Punting First Base Is The New Black
It’s no secret that this winter has not been kind to veteran hitters, particularly those with limited defensive ability. Mike Napoli is still a free agent, as are Chris Carter and Pedro Alvarez. Brandon Moss just signed with the Royals yesterday, getting a backloaded $12 million on a two year deal. Edwin Encarnacion, Jose Bautista, and Mark Trumbo all took significant discounts relative to their initial asking prices. As we discussed a few weeks ago, the market for offense-first players was remarkably poor this year, to the point where it could be seen as an overcorrection; perfectly useful players are signing for less than what similarly valuable players with different skills are getting paid.
What is perhaps most interesting about this development, however, is that the teams who could are most in need of a first base upgrade are also teams that should be trying to squeak out every marginal win they can find.
If you look at the projections on our site for value by position, you’ll notice a lot of the same teams at the bottom for most spots. Worst projected value from their catchers in 2017? The Rockies are down there in part because our forecasts don’t yet include the potential value of Tony Wolters‘ framing abilities, but then there’s the Braves, Diamondbacks, White Sox, Phillies, Twins, Padres, and Brewers. Worst second baseman? The Royals, who want to win, but then the Braves, Diamondbacks, Brewers, and White Sox. Worst shortstops? Padres, Brewers, Diamondbacks… you get the idea.
But if you go to the projected first base depth charts, here are the teams at the bottom, along with their 2017 projected record, according to our current forecasts.
30. Texas Rangers, 83-79
29. Pittsburgh Pirates, 82-80
28. Washington Nationals, 90-72
27. Seattle Mariners, 83-79
26. Colorado Rockies, 79-83
25. Toronto Blue Jays, 84-78
The Rockies are the only one of the six teams with the least projected value from their first baseman to not currently project as a .500 or better team, and that will change once the more-optimistic ZIPS forecasts are folded into the depth charts. All six of these teams are going into 2017 looking to win, and all of them have pretty questionable first base situations.
Of the six, the Nationals are probably the one without a strong opportunity to do something about their 1B situation, since Ryan Zimmerman still has three years and almost $50 million left on his contract, and getting ownership to replace a guy making that kind of money is never an easy conversation. But, of course, the Nationals could have acquired a better alternative than Clint Robinson, so that if Zimmerman struggles again, they could have a reasonable alternative around; for instance, Seth Smith would have been perfect for them, giving them depth behind Jayson Werth as well.
But let’s give the Nationals a bit of a pass, since they have more reason to continue to bet on Zimmerman than the other teams. The Rockies would, of course, quibble with the idea that Desmond is likely to produce at a below-average level, given what they just spent to get him, so that’s more of a difference in forecasts between the public and what Colorado thinks they’re likely to get. They’re not really punting first base as much as they just think their first baseman is better than we do.
But the other four? The Rangers, Pirates, Mariners, and Blue Jays just seem to be okay going into the season with mediocre options, most of which have fairly limited ceilings. The Pirates probably like Josh Bell more than the public forecasts do, but the reality remains that he’s a very weak defender without the kind of power you usually associate from a bat-only player. Likewise, the Mariners are going forward with Dan Vogelbach, hoping his high walk rates from the minors translate into enough on-base percentage to offset the lack of much else in his game that will provide value, but as a guy who probably fits best at DH, he’s going to have to hit a lot to be worth playing, and there doesn’t seem to be much optimism outside of Seattle that he’ll hit at that kind of level.
The Blue Jays are probably the most egregious offender here, with Justin Smoak — himself a cautionary tale about 1B prospects who extract a lot of value from their walk rates despite average power — looking like the guy in line for the most at-bats at first base. With Vogelbach and Bell, you can at least bet on their youth and hope for power development, but Smoak is 29 and has a career wRC+ of 95 in nearly 3,000 plate appearances; he is what he is.
And we haven’t even mentioned the Red Sox, who are only higher on our depth charts because we have Hanley Ramirez getting at-bats at the position against left-handers, when he would be in the line-up anyway; if we were to evaluate the team’s first base situation by looking solely at the expected production from Mitch Moreland and Chris Young (the right-hander who will likely play when Moreland sits), they’d be in this conversation too, as another contender that is basically punting production from first base.
Most likely, this is a reaction to the fact that first base is just particularly weak right now. Baseball talent is cyclical, and we’ve moved into a time where there just aren’t that many good players at the first base position relative to players at other spots. Shifts also disproportionately hurt older, pull-heavy slow players, and that basically describes the first base arch type, so it’s possible that the changes in the game’s defensive alignments are going to change what we should expect from first baseman offensively.
But it still remains interesting to me that so many contenders have moved so quickly away from looking to upgrade at first base. The Pirates found $11 million for Daniel Hudson to pitch in middle relief while the Mariners gave the same amount to Marc Rzepczynski, preferring bullpen depth over first base upgrades, so it’s not like these teams didn’t have any money to spend in a depressed market for decent hitters. It just seems that a number of teams in win-now mode are okay going into the year with a first baseman who doesn’t produce like we’ve historically expected.
The issue could very well be on our end, and perhaps we just need to adjust what normal production from a first baseman looks like these days. Or maybe this summer the White Sox are going to get a massive haul for Jose Abreu when a number of teams realize that they should maybe thinking about acquiring a player who could substantially upgrade their line-up. We’ll find out in July!
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Interesting take. Does this make 1B prospects far less valuable, as they would have to exceed normal levels of production in order to be worth having?
Yes, I think, is the short answer. If you’ve got two prospects with identical batting lines, and the first one’s write-up says “defense won’t play anywhere except first” and the second one’s write-up says “should stick in a corner-outfield spot”, you’ve got a pretty big difference in prospect values.
If I counted correctly, BaseballAmerica’s 2016 Top 100 Prospects List had 4 players listed at 1B only (as opposed to 14 at SS), only one of whom (AJ Reed) was in the top 75.
They are far less valuable and have been for many years.
Yes but not because of this, it’s because it’s basically always been true.
All else being equal, but by virtue of being a 1B prospect, they’re likely better hitters than prospects at other positions.
1st base probably requires the least range of physical attributes to play (aside from being somewhat tall). Therefore, it’s the easiest position to hide all the decent bats that float around in the baseball universe that cannot play other positions. Given that there are probably a lot of these guys, it just becomes a surplus versus demand thing.
However, as more teams choose the cheap 1B route, it might increase the value of the elite, 2-way guys at the position like Freeman/Rizzo or a guy like Goldschmidt who also adds base running value.
Obviously, Atlanta is pretty dead-set against trading Freeman, but if the Yanks were to come begging, it could make for one interesting blockbuster.
It’s also a different position to peg market value for, because a lot of the most talented, young guys have extended early (Rizzo, Goldschmidt, Freeman) and we haven’t seen a super elite guy hit free agency.
This is ignoring the fact some of these teams aren’t even putting the decent bats there though. That’s kind of the point.
This guy didn’t watch Moneyball!
“The Blue Jays are probably the most egregious offender here, with Justin Smoak — himself a cautionary tale about 1B prospects who extract a lot of value from their walk rates despite average power — looking like the guy in line for the most at-bats at first base. ”
Then there’s an issue with your depth chart, because Pearce is the starting 1B. Smoak is going to be the backup, and hopefully DFA for his roster spot. It’s why I sometimes question the projections, because you don’t have the right players in the right spots. I know the Jays say they can use Pearce anywhere, but what’s most likely is he plays 1B, Morales plays DH, and either they upgrade LF or roll with Pompey or a Carrera/Upton platoon. Smoak is the bench guy here though.
I don’t think the issue was about 1B as much as it was other factors. Boston is trying to stay under the luxury tax, Texas has Gallo who they can try, Bautista was coming off a bad year and had the QO attached. The other guys are 1-1.5 WAR guys so they have some value but there’s no rush to sign them. Especially when teams have similar calibre players in their own depth charts, or prospects they’re willing to gamble on. Is it really worth spending 10M on Napoli if Steamer is projecting a 103 wRC+ for him vs a 98 wRC+ for Gallo?
If nobody gets hurt, none of the left field options play themselves to the bench, and nobody takes days off then you’re probably right that Pearce will see most of the first base at bats on the team.
The depth charts have to take into account that that won’t happen and Pearce will probably spend a fair amount of time between the corner outfield spots and DH; possibly even second base if Travis loses extended time and the backups there are tossing up 0 for 4s every night. Any time he is somewhere else, it’s likely that Smoak (who doesn’t have that flexibility) is playing first base. With Pearce’s own injury issues tossed in with the injury/performance risks of the guys he is backing up around the field, 406 plate appearances from him with just over half of them coming at first base is a very reasonable projection.
I would gladly take a bet on Pearce collecting less 1B at bats for the Jays than Smoak this year.
I think Jays fans are just hoping and praying that they’ll see the light, and that Smoak won’t come anywhere near 1B on a regular basis. But yeah, I’m pretty much expecting that Smoak will be starting opening day. Sigh.
Pearce isn’t even that great a defensive OF, so there’s little sense to use him there. He’s a plus defender at first, and there’s really no situation barring multiple injuries that he makes sense at the OF, especially since him off of 1B means more starts for Smoak, which should be avoided. ANd if there are multiple injuries in the OF, odds are the Jays aren’t competing.
Given that the Jays 1B options are sub replacement level, it makes the most sense to maximize Pearce at 1B, and take advantage of their OF depth – Bautista/Pillar for 2 spots, and Upton vs LHP for the third with either a FA/trade acquisition, Pompey, or Carrera in LF. I get that injuries happen, and Pearce will probably get injured, but he doesn’t make sense on the current Jays roster in the outfield. Unless of course he shows more range than Bautista, at which point Bautista is the 1B and the problem of a poor hitting 1B solves itself that way.
If Travis is out I would prefer the Jays use Barney at 2B and leave Pearce at 1B. Barney was quite valuable given his glove, and I’d take Barney at 2B and Pearce at 1B over Smoak at 1B and Pearce at 2B if Travis is out. Barney is generally a 1-1.5 WAR backup the past 3 years (when given the AB) so I think this is far superior to using Smoak, and I imagine the Jays will come to a similar conclusion. Even if it takes them a couple of games to realize this.
So even knowing Pearce’s injury history, I would gladly take whatever bet you have that Pearce has more AB from Smoak at 1B. Pearce’s versatility has value, but on the current Jays roster his best spot is 1B. Keeping Smoak on the bench where he belongs and using Barney to cover other IF spots or Carrera/Upton/Pompey or a FA/trade candidate for the other OF spots makes the Jays a far better team.
wRC+ vs RHP in 2016/2015:
Carerra 71/87
Upton 68/101
Pearce 118/107
Smoak 99/105
Barring Pompey showing he can hit MLB pitching, it is incredibly difficult to argue Smoak should be on the bench against right handed pitching if Pearce can play average outfield defense. This not even taking into account days off for Bautista, Pillar, and Morales, or injuries.
I don’t think Pearce is an average defensive OF. And Smoak is a defensive downgrade at 1B from Pearce as well. Toss in the baserunning, and I think there’s enough that you can justify keeping Smoak on the bench in that situation.
Also I do think Pompey can hit in the majors.
Well, luckily you don’t manage the Jays because that’s a hell of a lot of offense to make up, and a lot of days off to go around. Smoak will have the most 1B appearances on the team. Deal with it.
Gibby will probably try a lot of combinations and see what sticks. Who’s hitting, who’s making big plays in the field.
The 0 PA at 1B for Bautista is what seems strange to me, because it’s probably something we should be preparing for under the assumption we have him for 3 years.
Many, you and me both on Smoak and the Jays. They gotta make Pearce the full time 1b, right? I mean, he’s even been better against right handers each of the last 3 years. I can’t believe they’re really going to roll with Smoak on the strong side of a platoon there.
“The Pirates found $11 million for Daniel Hudson to pitch in middle relief…”
They signed him to 2 years, so they ‘found’ $5.5m in 2017, not $11m. They also *likely* feel that he’s more at the back-end of their bullpen (especially in 2018 when Watson is gone) based on his peripherals last year.
Also, while you can be a skeptic re: Josh Bell, they need to find out what they have. And, considering that Keith Law just named him one of the Top 15 prospects in the game, that seems rational. In addition, let’s be honest: They also have David Freese and John Jaso that can play 1B as well, so the Pirates are most definitely not going into the market for 1B when they already have as many as 3 options and both halves of a platoon.
So, it probably would’ve been prudent to leave them off your “What the hell are they doing?” list.
I’m with Dave, why not block our top notch 1B prospect with Pedro Alvarez playing 1B?! That move will work out great, oh wait…
Are you referring to some past Pirates event? Please inform.
There is no “what are they doing” list. This post wasn’t a critique of the chosen strategy; I was just pointing out that this is the trend in baseball now, and it seems unique to first base.
At pretty much every other position, MLB has done a pretty good job of sorting the best players to contenders, who can take advantage of their short-term value, while the rebuilding teams are the ones who have to employ a guy like Alvarez or Carter. But at first base, that hasn’t happened: Votto, Goldschmidt, and Freeman are all on also-rans, and even guys like Wil Myers are locked in to rebuilding clubs for the foreseeable future. The best few 1Bs aren’t on good teams, the middle class of decent 1Bs has disappeared, and so contenders are left with the leftovers.
That’s interesting, and that’s why I wrote the post.
i would argue that Rizzo would be included in that best few 1B, and he is on one of, if not the best team in baseball.
6 of the top 10 first base projections are for contending teams and the #1 projection is for the cubs and #2 is for the tigers. How does that reconcile with, ” The best few 1Bs aren’t on good teams…”?
Dave tossed out a post a little too casually, is how it reconciles. It happens.
Well, top 10 is an arbitrary number.
To draw an another arbitrary line of the elite five
‘Cabrera, Votto, Rizzo, Freeman, Goldschmidt’
then three of them are very unlikely to play in the playoffs.
I think most people would agree on that list of
top tier first basemen.
The projections also say that the difference in WAR
between number 1(Rizzo) and number 5 (Freeman) is equal to
the difference between number 5 and number 6 (Belt).
If you have “the best 1B” on your roster isn’t that a “world’s tallest little person” argument?
With the limited opportunities to accumulate positive defensive value available to 1B the deck is stacked against them as far as ceiling of WAR output. A capable hitter that is playable as a defender anywhere else will produce more value anywhere other than 1B.
Perhaps the smart teams aren’t so much willfully punting 1B/filling it with suboptimal options as a plan so much as they are prioritizing everywhere else first with the knowledge that stop-gap 1B are plentiful and the delta between a stop-gap 1B and top of the league 1B is a lesser gap than any other defensive position.
Edit: Also if a lot of the better 1B are on non-contenders then factor in the opportunity cost of signing a mediocre option now vs being in the trade market for a difference maker later.
to your edit
Of the top 10 1b projections you have Ari, Cin, Atl, SD, and Bal as possible non-contending teams (IMO Bal is a contender, but it’s debateable). As mentioned Myers just got locked up, doubt they trade him anytime soon, Votto has said he doesn’t want to go anywhere and has no trade protection, Atl has said freeman isn’t going anywhere, and Bal is probably trying to compete and lets be serious, no one wants Chris Davis’ contract anyway. So you are left with Arizona and Paul Goldschmidt as an option.
I know Ari is not projected well and probably wont compete, but you have to think they are going to try, at least for this year with that Greinke contract. They probably aren’t really looking to move him, so I’m not really sure he’s an option for this year/near future either.
But there’s a reason why that is happening. Votto refuses to waive his no trade clause. San Diego just extended Myers after his career year. The Dbacks have new management and can’t move Goldschmidt because they need to see if they can rebound after last year. Rizzo and Cabrera are on teams hoping to contend (whether Detroit should, is another story). Belt, Edwin, Santana are all on contenders. Baltimore just signed Davis, he’s not moving.
Jose Abreu is available but coming off a poor season, so he’s tough to evaluate.
So I don’t think it’s so much as a fact that MLB isn’t shifting the best players at 1B to contenders. There are many other factors at play, with the luxury tax or no trade clauses or teams banking on prospects the primary reasons for this offseason. Or your depth charts not reflecting the right players at the position, like Pearce over Smoak.
The pirates are likely to use bell in the of though not 1b. And at this point there’s a good chance Chris Carter or Adam Lind would cost less than 5 million.
Where do you get that? The OF is jammed even with a Cutch trade and NH has said recently that Bell is his 1B. Bell spent all winter losing weight and working at 1B.
There’s literally zero chance that Josh Bell starts in the OF. Even if Cutch got traded, they would simply call Meadows up.
They don’t want Chris Carter or Adam Lind.
It’s amazing how fast people get defensive over perceived slights. I’ll admit that Dave has a tendency to strike me as overly snarky at times but nothing in that article suggested anything negative about the teams. It was just like “Hey, this is different. Look at it.”
Obviously Moreland isn’t great, but his batted ball profile and adjusted wRC+ from last season was 112, putting him right in line with guys like Napoli, Alvarez, Abreu, and Hosmer. Obviously he’s a good defender too. Maybe they just feel Moreland is just as good/better than guys like Carter and Napoli based on these batted ball results?
Additonally, they do have Sam Travks who projects as something like a league average hitter so there’s a bit of depth there too.
Obviously not saying they couldn’t use an upgrade (they obviously could) but i don’t know if guys like moss and Napoli would be a clear cut upgraded. At least according to adjusted OPS+ according to the batted ball profiles
Moreland can play OF and brings a plus glove at 1B too.
??? Moreland had an 87 wRC+ last season, and a 95 career. He’s barely above replacement level.
Did you read the first line of his comment?
A strategy I’ve used for years playing Strat has been to punt both first and catcher if I didn’t have an incumbent… firstbase because there are so many of them, somebody’s going to fall… catchers because there are so few of them, you don’t want to get caught overpaying.
Not to mention, the projected best offense in the AL (Housotn) is 20th in projected WAR, with a mere 100 wRC+.
I just don’t buy the premise that “perfectly useful” players are getting shafted in the 1B FA market. Napoli, Carter, Alvarez all just put up ~1 WAR seasons and would stand to make several millions of dollars just on a one year deal.
If teams have decided that a 30+ year-old who produces all of his value at the plate is a riskier proposition and a less useful bench piece/platoon guy than a player that also arrives at 1 WAR production from a combination of bat/glove/legs I can see that: diversification of the risk portfolio. Mr Bat/glove/legs seems less likely to have all 3 aspects tank at once vs mr Big Bat who loses all value if he suddenly takes an offensive nosedive.
Just a simple Marcel WAR projection for these guys would peg them all below 1 WAR for 2017: do you really want to spend millions on this sort of player when you can give your sluggingest AAAA player a shot for the league minimum? Do you really want a player like this under a guaranteed MLB contract when someone who could play around the diamond and also pinch run and also has options could just as easily supplement your roster?
How long will it be until a team goes all in on this strategy and signs Darin Erstad out of retirement?
While I see your larger point about punting 1B, I think that there just are not any really good options out there. All the free agent firstbasemen left are older .5-1.5 win players. That’s not impact talent unless you are running out a replacement level or below player. And even then, many teams would prefer to try out a prospect for league minimum who may have upside than sign an older player for millions who just has downside. And if that prospect tanks, you send them to minors and sign one of these guys who may still be out there at midseason for a bargain. It’s not as if they are passing over above average players just because they play first base.
I feel like you know this, but elected to eschew detail for the general thrust of the narrative: Dipoto obtained Danny Valencia to platoon with Vogelbach, and while Valencia/Vogelbach doesn’t inspire fear, platooning each gives them more opportunity to succeed and may yet be affordable, competent, and cost controlled allocation of resources at first.
How many MLB platoons are there where the guys in the platoon share initials?
Who’s on first?
D.V.
Chris Carter / Chris Colabello 1B/DH platoon with EE : make it happen tribe!
To this point, I’d rather have Valencia over Napoli or Carter. Perhaps the M’s could’ve gone after Alvarez to platoon with Valenica, but even if Vogelbach fails, Valencia at first full-time isn’t terrible as a fall back plan. He hasn’t hit righties well over the course of his career, but did okay last year.
I’m glad you added in the last bit about Abreu — given the White Sox rebuilding mode, I think they should be fielding offers on him as well – he’s 29 and has seen his OPS+ drop each of the last two years – there’s good reason to expect him NOT to be that hot by the time his team is viable again. “Sell high”.
I do not personally think Abreu is going to continue to get worse
Right – if it were obvious he was going to keep getting worse, his trade value wouldn’t be there; there’s enough reason to think he may bounce back closer to his rookie numbers that someone would give value for him.
The odds of him being at/near his rookie-level when the ChiSox are decent again, seems low to me – so I’d consider cashing his value in now while it’s still reasonably high.
Astros didn’t punt first base, their last two “top prospects” didn’t work out. Jon Singleton and AJ Reed. Just the way it goes. Reed may get another shot. Otherwise it’s Gurriel, and that’s not bad. But not good either. Falls in the 1.0 – 1.6 WAR projections along with the unsigned guys. But he does have position flexibility.
As an Athletics fan, to not see us in the bottom 5 when we have Yonder Alonso, is somewhat funny. What is even more sad is Alonso had a bad defensive year