Shouldn’t Some Team Want Bartolo Colon?

There are a lot of reasons not to like Bartolo Colon. He’s 41 years old. He has a 50-game suspension for synthetic testosterone in the recent past, and he underwent controversial stem cell treatments before that. He pitched a grand total of 257.1 innings in a span of five years between the ages of 33 and 37. When he bats, he looks like this and this, and he still has $11 million coming to him for his age-42 season next year — along with the million-plus left on this year’s $9 million. If we’re thinking about the Moneyball scouts who (probably really didn’t) prioritize selling jeans over winning baseball games, Colon is the guy they were thinking about.

For all those reasons, and who knows how many others, Colon went unclaimed through the waiver process earlier this week. If the paragraph above was all you knew about the man, that would make a lot of sense. A fat, old, expensive pitcher who doesn’t throw hard or strike people out shouldn’t draw interest. Big deal, right?

Maybe it’s not. It’s probably not, because Colon is no ace. And yet it still raised a few eyebrows around the game, because Colon, for all his considerable flaws, is well into his fourth consecutive season of being a useful major league pitcher. And that’s after an earlier career portion that had eight seasons of being a useful — or better — major league pitcher. There’s a select few contenders Colon couldn’t help right now. There’s plenty more that could benefit, and there’s precious little pitching available. So why is he still a New York Met?

Perhaps the better question is, “Why didn’t a team claim him off waivers?” That’s a little easier to answer. Teams reportedly still want Colon, but they don’t want to have the entire $11 million bill handed to them for 2015, so the minuscule possibility that the Mets would have just thrown up their hands and said “Take him” to an interested suitor seems to have been enough to scare off all of baseball. Instead, it seems as though teams would prefer to ask the Mets to subsidize some portion of that 2015 salary, and perhaps a potential claiming team would rather have the flexibility of the full time remaining before the Aug. 31 deadline rather than the artificial 48-hour time limit a waiver claim imposes. That seems flimsy compared to the risk a competitor would have put in a claim and prevent you from having any opportunity at all, but it seems to be the case.

Let’s talk about that 2015 salary for a minute. There are 96 players on the books for at least $10 million next year, which is what Colon’s hit against the luxury cap would be since it goes by average annual value. Edwin Jackson is one of them. So are Matt Harrison, Joe Nathan, Bronson Arroyo, Ricky Nolasco, Ubaldo Jimenez, John Danks, Nick Swisher, Carlos Beltran, Andre Ethier, Tim Lincecum, Carl Crawford, Ryan Howard and Alex Rodriguez. Either due to injury or ineffectiveness or both, that is a highly-paid collection of players who have added little — or worse, subtracted much — in 2014.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

That so many other players are making that much money doesn’t automatically mean that Colon is worth it, of course, but it does mean $11 million isn’t unreasonable for a pitcher who is still contributing. At the risk of going all “It’s not my money” on you, baseball is overflowing with cash. It’s a lot to me and to you. It’s not that much for a year of a solid starting pitcher.

That’s what Colon has been, anyway. Since his career rebirth in 2011 with the Yankees, here’s how he’s ranked among starters:

WAR: 25th
FIP-: 37th
ERA-: 38th
K%%-BB%: 58th
Innings: 41st

None of that is at a star’s level, and none of it is intended to be. But it’s absolutely “solid major league pitcher” quality, and he’s about to complete his fourth straight year of being a 2-3 win pitcher. Colon, improbably, based on his age and body type, keeps taking the ball, and keeps getting hitters out, despite continuing to throw little but fastballs. It’s not without risk, as Eno noted when Colon signed with the Mets. But Colon’s easily been worth what he’s been paid so far, and another year of the same performance would be worth the $11 million, as well. The counter-argument that he’ll be 42 and has seen his velocity dip somewhat is valid, though Colon has broken most of the usual aging curves. Besides, only eight pitchers have made more starts this year of seven innings or more, and while that doesn’t automatically equal quality, you’ll see that the others on that list comprise the absolute elite of baseball pitching royalty.

Of the teams potentially interested, the Angels would seem like the obvious choice to want Colon, considering Garrett Richards and Tyler Skaggs are hurt, C.J. Wilson and Jered Weaver are declining, and Matt Shoemaker, as fun as he’s been, is hardly an ideal candidate to front a playoff rotation. They fished Wade LeBlanc out of the recycling bin, ditched him after one start, and currently don’t have a starter for Saturday’s game against Oakland — which is, you know, kind of a big deal in a division that has the two separated by one game. Possible fill-ins include Randy Wolf and Chris Volstad. Seriously.

But for them, cost is a concern:

The Angels already have more than $140 million committed to 10 players in tax payroll (teams are charged the average annual value of multi-year contracts for tax purposes).

Owner Arte Moreno is adamant that the team will not surpass the threshold, according to rival clubs that have spoken to the Angels.

Next year is when Mike Trout’s extension starts to hit the tax even harder than the actual dollars do, so there’s some validity to that, even though it arguably shouldn’t be enough to prevent the team from acquiring Colon. Not only did we see how awfully the Yankees’ plan to stay under $189 million backfired, but it’s certainly possible for the Angels to get Colon for the stretch run and flip him this winter, potentially even if they had to kick in a little to make it happen. Total, maybe that’s several million dollars. You can value playoff wins however you like, but there’s no way the Angels will ever have games that are more valuable to them than the ones over the next six weeks will be. If you’re willing to sign guys like Albert Pujols and Josh Hamilton to obvious win-now deals, you shouldn’t be shying away when things get tough.

The Angels aren’t the only team, though. Some teams have a good idea that they’re going to the playoffs and don’t know who would start a potential Game 3 or Game 4. The Dodgers have injury concerns about Zack Greinke and Hyun-Jin Ryu, and a whole lot of guys who aren’t Clayton Kershaw — namely Dan Haren, Kevin Correia and Roberto Hernandez. The Pirates are still starting Edinson Volquez and are watching Vance Worley‘s explosive regression, which is a great band name. The Tigers have started Buck Farmer and will start Kyle Lobstein. Kansas City has to worry about Yordano Ventura’s back. The Angels, if they don’t go with Wolf or Volstad for Saturday’s game, may turn to Michael Roth, who has been nothing less than awful in his stints in the big leagues.

Jeff made an interesting point that some of these teams could do just as well by patching with internal options or expanded bullpens. He’s not wrong. There’s only so much value that a non-elite pitcher can add over a month of play, and Colon is a non-elite pitcher. If he’s worth a half-win above replacement over the last month (ZiPS has him for 0.4, and we aren’t quibbling over tenths of a point in WAR) that might not sound like much. The thing is, some of these teams may not have replacement-level options, if we’re talking about guys like Wolf or Volstad or Farmer or Lobstein, and that sort of sinks the “R” in WAR. In the playoffs, when you’re not so much thinking about WAR as you are about what happens in that one game, it’s easy to think that Colon is a better option than some of the potential threes and fours we’re seeing.

The Mets would want some kind of talent in return for Colon, and that can’t be ignored. The cost here isn’t zero. The return on investment isn’t guaranteed. But if Colon is still a Met after this weekend, it’ll be interesting to see if any of these contending teams wind up regretting it.





Mike Petriello used to write here, and now he does not. Find him at @mike_petriello or MLB.com.

37 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
tz
11 years ago

I made a comment in the C.J. Wilson post that I’d love to know how Livan Hernandez worked his magic with little stuff (getting the level of detail that David L. got in that interview).

I’d really love to know this with Colon. Just different takes on the fastball, none of which come near MLB-average velocity.

And, maybe if Colon speaks out on his craftiness like Wilson did, maybe some team will have faith to give him a nice deal when the current one runs out.

AJP
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

Colon has good control. He gets ahead of guys (8th highest in f-strike%), doesn’t walk guys (3rd lowest BB%), and limits home runs. That goes a long way even with subpar stuff.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  tz

“maybe some team will have faith to give him a nice deal when the current one runs out.”

I would imagine he’s on strictly one-year deals from here on out, no? His current contract takes him through his age 42 season. Given that he appears to be untouched on waivers so far, I can’t imagine any team having to guarantee multiple years to obtain his services in 2016 and beyond.

Johnston
11 years ago

Colon’s return on investment rate is just not high enough.

Stuck in a slump
11 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

If the Mets are insisting that they get salary relief AND a solid prospect, then yes, you’re absolutely right. But frankly, if the Mets get a B prospect, they should be willing to eat the remaining $11 million or so to make it happen. Then your ROI is just over a season of a guy that you can expect to be right around league average and could be as much as 1 WAR better than the guy you would be pitching in a stretch run over the last month of the season, and if you get to the playoffs, then it’s a worthwhile investment.

Not to mention what Colon could mean next year for the Angels. We know that Skaggs will be out for almost the entire season, Richards may not be ready to start the season, and no one else in that rotation has been worth 2 WAR. Shoemaker can do it, Weaver has a shot, Santiago has been worth 1 win, and 141.2 IP from Wilson has been worth the same as 15 IP from Street? This is a team badly in need of starting pitching depth, and Colon would have been their second best pitcher this year.

Dave42
11 years ago

that’s just it isn’t it – do they want salary relief, a good prospect or both. I’d think they can get one or the other.

Brian K
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

I find it odd how this is being portrayed as a salary dump by so many media outlets and fans. Despite their pitching “surplus” (if there is such a thing), this is not a guy that would make sense for the Mets to just dump. This is a guy that will give you innings and a lot of quality starts along with about one stinker a month. After the season he’s had, it seems to me that there would be more than a few teams that would line up to give a guy like that a one year $11-mil deal next winter. It seems to be a stretch to me that the Mets would have to eat most of the contract in order to get a decent prospect. The reality is that this is a guy that provides value, and there are a lot of teams that are still rather thin at the back ends of their rotations. I would be really surprised if they have to eat much money in the off season to get a satisfying return – after all, I can’t imagine they’re expecting a Zack Wheeler for him.

LaLoosh
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

problem is that the market is very crowded once the season ends with literally dozens of FA pitchers plus a wide open trade market. You would think that pressure to make the playoffs would be bearing down on at least 2 or 3 teams to make a deal but no one wants to give up a good young prospect and also pay the retail price for 1 year of Colon it seems. And I agree that he’s worth the $11M for 1 yr.

As I said there seems to be a lot of posturing going on and in the end the Mets will eat a few M to get a useful prospect back.

Stuck in a slump
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

While I don’t disagree with you Brian, you have to think about the value here. LaLoosh is absolutely right about the crowded off season market, and that’s not even factoring what we should realistically expect of him, which is about a 2-2.5 WAR pitcher. At 6 million per win, Colon doesn’t have a ton of excess value to give a team. I would expect Colon to make that much in free agency this winter if we were a FA. So why would a team give up a prospect of real value for a pitcher on a contract that would otherwise give him in the scope of ‘fair value’. Honestly, Colon on that contract with the uncertainty surounding him given his age just isn’t worth giving up more than flier type prospect.

If the Mets want to get a prospect with a good shot at being an MLB regular, they’ll need to eat a good chunk if not all of that contract to make it worth a contender’s while.

LaLoosh
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

Would seem to me that Colon at $8M next year sounds like a pretty good fit for a now team like the Tigers or Angels given how reliable he has been the past 4 years (he could prob pitch like this for another 2-3 yrs actually) especially that there will be a rotation spot ostensibly available for the Tigers next year.

I would have to think that Colon for next season at a value rate plus the pennant race for this year should certainly be worth getting back a good but not great SS prospect like Dixon Machado, esp since the Tigers are pretty crowded at SS. I’d have to think that works for both sides. I’m sure I could think of another prospect that would make it work just as well.

LaLoosh
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

So yeah I could see the Mets kicking in about $3M to make a deal work. No reason to think they’ll foot any more than that.

AdropOFvenom
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

Midseason Trades just about never have surplus value. You are paying for the opportunity cost of obtaining a valuable player at a time when there are almost none of them actually on the market. It’s just not a realistic expectation to get surplus value as well.

You pay for Colon because he can help you win games in 2014, at a time when the value of a win couldn’t possibly be any higher for a contender.

LaLoosh
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

Exactly. If you’re a Met fan, better hope the Yankees do a number on the Tigers today. That will snap Dombroski to action like nothing else will.

Stuck in a slump
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

From MLBTR on Tuesday:

The Mets are interested in not only clearing the bulk of Colon’s salary but also in receiving a decent return in terms of prospects, which further complicates the situation.

If you give up a B grade prospect to get $3m off of the books, you’re giving much more in excess value than you’d be getting in return. Colon would then go from costing you $11+ million to costing you closer to $20m due to lost excess value of said prospect. At that point, it doesn’t make much sense to do the deal if you have concerns over his durability or performance, or if you have reason to believe that he wouldn’t increase your playoff odds enough to make it worth while, because depending on where he goes, he may or may not make the playoff rotation.

Dave42
11 years ago

Watching Colon pitch is fascinating. Similar to watching Pedro pitch toward the end of his career, he’s a man relying on his ability to hit spots and be one or two steps ahead of the hitter. While he hasn’t struck out a bunch of guys, his 22 walks in 167 innings and 5.9 K:BB Ratio is 6th best in baseball.

I would think the next few days are the Mets’ best chance to trade Colon for a good return. Some team should come to terms with the fact that they don’t have enough pitching. Colon has been a Jekyll and Hyde pitcher this year too, as alluded to by his number of 7+ inning starts. When he’s been on, he’s been great. In his 4 starts of 5 innings or less, he has a 12.10 ERA. In his other 21 starts it’s 2.74.

Mike
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

That last stat is kind of pointless though; spot-checking a handful of other pitchers of different competence levels you see the same kind of superficially interesting splits, but that just tells you that starts of 5 innings or less tend to be short because the guy was getting shelled.

Wainwright: 5 innings or less, 10.93, other starts 1.91
Collmenter: 5 innings or less, 10.02, other starts 3.00
Hutchison: 5 innings or less, 11.57, other starts 3.26
Lincecum: 5 innings or less, 9.26, other starts 2.53

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike

^^This.

EDogg1438
11 years ago
Reply to  Mike

Clayton Kershaw:

5 IP or less: 10.80 ERA
More than 5 IP: 1.39 ERA

Fun fact: In Kershaw’s two shortest outings this year, he’s combined to go 6.2 IP with 12K 2BB 1HR allowed. Even when he sucks he’s still awesome.

attgig
11 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

4 stinkers out of 25 isn’t too horrible. 84% chance that he’ll give your offense a chance to win a ballgame. i think any of those contending teams should like that.

LaLoosh
11 years ago

there is a lot posturing going on right now. The Tigers aren’t going to sit idly by if they drop another game or two and have to start Lobstein and then Farmer? on Saturday. Pressure is mounting on them even more than for the Halos.

Stank Asten
11 years ago

The waivers are revocable, and the likes of Beltre and Darvish clear it. There is no reason to assume that 29 teams did not want to take Colon’s contract and then write an article about what made them avoid taking Colon.

TKDC
11 years ago

It seems like for the Angels this is a no-brainer. I find it hard to believe that they could not ship him to a different team next year, perhaps eating $3-4 million (insert Bartolo joke here). That makes this about $5-6 million for a good chance of winning one more game the rest of the season than they would without him. And the playoffs to boot. How can that not be worth it?

Descalzo Jose
11 years ago

The way he looks when he bats is actually the only reason to love Colon. Pity he won’t get picked up by another NL team. And he’ll soon be out of baseball entirely, and then where will we get a GIF like that with the most appropriate backstop advertising in the history of baseball GIFs?

Nate
11 years ago
Reply to  Descalzo Jose

Aauuggh! Can’t unsee that first jpg!
I also can’t imagine how that image by itself doesn’t save NotGraphs!

Tim
11 years ago

Given what we’ve seen lately, Colon at 1/$12 would probably be one of the best free agent deals of the offseason. I don’t get why non-contenders who need pitching next year didn’t claim him.

vivalajeter
11 years ago
Reply to  Tim

I agree with you. It doesn’t really make sense to me. Over the last couple of off-seasons, mid rotation starters have been getting 4 year, $50MM contracts, and pitchers like Nolasco, Jimenez and Jackson have turned into pumpkins pretty quickly. It’s not easy to find a pitcher coming off of 4 straight solid seasons, and signing him to a one-year deal.

I wouldn’t give up an elite prospect for him, but if I’m the Angels (or a comparable team with a terrible farm system), I’d put in a claim and hope that the Mets give him away for free. Then if they really can’t afford his contract next year, I’m sure they can pawn him off on another team as Spring Training approaches.

Garrett
11 years ago
Reply to  vivalajeter

Those guys weren’t going to be turning 42. There is a HUGE difference just based off age.

The reality is this. Colon at 2 WAR (reasonably optimistic projection) would be worth approximately his salary. No real economic upside. On the downside, there are plenty of guys who hit their 40’s and their fall from grace is far from pretty. The wheels come off real fast. Not a gradual descent into mediocrity.

This is basically an all risk/no reward type deal. And while you cite Jimenez and Nolasco, I could easily cite guys like Hughes and Harang. With Hughes you had a much higher upside and with Harang you had virtually no risk given his contract size.

LaLoosh
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

we’re talking about a multi-year commitment tho. It’s just for 1 year.

Why are people coming up with every contrived reason that Colon hasn’t been traded yet except the one that probably matters – that Alderson has most likely overplayed his hand and is asking for top prospects in return. Once he gets real about the prospect value that Colon at or near retail value should return, he can then decide how important it is to clear Colon’s 2015 salary off the payroll.

LaLoosh
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

sorry, *not* a multi-year commitment…

vivalajeter
11 years ago
Reply to  Garrett

Hughes and Harang aren’t comparable though. Harang hasn’t had a 2-win season since 2009, and was one of the veterans you bring into Spring Training and don’t know if he’ll make the Opening Day roster. He’s surpassed expectations this year, but he could have also spent the entire year in the minors like many pitchers that are signed to his type of contract.

Hughes was a top prospect who consistently put up FIP/xFIP’s in the mid-4’s over the last few years, and he’s average 1.5 wins per year leading up to this year, with a ~5 era to go along with it.

With either guy, you hope he turns into a mid-rotation starter but you certainly don’t project that out of him. From a performance perspective, they weren’t in the same ballpark as Colon over last few years.

The guys I mentioned, they were expected to slide into the rotation and perform pretty well, and they got large multi-year contracts based on it. Colon has averaged about 3 wins over the last 4 years, including this year. I wouldn’t want him for 2-3 guaranteed years after 2014, but on a one-year deal I don’t think $11MM is very risky. If I’m a contender looking for a SP this off-season, Colon is a guy I’d target because he has performed consistently well for the last 4 years, and I wouldn’t have to risk more than a year. His age is beneficial in the sense that it prevents someone from giving him a multi-year mistake contract.

And I don’t really see how 2 WAR is a reasonably optimistic projection. He’s surpassed that 4 years in a row, and he’ll probably come in around 3 WAR this year. Yes, he’s old, and yes, he’s fat. But it hasn’t caught up to him yet, and I wouldn’t expect it to take away his ability overnight.

Tim
11 years ago

I think it’s simply an age-related avoidance. At his age, and with his body type, his chances of imploding are much higher than other guys. I love that he has defied the baseball gods to continue being a quality starter (it’s one of my favorite baseball stories of the past few years, believe it or not), but if I’m a GM, I’m not giving up meaningful prospects, whether salary is eaten or not. I might take on the reasonable salary, but only if my team is flush with cash.

As for a “mystery” team? What about the Cardinals? They have a lot of payroll room, Masterson looks toast, and they’ve dicked Martinez around so much that his value in 2014 is nil. There’s no guarantee Wacha makes it back this season, and if that’s the case, the team only has three viable starters.

Johnny Ringo
11 years ago

If the Mets are looking at contending next year, which it seems they are, why dump Colon?

Especially for salary relief or “B” prospects? I don’t think this is a move they need to make. He has an option for next year, so unless they are expecting total regression or injury, why not keep him they flip him at the deadline next year?

Not to mention, if they are in it next year, he could be an extremely valuable piece with all the injuries we have seen to pitchers around the game this year.

Garrett
11 years ago
Reply to  Johnny Ringo

The answer is simple. He could easily be a non-contributor next year and $11M is a chunk of change for the Mets. Better to free that money up now and use it towards the next season.

The reality is that he has pitched well this season. Far better than many people expected. And even then nobody will take him for just salary. To assume that next year he’ll have a line of suitors at the deadline is pretty darn optimistic.

PoundTown
11 years ago

I don’t understand the concern about next year’s salary. Colon’s been a league average pitcher over the last 4 years. Try buying a league average pitcher for 1 year 11 million this offseason on the free agent market. That extra year at 11 million is an asset, the Mets shouldn’t just give it away for nothing.

Danielle Rennifer
11 years ago

There must be a mystery team as in Seattle Mariners interested in Bartolo Colon the way Felix Hernandez and couple other starting pitchers has been struggling lately. A three way trade between Mariners, Mets, and Dodgers/Royals/or Dodgers would make sense similar to the Mariners, Rays, and Tigers trade involving David Price but on somewhat lesser value in return.