The Adjustment to Revive the Final Boss

This post begins with a friendly reminder — specifically, that there are five teams in each of baseball’s six divisions. Given the noise around baseball for much of the offseason, one could be forgiven for thinking there were only four clubs in the American League East. Much of the chatter regarding the AL East this winter has centered around the formidability of the Yankees’ roster, the Red Sox’ (now successful) pursuit of J.D. Martinez, the imminent close of Baltimore’s competitive window, and the Rays’ sort of, kind of, not really teardown. It isn’t that the Blue Jays have done nothing — they’ve made several good trades and taken low-cost risks — it’s just that there have been a few more prominent stories and louder fanbases.

The most recent move out of Toronto continues the club’s offseason trend of reasonable, low-cost acquisitions. For a price of just $2.5 million, the signing of Seung-Hwan Oh — a player who, in 2016, recorded nearly three wins out of the bullpen — seems like a potential bargain.

Of course, he would not be available at this time of the offseason and at this price if he didn’t have some warts. He is coming off of a mediocre 2017 campaign, falling from one of the leauge’s top-10 relievers to barely replacement level. Of possibly greater concern is the fact that the Rangers nixed a potential deal after expressing concerns with Oh’s physical. Despite these warning signs, there is reasonable optimism for an Oh turnaround, one that would benefit the Blue Jays in either a playoff chase or as a deadline trade chip.

Upon coming over from the KBO in 2016, the “Final Boss” was a revelation. He mixed a strong fastball with a potent slider, even throwing in the occasional splitter to keep hitters off balance. His numbers were impressive: Oh struck out nearly a third of batters faced while walking only 5%. When Trevor Rosenthal faltered, Oh took over the closer role for a Cardinals team that fell a game short of the Wild Card.

For as good as 2016 was, 2017 was equally as bad. Oh’s ground-ball rate declined, his home-run rate spiked, and he struck out a third fewer batters. It all combined for a 0.1 WAR, down from 2.6 the year before, the seventh-largest single-year decrease in WAR for a reliever since 2001.

What happened that caused the deterioration of Oh’s performance? A cursory glance at the numbers, specifically the pitch values for Oh’s three main pitches, tells the top-level story.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Seung-Hwan Oh Pitch Values (Per 100)
Season Fastball Slider Splitter
2016 1.7 2.2 0.6
2017 1.3 -1.1 -7.1

It seems that Oh’s fastball still remained a decent weapon in 2017, while his slider and splitter fell off the edge in terms of effectiveness. When you look at deeper numbers on the pitches, this narrative is borne out further.

Seung-Hwan Oh Pitches, 2016-17
Pitch Season Whiffs/Swing BIP % GB/FB AVG ISO
Fastball 2016 29.0% 13.5% 0.9 .208 .088
Fastball 2017 26.5% 14.0% 0.6 .248 .133
Slider 2016 45.2% 16.3% 1.9 .164 .082
Slider 2017 28.9% 24.8% 1.0 .280 .151
Splitter 2016 42.2% 15.7% 2.7 .200 .000
Splitter 2017 30.0% 25.4% 2.0 .375 .333

We again see a fastball that backed up slightly, but sliders and splitters that were not nearly generating as many whiffs and endured more damage when being put into play. It’s easy to chalk this up simply to greater familiarity with Oh’s stuff among opposing batters. However, if we look at the velocity, movement, and release of his pitches, we see that Oh may be just an adjustment away from returning to dominance.

Oh’s velocity essentially didn’t change from 2016 to 2017, so the decay in his numbers doesn’t seem to be tied to that. However, he saw decreases in vertical drop from both his slider (3.01 to 3.27 inches) and splitter (4.49 to 6.24) in 2017. What caused this change in movement?

Unsurprisingly, Oh seems to have inadvertantly changed his mechanics. In 2016 (represented by the red points in the plots), Oh got more extension (5.77 feet in 2016 vs. 5.55 feet in 2017) on his slider and released it at a slightly higher point (5.46 feet in 2016 vs. 5.32 feet in 2017). The same was true of his changeup, which featured more extension (5.87 feet in 2016 vs. 5.71 feet in 2017) and higher releases (5.62 feet in 2016 vs. 5.5 feet in 2017) in 2016.

So basically, it looks like Oh stopped getting on top of his pitches, leading to less drop. This left more pitches up in the zone leading to fewer whiffs and grounders. If Oh manages to find his 2016 delivery, he may see his 2016 results return. Even amongst his 2017 results, there was reason for Oh to be hopeful. He lowered his average exit velocity (85.1 mph in 2017 vs. 87.5 in 2016), while his walk rate remained fairly similar. The Blue Jays have every reason to believe that Oh could return with a slight change.

A return to form for Oh would be a minor coup for a Blue Jays bullpen that lost two of its top members from last year. They still have Roberto Osuna, who put 3.0 WAR in 2017, leading a bullpen corps that was a top-10 unit last year. But Joe Smith signed with the Astros, while Dominic Leone went to the Cardinals in the Randal Grichuk trade. A pitcher like the 2016 version of Oh would provide the Blue Jays with one of the better setup/closer combos in baseball.

All this, of course, supposes that the Blue Jays contend in 2018. Should the depth of the AL East cause Toronto to fall behind the pace, a rejuvenated Oh would be attractive to contenders, while the going rate for relief pitchers would give the Blue Jays opportunity to add to a top-10 farm system.

Seung-Hwan Oh was not good last year. However, despite his poor performance, there was reason for optimism in his underlying numbers. Even more so, it seems like a small adjustment on Oh’s part could return him to his impressive debut season. Even if Oh ultimately becomes only a deadline trade chip for the Blue Jays, he provides baseball with a great comeback story opportunity and the Blue Jays with a low-risk, high-reward option out of the pen.





Stephen Loftus is a Visiting Assistant Professor in Mathematical Sciences at Sweet Briar College in Virginia. In his spare time he usually can be found playing the pipe organ or working on his rambling sabermetric thoughts.

13 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
tb.25
8 years ago

On a side note, the Cardinals recently have sent two all-star closers to replacement-level. Trevor Rosenthal was the other.

Momus
8 years ago
Reply to  tb.25

Which Cardinals team – the one in St. Louis or the one in Toronto?
;-P

Michael Augustine
8 years ago

I guess I’ve completely misunderstood pitch value metrics. I always thought negative was better; negative run value when throwing a pitch.

Today I Learned…

HandsomeBoyModel
8 years ago

Minor nitpick, Oh came from the NPB where he pitched for the Hanshin Tigers for 2 years after coming over from the KBO.

ice_hawk10
8 years ago

very nice. when i took a brief surface dive at his numbers i saw the difference in heat maps for his fastball (up in the zone in 2017) and left it at that. up in the zone -> more flyballs -> more HRs. i did not see that it was actually his slider that declined (heat maps for his slider dont indicate any change in location between years.

good catch on the extension.

dbeattie
8 years ago

Interesting piece

tung_twista
8 years ago

One concern regarding Oh is his age and the accrued mileage on his arm.
From 2005(age 22) to 2017(age 34), he recorded
39W 29W 396SV 709G 785.1IP ERA 1.99
for an average of 30SV 55G 60.1IP per season.
This understates Oh’s actual workload since a) most of his career was spent in KBO/NPB where they have less games per season, b) he almost always pitched in the playoffs were the reliance on the top relief arm increases and c) he constantly represented Korea in Olympics/Asian Games/WBC.

For comparison, I looked at relief pitchers who clocked more than 700 innings between their 22 y.o. and 34 y.o. season during the past 30 years.
There are a grand total of 13 pitchers that satisfies this criteria with only Mike Jackson and Franciso Rodriguez having more innings than Oh.
Their average during this 13 year span is
43W 39L 181SV 668G 758IP ERA 3.22 FIP 3.63 WPA 13.74
ERA- 75 FIP- 84 fwar 10.4 ra9-war 15.3
Pretty solid overall.

Just as a sanity check, I looked at their 34 year old season record.
Sullivan was retired, Foulke was injured and Tavarez started some games so I excluded them.
The remaining 10 players averaged
3W 4L 24SV 66G 65IP ERA 3.17 FIP 3.62 WPA 1.16
ERA- 73 FIP- 82 fwar 0.9 ra9-war 1.3
So again, a solid performance.

Finally, let’s look at how these group of players did in their 35 year old season.
Shaw additionally retired and Jackson was injured so again I have averaged across 10 players.
2W 3L 5SV 45G 47IP ERA 4.64 FIP 5.15 WPA -0.15
ERA- 108 FIP- 118 fwar 0.2 ra9-war 0.1

Basically, replacement level performance.
Just to check it is not a one year blip, their 36 year old performances.
Note Rodriguez is unlikely to play in the majors and four more players retired giving us a six player sample.
3W 4L 13SV 52G 53IP ERA 4.02 FIP 3.97 WPA 0.41
ERA- 95 FIP- 92 fwar 0.4 ra9-war 0.3.
Better, but not really.

Of course, this is far from a sound methodology to predict individual pitcher performance but it is quite telling and should explain why Oh’s contract looks so team friendly just one year removed from a great season.

OddBall Herrera
8 years ago

This brings to mind a funny thing about opening day last year. We’re always saying not to put too much stock into the small sample of April games, but on opening day Oh looked terrible and blew a save, and Melancon did the same. More of a coincidence than a truly teachable moment, but I did find it interesting that right there we got a snapshot of just how those two players’ seasons were going to go, we just didn’t know it yet.

MichaelMember since 2016
8 years ago

Would love to see some side by side video of his release points from each season in a piece like this. Is this something you looked at? Was the difference small enough to not be easily seen?

Momus
8 years ago

The Blue Jays have had a solidly good off-season for a team caught in that in-between place where they are no longer one of the elite teams in the AL, and their roster is a little old, yet they’re still among the teams likely to compete for a wildcard spot.

I would’ve like for them to make a couple of other calculated risk additions – another 2/3 quality SP, and a more certain upgrade in the OF – but as it stands this is a team that is pretty well positioned for whatever the season holds. They have deftly addressed all of the areas of greatest need without taking on any real contract commitments; raising the floor for this team from the low 70s to the low 80s. This now looks like a solidly .500 club, if they’re forced to deal with an average amount of injuries and underperformance, with the potential to push its win total into the 90s if things break the right way for them.

If they start falling out of contention they can begin selling off pieces and be left with very few payroll commitments beyond this season. Happ, Estrada, Oh, Biagini, Garcia, Loup, and Barnes are easily movable, and the team has a number of infield and outfield guys who could be utility options or emergency replacements for contenders at the trade deadline.

If things go well they have a lot of payroll flexibility to make some additions during the season, and the farm system depth to make some significant trades.

…and of course there’s Donaldson who could either be extended or traded.

Momus
8 years ago
Reply to  Momus

It will also be very interesting and exciting to see where things go with Jansen and Alford this year as both look to potentially spend some significant time with the big club at some point during the season.

radivel
8 years ago
Reply to  Momus

I believe that there was an article on FanGraphs some longish time ago that talked about raising the floor as opposed to raising the ceiling for similar value but costing a lot less money, and they used the Indians and Cardinals as examples of the effectiveness of doing so. I might be making this up, because this memory is so vague.

Anyway, that the previous Indians management team should employ a similar strategy in Toronto isn’t a huge surprise. Last year, the Jays gave far too many ABs to completely useless hitters. This year, all of those players are gone and replaced by players who should be able to contribute a fair bit more.

This team is a pretty good test of that manner of thinking. It’s going to be interesting to see how it plays out.

Kristopher
8 years ago

Good stuff, Stephen.

I looked at Oh the other day, and first and foremost, was just amazed at his hilarious wOBA splits (on count)

My concern with the release point was that he was going it to ease whatever pain everyone is clammering about.

The slider, despite *not* being that different, is a totally different pitch. He spun the hell out of it last year which concerns me. It’s almost as if he was trying to spin it more to make up for the different arm angle, and it didn’t work.

To be fair, i didn’t validate the data beyond a cursory glance at spin-rate and spin-axis, but it didn’t look good.

My initial reaction is that the cardinals must’ve noticed, this stuff, right? If this were fixable stuff, why wasn’t it fixed last year by the end of the season?

Then again, I’m sure a lot of teams wait for mechanics to get quite bad before they even consider messing with them in-season. The player’s already struggling at that point, and giving him more stuff probably often hurts more than it helps.

Who knows.