Skubal Becomes Ta-Richest Player in Arbitration History

Stephen Brashear-Imagn Images

Seldom, if ever, has the baseball world waited on tenterhooks to hear the result of a salary arbitration case, but most arbitration-eligible players are not Tarik Skubal. On this point, the arbitrator seems to have agreed, granting the Tigers left-hander a record $32 million salary for his final year of team control.

Arbitration cases themselves are usually back-page news. The question is not whether a player will return to his previous team, but how much he’ll be paid. Only people who work in baseball and unrecoverable RosterResource addicts care about such things, especially because the club’s offer and the player’s request usually only differ by a small amount.

I can think of few players who need less context in this audience than Skubal. Big dude, heavy fastball, great changeup. Two-time defending AL Cy Young winner, incumbent ace of a Tigers team that’s made the playoffs two straight years. If there’s an argument that Skubal is not both the best left-handed pitcher in baseball and the best pitcher in the American League, I’m all ears, but anyone making such a case would be defending a minority position.

What makes Skubal’s case fascinating is the fact that he filed at $32 million, while the Tigers came in at $19 million.

That’s a huge gap, and by rule, the arbitrator could not split the baby (not that you could split the baby in King Solomon’s days either). There would be no meeting in the middle. Having a $13 million question mark in February is a big deal for any team, especially the Tigers, who signed Framber Valdez to a three-year, $115 million contract on Wednesday night while they were waiting for the decision to come down.

The timing of the Valdez contract launched a thousand tin foil hats. The Tigers knew they’d won the case, and therefore would have the money to sign Valdez. Or, the Tigers knew they’d lost the case, and therefore were already preparing to trade Skubal.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

It doesn’t help things that Skubal’s quality and contract situation — he’s a free agent after this season — have made him a frequent target of trade rumors. Some people think (either genuinely or sarcastically) that even a contender like Detroit can’t afford to let its best player walk for nothing, and that every star produced in the heartland will eventually become a Los Angeles Dodger.

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. The Tigers are running back a team that’s lost paper-thin division series in each of the past two years. Adding Valdez could be enough to snag a pennant in an American League without a heavy preseason favorite. If they keep Skubal, maybe he walks, but with a World Series ring on his finger. Surely no one Detroit would trade him for would help the team as much in pursuit of that goal.

The Tigers know this, so how did they expect to convince an arbitrator that Skubal was worth $13 million less than he wanted? Even knowing that teams throw rhetorical elbows in arbitration hearings — sometimes to the point of alienating their star players — that seems like a stretch.

The $32 million award is a record for a player in his last year of arbitration, but in absolute terms it’s an incremental step. Just two years ago, Skubal’s agent, Scott Boras, settled with the Yankees on a $31 million deal for Juan Soto. The year before that, Shohei Ohtani and the Angels shook hands on a $30 million deal for his last season of team control. That broke the record set in January 2020, when Mookie Betts and the Red Sox settled at $27 million.

I don’t think it’s a stretch to put Skubal in a class with Soto, Ohtani, or Betts — i.e., the class of the best players of their generation — but unlike those three, Skubal doesn’t hit.

Until Thursday, the record one-year contract for an arbitration-eligible pitcher belonged to another Cy Young-winning Tigers left-hander: David Price.

Man, that was a long time ago, I can hear you thinking. And it was. That record stood for 10 years, because almost every elite young pitcher gets a contract extension before he reaches this point.

Last season, 19 pitchers got at least one Cy Young vote. Seven (Max Fried, Carlos Rodón, Aroldis Chapman, Jacob deGrom, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Nick Pivetta, and Zack Wheeler) were veterans who’d reached free agency already. Four others (Paul Skenes, Hunter Brown, Bryan Woo, and Andrew Abbott) had yet to amass enough service time to qualify for arbitration. Another five pitchers (Garrett Crochet, Drew Rasmussen, Cristopher Sánchez, Logan Webb, and Freddy Peralta) had already signed contract extensions that took them out of arbitration.

Given the uncertainty of a young starting pitcher’s health, and the riches on offer even in an under-market pre-arbitration extension, it’s obvious why most choose the safer path. So only three of last year’s 19 Cy Young vote-getters went into this season going through arbitration the old-fashioned way: Skubal, Trevor Rogers, and Jesús Luzardo.

Rogers and Luzardo settled, the latter for just $11 million in his final year before free agency. I think if Luzardo’s worth $11 million, you can make a case that based on his achievements, Skubal’s earned $32 million, but getting that out of an arbitrator is easier said than done.

Because Price’s record payday, all the way back in 2015, was just $19.75 million. Boras and Skubal didn’t just have to beat the record, they had to beat it by more than half. I admit I wasn’t optimistic they would; the question of what a pitcher like Skubal was worth in a final year of arbitration simply had not been asked in so long that I had a hard time imagining the record going up by that much in one hearing. Maybe Boras was making a statement, softening the ground for the arbitration scale for pitchers to move belatedly, in the hope of enriching MacKenzie Gore or Jackson Jobe in the future.

How wrong I was. Skubal had not just Boras Corp. in his corner, but MLBPA deputy executive director and lead negotiator Bruce Meyer as well, according to ESPN’s Jeff Passan.

The rules of arbitration are spelled out in the CBA under Article VI, Section E(10), which instructs the arbitration panel to use the salaries of players “not exceeding one annual service group above the Player’s annual service group” as a guide for determining an appropriate salary. So when Skenes hits arbitration next year, he’ll be awarded a salary not based on what guys like Skubal and Valdez are making, but on precedents set by other first- and second-year arbitration players.

However, that same section exempts players with five or more years of service time — e.g. Skubal — and continues with the following provision: “This shall not limit the ability of a Player or his representative, because of special accomplishment, to argue the equal relevance of salaries of Players without regard to service, and the arbitration panel shall give whatever weight to such argument as is deemed appropriate.”

In other words, the reigning back-to-back Cy Young winner could argue that if Wheeler and deGrom and Gerrit Cole were making $30-odd million a year, why couldn’t he?

The arbitration panel didn’t have to buy that case completely, it just had to find it more persuasive than the argument that Skubal should make less now than Price did back in the Paleolithic Age.

With Skubal winning his case, RosterResource’s latest estimate places the team’s payroll at around $215 million, and its competitive balance tax payroll at $244,086,251, which is a figure I would ordinarily not go to nine significant figures on before spring training. It is, however, notable that the first luxury tax threshold this year is $244 million on the dot.

If the Tigers stayed at that number, the actual tax liability would be close to nil. At just $86,251 above the threshold, they’d owe only $17,250 in tax, a trivial sum to the Ilitch family, which probably loses that much between the sofa cushions every day. It would open the Tigers up to an additional 10% repeater penalty if they went over the tax again in 2027, but if they want to avoid that, they can shed $100,000 in payroll more or less at will.

Besides, the Tigers — who had zero $30 million-a-year pitchers 24 hours ago, and now have two — are in an in-for-a-penny, in-for-a-pound situation here. Their payroll is due to go up some $60 million from 2025, and no other team in the AL Central has a projected payroll of more than $146 million. Detroit is spending twice as much on its players as the Twins, and more than what the Guardians and White Sox are paying their players put together. This team is in win-now mode, and the outcome of Skubal’s case does nothing to change that.

But the impact of this case on the league at large is quite meaningful — Meyer’s participation in the hearing is strong evidence of that. The pre-arbitration extension has taken a bit of steam out of the free agent market; my sense was that Soto was going to be the last half-billion-dollar free agent for a while.

Maybe that’s still going to be the case, but with Skubal raising the ceiling for arbitration, and setting a new precedent for what pitchers can earn, going through arbitration is going to be more attractive for players who would otherwise be thinking about settling down with the first seven-year contract offer they saw. At the very least, those extensions for homegrown players are going to get more expensive.

By shooting the moon here, Skubal made the next group of pitchers to come through behind him — Skenes, of course, but also Brown, Woo, Jacob Misiorowski, you name it — a ton of money when their time comes. Skenes in particular should be penning a truly groveling thank-you note to Skubal as soon as possible.

We talk sometimes about contracts that reset the market quite a lot, but there is no better example than Skubal’s arbitration award. When the train comes in for the big lefty, everybody rides.





Michael is a writer at FanGraphs. Previously, he was a staff writer at The Ringer and D1Baseball, and his work has appeared at Grantland, Baseball Prospectus, The Atlantic, ESPN.com, and various ill-remembered Phillies blogs. Follow him on Twitter, if you must, @MichaelBaumann.

51 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
GoodEnoughForMeMember since 2018
6 months ago

Good for Skubal, that team offer was offensive.

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 months ago

I was convinced it was Slubal’s side that was crazy and Boras was an idiot and all that because that’s basically all you heard about this until today. Everyone likes to poke at a small handful of failures, but if your goal as a player is to make as much money as possible, Scott Boras is your man! He shows this time after time. Those misses are talked about a lot but they’re also rare.

raregokusMember since 2022
6 months ago
Reply to  TKDC

Yeah, the way some people talk about him on here, you’d think he was a bumbling idiot

TKDCMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 months ago
Reply to  raregokus

Way less here than most of the internet.

JimmieFoxxalorianMember since 2020
6 months ago

It’s funny, I said something similar about this in a different article (before the arb outcome was announced) and people voted my comment down.

I realize orgs have to be careful about their arb proposals (not just for their own $$ but also mindful of setting a new precedent). However, they also should be equally careful of not alienating important franchise players in the negotiation process. Especially so in a player’s walk year.

Greg SimonsMember since 2016
6 months ago

I agree teams shouldn’t alienate their best players, but if they’re going to, if they don’t plan to resign him, the walk year probably is the *best* time to so.

sadhulkMember since 2020
6 months ago

I’m trying to imagine working for the Tigers and attempting to make the point that Skubal isn’t that good and deserves to be paid less than Robbie Ray and Seth Lugo in 2026.

Ivan_GrushenkoMember since 2016
6 months ago

So much so that they probably thought they’d lose but it was worth a shot. The alternative would have been to offer $27m or something, and they still might lose.

ScoreboardMember since 2016🏆 MVP
6 months ago

“ unrecoverable RosterResource addicts”

I feel seen

timtomakethedonutsMember since 2025
6 months ago

i really wonder what number would have swung this decision in favor of the tigers. 22mil? 25mil? seems like this is more about the tigers being cheap (they, like most teams, are) than skubal being worth this amount (he, like any 2 time cy winner, certainly is).

HappyFunBallMember since 2019
6 months ago

Yeah. Something in the mid 20s. Higher than Price and not insignificantly

A Salty ScientistMember since 2024
6 months ago

I think that’s in the ballpark of what would have swung the decision. The Tigers being egregiously cheap very likely cost them $5-10M.

Last edited 6 months ago by A Salty Scientist
endaroundMember since 2025
6 months ago

Keep in mind this was likely not the Tigers but MLB. MLB tells teams what each player in arbitration is worth and why that is. The Tigers could have been feeling pressure themselves not to go above the MLB salary line.

DavidMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  endaround

Mmm. Love the smell of price fixing in the morning.

LaBellaVitaMember since 2018🏆 MVP
6 months ago

Price’s salary was $27M in 2026 dollars. Maybe start from there.

MoMember since 2024
6 months ago

Or what ask from Skubal would have swung it to the tigers. If the highest paid pitchers in baseball make $35M-$40M, and skubal is the very best pitcher in baseball, shouldn’t he be paid even more? Would he have won if he asked for $45M?

JamesFanMember since 2018
6 months ago

I don’t think it’s a matter of the Tiger being cheap more than they were just dumb. Even the slightly above average fan knew that their offer should have been at least $25M, and more likely $27M +/- $1M. It’s almost like they wanted to lose.

ChrisMember since 2024
6 months ago

IMO this has little to nothing to do with the tigers themselves and more to do with the billionaires in cahoots with one another to artificially drive down the cost of their workers

SorianoSympathist
6 months ago

My name is Owen, I am a roster resource addict.

HI OWEN

johansantana17Member since 2026
6 months ago

Which Soriano are you a sympathist for? Hopefully Alfonso, however I can’t imagine how you would even criticize such an amazing player.

CC AFCMember since 2016
6 months ago

A good, union man. Way to go. The other owners must be so pissed at the tigers right now.

bubblesMember since 2024
6 months ago

$80K over the tax? Could the Tigers not get Valdez to sign for say $500K less overall to avoid hitting the tax? I suppose it won’t matter though as most likely they trade to acquire someone at the deadline and that would push them back over the tax

jtsnowdayMember since 2022
6 months ago
Reply to  bubbles

The public estimates of CBT payrolls aren’t 100% precise though too right? I doubt it’s accurate to $80K. So it’s possible the team and MLB could be working off a different value

mconsultatlMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  jtsnowday

Presumably it’s also possible for them to shed that salary in the next week if they want to?

raregokusMember since 2022
6 months ago
Reply to  mconsultatl

It’s the end of season number that matters, not the start of the season

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
6 months ago
Reply to  jtsnowday

Valdez’s contract apparently has deferrals which would affect his AAV. I can’t imagine that the bean counters in DET’s front office weren’t thinking about that when drawing up the contract.

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
6 months ago

If not, there will be some new bean counters there soon.

johansantana17Member since 2026
6 months ago
Reply to  jtsnowday

Yes, and also it’s an estimated $80k difference and the tax is calculated at the end of the regular season, which is 8 months away.

CleverBaseballPunMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  bubbles

Are the deferral figures on Framber’s deal public yet? When those are accounted for, they may not actually be over.

vbjd1111Member since 2019
6 months ago

The arbitration panel didn’t have to buy that case completely, it just had to find it more persuasive than the argument that Skubal should make less now than Price did back in the Paleolithic Age.

Sigh. This perpetuates the argument that the arbitrator had to find the team’s number to be better than the player’s number. In fact the arbitrator simply had to conclude that the midpoint less a dollar was more reasonable than the midpoint plus a dollar. That makes the argument for the Tigers considerably easier (even though they lost). And it makes what Price made very irrelevant.

Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  vbjd1111

That’s a good point. The question was really, was Skubal worth more or less than $25.5M. The answer was more.

krusherkovalev55Member since 2025
6 months ago
Reply to  vbjd1111

I’ve read rhis comment five times and still have no idea what it is you are trying to convey

CleverBaseballPunMember since 2020
6 months ago

Uncle Spike’s comment boils down the point. vbjd’s first paragraph was a quote from the article that vbjd takes issue with.

In the arbitration hearing, the Tigers would have been focused on Skubal’s value being less than $25.5 million and not that their $19 million offer was the correct amount. I disagree that Price’s arb salary would be irrelevant to that argument, and I suspect that Tigers brought it up in the hearing. “Sure, Skubal may be better than Price was, but not 30% better.”

Last edited 6 months ago by CleverBaseballPun
Uncle SpikeMember since 2020
6 months ago

The arbitrator had to decide whether to award Skubal a $19M salary (the Tigers price) or $32M (Skubal’s price). Chances are, they didn’t come to the conclusion that Skubal was worth $32M, they likely, heard all the arguments, reviewed all the data and came to a number somewhere between the two. But they can’t award that number, they have to pick one of the two so that almost certainly pick the one closest to their number. If they thought Skubal was worth $25M or less, they likely would have gone with the Tigers bid. $26M or more and they go with Skubal. Had they said $22M and moved the midpoint to $27M, perhaps it would have been a different story. Thanks again, if that happened, perhaps Skubal would have changed hood number to $30M as he felt he was more likely to lose now. It’s a fun little game and the Tigers lost.

Dave from DCMember since 2018
6 months ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

Fair enough, but the original post argues that the arbitrator did not have “to find the team’s number to be better than the player’s number.” Isn’t saying that the team’s number is closer to what the arbitrator deemed to be the correct number the definition of deciding the team’s number is better? That’s why the original comment does not track for me–what is the distinction between “this number is closer to the right figure” and “this number is better”?

CleverBaseballPunMember since 2020
6 months ago
Reply to  Dave from DC

Yeah, the original comment started by quibbling with the technicalities of how the arbitration hearing works (which I understood), but it lost me on the substance. Baseball arbitration doesn’t distinguishing between “better” and “closer.”

Fun-Hating DorkMember since 2019
6 months ago
Reply to  Uncle Spike

Maybe heuristically you might ballpark a figure, but you don’t even really need to to make the binary decision between $19 and $32 million. I would be surprised if the arbitrators were actually working out a number rather than just considering the precedents and thinking that the case for $32 mil is more persuasive. I don’t necessarily need to know if it’s $30 or $28 or $26. I’m pretty sure they could even rule for Skubal even if a “calculated” figure was slightly below the midpoint, if they feel his arguments are more in line with actual precedent.

I think, due specifically to the vastness of the gap between the two numbers, there is logical space to award a number even if they did a strict valuation that was on the other side of the midpoint.

Given the pretty clear language of the CBA around comparisons when “special accomplishment” is in play (and honestly, back-to-back Cy Youngs would qualify as “special accomplishment” under any honest definition of the phrase in this context), it honestly feels like a bit of a no-brainer to me that Skubal won.

Sonny LMember since 2017
6 months ago

Excited for the Pirates to argue against Skenes’ number in a few years because his Cy Youngs weren’t back to back*

*assumes he wins another in nonconsecutive seasons

**Cys Young?

PhilMember since 2016
6 months ago
Reply to  vbjd1111

I do think what Price made is relevant if you are considering the midpoint. Skubal’s argument would be “in today’s dollars, Price’s arb salary was worth $27 million (and thus above the midpoint), and Skubal is even better than Price was then.”

I do really think the Tigers’ FO goofed here, just by not upping their offer to at least a million or so over Price – because as much as the arbiters are looking at numbers, they are also human, and going “they’re not even offering more than David Price got a decade ago, and Skubal’s won back to back Cy Youngs!” might be a persuasive argument. I don’t know how the arbiters work or think, but if you can get them to feel that the team are being obviously cheap, they might then think Skubal should win, and fit the numbers to support that, rather than look at the numbers and decide who should win.

Nathan AndersonMember since 2021
6 months ago

As soon as I heard the Tigers offered less than Price’s old record, I figured they would lose. Well, until I saw what Skubal submitted. I’m really glad he got it. It was disappointing to see the Tigers offer such a low amount for a guy that they’ve leaned on so hard.

KeithMember since 2024
6 months ago

As note previously in this thread, Mark Boras is really good at his job. We may not always like the tactics and once in awhile he overplays his hand, but honestly if I were a player, he’d be my agent.

raregokusMember since 2022
6 months ago
Reply to  Keith

And if you think Mark is good, wait until you see Scott

CleverBaseballPunMember since 2020
6 months ago

I am curious about the historical correlation on top arbitration salaries (settled or actually arbitrates decided) between pitchers and position players. Before the Skubal decision, Soto’s mark was 62% greater than the Price salary.

In 2020, Mookie’s then-record was only 37% more than Price’s salary. The position player record obviously grew considerably in the last 5 years while the pitcher record didn’t budge.

The article mentions how extensions have limited the big arb cases for pitchers, but what has this ratio looked like over time? In 2015, at the time of Price’s settlement, what was the position player record?

Absent the market dynamic with so many arb-extensions for top end pitchers, would you expect more parity (or maybe even a premium for pitchers) given that the one-year commitment provides protection against the higher likelihood of a major injury for pitchers? Or is the lower risk of injury, especially catastrophic injury, enough to expect that position players would receive a premium even on a one-year deal?

Dmjn53
6 months ago

So happy he won this. Given how archaic the performance metrics used in arbitration are, I was half expecting the the result to be that he’s not actually an ave because he only had 13 wins

Yer Main GuyMember since 2024
6 months ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

On the other hand, “number of Cy Young awards” is a stat that will appeal to any living generation.

LMOTFOTEMember since 2017
6 months ago
Reply to  Dmjn53

Good point, he was only 2nd on his own team in wins, Casey Mize had 14.

adrock75Member since 2018
6 months ago

Great article, I just take issue with the notion that Skenes’ thank you note should be ‘groveling’.

He is neither an MLB owner nor a pitcher whose arb years have been bought out.

He’s another elite arm who is now likely to be paid more fairly because of Skubal’s win.

Perhaps ‘glowing’, ‘effusive’, or even ‘fulsome’ would be appropriate.

The Ilich family’s apology note to Skubal can be groveling.

tigerfannky
6 months ago
Reply to  adrock75

I don’t think they have to grovel. They’re defense was probably that their offer was more than any fifth year player has ever been awarded and and takes into account how remarkable his performance has been. That’s all they really could say, especially after he had placed his two CYA’s on the table in front of him when he sat down.

I think that is one of the best flexes of all time.

Unless they really believe he will leave or they didn’t want to pay that much, I don’t understand how the team didn’t say, we’ll give you the $32M and then add nine years at an amount to get him to $400M for a 10 year overall contract. That was the amount he said he wanted last off season.

Then you’re only into him through age 38 and he gets the number he wants. Even if he wanted $500M total, then do some deferrals to get there. I wish we lived in world where the sane approach was nothing more than five years, but we don’t, and for special cases you should stretch for it.

The Old Man would have paid him and it wouldn’t have gotten to this point. Unless we find out they did make a really strong offer and he just flat turned it down like Scherzer did because he wanted to go through the process.

Sonny LMember since 2017
6 months ago
Reply to  tigerfannky

Both can be true.

Reporting suggests Skubal saw his opportunity to help other players and was determined to stress test final arb year compensation.

The Tigers may not have offered him, or like the Mets not countering Alonso decided internally that the max of what they were willing to pay would read as insulting to a player they still care about and need.

I’m just happy the Tigers took the bait and played an important part in smashing this comp ceiling.

Rallymonkey5Member since 2018
6 months ago

Didn’t remember Price got that much. Considering it was 10 years ago, seems like any easy sell. Look at average payrolls, top free agent contracts, or whatever, I’m sure they’ve all jumped 50 percent since 2015

si.or.noMember since 2017
6 months ago

I’m not sure on the mechanics of how this works, but has a team ever submitted for _more_ than a player?

If not, that would imply that both sides have an idea of what the other side is going to submit. And if that’s the case — what exactly were the Tigers thinking here? Even assuming Price, Skubal equivalency (and 27M in inflation adjusted target), 19M wins against — 36M?

So, working backwards, the Tigers thought Boras was going to submit at 36M+?