Roy Oswalt and the Rangers
This post is quite a bit shorter than our normal fare here. We’re going to experiment with some quicker news analysis pieces for things that are still churning through the rumor mill. Don’t worry, these pieces won’t take the place of the more in-depth articles you’ve come to expect from the site.
A few weeks ago, I talked about how Roy Oswalt could end up as the steal of the off-season, and noted that he could instantly improve the rotation of nearly every team in baseball.
In fact, there might only be one team where Oswalt wouldn’t represent an upgrade over someone currently penciled into their starting five – that team is the one that Oswalt is meeting with today, and is apparently one of the two teams he wants to play for in 2012.
No team in baseball needs a starting pitcher less than the Texas Rangers. Their starting pitchers combined for +19.8 WAR last year, third most in the Majors, and while they lost C.J. Wilson, they spent roughly $110 million to bring in Yu Darvish and have decided to bring Neftali Feliz to camp as a starting pitcher. Toss in Derek Holland, Colby Lewis, and Matt Harrison, and their rotation doesn’t even have room for Alexi Ogando, who himself probably belongs in a Major League rotation next year.
Oswalt’s a good bet to be a solid starter next year, but the Rangers already have six solid starters at the big league level. If, as rumored, they’d have to either move Harrison to the bullpen or make him available in trade, they should simply say thanks but no thanks. Oswalt makes sense for St. Louis, who have replaceable pitchers at the back-end of their rotation. Texas, though, simply doesn’t need him.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
I like the new format – short and sweet!
Thanks – feedback is certainly welcome. The idea is that these pieces would supplement what is already on the site, and would give us the ability to just put up quick-reacts to news before it becomes official.
If there’s something you’d like to see us do in these types of pieces, feel free to let us know. We’re always working to try and make the content better.
I like the concept. You might want to consider flagging these shorter posts as “Quick Hits” or something along those lines so people know what to expect.
I like the idea, Dave. Not every rumor is worthy of in-depth analysis, but you don’t want to completely ignore stuff either.
Quick suggestion:
I like the idea of quicker news stuff, but I would like a way to separate the deeper analysis form the news. Might you have a separate list of topics? I know the homepage is getting a bit cluttered as is, but I’d gladly deal with a bit more (or a redesign?) to be able to distinguish in this case.
Bigger than a tweet, shorter than a coffee break.
Pitching Wins…..nough said
Wow, pitching wins aren’t informative on their own? No way!!
Here’s some feedback – try not to look so goddamn lumpy on camera.
LOL
I’ve seen a woman naked. Your move, Cameron.