Team NERD: Some Early Returns

Though we’re just a bit over a week into the season, every team in the majors has recorded over 300 plate appearances and has, at least to some degree, begun to fashion something like a “team identity.” Whether said identity is the one that defines the team even two weeks from now — that remains to be seen. But, like I always say, it’s never too early to begin making sweeping generalizations!

In any case, owing to the samples available, it’s not entirely inappropriate to look at our very proprietary watchability index, NERD, at the team level. NERD, which was introduced in these pages at the end of last August, represents an attempt to anticipate how interesting a team might be to the smarter baseball fan — taking into account both sabermetric variables (batting runs, bullpen xFIP) and more aesthetic or generally appealing ones (team speed, age, payroll).

Here are the results, first. Discussion regarding particular scores and a reminder on calculating NERD appear after the jump. (UPDATE: for some reason the Padres’ Pay variable was off. Now fixed. Thanks, reader Tony.)

Two Quick Notes
As I say, there’s a reminder further down on how NERD is calculated. Still, I want to mention two quick things here.

First is that, because UZR numbers aren’t available yet, they’re not factored into the scores you see here. Second is that I’ve added a new variable to the team scores — namely, a way to reward teams that are squarely in the middle of playoff contention (and represented above by POFF).

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

I noticed last season that teams which were either totally incapable of clinching, or had already clinched, a playoff spot — they were generally less interesting to watch, as they had less to play for than teams competing directly for postseason play. Accordingly, I’ve rewarded teams that have approximately a 25% chance of making the playoffs per Cool Standings (with the idea that most teams begin the season, generically, with something like a 25% chance of making the postseason). I’ve included more information on calculating the POFF variable below.

Discussion
• I’ll concede that it’s difficult to consider very interesting a team that’s given considerable playing time to Willie Bloomquist, but the Diamondbacks have other, less scrap-related items of interest to offer. First of all, only the Phillies and Reds in the National League have produced more park-adjusted batting runs above average. Additionally, there’s the relatively low team age and payroll. And, finally, the Arizona bullpen — which was miserable last season — has been excellent so far. J.J. Putz, Juan Gutierrez, Kam Mickolio, and Aaron Heilman: all have posted xFIPs under 3.00 (in very few innings, admittedly).

• When considering the Cleveland Indians, it’s probably important to divorce them from their present stadium atmosphere (which SB Nation’s Jeff Sullivan has monitored with admirable dilgence). Still, it’s important to note somthing — namely, that Carlos Santana is frigging awesome. Also, per Base Runs standings, the Indians actually “should” be 6-3 through their first nine games — meaning their 7-2 record isn’t totally crazy.

• The Royals? What? (Tim Collins is one thing. Alex Gordon hitting .357/.400/.548, 163 wRC+ so far is another.)

• The Cubs? The Mariners? The Astros? These aren’t suprising, are they?

• The Twins would do better if sideburns were one of the criteria.

Components of Team NERD
The components of Team NERD — again, originally presented last August — are as follow:

• Batter Age (AGE)
• Park-Adjusted wRAA (BAT)
• Park-Adjusted Home Run per Fly Ball (HR/FB)
• Stolen Base Attempts per Opportunity (SBA)
• Stolen Base Runs (SBR)
• Extra-Base Taken Percentage (XBT)
• Bullpen xFIP (BULL)
• Team Defense (UZR)
• Base Runs – Actual Runs Scored (LUCK)
• Payroll (PAY)
• Playoff Contention (POFF)

The Formula for Team NERD
The formula for Team NERD is represented as follows:

(AGEz*2) + BATz + HR/FBz + (SBAz*.333 + SBRz*.333 + XBTz*.333) + BULLz + UZRz + PAYz + LUCK + POFF + Constant (to make 5.00 average)

A Note on Calculating POFF
As noted above, I’ve added a variable to the NERD formula to credit teams that are most thoroughly in playoff contention — that is, neither way ahead or behind in the standings.

To measure playoff odds, I use the POFF number from Cool Standings. For teams with less than a 25% chance of making the playoffs, I do 25-POFF. If a team’s chances of making the playoffs is greater than 25%, I do (25-POFF)/-3. This way, a team with, say, a 10% chance of making the playoffs is roughly equivalent to one with a 70% chance of making the playoffs. We’ll call the results of this X.

From here, I do the following: ((25-X)-12.5)/6.25. This gives teams with exactly a 25% chance of making the playoffs a +2.00. Team that have either clinched or been matheatically eliminated will have a 2.00.





Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Phegan
15 years ago

Was Tampa the biggest drop? from 10 to 4?

BascinatorMember since 2022
15 years ago

Why are there no negative numbers for AGEz, LUCKz, and PAYz?

Oliver
15 years ago

Am I missing something or does the formula ignore the appeal of great starting pitching? That would explain Arizona, Cleveland and KC outscoring my perception.

KC
15 years ago

I’ve been a long time baseball fan and as a math major I’m trying to get more into the numbers of the sport, but as I look at this list I see teams that are scoring a good number of runs at the top. I’ll admit that most fans probably like it more when there’s a lot of runs, but for me I love defense and pitching.

glassSheets
15 years ago

I would like POFF to account for the fact there are 4, 5, and 6 teams in divisions. The AL West has better odds to make the playoffs than the NL Central simply because there are less teams (if we assume every team is the exact same quality and each game is a 50-50 coin flip). This unfairly penalizes the NL Central, helps the AL West, and actually helps the entire AL more than the entire NL.

Could POFF be some sort of deviation from the 50-50 percentages. I.e. assuming all teams are equal SEA has 1/4 + 1/11 * (3/4) = 31.8% chance of making the playoffs whereas MIL has 1/6 +1/13 *(5/6) = 23.1% chance of making the playoffs (I just did the math quick don’t be too harsh if I goofed it up).

Nate
15 years ago
Reply to  glassSheets

Quote:
“…SEA has 1/4 + 1/11 * (3/4) = 31.8% chance of making the playoffs…”

SWEET!! Go M’s!

Yirmiyahu
15 years ago
Reply to  glassSheets

“This unfairly penalizes the NL Central, helps the AL West, and actually helps the entire AL more than the entire NL. ”

Take it up with Bud Selig, not Carson.

glassSheets
15 years ago
Reply to  Yirmiyahu

The fact MIL only has a 23.1% chance of making the playoffs doesnt explicitly make them less interesting than SEA with a 31.8% chance, though. In this scenario SEA is in a four way tie whereas MIL is in a six way tie. I would say a six way tie is more NERD-licious than a 4 way tie. Bud Selig hampered their playoff chances, Carson is the detractor of interesting.

Nate
15 years ago

Carson,
I love me some NERD.
This team chart COULD be dynamic. How often will you update/post it?
I’d love to watch my Mariners climb week after week after week from 2 to say… 4 or something. That’d be awesome!
Please update and post on some kind of regular (frequent?) basis.

Tony
15 years ago

Why don’t the Padres have a + PAY score? They have one of the lowest payrolls in baseball.

shamus
15 years ago

ok, this is undoubtedly a stupid question, but why is LUCK never negative?

Choo
15 years ago

Willie Bloomquist — Most Scrappiest NERD, Hellenistic Nose Division — April, 2011.

Atta boy, Willie!

Derek
15 years ago

Hey Carson…I only get about 100-200 page impressions a day, but I thought you might be happy with the pleasant things I said about your system in my blog today. It’s always nice to feel loved, right? Check it if you wish: http://royalsbraves.blogspot.com/2011/04/series-breakdown-royals-hope-twins-stay.html

Jordan
15 years ago

Looking through the chart, the POFF column can’t be right. PHI and TEX are the 2 highest chance teams on coolstandings.com, yet both negative in this ranking? something went wrong somewhere.

jrogersMember since 2017
15 years ago
Reply to  Jordan

Teams with too high a chance of making the playoffs are less interesting to watch than those on the bubble.

camisadelgolf
15 years ago

The Reds have a very good defense. When UZR starts to become factored, how big of a boost will they receive in these rankings?

wurst2first
15 years ago

The Brewers lead the league in an additional category, Gentlemanliness, thanks to Tony Plush. That’s got to be worth something, right?

Jim Lin
15 years ago

Carson,

While I understand the idea behind having the POFF column, the use of it early in the season is giving highly counterintuitive results. This early in the season cool standings is clearly using some kind of preseason projection to predict the rest of the season so there are teams like Philadelphia and Texas that are being penalized for “nearly clinching” which is obviously ridiculous this early into the season. Do you really think that Minnesota and Cleveland are the two most interesting teams to watch right now based on standings? Or that Philadelphia and Texas are the 5th and 6th least interesting teams to watch based on standings?