Predicting the Deadline Acquisitions
With five days left until the trade deadline, things seem to be picking up, with one big move nearly happening last night, and some others potentially getting done today. So while I was originally planning on running these speculative guesses as my Monday piece, I figure I might as well publish it now before teams make a good chunk of this irrelevant.
So, what follows are my guesses as to who goes where before July 31st, based on what teams are rumored to be looking for and who we know is available. The tricky part of an exercise like this is that there are also guys who are available that we don’t know about, and if a team penciled in for one of the available guys goes for the mystery box instead, it will have a domino effect, driving that available player somewhere else, and messing up multiple guesses in the process. So, by Friday, I’d be surprised if I got more than a few of these right. This is really more just for fun than any kind of serious attempt at handicapping exactly where everyone is going. But let’s see how I do.
We’ll go by how impactful the team’s additions would be, with the team’s making the biggest splashes listed first.
Chicago Cubs
Andrew Cashner, Justin Upton, Joaquin Benoit, Jedd Gyorko
Here’s my speculative blockbuster. The Cubs are in a position to make a run this year, and while they may prefer not to pay a high price for rentals, getting a guy like Cashner back might just be the carrot they need to give the Padres a good return for their other two pieces. And the two teams line up in a lot of ways, with the guys the Padres are selling checking a lot of boxes for the Cubs.
My guess on something this size is that the Cubs would send both Starlin Castro and Javier Baez (along with some lower level guys) to San Diego, as this trade would give the Cubs a guy who could slide in at second base and allow Addison Russell to go back to shortstop. The Padres get a brand new middle infield and get out from under Gyorko’s deal (though they take on Castro’s contract in the process), as well as restock their farm system to some degree, while the Cubs push in heavily on 2015 while also getting a couple of guys who will be around next year as well. Yeah, it’s probably too large and unwieldy a deal to get done in July, but we know A.J. Preller is up for shock-and-awe trades, and maybe Theo Epstein will go along for the ride.
Toronto Blue Jays
Jeff Samardzija, Jay Bruce, Aroldis Chapman
We know the Blue Jays are going to add a starting pitcher, and Samardzija seems like the most obvious fit, even though he’s a rental. Alex Anthoplous could give up a little more to get one of San Diego’s controlled arms instead, but I’ll guess they pay a lesser price for Samardzija and then use the prospect currency to land a Bruce/Chapman package from the Reds instead. That combination would add some significant upgrades to not only this year’s team, but next year’s as well, and would justify giving up the young arms that everyone wants when they talk trade with the Blue Jays.
Los Angeles Dodgers
Hisashi Iwakuma, Jesse Chavez, Jake McGee
The Dodgers need arms, and I’d expect that they’ll pick up a starter, a reliever, and a guy who could do both, depending on need. Iwakuma would be a perfect fit as a #3 starter for LA, since they don’t really need another ace, and if the Rays really are listening on Jake McGee, I’d have to imagine Andrew Friedman would love to add him as a lefty complement to Kenley Jansen; that pair could be the west coast version of what the Yankees have at the end of their bullpen. Jesse Chavez is a guy who could help keep the team from using replacement level starters down the stretch, then could add depth to the team’s bullpen in October, or potentially remain as the team’s #4 starter if Brett Anderson gets hurt again.
Kansas City Royals
Johnny Cueto, Marlon Byrd, Dan Haren
The Royals make the most sense for Cueto and probably aren’t going to give up on acquiring him just because one of their trade chips failed a physical. Maybe someone will swoop in and steal him away, but this is the one guess that seems most likely to happen, and if the Reds are sending Cueto to KC, they should include Marlon Byrd as well; the Royals could use another outfielder with Alex Gordon on the shelf and Alex Rios being terrible. Haren could make some sense as a replacement for the injured Jason Vargas, and if he’s going to keep his FIP-beating ways going anywhere, KC is probably the best bet for him.
New York Yankees
Ben Zobrist, Mat Latos, Jim Johnson
While Brian Cashman keeps laying expectations for a quiet deadline, the Yankees are the best fit out there for Ben Zobrist, given their glaring hole at second base and the likelihood of winning their division. Few teams are capable of giving themselves a larger boost than the Yankees would get from swapping in Zobrist for Stephen Drew. On the pitching side of things, I’d imagine they’ll go with lower-tier options, and Mat Latos’ cost will be limited based on his struggles and personality, while a guy like Jim Johnson won’t cost a lot to add a piece who can bridge the gap to Dellin Betances and Andrew Miller.
Texas Rangers
Cole Hamels
The teams in win-now mode have enough short-term alternatives to not need to pay a premium to get the 2016 value that comes with having Hamels under control beyond this year, and while I don’t necessarily see the Rangers as on the verge of contending, they clearly see themselves that way, and adding Hamels to a healthy Yu Darvish would at least give them a shot to get back to the postseason next year.
The Rangers probably aren’t giving up Joey Gallo, but if they put Nomar Mazara or a combination of Jorge Alfaro and Alex Gonzalez on the table, this is the kind of deal that could work for both sides. I’m lower on Alfaro and Gonzalez than most, so I’d push pretty strongly for Mazara and some lesser stuff if I was Ruben Amaro. Getting at least one high profile guy seems to be the preferred course of action for the Phillies anyway, and Mazara is a legitimate top prospect, so this is probably the best option for Philly to get a guy with All-Star upside in return.
Houston Astros
Carlos Gomez
The Astros already got a pitcher, but they shouldn’t stop there, and Gomez would be a perfect fit for them, sliding in as their regular center fielder, pushing the overmatched Jake Marisnick back to a reserve role. With George Springer, Colby Rasmus, and Preston Tucker around, a center fielder makes more sense for the Astros than any of the corner guys on the market, and Gomez is the best center fielder potentially available. Given that he’s under control for next year as well, this is the kind of guy the Astros should be willing to pay for.
Pittsburgh Pirates
Mike Leake, Tyler Clippard
The Aramis Ramirez acquisition essentially sums up the kinds of moves the Pirates like to make at this point in the year; looking more for depth than paying for the perceived huge impact that doesn’t really exist in acquiring a guy for two months. Given that, I don’t think Pittsburgh will be in on the big names, though Ben Zobrist does still make some sense there, and I would see them going more for the middle-tier guys who can help but aren’t going to cost an arm and a leg. Leake and Clippard both fit that mold, but there are a lot of other mid-level starter/reliever combos that could go here too. And if Ramirez doesn’t take to 1B well, I could see them swinging a deal for Mike Napoli, though that might be an August trade.
Anaheim Angels
Carlos Gonzalez
They want a left-handed power hitting outfielder, and there’s really only a couple of them on the market. Bruce could fit here too, but because they don’t have much in the way of prospects to trade, taking on most of CarGo’s contract is probably an easier deal for them to make. His recent hot streak has made it more likely that he’ll get moved, and Anaheim looks like the most logical landing spot for him if they have the budget room to get it done.
Minnesota Twins
Yovani Gallardo, John Axford
The Twins are openly talking about adding a power arm who can rack up strikeouts, and Axford checks both boxes. If the Twins are really going to make a run, they’re going to need to add another arm to their rotation as well, because Ervin Santana is ineligible for postseason play; Gallardo seems like a good fit among guys who could be an actual upgrade but won’t cost top-line prospects.
San Francisco Giants
Gerardo Parra
Parra is a classic Giants player, with the good-at-everything-great-at-nothing skillset that has become the team’s hallmark. He makes contact, hits for power, plays solid defense in a corner, and could even replace Angel Pagan in center if the team needed him to. While Parra is playing well enough to appeal to a wide variety of teams, he seems destined to play for the Giants; they own the copyright on players like this.
St. Louis Cardinals
Adam Lind
It’s tough to see St. Louis really rolling into the postseason with a rookie platooning with Mark Reynolds at first base, so I’ll pencil them in for Adam Lind, though they could go with a buy-low guy like Mike Napoli if they wanted to give Stephen Piscotty a longer look. My guess is that they know Piscotty isn’t the answer, though, and a lefty with power who can fit between Matt Holliday and Jhonny Peralta fits the bill nicely.
Washington Nationals
Jonathan Papelbon
The Nationals are getting their big guns back, making additions anywhere besides the bullpen less likely. But they’re almost certainly going to add a reliever, and Papelbon actually makes some sense here. Yes, Drew Storen is doing a great job as the team’s closer, but they wouldn’t lose much in the ninth with giving Papelbon that job, and that would free Storen up to pitch high-leverage spots in the 7th and 8th innings. And since the Phillies are reportedly willing to pay down some of Papelbon’s contract, the Nationals — who even got the Indians to pay the freight on Asdrubal Cabrera last year — might be able to get a good reliever by just taking on 2016 money.
New York Mets
Koji Uehara
The Mets made their move to solidify their line-up on Friday, adding Juan Uribe and Kelly Johnson as solid role players who didn’t cost a lot. I’d expect one more similar move for the bullpen, with a guy like Uehara being a good fit as a different look from the hard-throwing staff the Mets already have. It isn’t a sexy deadline, but the total value added by these three guys may have just as large of an impact on the team as making one big acquisition.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
I could see the Mets getting Koji and Holt
I don’t see Holt being moved. A utility player isn’t a sexy addition, but he’s also a high quality player who would be starting for a lot of teams.
I just see his value to the Red Sox supervising what anyone is likely to offer.
Red Sox don’t trade Koji. They need a closer next year and Koji is both very good and on a short-term deal. They’ll be net negative once they replace him.
Holt has been worth 5 WAR since being called up last year, is making the LM, and has 4 years of control. I doubt BOS trades him unless they get a crazy offer.
Maybe something like Holt+Koji+10mil for Wheeler, unless they got a young pitcher with upside I dont see them trading Holt.
Hahaha for wheeler.
Holt had been worth 3.9 war over 260 games over 4 years he is what he is a germ part time starter/bench guy. He And Koji would not be remotely close to wheeler
Sox would need a little more insurance if they were to take on Wheeler coming off his year matriculation at Tommy John University…very, very hard to trade a popular closer in Koji plus a quality Swiss Knife player in Holt. Trying to get Koji in a stand-alone trade make more sense. And they’ll want a sure thing starting pitcher (or 2).
Jays will give up the “farm” for Chris Sale.
Who’s farm? The Cubs? Jays don’t have enough?
What?? The Jays may have more quality pitching in their system than anyone.
You are 1 for 1!
like .5 for .5, since the deal was already reported, and just had a complication
He called it last week.
http://www.foxsports.com/mlb/just-a-bit-outside/story/kansas-city-royals-johnny-cueto-cincinnati-reds-trade-deadline-rumors-072215
.5 for .5 is still batting 1.000
I’m a little confused on why the Rangers would give up Gallardo but then acquire Hamels. I get that Hamels is clearly the better pitcher, but is it also because they’d have Hamels for next year whereas Gallardo becomes a free agent?
Yup, I think the Rangers have a lot of holes in their rotation, and a lot of prospects to trade. However, trading for a long-term asset at the trade deadline seems inefficient, since the prices for buyers tend to be inflated, given that there are no alternatives on the market (no free agents)
I thought a Hamels to Texas deal was a good fit over this past offseason, and it may still be one this offseason. Unless one of the standings leaders moves a ton to get Hamels at the deadline, I see the Phillies holding firm and having to wait for the offseason. They have more urgency to move Papelbon and other short-term assets now anyways.
In the abstract I agree, but if Hamels goes to a team like the Dodgers then the Rangers would have little chance of prying him away in the off-season.
The logic in the metroplex has been that Hamels is a long term commodity they prefer over this years FAs, and Gallardo can net some prospects to soften blow of acquiring him. Given how Gallardo has pitched of late, if trend continued don’t know if he’s as likely to get tendered a QO as he was 3 weeks ago. Gallardo could also theoretically resign with club (don’t know how likely) this offseason as he obviously would have no draft pick compensation attached.
It’s a little confusing, but even if you’re not getting as much value from the next two months as a contender would, the price may still be worth it. What’s more, you could argue that he’s got more value to the Rangers than most, as Texas isn’t on his no trade list, giving Hamels less leverage to demand the option be picked up. So while he’ll help them a little less than a contender, he’ll also actually cost less money for them than for many other teams, perhaps balancing out.
As a Dodger fan, Iwakuma and McGee would be awesome. What do you think they’ll need to give up to get that? Certainly not Seager or Urias, but do you think they’d need to part with one of their tier-2 prospects, like De Leon or Grant Holmes?
Is there any specific reason you don’t have the Tigers listed as either buyers or sellers? I feel like they’re not in a good enough position to just do nothing.
Probably because you have to have something to trade in order to be buyers….besides being a couple games under .500, what does Detroit have to trade that would get them a useful piece?
David Price?
Yoenis Cespedes…Rajai Davis….
Another reason Parra is perfect for the Giants: Dodger fans hate him
Buy or sell? I have no idea but I think it’s a safe bet Tigers GM Dave Dombrowksi is very active. I assume was probably too tough a call with what direction the Tigers will end up going right now so better off not saying either way yet.
If that was the case than I agree but I do think there will be a definite decision made one way or another by the Tigers organization and whatever that is they will be involved in at least a minimum of two trades before the deadline is over.
The Jays don’t need bullpen arms. Or a corner OF. Shark is the only one of the three I hope they get.
The Jays don’t need bullpen arms?
Really?
Who gets the tough outs in a one-run game?
Osuna and Sanchez
Fringy team relies on untested rookies for closeouts= early exit from playoffs
2002 K-Rod and the LAA beg to differ.
So do Wainwright and the 2006 Cardinals.
2002 Angels also had a guy named Percival.
Osuna, Hendriks, Sanchez, and Cecil. The Jays are losing games because Gibbons is sending Loup against RH bats, and is using Schultz/Tepera/Loup as his primary set up guys instead of Hendriks/Cecil.
Just a note on Haren: he had said during the off-season that he would only play in California or he was going to retire so it was a big surprise that he agreed to play in Miami. Given that he now has almost 2/3 of his salary paid for the year, he’s probably not going anywhere he doesn’t want to. No idea what he might say about KC but he essentially has a no-year with the retirement hammer in his pocket
I can’t say I was too surprised. Rational people don’t turn down $10 million for a year’s work even if it is not where they want to live. For the same reason, I don’t see him refusing $3 million for another two month’s work, no matter where it is.
Doubtful, I think they’re all competitors and he wouldn’t turn down a chance at the playoffs
Haren has incentives that also kick in another 3 million dollars. Hes pitching where ever he is told.
Castro’s trade value is currently at rock-bottom, and Baez’s stock isn’t very high either with his K/BB ratios still rather abysmal. Too much risk to be considered a premium asset or the headliner in a trade.
No idea why the Pirates would need to add a starter unless somebody goes down. The performance of the rotation has been just fine; the problem is depth. Adding a starter just means that somebody has to be removed from the roster, resulting in no depth gain. A bullpen arm or a depth starter who has options, but no Mike Leake.
I’m still angling to see if the Pirates can get Jesus Montero on the cheap as a bench/platoon bat and reclamation project.
Teams don’t vaporize players who are removed from the rotation – they live on, as depth, in either the minors or bullpen.
Locke and Worley have no options left and have zero chance of making it through waivers. They will, in fact, vaporize. That, or you have a severe square peg in round hole situation with two starters in the bullpen, and that’s no depth because they’re not stretched out.
The Pirates do not need Leake. They do not need Napoli unless they want to replace the void that was Corey Hart’s season with the near void that Napoli would provide.
Clippard sounds about right for the Pirates.
Jay Bruce can stay with the Reds.
What kind of return do people think Koji would get? I’m confused about his value, frankly. He’s been pretty good this year, and players are worth more at the deadline, but… is he worth a real prospect of any kind? I’m not saying he’s not, I just really don’t know how to judge a year and a half of a kind-of-expensive-but-very-good-but-also-hey-kind-of-old relief arm.
Might get a decent prospect from a team desperate for a closer, but the Mets have Familia. I can’t see them giving up too much for a $9 reliever, even though he has been tough on lefties.
A Koji trade would give the Sox a little more room under the CBT than the $25-30 MM they project to have (if they leave Craig in the minors). But since that only leaves them with Tazawa as a reliable RP, they will need to go cheap on a closer. So then you are adding volatility to the closer position with a cheap or unproven replacement.
I agree the return wouldn’t be great. Koji has stayed relatively healthy except for a lat (or was it oblique) strain for two and a half years but remaining off the DL for the next 15 months is a gamble.
A Koji trade would give the Sox a little more room in 16 under the CBT than the $25-30 MM they project to have (if they leave Craig in the minors). But since that only leaves them with Tazawa as a reliable RP, they will need to go cheap on a closer. So then you are adding volatility to the closer position with a cheap or unproven replacement.
I agree the return wouldn’t be great. Koji has stayed relatively healthy except for a lat (or was it oblique) strain for two and a half years but remaining off the DL for the next 15 months is a gamble.
My phone phone threw up.
I heard you the first time, the first time.
He’s having a top-10 year among relievers this year and is a top 5 reliever over the last 3 years. His contract isn’t great, but he’s definitely a valuable arm.
Where are the Dodgers getting the prospects to facilitate such trades?
The Dodgers with two of the top 5 prospects in baseball?
They’re untouchable.
If I were the Dodgers, with Detroit rumored to be offering a negotiating window with Price for a new contract, I would 100% offer Urias. Why not? Wost case scenario, you still have an awesome prospect. Best case, you have a n awesome actual player.
Dodger system is way deeper than just Seager and Urias.
Curious to see what the Diamondbacks do. One of the teams I expected to see somewhere on this list. Guess it has been said that they have no classic trade assets
Oliver Perez fits for the Astros
I still think the Yanks will go for Hamels or perhaps Price. Their need is a lefty starter, not another righty like Latos.
I think the Mets ought to move Murphy if they can find a taker, and obviously Colon. The Angels are a little light at 2B and 3B, so there’s a good fit there, although I don’t know if there’s a prospect worth dealing.
Jon Niese is probably the better player to move than Colon (as he’s probably actually worth something, whereas Colon is worth very little above his contract)
For the Mets the real question is what Matz’s injury recovery is going to be – with him, they have 4 pitchers for two spots (Matz, Colon, Niese, Gee), and can probably trade whichever one of the last 3 gives most value… with Matz on the DL and Gee in AAA for now that’s less of a pressing issue, though.
Dave: the Yankees have steered clear of guys with attitude problems for while now – the last example I can think of is Gary Sheffield. I don’t see them going for a guy known to make so many enemies, though otherwise he fits the bill for a deadline deal for the team.
Additionally, I don’t see them focusing on bullpen guys when they’ve had so much success from the pen so far. And they still have Chris Martin, Andrew Bailey and some young fireballers in the minors.
Yes, no attitude problems here! **Climbs into the stands to chase a guy who seemed slightly disrespectful during the 417th rendition of “God Bless America” **
Unless of course you view lying, cheating and endless narcissism as attitude problems. In which case you’d have to add A-Fraud.
Still, that was ten years ago. So it really backs me up if anything.
Epstein and Hoyer should be fired if they’re stupid enough to make that trade.
Not that I care about keeping Castro or Baez, but what does that trade do for the Cubs? They need a reliable #5, and the solution is Cashner whose K/BB since June is about 2.10, and whose ability to stay healthy is…well, it’s not there. Upton’s a sexy name, but he’s a rental, and Coghlan is outplaying him on the season, while Upton’s not hitting. Where do you put the Cubs’ currently third-best position player (maybe fourth, with Schwarber around)? Benoit just sucks, as he’s putting up a 4.02 FIP and has his worst K rate since 2005 and his worst BB rate since 2006–he’s not a plus to an OK bullpen (even if a stable closer or monstrous lefty would be a smart addition). Lastly, we have Gyorko. So, the Cubs replace a -0.9 WAR shortstop worse 2014 WAR was 2.7 for a 2B who is a year older, has a -0.5 WAR himself, and was a 0.0 WAR player last season, to boot. I don’t see where the Cubs get better in that trade, by getting a pair of rentals, a different MI worth negative WAR, getting older, adding money, and losing years of control.
Again, I don’t have any real desire to hang on to Castro or Baez. I’m just missing the part where improvement come from that suggestion. It’s more questionable bodies who don’t have homes. I guess you pray Cashner’s ugly K/BB improves and Coghlan can play 2B, in this scenario? I’d rather do a trade for Ross and Gyorko (as a contract to take back, if Castro leaves), even if Ross worries me himself. Ross really is the only Padre who might help the Cubs.
Yeah, it’s weird how little skepticism there has been of the rumor that the Cubs are packaging Baez and Castro together. Unless you get back a capable middle infielder (read: not Gyorko), you are creating a bigger hole than you’re filling.
la stella might eventually be healthy, alcantara is probably above replacement level at second should russell slide to short. so a couple internal options, which leads me to question why gyorko would be involved in the trade to begin with.
Gyorko would be in as cap balancing for Castro.
Why you think La Stella is of important, I don’t know. AT BEST, he’s a no-power, no-speed guy hitting .270 playing average defense. He’s replacement-level in a perfect world. Alcantara strikes out more than I like, he’s not even managing a .300 OBP in the minors, and he just generally doesn’t seem like a smart gamble.
I’d rather hope putting Gyorko in Wrigley, rather than PetCo, would do him some good. I mean, even the garbage Gyorko is putting up right now is ONLY a -0.5 WAR, while Castro’s at -0.9. He’d actually be an upgrade.
It kind of makes sense, but not today. Both have bottomed out, so it’s not like their stock can really go down. They do have Torres coming, and enough plug-in guys who might be replacement-level (Alcantara, La Stella, Herrera). Given Baez might be a total flop and Castro’s actually dragging wins from the team, dealing both could make sense, in the right package.
I’d be very happy to take a shot on Cashner, but I’m with you on everything else you said. It makes no sense to pay the sticker price on Upton or Benoit.
If the Cubs are going to dump Castro (fine by me!) and they have to include Javy to get it done (NOT ok by me!), then by all means do it. But don’t take back Gyorko’s dead weight in the process if the only real upgrade you get is a flyer on constantly broken Cashner.
I would be willing to take Gyorko to move Castro. There is hope that .270 career BABIP can come up, then you maybe have someone hitting .250 with some pop at 2B. He was nearly a 25+ homer bat as a rookie, and in only 25 games, so there should be SOME talent left in him. I am fine with trading Castro for a pitcher (not sure I’d want Shields, though), and giving Baez a shot, but I wouldn’t hate if the Cubs got Tyson Ross by trading Castro AND Baez, while seeing if Gyorko is fixable.
Small correction:
Jesse Chavez is a guy who could help keep the team from using replacement level starters down the stretch, then could add depth to the team’s bullpen in October, or potentially remain as the team’s #4 starter *when* Brett Anderson gets hurt again.
I predict the Tigers trade Price and Soria to the Blue Jays. As the previous poster said, it doesn’t seem like they need an outfielder, but if they do then Cespedes also fits the bill (or Rajai Davis?)
I am mortified that the Giants are continuously associated with Parra or Zobrist. They have a 380 OBP leadoff hitter currently on the bench (yes, Pagan should sit instead, but Bruce can be stubborn), they have five poor starters, six if you count Petit (and two good ones), and we need field players?
Too early to say if Cain/Peavy are poor or not. Really don’t see the Giants getting a starter. Maybe some bullpen help. Not many positions to upgrade now that they are healthy.
Why would the Dodgers need to make a trade? They were supposed to have the division wrapped up by the All Star break and their bargain basement bullpen was supposed to dominate.
Or was that written at a Fangraphs in an alternate universe?
As for the Giants… They need a better closer and a better 5th starting pitcher before they should consider trading for a 5th outfielder now that Aoki and Pence are healthy and Blanco seems to have finally learned to avoid the offense killing slumps he was prone to in the past.
Casilla is fine at closer. He’s been pretty dominant over the last 5 1/2 years regardless of what FIP says. They could use another reliever but the bullpen really isn’t that bad if Affeldt can return to form.
Casilla, Romo, Strickland, Kontos, Petit, Lopez, Affeldt is pretty good in my opinion.
Good thoughts on the Upton to Cubs, Shark to Jays and Gomez to Astros deals. All make sense both ways. As does Lind to the Cards.
The one I don’t get is Parra to the Giants. Seems like Blanco already fits that role over there. I think Parra to the Angels makes more sense.
Further, I see:
Hamels to the Dodgers
Zobrist to the Nats
Clippard to LAD as well
Chapman to the Giants seems a perfect fit
Prado back to the Yankees (Phillips possible too given it’ll be a salary dump and that’s where the Yankees can exercise their financial advantage)
I think the Mets fall short on adding a big OFer such as Bruce or Reddick tho I could see both being dealt, with maybe the Twins ending up with one.
Any idea who closes for Oakland if Clippard is dealt?
Why in the world would the Padres do that trade? Basically it boils down to Cashner, Upton, and Benoit for Javier Baez (Gyorko for Castro is about a wash). That seems to a pretty steep return for Javy Baez – is he really that highly regarded still? I thought his prospect shine was fairly dull now – I would think Upton and Benoit is a fair trade deadline return.
point awarded for Papelbon.