .085 | .364 |
| 2008 | 23 | IL | AAA | 8 | 36 | .452 | .500 | .516 | 11% | 11% | .064 | .519 |
Bonifacio is about the point where a player becomes offensively inept enough that even his speed, baserunning, and defense make people wonder whether he’s worth giving significant at-bats to. With Bonifacio, you see the upper bounds of this group’s K rates – around 16-18% – and the lower bounds of the walk rates – 6-8% – along with poor power numbers – ISOs in the .060-.080 range. Boni’s speed, however, gave him high enough BABIPs to remain viable.
Prospect Focus: Billy Hamilton
| Year | Age | Lg | Lev | G | PA | BA | OBP | SLG | K% | BB% | ISO | BABIP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 18 | GULF | Rk | 43 | 180 | .205 | .253 | .277 | 26% | 6% | .072 | .286 |
| 2010 | 19 | PION | Rk | 69 | 316 | .318 | .383 | .456 | 18% | 9% | .138 | .391 |
| 2011 | 20 | MIDW | A | 135 | 610 | .278 | .340 | .360 | 22% | 9% | .082 | .362 |
| 2012 | 21 | 2 Lgs | A+-AA | 132 | 605 | .311 | .410 | .420 | 19% | 14% | .109 | .395 |
| 2012 | 21 | CALL | A+ | 82 | 392 | .323 | .413 | .439 | 18% | 13% | .116 | .406 |
| 2012 | 21 | SOUL | AA | 50 | 213 | .286 | .406 | .383 | 20% | 17% | .097 | .374 |
| 2013 | 22 | IL | AAA | 123 | 547 | .256 | .308 | .343 | 19% | 7% | .087 | .311 |
Billy Hamilton is easily the most notable “slap hitter” of the prospect world, and his hitting is in question. How does he compare to the group? Looking first at his age, he’s arriving at the right age (22) – every member of this group makes it by 24, and most make it by 23 – so that’s a positive first step as age is one of the most important qualities of prospects. Hamilton’s K rate range of 18-20% is a little high for this group, and while he had a couple really high walk rates last season, the other walk rates of 7-9% are toward the lower end of the group. Despite the concerns about his power, Hamilton’s ISOs aren’t dissimilar to others in the group, and you’ll note his BABIPs of .360-.400 are definitely in the upper range of the group, which is not surprising given the hubbub about his speed.
My concern here remains the high strikeout rate because the others with high strikeout rates add higher walk rates or power rates, and his BABIP took a nasty dive this season to .311 and took his BA and OBP down with it. Looking strictly at the numbers here, Hamilton appears most like Emilio Bonifacio. Bonifacio has mostly been a 1-win player over the course of a season, and given my belief that Hamilton can add above-average to better defense in center to slightly to significantly more value on the bases than Bonifacio, Hamilton might find himself a 2-win player with the chance for more with some BABIP/HR fluctuation.
What list like this is complete without the slappiest in all the land?
Ichiro!
The problem with including Ichiro or Norichika Aoki is that they didn’t play in the minors. It would have been hard to compare what they did with players going through the minors here.
Jason Tyner would like to have a word with you.
pete rose! looks like FG doesn’t have data for his minor league seasons, sadly.
Placido Polanco? Aaron Miles?
It would have been cool if you looked at older players too. I feel like even just going back to the 90’s and 80’s you had more guys willing to do this. Lofton, Lance Johnson, tony Phillips, Otis Nixon, Willie Mcgee, Brett butler..in a way i’d count tony gwynn and Wade boggs in that category too cause they sacrificed power for CRAZY BA and I’m sure with that BABIPs…I’m sure i’m forgetting tons, but damn lots of leadoff guys had that unique slappy approach that you’re talking about. And it might have been better executed back in the day.
Greg White – love it. I wonder if he would have gotten a hit or walk if he ever batted against Joe Bread-and-water.
jose reyes has actually had some pretty big power years. only 3 years in his career with slugging under .400, and has had a 19 homer season. only juan pierre (twice) and gardner (once, this year) have had years with slugging over .400
overall it was a good article i enjoyed it
I call them Rabbits. I took the term from John Hart but that’s usually what I tend to call them. Maybe a little different, but more or less the same type of player.
Reyes is physically bigger than the other guys. Reyes is 6’1″ 195lbs. while the other guys are 5’9″ to 5’11” and five of the six weigh less than 185lbs. (Bonifacio is listed at 205lbs.)
Interestingly, Hamilton is listed at 6’1″ 160lbs., so I’m not sure what to make of him compared to the other guys. Does he need to bulk up more to become a better slap hitter? Or does his lanky frame put him at a disadvantage when compared to the others?
You really should look at some similar players with less success in the majors (if any at all). Much of what you identified could be quite common in the unsuccessful players too, in which case none of this means anything, other than to state the obvious.
I did try to get a fairly good range of players – a 79 wRC+ isn’t exactly good – but if you can think of other guys, I’m all ears. I think it’s an interesting approach, but I’m open to other suggestions. One of the guys I thought of was Jose Constanza, and while he has some statistical similarities, he was way older than the players above.
Also, there are space considerations, too. 🙂
A 79 wRC+ isn’t exactly good, but at least he progressed to the majors. I’m talking about similar players who simply flamed out.
Probably not the best example, but the first one I found was Jay Austin, a former top 10 prospect for the Astros (2009 and 2010; I realize it was an awful system those years, but he was a prospect nonetheless). As a 19 year old in A ball, he put up numbers similar to Bonifacio, and was perhaps a bit better in A+ ball the next year (thanks to improved slugging, which turned out to be Cal League influenced). The next year he was awful repeating A+, had a hand injury the next year and hasn’t played this year (presumably left the sport/retired?).
So why did marginal guys like Bonifacio and Blanco make it but Austin didn’t? Obviously, you’d want a longer list than this, but that’s the idea.
Right, and I think I’ll try to find “busts” for future similar posts. You bring up a good point about looking at it from that perspective.
As for Austin, he couldn’t keep the same BABIPs that the others did. None of the others had below .300 seasons, but Austin had high K rates for the group and low BABIPs for the group as well. But this is mostly a statistical look, and I’m curious what other scouting reasons there were.
I liked the article. It’d be interesting to also look at it from a scouting perspective, too, because it seems these guys have very different swings, too. Reyes and Gardner both swing pretty hard whereas Pierre really seems to “slap” or “poke” at it.
I disagree with the comparison; looking at the power, and K/BB %, I think Hamilton looks very comparable (at least statistically) to Michael Bourn.
Bonifacio never posted a BB% above 9 past rookie ball, whereas Hamilton has done that three times.
Can you add in the park adjusted numbers for the hitters next time, since there are some large variances between minor league parks and the different levels, so that might add to a discussion of their underlying slap hitting skills.
Presumably, this article is relevant because of Hamilton’s skill set and interest among baseball fans.
The problem with prognosticating Hamilton right now is whether his 2013 is his new normal or if it was a blip on the prospect radar.
Before this past season, he’d shown successive BB rates of 6, 9, 9, 12, and 17 percent. Though these are obviously small samples, his rate improved as he moved up the ladder. With a K rate hovering right around 20%, a BB rate of anything north of 10% makes him very interesting in a .300/ .370 leadoff hitter kind of way.
If you think his AAA success (and lack thereof) is the “real Billy,” he’s more likely to end up as a low obp, low power, high usage CF in the vein of mid 90s journeyman CFer Brian Hunter.
As a leadoff hitter, his slugging isn’t nearly as important as his speed-adjust total bases and BBs. With his (limited) power and ability to generate another 80 – 120 bases per year with his legs (after subtracting CS and PO), Hamilton could be anything from Tim Raines to Omar Moreno.