Should Justin Upton Opt Out?
We’ve seen a lot of premium free agents negotiate opt-outs into their contracts in recent years. Teams like the fact that they can use opt-outs to decrease the total amount they have to guarantee the player in order to sign him, and players like the flexibility of hitting the market again if they play well and increase their value. But by and large, most of these end up not getting used, as free agents are almost always older players by design, and older players usually don’t get better as they age.
Johnny Cueto has an opt-out for this winter that he almost certainly won’t use, as his poor 2017 season — and now an extended DL stint — would force him to take a pay cut this winter. Masahiro Tanaka probably won’t use his opt-out this winter either, since he’s developed a home run problem this year. Wei-Yin Chen definitely isn’t opting out. Neither is Ian Kennedy. Looking ahead to the future, it’s hard to imagine either Jason Heyward or David Price walking away from the remainder of their guaranteed years at this point.
A year ago, Justin Upton fit into that category. In the first year of his six year, $132 million contract, he hit .246/.310/.465, posting a career-low (as an everyday player) +1.4 WAR. He joined a host of other albatross contracts in Detroit, and all the money owed to aging, unproductive players was part of the reason the Tigers decided to start rebuilding this year, moving veterans for younger, cheaper talents when they could.
But this year, Upton has gone right back to being the Justin Upton the Tigers hoped they were signing. He’s currently at .282/.366/.546 and +4.1 WAR; his 140 wRC+ would be the second-best of his career, behind just the 141 mark he put up in 2011. He won’t match the +6.3 WAR he put up that year, but if he finishes strong over the next six weeks, he’ll crack +5 WAR for just the second time in his career. Regardless of how he finishes, this will likely go down as one of Upton’s best seasons.
So now, with $88 million left over the next four seasons, Upton might have a real decision to make. Has he played well enough to get himself back into consideration for another big contract?
On the one hand, it’s easy enough to argue that Upton’s performance-swings the last few years aren’t really all that meaningful.
| Year | O-Swing% | Z-Swing% | O-Contact% | Z-Contact% | Contact% | ISO | BABIP | xwOBA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 24% | 66% | 47% | 79% | 70% | 0.203 | 0.304 | 0.332 |
| 2016 | 24% | 65% | 55% | 78% | 72% | 0.219 | 0.301 | 0.329 |
| 2017 | 26% | 64% | 54% | 80% | 72% | 0.264 | 0.349 | 0.360 |
Upton’s seen a bit of a power spike this year, but so has everyone. His plate discipline and contact rates show no real significant change the last few years. His contact quality as measured by Statcast is a bit better, but just like he underachieved relative to expectations last year, he’s overachieving a bit this year. By process rather than results, Upton looks more like a guy going through regular year to year fluctuations than a star player who collapsed and then had a big bounce back.
So, if we get rid of the yearly break points and just look at what he’s done in total since signing, Upton doesn’t look that much different now than he did when he signed his contract two years ago. He’s put up a 120 wRC+, versus his career average of 121. He’s put +5.5 WAR in 1,109 PAs, equaling out to about a +3 WAR per season level of performance. In 2013-2015 years before he hit free agency, he averaged 3.2 WAR per 600 PAs.
In Detroit, Justin Upton has basically been Justin Upton. He’s a couple years older now, but he looks mostly like the same guy he looked like two years ago. And if we think Upton’s basically a +3 WAR player now, then his remaining contract would be almost exactly market value based on some basic assumptions.
| Year | Age | WAR | $/WAR | Est. Contract |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 30 | 3.0 | $9.5 M | $28.4 M |
| 2019 | 31 | 2.5 | $9.9 M | $24.8 M |
| 2020 | 32 | 2.0 | $10.4 M | $20.8 M |
| 2021 | 33 | 1.5 | $10.9 M | $16.4 M |
| Totals | 9.0 | $90.4 M |
Assumptions
Value: $9M/WAR with 5.0% inflation (for first 5 years)
Aging Curve: +0.25 WAR/yr (18-27), 0 WAR/yr (28-30),-0.5 WAR/yr (31-37),-0.75 WAR/yr (> 37)
He’s signed for 4/$88M. If teams pay about $9 million per win this winter, we’d expect a +3 WAR player in his age-30 seaosn to sign a four year deal for around $90 million, as long as he didn’t have significant health risks or off-field issues. And Upton has neither of those.
But then, those assumptions don’t factor in what the market just told us about bat-first corner players last year. Teams just stopped paying for this skillset, forcing guys like Edwin Encarnacion and Mark Trumbo to settle for a fraction of their original asking prices. And that trend has continued this summer, as productive hitters like J.D. Martinez were traded for relative peanuts. Jay Bruce, in the midst of a career revival that makes him look Upton-ish, cleared waivers and was traded in a pure August salary dump deal.
Perhaps in part because the ball has made it easier for everyone to hit for power, teams have stopped valuing guys who hit the ball hard the same way they used to. Upton’s deal was the last of the big slugger contracts, and if this winter is anything like last winter, there might be more guys trying to sell their ability to hit dingers than teams looking to pay dinger-hitters.
If Upton opts-out, he’ll be opting into a free agent class that already includes Martinez, Bruce, Eric Hosmer, Mike Moustakas, Logan Morrison, Lucas Duda, Todd Frazier, Carlos Gonzalez, and Curtis Granderson. Once again, there will be many options for teams looking for corner sluggers. Given what teams did last winter, and the number of alternatives with similar profiles, I don’t think Upton can realistically expect a big raise if he hits the market again this winter.
But given where the Tigers are headed, perhaps just not walking away from a significant amount of cash should be incentive enough to walk away from Detroit. Players often take less money from contending teams than they would take from rebuilding teams, and it would be perfectly rational for Upton to prefer an ~$80 million contract from a contender over an $88 million contract from a team headed for several years of losing. He’s played well enough to think that he should be able to land something in that 4/$80M range, and maybe he could push up towards 5/$100M if there’s a bidding war, so the risk of walking away from 4/$88M shouldn’t be that overwhelming.
You’d have to think his floor is probably Encarnacion’s 3/$60M deal. Encarnacion is a better hitter than Upton, but was also selling his age 34+ seasons and really only appealed to American League teams. Upton’s ability to play the field for all 30 teams, and his four-year age advantage, should make it hard for teams to argue he’s less valuable than Encarnacion was last winter.
So in terms of annual salary, I don’t think there’s much risk for Upton here. He’ll get $20 to $25 million per year from someone. If the market turns against him, it will be for three years. If the market is rational, it will be for four years. If the market starts paying for power again — doubtful, but not impossible — maybe he’ll get five years at a slightly lower AAV.
From a purely money standpoint, Upton doesn’t have a lot to gain by opting out, but it’s hard to see him ending up walking away from a lot of money either. His contract is basically still market-rate, and his next contract shouldn’t be all that different from his current contract.
But now that he knows the Tigers are headed for a rebuilding phase, it makes plenty of sense to take a similar deal from a team with a better chance to win. Even if he leaves a little money on the table, getting to a legitimate winner might be a big enough benefit to make the opt-out worth it.
So, yeah, if I was Justin Upton’s agent, I’d be preparing him to cancel the rest of his contract this winter. He won’t get a huge raise, most likely, but he’s played well enough to get this same deal with a better team, and that is a goal worth pursuing.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Another thing to take into consideration is how much he cares about his legacy, and how much better counting stats he could put up in a ballpark that doesn’t suppress offense in the way comerica does. He isn’t a hall of famer, but with another half decade of solid production and an ok decline he could get himself into consideration. Voters and players themselves still care primarily about counting stats, so ballpark matters.
2015 is the only season out of the last five where Comerica’s park factor didn’t rank above the league average for runs and home runs. I have a hard time seeing Justin Upton working his way into Hall of Fame consideration anyway.
I don’t see how the park would have any factor on his next contract being as that it didn’t seem to factor into his last contract, it’s not like Comerica was build after he arrived. I would think that the fact that he hasn’t been in a WS much less won one would be a much larger factor.
I would guess that it will come down to whether Upton is happy with Detroit (as an organization and a hometown) more so than his desire to play for a contending team. At least in MLB, you hear about guys choosing teams based on the former consideration a lot more than you hear about the latter.
Yeah, if his wife really loves wherever-the-heck-they-live-in-the-general-Detroit area, that’d be a big reason to stay. I’d wild-heinie-guess she doesn’t particularly, a year-and-a-half isn’t much time to put down roots, and they can live wherever they blessed want come winter.
Unfortunately for Upton with the Braves loaded corner outfield of budding star talents Nick Markakis and Matt Kemp a return to Atlanta isn’t a option
Is J.D. Martin the all-time Fangraphs leader in page views among obscure minor league journeyman pitchers?
I sure hope his second baseman was Johan Santa.
If this happens then who do you think the Tigers will put into left field to replace him? Who should they put in left field in your opinion?
They’ve already talked about having Nick Castellanos play OF if Jeimer Candelario (I dare you to spell that name without looking it up) makes it. Mike Gerber and Christin Stewart are also real prospects, though it’s curious that the Tigers haven’t promoted them to AAA despite solid AA numbers.
Castellanos has been working out in the outfield already. https://www.blessyouboys.com/2017/8/12/16138888/detroit-tigers-nick-castellanos-jeimer-candelario-mlb-roster-news
I think he is gone if he decides he wants to win a WS. aint happening with DET in rebuilding mode with Miggy n Verlander’s contracts blocking the path of signing other FA
To be fair to DET, Upton was the “other FA” and was not blocked by their existing commitments. His own contract would be ~15% of the team’s payroll next year.
I think there’s a bit more risk than you’re suggesting. Your estimated contract for Upton means if a team gives him that he essentially breaks even to what he makes if he doesn’t opt out. The risk is that teams lowball him on term, something quite likely given what we’ve seen for bats in FA. So there’s a decent possibility he gets an EE like contract, at which point he’ll have sacrificed 20M in guaranteed money. Going to a contender is important, but is it worth sacrificing potentially 20M?
The other thing to keep in mind – which teams really need a corner OF? Rockies, Giants, Jays, Os, Dbacks, Rangers, Angels? The point being I don’t see NYY, LAD, Houston, Washington, Boston, Cleveland, or the Cubs being interested in a corner OF. So it also comes down to which teams both are willing to spend 20M+ AND have a need for that OF.
I’m not sure there’s a team out there that needs a corner OF and is willing to spend on Upton.
Just to pre-empt what is likely an upcoming comment: Yes, millionaires like having another $20 million dollars, even if all they do is lie on their pile of jewels like Smaug.
And if you do like spending it, 20 million dollars can buy you a *lot* of burritos. Or you can name everything after yourself in your hometown. Really, the possibilities are pretty far-ranging.
Encarnacion turned down 4/$80M from Toronto last winter. He only had to settle for 3/$60M because he overplayed his hand and lost his primary suitor. And he was a 34 year old DH.
If everyone “lowballs”, then some team will rationally realize they should offer lowball + $1 million and win the bidding while still getting a deal. Then another team team will realize that lowball + $2 million is worth doing. And all of the sudden, he’ll be at market rate.
“Encarnacion turned down 4/$80M from Toronto last winter. He only had to settle for 3/$60M because he overplayed his hand and lost his primary suitor. And he was a 34 year old DH.”
Great point – who is Upton’s primary suitor? Without a primary suitor, or teams with money to spend, Upton isn’t likely to get market value.
Your argument still doesn’t address the fact that the teams with money to spend don’t need corner OF, meaning that the remaining teams aren’t as likely to spend on Upton. Upton can be worth 90M, but if there’s nobody who really needs an OF that is willing to spend that amount on him, then he’s not going to get it.
“If everyone “lowballs”, then some team will rationally realize they should offer lowball + $1 million and win the bidding while still getting a deal. Then another team team will realize that lowball + $2 million is worth doing. And all of the sudden, he’ll be at market rate.”
We’ve seen that isn’t the case though. Plenty of bats were left on the market last year and teams didn’t see the need to do lowball + 1 to get players to market rate. Maybe you’ll argue EE couldn’t get it because he had compensation attached, but your own article said EE’s market value even accounting for that was 84/4, and he didn’t get close to that. Neither did the majority of outfield or corner IF or DH bats.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/2017-top-50-free-agents/
Yeah, but the point is, he’s already at market rate and it’s not likely he’s going to go higher given the depressed market for corner outfielders.
If anything, Upton is in a worse place than Encarnacion was because the current team probably would just wave goodbye rather than re-up him on a similar contract.
A spot might exist in WAS. Eaten should be back, and one more year of Harper. But Werth will be gone. So it comes down to how much the Nats believe in Taylor or Goodwin. Or Robles for that matter. I have no doubt that the GM wants to go with Taylor/Eaton/Harper in 18 and have Robles ready to step in for Harper in 19. But the Lerners aren’t above spending for a guy they think is worth having, and they might decide that Upton/Eaton is a pairing the want for the next 5 years.
Plus, what better place than Washing for Up and Eat to play.
That kind of sums it up though, doesn’t it? The Nats have to find a way to squeeze him in to get him when they already have solid options. So I mean, they could be an option, but odds are they won’t be.
I’m not convinced that the Yankees don’t need corner outfield help, especially if an unnamed rf continues his epic slide
Easy comment to get downvoted but no one thought Pederson would get sent down. Or Puig, or Story. History is full of guys who set the world on fire then settled into the role of average to below average player and got sent down. I would say it’s a 1-3 chance he gets sent down in the next calendar year.
As a Red Sox fan, I hope you’re right; not as much on the ‘I think Judge has already peaked’ side, because that’s just silly. More on the ‘I hope they sign Upton to a 4-5 year deal and block Judge’ side because that would mean that the Yankee FO has totally lost its marbles.
Was going to post the exact same thing – kind of have to wonder exactly how many suitors Upton would even have. Between teams that are set at corner OF (Boston, for example) and teams that are locked into big contracts there (Yankees, for example) and 8-12 teams that just don’t fish in the $20-25M player pond, there just aren’t many teams left.
Realistically, which teams would pay big dollars for any left fielder?
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=lf&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2017&month=0&season1=2017&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=20,a
The Blue Jays? The Giants? The Angels? All three of those teams tried to fix the left field on the cheap last year–could it be different this time? In theory, the Orioles and Nationals could be bidders, but since Upton isn’t represented by Scott Boras it’s hard to see the match. The Braves still like Matt Kemp for some reason. The D-Backs couldn’t unless they dumped Yasmany Tomas. The Royals, Padres, and A’s won’t spend that kind of money and are on the wrong part of the win curve anyway.
And assuming there are teams looking for a slugging left fielder, is it really more important to sign Upton than Jay Bruce or JD Martinez? Is there going to be a bidding war of any kind?
No, if I’m Upton, I am not opting out. I am sending the Tigers a list of preferred teams (with a changed no-trade list) and keeping my $88 million dollars.
A player can opt out and then re-sign (granted maybe for a little bit less), can’t he? If so, Justin could give it a look-see.
The no-trade list is the big thing. Does Justin have one? A partial one? If not, then staying means Justin winds up going wherever the Tigers decide to send him to.
He has a partial no-trade list–he can list 20 teams. So if he wants, he can just re-do the no-trade list so that he includes the 20 places he would never consider signing (and if there are other places he’d want to go, he can just tell the Tigers he would approve a trade to specific other places too).
Of course, the simpler way would be to opt-out, but then he might get less money and/or lose the no-trade protection in a new contract, so who knows if he’d even get to stay where he signed.
That’s basically a no-trade then, you can always ‘allow’
9 teams that you know don’t want your contract.
Thank you for the info, Sad.
This seems like the right point to make, to me. If Upton is contemplating opting out of his contract to go play for a winner, it’s hard to see which teams he’d be looking at as possible players in that sweepstakes. It’s true that the AL is littered with “contenders”, but the ones that have financial strength (TOR, TEX, KC, SEA) appear to be the ones that are all on the way down from a peak, rather than on the way up. Meanwhile the teams that are ascending (TB, MIN) probably don’t have the payroll to make it work. And at the top of the league, the three leaders plus the Yankees don’t have a need for a slugging corner infielder, from what I can tell.
In the NL it’s the same story: the teams at the top have nowhere to put him, while the rebuilding teams either don’t have the cash (MIL, PIT) or aren’t on the ascent (MIA, NYM, STL). Maybe a team like COL, ATL, CWS, or ARZ could work, but if you’re banking on those four teams to get into a bidding war, with the long list of alternatives out there for you, you’re probably going to wind up disappointed.
If I were Upton, I would stick with my current contract.
As a quick follow-on point: if Upton does not exercise his opt-out, but his contract is of a reasonable amount (which Cameron is saying it is), then he’s hardly an albatross contract that can’t be moved. Detroit would likely be forced to trade him, and trade him to a contender by paying down his contract. Then all of a sudden teams like the Red Sox or Nationals might see a nice opportunity to get a solid player for a slightly-below market deal.
To me, the Nats look like the most likely option. Assuming they let Werth walk, they could use a LF, and assuming they still go all in for next year, would help them enough without costing them a fortune.
I wonder if a team could convince Upton to take some deferrals on like an 8-year deal.
Using a 4% discount (maybe a tad too low)
http://i.imgur.com/zY6QAXN.png
Upton gets about the same money in the end, but the team gets to save $10-20M on the front half of the deal while giving him a pretty cheap back half payout ($4M in 2022 MLB is probably going to be what a low leverage middle inning reliever gets).
Also FWIW, Upton gets to opt out and at least SAY he got more money ($100M nominal).
*For the nominal salaries in the front half I took the current $22.1M per year he’s getting now and multiplied by .8, .9, 1.0, and 1.1
The union wouldn’t allow this sort of thing to happen, unless Upton opted out and then found this to be the best deal he could find. But it’s not as though the Tigers could convince him to do this with his current contract without taking a lot of shit from the MLBPA.
What?
The union won’t allow him to take deferred money? Of course they will, as long as it’s not egregious (like deferring $100M out for 50 years).
The MLBPA doesn’t care solely about best deal (otherwise players would exclusively only take the best total contract). They just don’t want their players to sign awful deals, and even then so, players can still do this.
The MLBPA can veto a player renegotiating his contract if he doesn’t get something out of the deal (like they did with A-Rod when he was in talks to go to the Red Sox), but they can’t veto contracts/extensions (otherwise they would do that with every young player who signs an extension for cheap).
All of the players with opt-outs are successful major leaguers with more money than they, or all their generations to follow, will ever need. I might be naive but, at this point in any of these star players careers, I think giving myself a chance to dance around with my teammates after winning the last game of the World Series would be what I would be pursuing.
I think psychologically it’s harder to walk away from $88 million dollars in hand than to take a slightly lower figure on the open market because you want to play for a contender.
I am assuming, as Dave did, that the money would be similar. I have no idea what is a “significant” enough amount to be a determining factor in the decision, but the difference between $80M and $88M almost seems to lose its importance when the missing part of your life’s journey is a championship.
I never cease to be amused at fans saying players should walk away from millions and millions of dollars. Kills me every time.
If it were you, you would take $88M over $80M every single time and if you don’t admit it, you’re just kidding yourself.
Plenty of people have taken 80k jobs over 100k jobs. Please don’t assume that your world view is the only one that exists, it’s stupid.
Do you know who is going to win the World Series this season? Next season? The season after that? You would be gambling an awful lot of money on the chance that you sign with the team who does win a ring as opposed to merely being a contender who fell short.
Playing for a contender, however, is very different from playing for a non-competitive team – especially one that can blow any lead you can give them.
Isn’t it pretty doubtful that a truly non-competitive team is going to offer the most money?
He’s currently under contract with a truly non-competitive team.
They weren’t at the time that they offered him his contract.
Dave, would I be correct in assuming that his agent would be making preemptive calls around the league to get a feel for his market before he just pulls the plug?
Any team that told his agent anything would be tampering. I wouldn’t be shocked if it happens, but it is against the rules. Also, it’s not like someone is going to be like “I pinky-swear promise we’ll give him a boat load of cash if he opts out.” That’s not happening, rules or no rules. Obviously he is a good player and he should get at good deal, and his agent should be smart enough to guess if opting out will get him more money and what the risks are.
Gotta be honest… I don’t get what these guys could be thinking to risk all that $ to roll the dice they could get a bit more money… talking about Upton, Cueto and Tanaka. It’s not like these 3 guys have 1 or 2 g’teed yrs, it’s 4 they’d be rolling the dice on if I’m not mistaken. The market can be very cold and unforgiving. These 3 could look very foolish giving up that kind of money.
Cueto and Tanaka are in very different situations than Upton. Cueto and Tanaka are coming off of down years and/or showing problems they didn’t have in the past (Tanaka’s hr problem). Upton is going to have the 2nd best year of his entire career, and it is not entirely impossible if he goes on one of his trademark Upton tears (providing all his value in 30-45 days) that he has the best season of his entire career.
Point is that he’s been very inconsistent and when you make an investment at that level, you seek consistency and risk minimization. How many teams do you think will roll the dice that he could have a few 2016s rather than 2017s going forward?
Knowing the future of the Tigers (very bad, very bad) he damn well better opt out.
That’s another complicating factor in Upton’s decision. Normally in this scenario you assume that the current team wants him back and may even pay more to make that happen, yet in this case I believe the Tigers would actually prefer that he opt-out and free them of that contractual burden.
Upton is different from most of the bat-first corners left hanging last year. I can’t think of one against whom Upton doesn’t have a significant edge in either age or track record. I’d be shocked if he can’t get at least the same package he has now. I think he has nothing to lose.
I think this is a fairly easy opt-in for Upton. DET will be motivated sellers, if he’s worth 4/$88MM, then a contender will take on the salary. If he’s not, then DET will likely eat some of the deal to move him. If nobody bites, then he’s stuck in DET, but he knows that he’d have lost a ton of money in the opt-out. But let DET find the market price. No need to risk $20+MM to find out if you can play at the same salary for a better team. I’m sure DET will happily let someone have his existing contract. All he has to bank on is that DET is not ascribing a value to his contract significantly higher than what the market will pay.
If you look at the last calendar year, he is 7th in fWAR with 6.2 and only Stanton has hit more HRs than his 44. As a Tigers fan I actually hope he opts out, but I don’t envision any team paying more than the $88M he has coming so I don’t see him doing that.
Let’s put it another way. Your position at your current company pays you $88,000 a year, the highest salary in the industry (with an average salary around $40,000 per). But your company isn’t expected to be competitive. Still, you’re guaranteed that salary for four more years OR you can try to land a position at one of the other 29 companies in this sector, hoping they’ll pay you the same or more (even though they would have to replace their current employee and make room in their budget for you). And there’s no guarantee your contributions will result in future success. Would you take that gamble?
You understand that in the private sector, a non-competitive company will soon be no company at all? If you don’t jump boat immediately (even for half the pay), you’ll be out of a job soon.
That’s how bad your analogy is.
One thing that doesn’t seem to come up in these discussions is that we have no idea how much a player has leveraged the money they’re guaranteed in these opt-able years. That matters a lot to the EV calculations. If Upton has a stable financial foundation and a lot of savings, the risk of opting out makes a lot more sense than if he’s started a high-capital business that will need more investment in the next few years.
We really have no way of ever getting that information.