Ponce Upon a December: Jays Sign Reigning KBO MVP

Charles LeClaire-USA TODAY Sports

While 29 American teams sit around twiddling their thumbs, the Toronto Blue Jays continue to run up their bill on the free agent market. After spending $210 million (with deferrals) to bring Dylan Cease in on Thanksgiving Eve, Toronto has now landed one of the top international free agents: right-handed pitcher Cody Ponce, late of the Hanwha Eagles of the KBO.

Even those of you who vaguely remember Ponce from his first stint in the majors might have trouble distinguishing him from any other of the dozens of big, replacement-level relievers the Pirates have thrown out there over the past decade. On some level, Ponce’s stint in Asia is just a chapter in a Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants-type deal he’s stuck in with John Holdzkom, Nick Kingham, and Colin Holderman.

If that guy is getting $30 million guaranteed over three years (to say nothing of his own blog post here to commemorate the signing), there must be quite a story.

Ponce last pitched in the majors in 2021, when he posted a 7.04 ERA in 38 1/3 innings. After that, he signed with Shohei Ohtani’s old team, the Nippon Ham Fighters of NPB. After a strong first season in Japan (a 3.35 ERA in 83 1/3 innings), Ponce’s performance regressed in 2023, leading first to a move to the Tohoku Rakuten Golden Eagles, where he spent one disappointing season. After that, he left Japan entirely, signing with the aforementioned Hanwha Eagles of the KBO.

In his one season in Korea, well, I don’t know how else to say this other than: He beat total ass. Ponce made 29 starts, in which he posted a strikeout rate of 36.2% and a walk rate of 5.9%. Only seven qualified starters in AL/NL history have posted a 30-point K-BB% mark in a 162-game season: Pedro Martínez and Justin Verlander (who each did it twice), along with Gerrit Cole, Chris Sale, Randy Johnson, Max Scherzer, and Corbin Burnes.

Here are some numbers that don’t need to be put into context: a 17-1 record with a 1.89 ERA, 0.97 WIP, .197 opponent batting average, and 252 strikeouts in 180 2/3 innings. (Ponce’s teammate, Hyun Jin Ryu, went 9-7 with a 3.23 ERA and 122 strikeouts in 139 1/3 innings. Estevan Florial was on this team too, since we’re just remembering some guys now.)

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

On his trip back to North America, Ponce will need to pack an extra bag for all his accolades: He set new KBO single-game and single-season strikeout records, and won both the league MVP and the Choi Dong-won Award, which is given to the top starting pitcher in the KBO.

The KBO’s YouTube channel has some excerpts from Ponce’s 18-strikeout game, along with some hilarious auto-dubbed English commentary.

That looks pretty nasty: In the eighth inning, around the 100-pitch mark, Ponce is hitting 96 with his fastball and touching 90 with a downward-hooking cutter and an absolutely disgusting-looking changeup. You can see why he cleaned up come awards season, and why the Jays are so interested.

But Ponce is far from the first American to light up the KBO, then parlay that success into a major league rotation spot. The last two Choi Dong-won Award winners were also Americans: Kyle Hart and Erick Fedde. Just earlier this week, I mentioned both Hart and Fedde in the context of Matt Manning, the latest American to try his hand (or his arm, rather) in Korea.

Fedde’s post-KBO record has been mixed, while Hart’s has just been underwhelming. Can Ponce fare better?

There’s only one way to find out, obviously, and going from the KBO back to North America requires more adjustment than meets the eye. Not only are the quality and style of play different, even the baseball itself is different in Korea. The American ball might rob Ponce of some of his breaking ball movement.

But this is not the same pitcher who once got traded straight-up for Jordan Lyles. Even in relief, Ponce was sitting at 93 mph with the Pirates; now he’s more 94-97. His conditioning has improved, and he’s learned a new changeup. In his Top 50 Free Agent writeup, Eric Longenhagen called it “split-looking,” which definitely captures the pitch’s hard, cut-the-elevator-cables downward action, though it turns out Ponce gets that movement from a kick change grip.

I do love a good changeup.

Despite his new toys, and his total dominance over KBO hitters, Ponce was only our no. 40 overall free agent and our no. 11 free agent starting pitcher. (Our no. 9 starter if you don’t count Brandon Woodruff and Shota Imanaga, who took qualifying offers after the Top 50 list was published.) Our crowdsourced estimates for Ponce’s contract were for about two years in the $8 million AAV range, while Ben Clemens came in over the top with a third year at the same AAV. That estimate accounts for all the uncertainty regarding the transition from the KBO.

The Blue Jays, like they did with Cease, came in over the top in order to get their man before the silly season really got going at the Winter Meetings. But even if Ponce only turns out to be a fifth starter or a medium-leverage reliever, $10 million a year over three years is basically fine. If he’s anything more than that, this contract is a massive steal.

Consider Fedde, who just ran out a two-year, $15 million contract that he signed on his way back from Korea. Fedde produced 3.4 WAR across two teams in his first year, and while the White Sox did trade him at the 2024 deadline, they moved him in a three-team deal with so many moving parts I’d rather just look at whether he lived up to his salary.

Fedde was good for one season, and so bad in 2025 he got traded for nothing, then was cut by the fourth-place team that had just traded for him. But he earned all $15 million with that 3.4 WAR season in 2024.

The bar for Ponce is higher, befitting his higher salary, but considering what even mediocre starting pitching sells for these days, it’s not that much higher. And Ponce’s stuff, and his KBO results, are on a different level from Fedde’s. It’s fair to expect more.

From the Blue Jays’ perspective, they’ve already replaced their two outgoing free agent starting pitchers: Scherzer and Chris Bassitt. Cease will sit at the front of the rotation, with Kevin Gausman and (if his postseason form is a preview of what’s to come) Trey Yesavage. Ponce gives the Blue Jays an alternative to José Berríos at the back of the rotation. Shane Bieber gives Toronto six starting pitchers, plus fellow KBO veteran Eric Lauer as additional depth.

Theoretically, that’s more starting pitching than the Blue Jays need, but if all seven of those guys are healthy and firing on all cylinders come Opening Day, I’m sure manager John Schneider will be both surprised and willing to pay the price of having a couple awkward conversations about who’s going to the bullpen.

We’ll see how the Blue Jays operate going forward, but this — jumping on elite free agent targets early, and taking significant but calculated risks on mid-tier and international guys — is what the big teams do. It’s how you act when you’re worried more about building the best team possible than getting the best value. It’s encouraging not only that the Blue Jays are behaving this way, but that the players they’re targeting are buying in as well.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

49 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sandwiches4everMember since 2019
20 days ago

Blue Jays are (correctly, IMO) striking while the iron is hot. They’re being aggressive after a strong season. It’s similar to what we’ve seen recently with teams like Arizona and San Diego — attempting to move up a market tier based on good on-field results.

Given that Toronto was already in that “upper-middle class” tier, they’re maneuvering into the tier below the “big 3” — the two NY teams and the Dodgers.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
20 days ago

Phillies are pretty close to the Yankees in the headline payroll numbers. Blue Jays should be able to keep Bichette and at least keep up with the Phillies

CC AFCMember since 2016
20 days ago

I’m skeptical of their belief in themselves unless they re-sign Bo (you probably just got the best years you’re gonna get going forward from Springer, Clement, Kirk and Gausman). But I’m glad to see another team not just half ass it and try to be better than just good enough to maybe get a wild card and see what happens. Baseball is better when people try.

For the record, I’m not saying they’re bad. They’re clearly not and are clearly a playoff contender even if they don’t sign Bo, so good on them for getting better. I just don’t see an obviously elite team.

Last edited 20 days ago by CC AFC
frankenspock
20 days ago
Reply to  CC AFC

They were four strikes from winning a World Championship. They are the literal definition of “elite team”.

CC AFCMember since 2016
20 days ago
Reply to  frankenspock

So the 2008 Colorado Rockies were an elite team because they made the 2007 world series? How you did last year, particularly in the crapshoot that is the playoffs, is not how I’d define an elite team for next year.

Alex
20 days ago
Reply to  CC AFC

They had the best record in the AL, won the pennant and got as close as anyone to beating the Dodgers after they just mowed through the playoffs with ease. They score more runs against them in an inning that the Brewers got all series. Name the better AL teams. Hard to be more elite without being the best team in baseball

jdbolickMember since 2024
20 days ago
Reply to  Alex

Let’s not pretend that they were the runaway favorites in the American League. By Pythagorean won-loss, the Yankees were nine games better than the Blue Jays in 2025 and the Red Sox were four games better. Springer, Bichette, and Varsho were all well above what they’re likely to do in 2026.

Cease gives them an upgrade on Bassitt, Ponce should be an upgrade on Scherzer, and Santander can’t possibly be as bad as he was last season. They have reasons to believe that they can repeat, but they will have stiff competition in the East.

Twitchy
20 days ago
Reply to  jdbolick

From May 1st the Jays were third in the majors in run differential at 111. Their roster from opening day was a disaster and they had a ton of turnover. For the majority of the season they led the league in run differential since May 1. They’re a lot better than you’re giving them credit for.

We can’t ignore April, I get that. But I also wouldn’t use pythag to argue the Yanks are 9 games better than the Jays either.

tarvisMember since 2019
20 days ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Well, you’re likely right about Springer, but Kirk and Clement have both had similar seasons in the past (better, in the case of Kirk) and this past season seemingly is line with their recent output (Clement’s numbers, for example, are almost perfectly aligned the past three seasons and his value has increased simply because he has played more games in each). Gausman is harder to gauge simply because he is reaching the age where natural regression tends to creep in; however, it is not like the 2025 season was any kind of career, or even recent, outlier.

All to say: I have no idea what you’re on about here, ha. Could Clement, Kirk, and Gausman all have worse seasons next year? Of course. Is there anything … at all … that suggests 2025 was “the best year going forward” for any of them? No. And certainly nothing that data will support. (My guess is, as it usually does, Zips will drop them a bit, but that is normal, and I doubt it will be very much.)

CC AFCMember since 2016
20 days ago
Reply to  tarvis

For Clement: it was his best career year at age 29. That, in and of itself, indicates it might be a career year. But his value was also hugely tied up in defense, which is fickle and can regress quickly. He also hits the ball incredibly softly at a high launch angle and never walks, which is not a good combination.

For Kirk, who had a similar previous season, not a better one. Elite defensive catchers buoyed by framing often go poof, like Lucroy. And I wouldn’t be thrilled about how he’s going to hold up physically going forward.

For Gausman, last year was his lowest babip season of his career, but mostly it’s as simple as, do you think a 35 year old pitcher is going to throw 193 at the same level again? I would take the under on every single pitcher throwing 193 innings in any given season these days. That was 7 guys in all of baseball last year. Pitchers are durable until they’re not. And I don’t have any reason to expect his skills will be any better. So there’s two easy possibilities for him being worse – he’s as good as last year but throws fewer innings, or his skills regress because he’s old enough to have had an AIM account.

I’d say it’s more likely than not that all 3 have worse years next year. Now, does that mean all three will? Of course not. Basic probability tells you that even if it’s a 75% chance that each one will be worse, it’s better than 50-50 that one of them won’t be.

The overall point is that they had a LOT of things go really well for them last year that have obvious indicators of regression.

Twitchy
20 days ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Clement had a 94 wRC+ in 2024. It was 98 wRC+ in 2025. Feels pretty reasonable to say he can be an elite fielder with a 90 wRC+ for 2026. His defence shouldn’t vanish overnight in 2026.

Kirk is 27 with pretty fantastic K:BB and good enough pop for a C. Don’t think the Jays need to be too worried here. Lucroy went poof at 31.

I can see Gausman being worse than last year but still effective. They’re paying Cease to be the #1, if Gausman is a mid rotation arm the rotation will still be better than 2025. Berrios/Scherzer/Bassit/Gausman and Lauer/Francis is likely worse than Cease/Gausman/Bieber/Yesavage and Berrios/Ponce/Lauer. I’d think the rotation should be better in 2026 even if Gausman regresses.

The Jays also had a lot go wrong. Santander gave them nothing. As much as I dislike Gimenez he was 1 WAR and injured. Hoffman was awful, Scherzer and Berrios really struggled. They had key injuries to the bullpen. The lineup was amazing but the pitching staff had a fair amount go wrong.

As for the lineup the people I’d be concerned about are Springer, and Varsho putting up similar power to 2025. Kirk and Clement aren’t the ones I’d be concerned with.

NATS FanMember since 2018
18 days ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I’ll take the over on Clement’s bat. That offseason looked like he was different than the regular season. Granted small sample size, but different enough that it might indicate something anyways.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  CC AFC

I think we are no longer in the era of the superteam. The Dodgers are the closest but it’s so dependent on their rotation health that the team is a lot more precarious than previous iterations.

I am pretty sure the Dodgers would be my pick for “best team” but it’s hard to say they’re a full tier ahead of the Blue Jays and Mariners right now. (I would add the Yankees if they bring back Bellinger.) That’s not because the Blue Jays are a superteam but because I don’t think there is one right now.

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
19 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Yup, the Dodgers entire rotation somehow ended up healthy for the playoffs. For that to happen again seems like lightning striking twice. We also haven’t had a 100-win team for 2 seasons now, which I think gets at the heart of the lack of superteams.

krusherkovalev55Member since 2025
19 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I have a difficult time seeing how anyone can look at the Yankees and Blue Jays likely opening day rosters and not think the Yankees are clearly likely to be the better team. Dodgers as well obviously. Early futures markets seem to agree with the Yankees having twice the odds to win AL as the blue jays. I realize there will be people who scoff at that and say “that just means rhe public likes the Yankees and has nothing to do with actual odds” or similar nonsense and I don’t really care to argue with those people who believe that in 2025, Its hardly dispositive and just a data point, limits are probably low, opening day rosters aren’t close to finalized etc but jays missing the playoffs will almost certainly be a lot more likely than them winning AL again which disqualifies them from remotely resembling a super team IMO

sadtromboneMember since 2020
19 days ago

I understand how people can think the Dodgers look better, even if I disagree. But the Blue Jays are currently projected for more WAR by Depth Charts (powered by Steamer only right now). So it’s not just me.

sadhulkMember since 2020
19 days ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And that’s with Steamer projecting career best years from Volpe and Wells.

sadhulkMember since 2020
19 days ago

I think the Yankees are higher variance than the Jays, they’re counting on a lot of guys in their 30s staying healthy and maintaining performance from last year along with consistent performances from younger players who haven’t delivered them for a full season before. They could easily win 100+ games or finish around .500, while the Jays have a bunch of 2-3 WAR guys to carry them to around 90 wins but probably not more than that.

It makes sense there would be a difference between projections and gambling odds.

frankenspock
20 days ago

I put them ahead of the Yankees. In fact my top tier right now is just LA, the Mets and the Blue Jays. Those three are in a class of their own.