Rodgers Out, Moustakas In as Rockies Are Forced to Rearrange the Infield

Isaiah J. Downing-USA TODAY Sports

I first learned about joint dislocation in 2003 after Derek Jeter slid into a nasty collision at third base. When I heard that Jeter had suffered a dislocated shoulder, my five-year-old brain naturally conjured up an image of a disembodied arm lying on the infield dirt. You can imagine my surprise when the Yankees shortstop returned six weeks later, both arms firmly secured in their sockets.

As horrifying as dislocation sounds, and as painful as I’m sure it is, a dislocated shoulder isn’t always a serious injury. Fernando Tatis Jr. dislocated his shoulder several times during the 2021 season and still managed to play 130 games and put up 7.3 WAR en route to a third-place finish for NL MVP. Brandon Inge once dislocated his shoulder mid-game and popped it back in place on the field; the very next inning, he smacked a go-ahead RBI single.

Thus, when Brendan Rodgers landed awkwardly on his shoulder last Tuesday, there was no cause for panic straight away. Manager Bud Black described the incident as “a pretty classic thing,” while Matthew Ritchie of MLB.com wrote that Rodgers might be “a tad delayed.” Unfortunately, the injury appears to be far more significant than your run-of-the-mill dislocation, with reports suggesting Rodgers might need surgery to repair the damage. If he goes under the knife, the Rockies second baseman could miss most, if not all, of the upcoming season.

If you aren’t familiar with Rodgers, your opinion of him might be highly dependent on your go-to source for baseball statistics. Our version of WAR would have you believe he was a perfectly serviceable, if unspectacular, player last season. Rodgers put up 1.7 WAR in 137 games, on pace for 2.0 WAR in 162. That’s a league-average contributor. Baseball Reference, however, will tell you that Rodgers was worth 4.3 WAR, putting him on pace for more than five wins in 162 games. Those are All-Star numbers. Finally, Baseball Prospectus had Rodgers somewhere in the middle. He posted 3.1 WARP last season, almost the exact midpoint between his fWAR and bWAR.

On top of that, each website arrives at his WAR in a different way. At FanGraphs, as you might guess, we weren’t particularly high on Rodgers for his bat or his glove; his offense was a little worse than average, while his defense was a little better, but neither was a standout skill. Baseball Reference, meanwhile, was enamored with his glove, rating Rodgers as one of the best fielders in baseball last season, hence the All-Star-caliber WAR. Baseball Prospectus wasn’t quite as high on his defense but had a much higher opinion of his offense, rating Rodgers as an above-average hitter.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

All of this suggests to me that we’re still learning who Rodgers is as a player. Now, we’ll have to wait another year to find out.

Rodgers played his first full season in 2022, batting .266/.325/.408 with 13 home runs in 581 PA. While his home stats surely got a boost from the friendly confines of Coors Field, his away splits were surprisingly awful, dragged down by a .245 BABIP and a minuscule HR/FB ratio. Thus, Rodgers is probably a better hitter than his 92 wRC+ from last season suggests, but he has yet to grow into the offensive force he looked like as a prospect.

On our 2020 Top 100 Prospects list, Eric Longenhagen praised Rodgers for his bat, assigning a 60 Future Value to both his hit tool and his game power. Our prospect guru accompanied those grades with a positive evaluation: “One axiom to which we try to adhere is ‘good hitters hit all the time’ and that is indeed what Rodgers has done for the last eight years.” Since reaching the majors, however, Rodgers has stalled out, and his bat has yet to become an asset.

Thankfully for Rodgers, the young infielder has taken some big strides on the other side of the ball. Defense was never his calling card as a prospect, and in fact, there were once questions about his ability to stick at second base. In 2021, Rodgers graded out as a poor defender according to DRS, UZR, and OAA. Last season, however, he turned things around, improving his numbers in just about every defensive category and winning a Gold Glove to boot:

Rodgers Took a Big Step Forward
Season DRS UZR OAA DRP
2021 -5 -0.5 -2 1.1
2022 22 8.0 3 5.7
DRP via Baseball Prospectus

The Rockies, like the rest of us, will have to wait another year to see if their former top prospect can live up to his potential with the bat and maintain his success with the glove. It’s a disappointing loss for Colorado, further reducing the team’s chances to “play .500 ball,” as owner Dick Monfort predicted in January.

With Rodgers’s season in question, the Rockies turned to the free agent market for a backup plan. They agreed to a minor league deal with veteran infielder Mike Moustakas, who was released by the Reds in January. Jon Heyman initially reported that Moustakas would play second base, but Moustakas himself confirmed to Thomas Harding of MLB.com that he is only comfortable playing first, third, and DH. This lines up with GM Bill Schmidt’s plan to move Ryan McMahon over to second base, freeing up a spot for Moose at third.

McMahon was primarily a third baseman in the minors but played second in his first two full seasons to accommodate Nolan Arenado at the hot corner. After Arenado was traded, McMahon slid back to third while Rodgers took over at second. McMahon has had great success since returning to his natural position, compiling 23 DRS and 20 OAA since the start of the 2021 campaign. He may not be as valuable a defender at second base, but his unexceptional arm should play better at the keystone. His unexceptional bat will also play better at second base, where the offensive bar isn’t quite as high. The average second baseman had a wRC+ of 96 last season, while the average third baseman had a wRC+ of 102; McMahon posted a 95 wRC+ in 597 PA.

Moustakas is no McMahon or Rodgers with the glove, and he’s well past the point in his career when he was a Gold Glove finalist. He has played just 71 games at third the last three years, putting up -6 DRS and -4 OAA. Indeed, the 34-year-old took most of his at-bats as a designated hitter last season. Nevertheless, he should still be capable of holding a glove at third, and his offense is a more significant concern than his defense anyhow. Since the start of the 2021 season, Moustakas has posted a 73 wRC+ in 491 PA. He struck out at the highest rate of his career in 2021, then struck out even more the following year. His isolated power last season was .131; it hasn’t been lower since his rookie campaign.

Moustakas has dealt with arm, hip, leg, and foot injuries over the past two seasons, and he now claims to be back at full strength. When he was last healthy, he was still a valuable offensive contributor (105 wRC+ in 2020), so there’s hope for a bounce back, but I wouldn’t hold my breath. It’s generally not a good sign when hitters in their 30s start to show worse plate discipline and make significantly less hard contact than they did before. Don’t forget, there’s a reason the Reds are paying Moustakas eight figures to not play for them this season.

Therefore, while the Moustakas signing came in the wake of the news about Rodgers, I’m skeptical that Colorado views him as a direct replacement. It’s more likely the Rockies will consider him for playing time alongside Nolan Jones and Elehuris Montero. Moustakas isn’t a solution; he’s merely added depth.

While Jones shares a given name with the greatest third baseman in Rockies history, Montero came to Colorado two years ago in exchange for the very same man. Jones is a former third base prospect who converted to the outfield in 2022 with the Guardians. Montero played first and third for the Rockies last year. Both are promising bat-first players who exceeded rookie limits during the 2022 season. Each has the potential to become a big league regular, and one would think a rebuilding team like the Rockies would prefer to give the youngsters plate appearances over an aging veteran.

Further complicating Moustakas’s path to playing time are C.J. Cron and Charlie Blackmon. Cron is going to be the everyday first baseman, and he projects to be one of the better hitters in Colorado’s lineup. Blackmon, a veteran lefty like Moustakas, figures to get the majority of the plate appearances at DH against right-handed pitching. Even a bench role won’t be easy to come by, as the Rockies need one bench spot for a backup catcher and another for a utility infielder. If Jones and Montero split time at third, the final bench spot probably has to go to someone who can play center field. For all those reasons, Moustakas isn’t just going to walk onto the Rockies roster. There’s room for him if he earns a spot, but it’s going to take a strong showing this spring.

The injury to Rodgers threw a wrench in Colorado’s game plan, and signing Moustakas was hardly the solution. All the same, the Rockies will hope that adding this aging slugger makes the loss of their young Gold Glover a little more bearable… or should I say Moose-able? No, no I shouldn’t.





Leo has written for FanGraphs, MLB Trade Rumors, Baseball Prospectus, and Lindy’s Sports. You can follow him on Bluesky @leomorgenstern.bsky.social.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Crtl-F:
“Kris Bryant”
0/0

Let’s recap the options, shall we?
Nolan Jones: Had already stopped getting reps at third base because he couldn’t play it, and had intriguing defensive metrics in Cleveland in a small sample.
Mike Moustakas: Washed up.
Elehuris Montero: Deserves a shot, but unproven.Kris Bryant: -5 OAA and -3.4 ARM in 950 innings over the last two years in the outfield, while suffering from repeated foot and back issues in 2022 that completely torpedoed his offensive potential.

Now, the metrics don’t really like Kris Bryant’s defense at third base anymore either but they are so committed to him on the grass. I’m sure the reason is because they don’t trust any of Blackmon, Bouchard, or Toglia in the corner outfield, which is fair. But it defies all reason to keep Bryant lower on the defensive spectrum when he can’t even play that position in CO’s spacious outfield. To the best of my knowledge, there’s never been any rationale for why he’s out there, other than that the Rockies wanted to make a splash and they had a hole out there.

jsintonMember since 2025
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Maybe they forgot Bryant was on the Rockies? I know I did…

JimMember since 2016
3 years ago

You are only 24 years old? Tell your parents congrats that you are working for FanGraphs at this age.

CC AFCMember since 2016
3 years ago

I mean, yes, the logical thing would be to consider him added depth with jones and Montero rather than a direct replacement. Because that is the logical thing, I can only assume they are, in fact, planning to start him 150 games because Rockies.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

It reminds me a little bit of the Reds’ decision to play natural third basemen at virtually every position a couple years ago. The original plan was Moustakas at 3B, India at 2B, Suarez at SS, and Senzel in CF. (Castellanos came up as a third baseman too, but by that point it was pretty clear that he was not a “natural” third baseman).

For the Rockies, it depends what you think of Jones and Montero (I don’t think Jones is a third baseman, but I think Montero might be). But if you classify them both as “natural” first basemen they could roll with a lineup of McMahon (2B), Bryant (LF), Jones (RF), and Montero (1B or 3B) and Moustakas (either 1B or 3B). Now, if they really wanted to go all out, they could see if they could grab Ezequiel Duran and convert him to center field, since he runs pretty well; and if Tovar falls on his face, they could go after Matt Chapman and stick him at shortstop (which…might work?).

Last edited 3 years ago by sadtrombone
CC AFCMember since 2016
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Don’t forget Cron and Blackmon. Gotta put them somewhere. Or, rather, you don’t gotta, but the Rockies will so you might as well account for it.

Richie
3 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

Agree here. Rockies are gonna Rockie. Moose will be starting at 3rd on Opening Day.

If you like McMahon so much at 3rd, why not find a 2nd base patch instead, so McMahon can stay at 3rd?

But, Rockies gotta Rockie.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

Also, it’s worth noting that the different flavors of WAR are because:
(1) Baseball Reference uses DRS for its defensive calculation, DRS estimates can get very extreme, and Brendan Rodgers was the most extreme of all of them (+22 DRS).
(2) Baseball Prospectus uses a radically different approach to park factors than any other public-facing metrics I’ve seen. Coors Field has a park factor of 104.0 at BP, and the lowest one, St. Louis, has a park factor of 98.1. In contrast, Fangraphs has the Rockies park factor at 114, and the lowest one (the Mets) at 93. So BP takes the Rockies’ offensive contributions (including Rodgers’) much more at face value than other WAR-type metrics.

I have some real questions about both of these decisions. But it’s worth noting that I have heard the Rockies’ own version of WAR has park factor adjustments much more similar to BP’s than Fangraphs. So they believe their offensive performance at home isn’t a mirage, which explains why they have the lower wRC+ plus 2017-2022 of any team in major league baseball and seem to show little urgency to improve it; they’re 9th in wRC (without the “+”).

crackbaldoMember since 2024
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

So BP gives Colorado only a 4% bump? That seems light.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Have to say I find it quite odd when FanGraphs writers don’t even seem to believe that fWAR is the more accurate one. I know I do.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago

I think there’s a debate about the pros and cons of FIP-based WAR. I think of it as the best of a flawed group of options, but I understand that there are flaws. For hitters, it’s FanGraphs all the way and no one is convincing me otherwise.

Roger McDowell Hot Foot
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Oh yeah I’m with you on that, I was thinking only about position players and hitting/fielding metrics.

Last edited 3 years ago by Roger McDowell Hot Foot
proiste
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

Fangraphs really put themselves ahead when they dropped UZR for OAA. Their dWAR is in a category of it’s own now

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

fWAR for pitchers is a complete joke and the worst among a flawed group of options. It’s long been proven that pitchers have a decent bit of control over balls hit in play and that FIP only has value as a predictor metric.

Last edited 3 years ago by Lanidrac
fjtorres
3 years ago

Jones for Brito now looks…interesting…
Brito has been looking good in Goodyear as a 2B.
He’s not making it to Cleveland this year but he would let McMahon stay at 3b and might even hit better than Moustakas et al.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
3 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

I guess sometimes these positionless guys pan out, like Ian Happ, but Brito is going to have to hit a lot to make it work. And he just wrapped A-ball. He is going to be a while, if he even makes it.

fjtorres
3 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

And yet, he might still out hit and out field Mustakas at 2B because of the new rules. He projects as a 2B and while he’s never going to be a middle of the order hitter he’ll be useful soon. ’23 on a normal schedule but given what else the Rockies are dealing with and he’s already on the 40-man. They could’ve taken a flyer on him.

From right here:

“Brito has plus hit tool projection, and even though he barely has 40-grade raw power right now (the high-end exit velocities are below average even for a player his age), the amount of contact he makes, his approach (just a 22% chase rate in 2023), and the consistency of the lift in his swing all indicate he’s going to actualize whatever raw power he grows into in games. Brito’s ability to get on top of fastballs and put the barrel on inner-third strikes is enabled, at least in part, by his super short levers, which make him tough to beat in the strike zone. He’s a compact 20-year-old without overt physical projection, and the hit tool will almost certainly have to carry his entire offensive profile, but it looks like it’s going to. Projecting second base-only types without much power can be precarious since they lack the defensive versatility to play utility roles if they don’t make enough offensive impact to justify playing second base every day, but Brito has a good chance to do just that.”

Lanidrac
3 years ago
Reply to  fjtorres

Then it’s a good thing Moose isn’t going to play 2B anymore.

bothdatkotas
3 years ago

Did Coco Montes pee in the manager’s coffee?

bothdatkotas
3 years ago
Reply to  bothdatkotas

Alan Trejo do doughnuts on Monfort’s lawn?

Mike NMN
3 years ago

When the Reds, who see money as something that doesn’t grow on trees, cut loose a contract as expensive as Moose’s you wonder what they saw every day. That 2015 WS winning KC had stars that turned into bad contracts. Alex Gordon was a free agent after 2015m but re-signed with the team and amassed only 3 BWAR over the last five years of his career for $72M. Hosmer gave SD 3.7WAR for $144M, and Moose negative WAR for $60 something million.