Red Sox Call Upon Devers, Fill Glaring Need Internally

Happy Trade Deadline Week, folks.

T minus 175 hours, roughly, until the non-waiver deadline horn sounds.

This period, of course, represents the last, best chance for contending clubs to add pieces and fill gaps — and for sellers to spin off remaining assets. Dave Cameron updated his buyer-seller status list last week and things remain fluid. Just since that update, the Brewers’ playoff odds have declined by roughly 20 percentage points to 10%, so there’s still quite a bit of uncertainty in places like the NL Central, which will add an element of drama to the period. Teams must first decide how much they are willing to bet on themselves.

One of the clubs almost certain to bet on themselves before the deadline was the Boston Red Sox. Their third-base situation has represented one of the great positional voids of the 2017 campaign. The club released Pablo Sandoval last week, ending his pitiful tenure with the club. That move comes after having dealt 2017 breakout star Travis Shaw to the Brewers in the offseason in an unfortunate deal for Tyler Thornburg, who’s out for the year for a shoulder injury. The Red Sox have by far the weakest-third base situation among contenders.

Consider, by way of example, position-player units that rank 25th or worse in the majors among clubs with a reasonable chance of October baseball (numbers current entering Sunday):

Team – MLB Rank – WAR
Catcher
Rockies – 30th – (-0.5)
Diamondbacks – 29th – (-0.3)
Nationals – 27th – (-0.3)
Red Sox – 26th – (0.0)

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

First Base
Yankees – 29th – (-1.2)

Second Base
Rays – 27 – (-0.2)

Shortstop
Rockies – 25th – (-0.1)

Third Base
Red Sox – 29th – (-0.7)

Left Field
Nationals – 28th – (0.1)

Center Field
Dodgers – 26th – (0.8)
Twins – 25th – (1.0)

Right Field
Rockies – 30th – (-1.7)

Boston’s third-base mark of -0.7 WAR has been exceeded only by a couple other positions among contenders. Addressing that negative production at third would allow the club to avoid the awful — a necessity, more or less, for clubs with designs on the postseason.

On Sunday, they did address it. Instead of entering the trade market, however — where the Red Sox have been connected to multiple players — Boston changed course on Sunday evening and will now reportedly call upon their top prospect, Rafael Devers.

Devers has recorded fewer than 40 plate appearances above Double-A. The bat is ahead of the glove. Steamer projects a .270/.311/.437 slash line but even that league-average-ish line would mark a considerable upgrade.

With Sandoval out of the picture, Brock Holt has received seven of the last eight starts the position. He has missed most of the season with a head injury and vertigo and is slashing a paltry .175/.277/.175. He does not look like a player to be counted upon. Tzu-Wei Lin also received time recently at third. He acquitted himself well, actually, producing half a win in roughly 60 plate appearances. But his success this year (at the majors and minors) is preceded by years of mere adequacy. It would be unusual for a club like Boston, with so much at stake, to rely on a fringe prospect.

Just days ago, Red Sox president Dave Dombrowksi was preaching patience in regard to Devers after the latter’s promotion to Triple-A. Per Meredith Perri of MassLive:

“Our guys just feel with his age, where he is and what he’s come through that it would be beneficial for him to go to Triple-A from a maturity perspective,” Dombrowski said. “Really, this year he’s been tremendous, but we thought it might be beneficial for him to see Triple-A and be part of that and see how he adjusts to that.

“I think that’s really important for him because when he makes contact the ball jumps of his bat, and he’s used the whole field which is very, very good. I think he’ll continue to do that. But (it’s) just kind of the comfort zone of going up to the next step and seeing how he handles it and how he feels. And does he continue to perform the same way or does he let that get to him a little bit more, which can happen in the development stage.”

So much for that.

Perhaps Devers, who slashed .355/.412/.581 in his first eight games in Triple-A, simply accelerated his own timetable.

One could arrive at that conclusion given Eric Longenhagen’s assessment of Devers from a prospect update in May:

I thought Devers’ noisy, pull-side ground-ball bat path might require adjustments at Double-A, but he might just be a freak who does things however the hell he wants because he’s so incredibly gifted. Devers doesn’t turn 21 until October and he’s hitting .324/.351/.606 in Double-A, keeping his body in check, and accidentally hitting bombs the opposite way.

Or from Marc Hulet’s own report earlier this month:

He’s not easily overwhelmed and seems to handle pressure well; his triple-A debut saw him go 4-for-4 with a homer. He has 19 home runs on the season but makes a solid amount of contact with just 55 strikeouts in 78 games (17.2% K-rate). Devers has the raw power to be a 30-homer guy in his prime. He’ll have to keep an eye on his conditioning to remain at the hot corner but he has a strong arm and should stick at the position for a while. He could eventually challenge Mookie Betts for the most talented home-grown player on the Red Sox.

Or from simply watching Devers himself:

So this likely isn’t a rash decision. If anything, it’s perhaps late in arriving. Dave made the case for Devers way back in May, and Devers has only improved.

It is, perhaps, an indictment of the trade market for third baseman — a market that dried up a bit when the Yankees preemptively struck a deal to strengthen their bullpen and add Todd Frazier last week, perhaps in part to keep Frazier away from the Red Sox.

The Red Sox didn’t need a long-term option at third base like Yangervis Solarte, who should soon return from an oblique injury. Stars like Manny Machado and Josh Donaldson, under club control through next season, figured to be too expensive in terms of prospect treasure, and an intra-division trade might have complicated matters. They also might not be available.

Former Red Sox Jed Lowrie is likely available — and has been better than Frazier to date. Perhaps Lowrie would still be of interest to fill a utility role. Asdrubal Cabrera, Zack Cozart, Howie Kendrick, Eduardo Nunez: all four were options, as well.

In short, it was not a market with exciting, realistic natural fits for the Red Sox. So in the final week before the trade deadline, the Red Sox opted for an internal option over possible external upgrades. And it’s quite possible that Devers offers more upside than any outside help. And it’s quite possible the Red Sox might have patched one of the greatest remaining holes among contenders.

But don’t worry fans of trade activity, contenders have plenty of other voids to fill.





A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

It is also possible that the Red Sox thinks the price on all the third base options is too high, and is promoting Devers now to show other teams they will walk away if the price on someone like Nunez or Lowrie doesn’t come down. I don’t know how likely this is, but it’s at least worth considering.

SoxScout
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

The price is extremely low on bats and those 3B according to reports across the respected national media and the JD Martinez trade. Dombrowski is lying about that.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  SoxScout

Well, the price is low on outfield bats. But maybe the other teams think Boston is so desperate they’re aiming high, and Dombrowski is trying to let them know he’s not that desperate. Again, I really don’t know how likely this is, but it’s just so…unlike Dombrowski to not trade for someone at the deadline with a gaping hole like this.

bananas
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

DD already spent all his allowance at the candy store, and now it’s making his stomach sick. Sure he also swiped a golden ticket that’s putting up Pedro-in-his-prime numbers, but he’s still gonna barf a bit on his way to the chocolate factory.

0bsessions
9 years ago
Reply to  bananas

To be fair to Dombrowski, the three pieces he’s traded from the farm to get have been first, third, and fifth on the team in WAR on the season.

Moncada’s about the only one of those players I’d expect will ever perform as well as Sale and Kimbrel in the long term, and Pomeranz has been a pleasant surprise this year.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  0bsessions

Pomeranz has been a nice surprise, and it’s nice to see Kimbrel return to being himself. And I actually sort of-kind of agree with Dombrowski’s MO that prospects are overrated if you have an owner who is willing to spend gobs of money. It’s just that I wouldn’t be surprised if there was another move coming.

0bsessions
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I’d honestly be pretty shocked. The Sox have some decent names to move, as far as prospects go, but no real depth. Moving for any 3B that’s apt to give you anything more than Devers will give you realistically costs someone like Groome simply because they have such a big gap from him to their next level of prospects and it’d be the only way to top a team that maybe has more depth, but less at the very top.

The only alternative to moving the likes of Groome would be something targeting quantity over quality (Something like Chavis, who has been good this year but is high risk, Dalbec, high ceiling but so new and not as good this year, and Shawaryn, a P with good upside but so far away), which is just as bad because then you have nothing left.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  0bsessions

I was actually thinking of Chavis or Shawaryn or a comparable prospect as a likely piece to go. I guess I’d be surprised if the Giants got a better offer than that for Nunez. I think that Lowrie probably should net a better return, but not sure if he will. Maybe the Giants and A’s figure that there will be a market because they’re both utility guys.

0bsessions
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That’s the thing, though. I’d consider Shawaryn a non-starter for Nunez, I feel like he’d be better suited as a long-term relief project (Those K numbers) or as a filler piece in a bigger trade down the line. Same for Lowrie, who I don’t trust to stay healthy.

The Sox, realistically, will have to overpay for any mediocre piece because of their lack of depth and overpaying for a mediocre piece is something that you shouldn’t be doing unless you think you’re WS favorites (And I can see the Sox being contenders for the WS if their bats regress to norm, but they still have an uphill climb against either the Astros or Dodgers).

2017 is starting to resemble 2010 in that the team has the pieces to conceivably make the playoffs, but throwing prospects away to supplement those pieces when they’re not playing to their potential is a waste.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  0bsessions

Yeah, part of the reason the Yanks sniped them on Frazier is that the Sox don’t really have any depth to deal from in the Rutherford tier.

Doorknob11
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

I agree, most prospects are very overrated. There are very few that are not and even they don’t always pan out. You also have the flip side, not all stars were top prospects, so you can still have a really good player that most people don’t want in a trade. Moncada might be useful in the future but he’s far from a Bryce Harper quality prospect that you know is going to be an above average player.

Johnston
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

What about the gaping Red Sox hole at catcher?

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

There is no gaping hole at catcher. I watch every game and the Red Sox catchers pass the eye test. The Sox are content with the defense that Leon and Vasquez give them, especially in controlling the running game. While not quite league average hitters, they both add a little with the bat.

PlatypiMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  bosoxforlife

We must be watching different teams, “not quite league average” is a pretty generous statement about the way these two hit.

Its not like theyre defensive wizards either.

jdbolickMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

That’s my take as well. Bringing up Devers now gives Boston a bit more leverage in trade negotiations, and I imagine they still want to add a veteran alternative.

Paul22
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

They have a depleted farm system and the owner wont allow them to take on too much salary for fear of going over the LT Threshold. Not much they could do. Also, they arent getting great production out of Moreland (toe) and XB (hand) so might want to divert chips elsewhere

Les Vegetables
9 years ago

I really really hope Devers is the real deal. The Red Sox 3B has been absolutely awful for a long time now, and while a lot of that is due to Pablo, it dates back even further than him. Going back to the beginning of the 2012 season, the Red Sox are dead last in 3B WAR at 1.3, with a 79 wRC+ and -54 Defensive Runs Saved. This was a big reason the Red Sox signed Pablo to begin with, 3B has been a big issue for them for a long time and most of the options at the time really weren’t great.

Hindsight is 20/20 and counterfactuals are a waste of time and all that, but I do wonder what the last 5+ years would look like if the Red Sox had signed Adrian Beltre after the 2010 season and never traded for Adrian Gonzalez. Those two moves done in tandem right after the 2010 season continue to affect the Red Sox to this day.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

Since Adrian Gonzalez gave them a monster season and then allowed them to dump Carl Crawford’s contract, I think the Red Sox are happy that turned out the way it did.

Les Vegetables
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

You’re correct, but, and this is why counterfactuals are pretty pointless, if they sign Adrian Beltre, do they sign Pablo at all? Probably not, so they are saved from that contract altogether. I’d love to see how it would have played out.

0bsessions
9 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

Of course they don’t sign Sandoval if they re-sign Beltre, but this ignores the fact that as bad as the Sandoval contract is, the Crawford contract was worse. Crawford was worth a grand total of 5.3 WAR over the life of his seven year deal and it’s still not even actually over yet (This is the last season).

Sandoval has, objectively, been an even worse player (-2.6 WAR over parts of three seasons), but he also got two less years and almost $50MM less.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  0bsessions

I had never looked at Crawford’s WAR during his time with the Red Sox but it seems virtually impossible that he had a positive WAR during his tenure. There isn’t a way to measure a clubhouse cancer but he added a terrible attitude to his awful play.

0bsessions
9 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

Realistically, they’d be in a worse position. Adrian Gonzalez was the only way they managed to offload Crawford’s abysmal contract and they used one of the comp picks from Beltre to grab Bradley (One might argue that they take him four spots up instead of Owens, but who knows?).

If the Sox haven’t got Gonzalez to include when moving Crawford, they realistically don’t have the funds needed to make the bridge moves that won them the 2013 World Series and while their 3B numbers are improved this year, they’ve shifted their black hole from 3B to the RF by subtracting Bradley (Likely Betts stays in CF with Benintendi in LF).

The much better question, to me, is what would have happened had the Sox signed Beltre and made it their only big move of the offseason. Suddenly, you’ve lost Bradley, but Beltre and Rizzo are at the corners. Plus, Youk was at his peak in 2010 and might’ve been movable for an OF prospect.

Yirmiyahu
9 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

Just how bad have they been for the last 5+ years? Since 2012, Red Sox 3Bmen have collective accumulated -2.6 WAR. That’s not only the worst in baseball, it’s 5.7 WAR worse than the next-worst team.

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=6&season=2017&month=39&season1=2012&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0

SoxWatcher
9 years ago

The 3B issues have been glaring enough, but I was surprised to see the Sox C’s rated so low in WAR. Both have well-better-than-league-avs numbers at throwing out base-stealers – they’ll never make anyone forget Pudge at bat, but 26th best was a surprise.

0bsessions
9 years ago
Reply to  SoxWatcher

It’s not surprising when you consider context, though it then becomes surprising why the author even bothered to include it.

The swing from where the Sox are to middle of the pack is a whopping 1.2 WAR. More importantly, though, FG is on record with noting that WAR is not remotely reliable for judging catchers (It places a heavy, heavy emphasis on offense because of the volatility of C defensive metrics). Ranking catchers is just tough in general because of the wide amount of debate in terms of weighting skillsets.

Take the comparison of the Sox Vs. the Astros. The Astros are near the top of the heap in WAR, but that’s almost entirely by virtue of being one of the top offenses at the position in the MLB, as they’re one of the worst defensively by FG’s metrics.

The Red Sox, on the other hand, are just above middle ground at defense (Arguably 10-15 range), but they’re one of the worst teams offensively at the position. That’s what drags them down, the offense.

Their catching corps isn’t great, but it’s nothing close to the liability that 3B has been because the position, by and large, sucks AND is super hard to judge.

sportsfreak2744
9 years ago

I still think trading for Lowrie makes so much sense. Should be had for cheap at his age, former Red Sox, no holes in his game, can play a few positions in a pinch.

0bsessions
9 years ago

Lowrie has one, significant, hole in his overall game: health.

He’s managed exactly one full season in his career and this season, his tenth in the majors, already ranks as third in appearances.

He also hasn’t played 3B since 2015 and that season accounts for literally the entire breadth of his time there since 2011.

He’d be best suited for the Sox as a utility man, but he’d be awfully expensive for a utility guy (And the Sox are very tight on budget) and it’s tough to justify anything of value in a trade for a guy who’s best served in a bench role, especially considering there would be teams he’d fit better as a starter.

sportsfreak2744
9 years ago
Reply to  0bsessions

Expensive? How?? He’s been much better after he had surgery to fix his deviated septum and he’d be more than adequate at 3rd as a starter.

0bsessions
9 years ago

Expensive because he’s apt to be a utility guy considering his injury history. He’s got a bit more than $2MM left on his contract for the year, which is a lot for a bench player.

Mike NMN
9 years ago

Wondering whether service time considerations come in here. I know Red Sox are wealthy, but do they want to start the clock, or is this just a week long audition while they see what’s availiable?

JoserMember since 2021
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

Maybe both? If he comes up and rakes, they enjoy it in a year where they seem postseason-bound and shrug about that future lost year. At the same time, they make a statement to other potential trade partners that they’re not desperate for a 3B upgrade, which makes their bargaining position stronger. And meanwhile, they satisfy the fans who’ve been clamoring to Let The Kid Play. In a week, they see where things sit. Maybe they find a deal and it was just a cup of coffee; maybe they don’t and the kid keeps hitting and they don’t care. Or maybe he struggles and they make a deal in August for somebody who passes through waivers. Other than him getting injured or somehow traumatized by major league pitching (and injuries happen in the minors too) there’s really no downside to this move.

jdbolickMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Mike NMN

It’s probably a week long audition to see how he does. If he plays well enough that he remains in the lineup and begins next season as the starting third baseman, then the service clock isn’t affected anyway. If he struggles and gets sent down, it means he has to stay in the minors a bit longer at the start of next season than he would have otherwise in order to preserve that extra year of team control.