Ryan Zimmerman’s Unsatisfying Explanation Behind Success

PITTSBURGH — I entered the visiting Washington Nationals’ clubhouse at PNC Park with a theory in need of vetting earlier this week. I suspected the most likely explanation behind Ryan Zimmerman’s success this season was that he had joined the merry band of fly-ball revolutionaries.

I was suspicious because one of the early adopters, Daniel Murphy, is of course a teammate. I was suspicious that Zimmerman had changed something because he ranks as the game’s ninth-most valuable position player to date — ahead of early-season sensation Eric Thames, for example.

I was convinced that something dramatic had occurred because his setup looks different this season…

… than it did a year ago:

Moreover, his slugging-percentage heat maps (per swing) certainly have changed, as Zimmerman has expanded the area in which he does damage.

2016:

2017:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members

I felt quite certain Zimmerman would tell me that he made some dramatic change. But when I approached Zimmerman and asked him about his white-hot start to the season, he was nearly apologetic for not having a more interesting story behind his success.

“I feel like my swing is pretty much the same,” Zimmerman said. “Baseball is the game of adjustments, obviously. I make adjustments between every pitch. So to say you haven’t changed anything, I think, I don’t think anyone does not change anything… But it’s not like this offseason I went and completely remade my swing. If you looked at my swing and position, I would think it would be pretty much the same.

“Consciously, I am not trying to hit the bottom of the ball or any of that stuff. For me, I’m just trying to square it up.”

Zimmerman has talked often with Murphy about hitting, and with other teammates. Washington Post columnist Thomas Boswell reported on part of Murphy’s pitch to Zimmerman in February.

“Ryan’s exit velocity last year was elite,” [Murphy said]. “He’s just looking to take his already elite skill of putting bat to ball and [achieving high] exit velocity off the barrel and get it at the right angle. Now we’re really starting to do some serious damage.

“He hit the ball really hard last year. He’s already doing the hardest thing at the high end. I don’t think there needs to be big adjustments.”

Those conversations did occur this spring, and Zimmerman’s average launch angle is up two degrees. But Murphy wouldn’t take credit for Zimmerman this week. And Zimmerman insists those conversations have not led to a dramatic mechanical or philosophical swing alteration.

“We’re teammates. We talk about hitting. That’s kind of what we do,” Zimmerman said. “I wish I had a better story that I started doing some crazy drill or started looking at video. But it’s really not a great story. It is what it is.”

Zimmerman’s batted-ball profile hasn’t changed dramatically. He’s hitting 1.12 ground balls for every fly ball this season compared to his career ratio of 1.23. His average launch angle has inched up from 7.9 degrees in 2015 to 9.0 degrees last season to 10.9 degrees this season. That’s evidence of something. Whether it’s evidence of buying into Murphy’s words, however, is unclear. Perhaps Zimmerman is merely being polite and attempting not to upset the Nats’ hitting staff by listening instead to his own teammate for advice instead.

Or perhaps two degrees of launch angle isn’t a big deal to Zimmerman, perhaps he doesn’t consider it a significant change even if it is leading to dramatically different results. Maybe Murhy is right and Zimmerman didn’t need to make a major change to angle or approach, just a subtle one. He was tied with Miguel Sano for 15th in average exit velocity last season at 92.3 mph.

Or perhaps this is just a healthy Zimmerman on the greatest hot streak of career, one which has been produced with an unsustainable .400 BABIP and his 31.0% HR/FB mark. Perhaps this is just baseball.

“I’m ready early, everything is on time… You have more time to manipulate and do whatever you want,” said Zimmerman of his experience at the plate a quarter through the season.

Zimmerman does believe there’s something that explains in large part what he has done the first quarter of the season. He believes that being healthy, being able to have the first normal, uninterrupted offseason of workouts is a significant factor. Zimmerman has not played more than 115 games in a season since 2013.

“To be able to do your routine consistently every day,” Zimmerman said. “It’s helped a lot.”

Zimmerman is a Virginia native, a productive of the University of Virginia, and lives near DC during the offseason. That makes it possible for him to work out with the Nationals’ strength-and-conditioning staff. On that topic, I asked him to address one other matter, about the record HR/FB ratios in the game the last two seasons. He believes it’s similar to why we see records broken every Olympics.

“I think it’s making these top-level athletes even better,” said Zimmerman of modern strength-and-conditioning science and practices. “We joke that we do this drug testing now, we get drugs out of the game, and it seems like every pitcher threw harder than they threw before.”

And now it seems like every hitter is hitting the ball further and more squarely than before. But unlike with Murphy or other swing converts like Josh Donaldson and J.D. Martinez, there isn’t a simple narrative for Zimmerman’s improvement. His answers, if he’s being completely candid, aren’t satisfying. He doesn’t consider himself part of the fly-ball, uppercut revolution. Or, at least, he doesn’t consider any adjust he made significant enough to have him qualify as a member. So we might need another way to explain Zimmerman. Perhaps it’s as simple as health, and a two-degree bump in launch angle.

Perhaps it’s a few little things adding up to a big thing.





A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.

34 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
HappyFunBallMember since 2019
9 years ago

That second heat map is … amazing

raws
9 years ago
Reply to  HappyFunBall

the glaring hole low and away?

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  raws

If you can consistently find that spot for strikes, not many people can hit you anyway.

Jason BMember since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  raws

At least his user name is an apt one.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Or maybe it’s not the uppercut, but some other mechanical adjustment that is more subtle. I’ve long been very suspicious of the “uppercut swing fixes it” narrative. You can hit better, and potentially even have a higher launch angle, even if you’re not intentionally trying to uppercut the ball.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
9 years ago

Health + Hot streak + Good hitter = Great batted ball results

johnforthegiants
9 years ago

Considering that ‘his batted-ball profile hasn’t changed dramatically’, simply referring to his BABIP of .400 would be even less satisfying?

jds07v
9 years ago

Not a swing expert but it definitely looks like his hands have dropped in his stance and into his load. Should help with lift.

EasyenoughMember since 2016
9 years ago

Zimmerman’s comments remind me of a Fangraphs piece last year about how direct instructional language on what to do with your body or how to swing can be less effective than coaching through metaphors about how the body feels through the swing. While Thames credited his strikezone focus, he also mentioned wanting the bat to “feel like the wing of a plane landing.” Preposterous speculation: If Murphy said something like that to Zim, Zim could make no conscious physical change but instead just be aware of that sensation and think nothing more of it. If that’s the case, I hope he sticks with it.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

LA is probably not explaning everything. he is also much healthier than in the last years.

however I do think that around 9-10 degrees is a very sensitive area for LA changes. You are not just pulling your average up but your whole range.

I wrote this article in the community section
http://www.fangraphs.com/community/why-launch-angle-can-only-be-optimized-not-maximized/

and the top10 in wRC+ averaged 15 degrees but the very best hitters actually averaged slightly below that (trout was just below 14 at that point as was judge and harper actually below 13. thames was also like 13, only sano really stood out with above 20. So the perfect LA seems to be around 13-16 or so with many productive hitters being around 13, some at 12 but very few below 10 degrees.

I think the LA range is important here. I don’t have the data for it but maybe that is when you start to get more of your batted balls in the barrel range.

if you go from 5 to 7 degrees there probably isn’t much of a change in production and going from 16 to 19 even might be detrimental but if you go from 9 to 11 something seems to happen, at least there are no 8 or 9 guys in the wRC+ top10 for some reason.

the same is true for exit velo too, going from 80 to 85 won’t make a difference and 100 to 105 also not but somewhere in the low to mid 90s it does make a big difference.

A HR is a binary outcome on a small percentage of batted balls (often flyout or homer, sometimes a double) and at one point the threshold is reached.

this is not like javelin throw were 5 feet don’t make much of a difference, the parks are constructed in a way that many HRs don’t clear by that much and 5-10 feet basically can change the result from nothing happening to game outcome changing.

someone would have to look at the whole batted ball sprectrum around the average LA. don’t forget that homers are only a very small percentage of batted balls and a small shift in percentage has a big effect on production. If you maybe get 10 more balls of the 95+mpg type from the 15-20 range to the 25+ range that can lead to a big change of production. homers are still only a rather small part of batted balls (like 6-10% of really strong hitters) but make up for a big part of production.

it is still a round bat and ball even with an uppercut swing and there is a big variety of outcomes.

johnforthegiants
9 years ago

Instead of writing articles about someone like Zimmerman whose ‘batted-ball profile hasn’t changed dramatically’ but whose BABIP is 89 points higher than his career average, speculating on what might account for this change when in fact it’s presumably mostly due to luck (for example, Bryce Harper hitting 105 points over his career average this year, but 72 points of this is due to BABIP luck), maybe you might write about people whose batted ball profiles actually HAVE change dramatically, because there’s much more likely to be a more satisfying explanation than luck?

bly
9 years ago

Yes, but we like stories too much. So, we spin them, and then but into lots of BS.

J
9 years ago
Reply to  bly

At risk of feeding the trolls here, I’d like to say that this article is not BS.

Sullivan has researched data and video, included relevant data and video, shown us illustrations and spoken directly to goddamn player.

None of this is “spin.” This is an excellent piece of journalism, covering a very relevant topic (“swing changes”). It makes a very strong point: I’ve heard a lot of people include Zimmerman in the “swing change” group, the article points out that perhaps he doesn’t belong there.

You can draw your own conclusion, which is presumably that he’s simply lucked out so far this year. Maybe you’re right. But there’s no need to attack the work done here because you’ve come to another conclusion.

bly
9 years ago
Reply to  J

I also like the article a lot. My point was that just because the player has a story doesn’t make that story correct. We latch on to stories and they can take us down the wrong path. Here, without a story from the player, I think we get some good data and some notion that Zimmerman may have changed his swing without knowing it. If Zimmerman was super sure it was his breakfast cereal or something about his approach he could be wrong. But he would convince a lot of people of the story.

LHPSU
9 years ago

Indeed. For example, there is a batter who currently has an IFFB% of 4.8% vs 9.1% for his career, and a soft contact% of 9.7% vs 14.6% for his career, and they’re not writing about him.

johnforthegiants
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

Apparently not. I thought fangraphs was supposed to be different from bleacher reports. Sigh.

Jason BMember since 2017
9 years ago

If it’s the same, just head on over there. You shan’t be missed.

Los
9 years ago

We really need to stop talking about average launch angle. He could be having the same season as last year and hitting 2 more popups a week and the average launch angle would be up. Name the line drive launch angle something name the home run launch angle something else and start talking about those buckets. Obviously there are problems with this approach too but at least it doesn’t commit murder on mathematics (this might be a slight exaggeration) by using averages on this type of distribution.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Los

I think over the long runs the average will tell you a pretty good picture because pop ups and choppers kinda cancel each other out over the long run and the angles are at least kind of normally distributed.
For example here is trout last year

https://twitter.com/darenw/status/819227015442264064?s=09

One or two pop ups or choppers won’t dramatically change the average if you have 500 BIP.

But over the short sample sizes of this year you actually might be right.

Barrels actually do what you want and maybe a second wider category like percentage of BIP between 5 and 35 degrees or so as a measure for somewhat decently hit balls would be nice too.

Jetsy Extrano
9 years ago
Reply to  Los

Is a hitter’s launch angle anything like a normal distribution? Do their variances vary? I don’t think we know, and yeah it doesn’t make much sense to talk about average without that.

chazzycatMember since 2016
9 years ago

per “xwOBA – wOBA”, he’s outperforming his batted ball data by about 60 points and is in the top 15 luckiest players in MLB by that metric. Shows how good the combination of skill + luck can be. But the scary thing? By xwOBA he’s also the 7th best hitter in MLB. So he can easily survive a little regression and still be a beast.

bly
9 years ago
Reply to  chazzycat

I wouldn’t call xwOBA – wOBA luck, but residual. It is probably a mix of luck and unquantified skill. It’s like FIP vs xFIP vs ERA. Yes ERA – FIP could be defense or luck, but it could also be skill (ask an Oriels fan, but not after a post season game, that’s just rude).

chazzycatMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  bly

I don’t really see it that way…FIP is based solely on walks/homers/strikeouts which leaves plenty of room to beat the metrics if you’re good at managing contact. But Statcast data is super granular, based on launch angle and exit velocity. The way to get a high “xwOBA – wOBA” value is to hit balls that are usually caught, but they don’t get caught for you. Isn’t that the textbook definition of luck?

bly
9 years ago
Reply to  chazzycat

Naming the residual is a pretty big sin. If you know what it is so we’ll, isolate it into its own term. Otherwise you’re lumping it in with everything you haven’t discovered yet. To get specific, a pull batter gets too much credit from xwOBA relative to someone like Zimmerman who has a really even distribution around the field.

chazzycatMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  bly

I think I get what you’re trying to say, but can you explain how other hitters who are also really good at spraying the ball around, such as Votto and Cabrera, don’t show the same out-performance of their batted ball data? Miggy with his flawless pull/oppo distribution is actually under-performing his xwOBA by the largest margin in MLB…

bly
9 years ago
Reply to  chazzycat

I’m not saying luck plays no role. I’d also point out that fielders are positioned based on previous data, so they might be fielding the relatively consistent Cabrera and Votto in the right spots but the wrong spots for Zimmerman. It’s also in their spines–they might just start going back quicker for Cabrera and Votto. Of course, if this is true than a decrease in BABIP is also in the cards for Zimmerman.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  bly

Btw does xWOBA consider the “pull” angle?

93/25 might be a lazy fly ball in center but a bomb down the line. Guys like dozier who don’t have huge power but pull a lot of balls in the air to use the short part of the outfield would probably be underrated if it didn’t.

Yes they might be ” cheap” homers but if you can do it a lot that is a skill (see mel ott in his small park who hit a lot of homers at home but actually for higher average on the road because he adapted his approach there).

chazzycatMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

No it doesn’t. As far as I’m aware, there’s not much evidence suggesting batters actually have that level of control over batted balls. Hitting a baseball is hard enough, for the most part players are just trying to make quality contact.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  chazzycat

Isn’t there some control over pull%?

chazzycatMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Dominikk85

To some extent, sure. You can make a conscious decision to try and sell out for power by pulling more balls, or go the other way more if the park suits it. But at the same time the dimensions of the park are also obvious to the pitcher, and teams are always adjusting their scouting reports/defensive alignments. Overall my guess is that it balances out in the end? But who knows really. I think to answer the question of whether players are capable of consistently beating their batted ball numbers, we’ll need a few more years of StatCast data.

J
9 years ago

Thanks as always Jeff!

I think biggest takeaway here (for me at least), is that the “swing changers” aren’t all going to be dramatically different. There are ALWAYS players who make small changes to parts of their game that yield better results. Perhaps the recent spate of dramatic cases have us, as spectators, hyper focused on changes that players normally make, that aren’t all that dramatic.

FWIW I do think there’s been obvious luck for Zimm this season. I do not think it negates all of the small things that Sullivan writes about here, nor do I think we should ignore the fact that he’s always hit the ball hard. It certainly doesn’t negate the fact that he’s a talented guy. Zimmerman himself says he continues to make small adjustments and has presumably made that a habit through his career. He’s changed his swing a bit (or, as he puts it made adjustments) and it’s working out for him. He’s mostly been a good player during his career. Not a GREAT player and SOMETIMES NOT a good player but the skill is clearly there.

One thing that ALWAYS has to be noted with Zimmerman is health. This is super obvious, but it speaks to the thrust of Sullivan’s article: when he’s been healthy through a full year he’s been quite good. He’s injury prone, and when he’s been injured (either playing with nagging ailments or out for significant periods of time) is where the inconsistency has been.

Sure, there is likely to be regression. Still, he may regress to better than his average career line if he stays healthy and continues to do what’s currently working for him.

Paul22
9 years ago

Maybe Al Jazeera has a theory, or is that only reserved for guys like Thames?

Seriously, its probably just health, the juiced ball and smaller strike zone. Seeing so many clear strikes called balls this year. Seems some hitters are getting more hitters counts as a result, or at least are getting more hittable pitches on such counts

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

Body angles also play a big role. The swing turns around the spine and if you lean back a little a flat swing can turn into an uppercut.
https://youtu.be/hELThd8Voj8

Zim had success before and if he can keep his head back a little better now at swing initiation he maybe swings up more without realizing.

So maybe his legs are a little healthier and stronger and he gets to better positions.a swing is a multi movement thing and it is not as easy as just swing up more for most guys, often it is a downstream issue causing it. Now there maybe some guys who just decide to swing up and do it but for most it is a lot of tinkering with several body angles before it works.

I’m not saying it is spine angle with Zim but there are a lot of factors involved.

ghosthornMember since 2019
9 years ago

People realize that Travis Sawchik, not Jeff Sullivan, wrote this article, right?