Raburn’s Big Score

Ryan Raburn, who will turn 30 early next season, finally made a “big score” this week. Raburn, who has been in the Detroit Tigers’ organization since 2001, was finally eligible for arbitration this season. Instead of going to arbitration, Raburn signed a two-year deal with the Tigers for 3.4 million dollars. Assuming that five million dollars is the cost of a marginal win on the open market and a conservative five-percent increase in that cost per season, along with Raburn being in his first year of arbitration (we assume teams typically pay 40, 60, and 80 percent of his time for those three seasons, so this is a one-year (.4+.6) deal for $3.4 when compared to the open market), the Tigers are paying as if he’s worth slightly more than half a Win Above Replacement (WAR). It is pretty obvious than Raburn is better than that, but how much better?

Raburn’s career line might make the point in itself: he’s had 1079 plate appearances in the majors (less than two typical seasons’ worth), and has been worth a total of 3 WAR. However, we need to be especially careful to observe the distinction between observed performance and (projected) true talent, especially in a case where the player has been bouncing between positions, been up and down between the minors and majors, and is likely beginning the downside of his aging curve. The 2011 CAIRO projection for Raburn (I changed the wOBA calculation to these custom weights for consistency within this post, although the difference isn’t a big deal) is for a.346 wOBA (.272/.338/.468), or 15 runs above average per 700 plate appearances. In the interest multiple sources, my less sophisticated projection system spits outs a .340 wOBA (.267/.333/.456, 11 runs above average per 700 plate appearances) for Raburn’s 2011. The 18 fans who have entered their projections for Raburn are somewhere in the middle: .281/.338/.452 for a .343 wOBA. Overall, Raburn looks like an above-average hitter.

Some will point out that the right-handed hitting Raburn has seen a disproportionate number of left-handed pitchers in the majors. This is true, but Raburn has not been helpless against right-handed pitching, as he has a career .327 wOBA (100 wRC+ — exactly league average) against same-siders. Platoon splits have to be regressed, and my rough calculation given his major league numbers and based on the my relatively pessimistic .340 wOBA projection given above is that Raburn is a .354 wOBA hitter against southpaws and a .329 against righties. A .329 isn’t great, but given the .320 league average of 2010, it is above average.

There are some questions on defense. Part of that is because the Tigers have sometimes had Raburn play positions that he obviously can’t such as second and third base. Given the Tigers’ current roster, it looks like he should primarily be playing left field, where the stats as well as the Fans Scouting have him either slightly above or below average. Overall, then, given the positional adjustment and his projected offense, Raburn looks to be roughly a 2 WAR player over a full season — about average. Even if he only plays part time in 2011 (as he did in 2009 and 2010), the Tigers are getting a very good deal. Hopefully, they’ll resist making him compete with Brennan Boesch, who was, for a couple months las season, the toast of certain Tigers fans who ignore minor league track records and BABIP luck. I wonder where they went after Boesch wOBAed .265, .234, and .231 in July, August, and September respectively? Raburn is probably good enough to start as a stopgap for a Tigers team with designs on contention, and is at least a good and inexpensive fourth outfielder for them.

Obviously, Ryan Raburn is going to make very good money compared to most of the rest of us. One might wonder if the current system, which lets the team keep players like Raburn in the minors for years until they need him such that he is just now able to negotiate a salary (at a distinct disadvantage) after having spent nine years with organization (and isalready past his athletic prime) is really fair. I imagine most fans, who just want their team to win, (somewhat understandably) are not too concerned about that issue, particularly in these rough economic times. However, the Tigers are the party that really scored here.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.




Matt Klaassen reads and writes obituaries in the Greater Toronto Area. If you can't get enough of him, follow him on Twitter.

19 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Dash
15 years ago

I like the analysis, but it made me wonder something about arbitration estimations. Is there a place I can read about the typical value awarded or negotiated in arbitration? You state 40/60/80 above, but where can I read about this and the methodology behind finding this?

Mike H
15 years ago
Reply to  Matt Klaassen

I know Bradbury cites it in Hot Stove Economics, and although I can’t remember where he gives credit, he does tend to recalculate a lot of already accepted stuff himself. Anyway, might be a clue in there somewhere.

Clark
15 years ago

Please tell me you meant your projection had Raburn with a .344 OBP, not .444

Frank
15 years ago
Reply to  Matt Klaassen

The problem, which you probably know, is you’re reading what’s in your head, not what you’ve typed out… Let someone else proof read your work.

Clark
15 years ago
Reply to  Matt Klaassen

Understand. I have the same problem with work emails. Was pretty sure it was typo, otherwise your projection system would require serious recalibrating.

phoenix2042Member since 2016
15 years ago

your projection system ended up with a wOBA, BA, and SLG that made sense so I guess it doesn’t really matter, but how did you end up with a .444 OBP? The wOBA was fine, so I guess your system “worked” overall, but the OBP component is all kinds of crazy. He is not going to walk like 200 times!

benzilla
15 years ago

“Raburn is probably good enough to start as a stopgap for a Tigers team with designs on contention, and is at least a good and inexpensive fourth outfielder for them.”

I feel like no matter what the Tigers do, no credit is ever given to them on this site by the editors. Fans predict 281/.338/.452. I’m sure a lot of teams would like to have a LF like this that is probaly good enough to start as a stop gap.

chuckb
15 years ago
Reply to  benzilla

Isn’t that what the author said?

I swear, some people on this site spend more time trying to find instances of bias against their preferred teams than in actually reading the articles.

jhull
15 years ago

Do you mean “left-handed pitchers” here: “Some will point out that the right-handed hitting Raburn has seen a disproportionate number of left-handed hitters in the majors.” ?

jhull
15 years ago
Reply to  Matt Klaassen

huh?

jhull
15 years ago

Gotcha. I re-read the article twice before re-reading the comments.

mscharer
15 years ago

I agree with your general thought regarding the unfair nature of players being shuttled back and forth to the minors and arbitration status. Raburn may not be the best example for you to use to support it though. Part of the reason he is so late to arb is that he got into a severe rec vehicle accident back in 2002, messed up his hip, lost some athleticism, missed an entire yr of development at age 21/22 and had to change positions partly b/c of it.

In my opinion that is the biggest reason he is just now making real big league money, not necessarily b/c of his back and forth minor league voyages.