The Allure of Club Control

Ryan Howard is overrated by the general public and media, one only has to look at the 2008 Most Valuable Player Award voting compared against his actual value and performance this past season to see that.

Much ruckus was raised last winter when Ryan Howard went from a club dictated salary of less than $1 million to an arbitration-awarded $10 million. There were calls that this was an insane leap and would do much to upset the balance of the market for future and current players.

Ryan Howard has a down year in 2008. He lost about ten runs off his offensive totals from 2007, which was down a little less than 30 runs from his peak in 2006. That would seem to be a recipe for an under performance on the whole.

If you buy the park adjustments and UZR as adequate measures, than Ryan Howard put forth about $15 million in value during the 2008 season, for which he was paid $10 million. In other words, Ryan Howard was the prototypical player to be over rated (heavy on power offense and short on position and defense), he was coming off a record arbitration award and he had a down season. All that and he was still only paid at about two-third of his worth.

This is not to say that a long-term contract for Howard would be a good idea; the Phillies have an incredible opportunity thanks to Howard’s advanced age at premier to squeeze most, if not all, of his fruitful years out while under team control and then let him become some poorly-run team’s mistake during his mid 30s. This is, however, to provide yet another illustration of just how valuable getting team-controlled players is.

Ryan Howard is about to embark on his second arbitration experience and buoyed not by performance, but by hype this time, he might engineer another extraordinary raise. But with his performance projected to return back to 2007 levels, there’s still a good chance that Howard will remain a net asset for the Phillies.





Matthew Carruth is a software engineer who has been fascinated with baseball statistics since age five. When not dissecting baseball, he is watching hockey or playing soccer.

15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Josh Wexler
15 years ago

Should it be more of a part of an organizational strategy to wait to bring players up until they are 26 or so (in order to ensure that the club has cost controlled players right through their peak years)? Do most teams lose value by bringing up players pre-peak?

Curt
15 years ago
Reply to  Josh Wexler

No.

philosofool
15 years ago
Reply to  Josh Wexler

It’s not really to their advantage. AAA experience isn’t MLB experience and most players need at least a year or two experience in the majors before they play to their talent level.

Also, the rule 5 draft sort of prevents this: any player signed at age 19 or older is eligible after 3 years, or after 4 years if signed at 18 or younger. So if you try to keep Jay Bruce in the minors until he’s 23, you basically give away your first round draft pick from a few years ago. (A rule 5 draftee must remain on the teams 25 man roster all season or be offered back to his original team, so you can’t just grab away at other team’s youngsters.)