Q&A with Sloan Sports Analytics Blog

You probably know that MIT’s Sloan School of Management puts on a sports analytics conference in Boston every spring, but you may not know that they also maintain a blog, which does Q&As with interesting people from the sports world, and when they can’t find anyone who matches that description, me.

All-around good guy Zachary Levine and I spent some time talking yesterday, and the transcript of that discussion is now up on the SSAC blog. Here’s the first question and answer, to whet your appetite.

Q: You wrote about the Nationals’ bad bullpen decisions and it’s definitely been a theme that we’ve seen in the playoffs over and over again. Twitter has played a big part in this, but it seems like we’re questioning what the managers are doing every night. To put it (over)-simply is there a chance that we’re right? Is there a chance that the combination of probably somewhat better analytical skills and wisdom of crowds outweigh what is to be gained by being on the inside?

A: I certainly don’t want to say that the fans know more than the managers do. They have information that we don’t have that is useful in what decision to make. Certainly they know the quality of the guy’s arm if before the game he was saying his elbow was injured. If there’s some factor that the public isn’t aware of, that could be a major determining factor in whether a guy should be used or not.

At the same time, there is clearly a bias that comes with being with these guys and seeing how you used them in the regular season that carries over to the postseason. That could be detrimental. If we look at the determination of many major league managers in managing in October the same way they did in the regular season, it seems that there is a disconnect between what we as outsiders or the front office would see as being important in certain situations and what they see. I wondered if being that close to the players and seeing the success of rigid roles, which in the regular season, there’s probably a good reason for them in terms of limiting usage, but in the postseason when there’s no such thing as a low-leverage situation anymore, I wonder if the familiarity and the success that the managers had with their rigid roles during the regular season actually becomes a problem.

You can read the whole thing over at their blog.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

6 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor In Chief
11 years ago

“which doesn’t Q&As ” in your opening should probably be “which does QA’s”