The A’s Found Another Building Block

A month ago, I wrote about Matt Chapman, the A’s developing star third baseman. The emergence of Chapman as a decent bat/great glove combination has dramatically changed the team’s infield, and despite only being in the big leagues for a few months, he’s pretty clearly the team’s best player right now.
But while Chapman’s emergence is the most positive development in Oakland this year, the team has added another Matt to the infield in the last month, and Matt Olson is now doing his best to make himself part of Oakland’s infield future as well.
Olson joined the team in June after terrorizing PCL pitchers for the first few months of the year, but mostly served as a pinch hitter and occasional right fielder, since Yonder Alonso was holding down the fort at first base. He got shipped back to Triple-A at the end of July, since there just wasn’t enough playing time to justify keeping him in the Majors. But when the team traded Alonso in a waiver deal, Olson returned to the big leagues on August 8th, and he hasn’t stopped mashing since.
| Season | Team | PA | BB% | K% | ISO | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | OAK | 108 | 7% | 22% | 0.408 | 0.279 | 0.306 | 0.370 | 0.714 | 183 |
Only five hitters have been better than Olson over this stretch; four of them have made All-Star teams, and Rhys Hoskins, the one who hasn’t, looks like he very well may in the future. For the last month and change, Olson has performed at an elite level.
But anyone can hit well for a month, especially when 89% of their extra base hits go over the fence. Olson’s track record isn’t that great, as he was barely an average hitter in Triple-A a year ago, and as a bat-only guy, Olson is going to have to hit a lot in order to play. So why is this not just a notable hot streak from a fringe prospect — Olson ranked just 19th on Eric Longenhagen’s preseason A’s list — and instead another encouraging development of a potential core player for the A’s?
Well, let’s start with a leaderboard.
| Player | Average EV | Average FB/LD EV | Batted Balls 95+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aaron Judge | 94.5 | 99.8 | 53% |
| Joey Gallo | 92.8 | 99.1 | 54% |
| Nelson Cruz | 92.8 | 98.1 | 48% |
| Miguel Sano | 92.8 | 98.5 | 48% |
| Khris Davis | 92.5 | 99.3 | 52% |
| Giancarlo Stanton | 91.9 | 99.6 | 46% |
| Matt Olson | 91.9 | 98.2 | 51% |
| Paul Goldschmidt | 91.5 | 96.7 | 47% |
By average exit velocity, Olson ranks seventh, among a bunch of other elite power hitters. In airball exit velocity, he ranks sixth, among the same group of sluggers. In percentage of batted balls hit at 95 mph or harder, he ranks fifth. And those are just his overall numbers, which include his early stints as a pinch-hitter and part-timer while waiting for a job to open up. Since being put in the line-up everyday, his average EV is 92.7 mph (4th-best) and his airball EV is 98.9 mph (3rd-best).
So Matt Olson hits the ball hard. For a power prospect, that’s obviously important, but it’s encouraging that Olson’s home run binge is supported by consistent hard contact.
Almost without fail, guys who hit the ball this hard have to sacrifice contact in order to do this level of damage when they do put the bat on the ball. And with a 27% strikeout rate, Olson certainly fits the bill of a guy with some swing-and-miss in his game. Except once he was put in the line-up regularly, that’s actually gotten better, even as he’s hit the ball harder.
Early in the year, when being used sparingly, Olson whiffed at a rate that effectively negated his power. But in August, he got that contact rate up to 70%, which is good enough for elite power to play. And then, so far in September, he’s making contact on 80% of his swings, which is almost impossible to sustain while hitting the ball as hard as Olson is hitting the ball. Remember those guys he shared the EV leaderboards with? Here are those same hitters, with their 2017 contact rate listed for reference.
| Player | Average EV | Contact% |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Goldschmidt | 91.5 | 75% |
| Matt Olson | 91.9 | 72% |
| Giancarlo Stanton | 91.9 | 71% |
| Nelson Cruz | 92.8 | 70% |
| Aaron Judge | 94.5 | 68% |
| Khris Davis | 92.5 | 68% |
| Miguel Sano | 92.8 | 63% |
| Joey Gallo | 92.8 | 60% |
Even including his early-season struggles when used as a part-time player and pinch-hitter, Olson’s making more than enough contact to fit right into this group; as an everyday player, he’s running a contact rate better than any of them. So as a big leaguer, he’s hit the ball hard, and he’s hit the ball often enough to play like an elite slugger for a little over a month. That’s a good combination.
As mentioned, his minor league track record isn’t spotless. He hit for a bunch of power in the Cal League back in 2014, but he’s run ISOs under .200 the last two years, and his offensive game was primarily built on drawing walks, which doesn’t translate to the big leagues that well. Eric noted that his approach was too passive, and that was certainly true right after he was called up back in June. But, probably not coincidentally, his strong run of late has included a significantly more aggressive approach.
Over the last month, Olson has swung at 68% of strikes he’s been thrown, ranking 48th out of 177 qualified batters.
So, yeah, the “overly-passive, not-enough-power” scouting report feels a little outdated right now. Olson is swinging at strikes and then hitting the crap out of them. His strikeout rate over the last month is right at the league average, and his contact rate is trending upwards of late. This is the foundation of a really good hitter.
Clearly, we’re still in small sample size territory. Pitchers haven’t had time to adjust to Olson yet, and they’ll figure out some flaws in his swing, forcing him to adapt. He’s not going to keep getting 90% of his extra base hits to go for home runs. As a pull-heavy left-hander, the shift is going to keep his BABIP down. As a guy who hits the ball in the air a lot, he’s probably going to hit his fair share of infield flies. There are some legitimate downsides to his skillset too, and as a bat-first guy, if pitchers exploit his flaws, he could still end up as a platoon-guy.
But after getting eaten alive by lefties in the minors last year — he hit just .167/.262/.250 against Triple-A LHPs in 2016 — he’s hitting .258/.343/.548 against them in the majors so far this year. Last year, he struck out in 40% of his at-bats against lefties, but he’s actually posting a lower K% against lefties in the Majors than he is against RHPs. Olson doesn’t have to be great against left-handers, but just being able to have competitive at-bats against them changes his outlook significantly.
The power looks real. The strikeout rate is fine and trending towards above-average, especially for a slugger. He didn’t embarrass himself during his trial run in the outfield, and has the arm for right field, so he’s not entirely a bat-only player. And now he’s holding his own against lefties.
He doesn’t have Chapman’s upside, and he might end up being just being a similar player to his teammate Khris Davis. Davis is a nice player, not a star, and it’s reasonable to suggest that becoming an average player would still be a very good outcome for Olson.
But given where he was a few months ago, that’s a significant leap, and it’s no longer absurd to think that Olson could become more than that still. If he can make contact around 75% of the time while hitting the ball as hard as he’s been hitting the ball, well, Paul Goldschmidt’s the only other guy doing that in the big leagues right now.
A few months ago, the A’s found their third baseman of the future. This last month, they might have found their first baseman too.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.


Olson has really only had one down year, last year at Nashville, a park that has so far been the most power suppressing park in the PCL and death on LHH power, it’s actually been really hard for those of us who follow Nashville hitters to judge how good they are because its so extreme compared to the rest of PCL and wrc+ isn’t park adjusted there.
Midland (and the Texas league in general) has been a lot friendlier on pitchers over the last few years, so even though Olson only slashed 249/388/438 that year it still went for a 132 WRC+
And finally, Longenhagen gave Chapman a 55 glove 60 arm and 40 speed and it may be that he just didn’t see the Oakland prospects at the right time or for long enough, but I think it’s safe to say his Oakland rankings in general are a bit wonky because 19th was just ridiculous.
Matt “fastest 3B in baseball” Chapman with 40 speed eh? A good study might be to look at speed in scouting reports and compare them to statcast foot speed data. Speed can be measured with a stopwatch, so you would think scouting a player would include timing them down the line. It would be interesting to rank the integrity of scouting reports based on comparison to empiric measures by statcast once players make the show.
As far as Matt Olson’s “average” offensive year last year it should be noted that First Tennessee Park is absolutely horrendous for hitters, unlike most of the PCL in general. His 102 wRC came in a park where LHH Park factors for runs is 80, HR is 60(!), and 2B is 77. And those are not halved. This means that a PCL hitter who calls Nashville home would only expect to hit 60% as many home runs and generate 80% as many runs as if they played elsewhere in the PCL. So Matt Olson didn’t actually just have an average offensive year at 22 in AAA, his stats just aren’t park adjusted because most of the PCL is launching pads and he had to play in a pitcher friendly park.
I pitched against Clint Frazier, Austin Meadows, and Olson in high school. I always thought Olson had the highest floor out of the trio because of his bat. Hell of a pitcher, too.
Jeez. What kind of lunacy is going on in the Eastern Atlanta Suburbs that you faced three Top-100 prospects in HS?
It was a lot of fun. Also faced Christin Stewart (Tigers #7 prospect) and K’ed him up. Lucas Sims was 0-3 off of me. Wish I could say the same about the aforementioned studs lol. Frazier hit a moon shot off of me.
who cares, it’s the A’s. let’s get an elvis andrus piece already
Came here everyday looking for Olson article. If this guy isn’t a 40hr a year guy I’ll eat my hat.
Here’s the total number of players who hit 160 HRs between 2013 and 2016.
1. Chris Davis
And now the list of the players who hit 120 between 2014 and 2016.
1. Nelson Cruz
Maybe the juiced ball will up that number but that’s a high bar to clear, especially at the Coliseum.
Still crazy to me that 5’10 190 lb Khris Davis is about to go back to back 40
Injuries, etc. My point is more like a 162 game average, not that he will literally hit 40 hrs every year even w potential changes to the baseball. More like he will be an elite power hitter for the foreseeable future.
Olson’s made some notable changes in his stance/setup between last year and the current year:
https://twitter.com/NBCSAthletics/status/905250594713067520
It looks like he’s had the changes most of if not all of for 2017 as evidenced by some minor league highlights of his from April/May:
http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?&sid=milb&content_id=1334723583
http://www.milb.com/multimedia/vpp.jsp?&sid=milb&content_id=1393312083
Whatever this does to unlock his full power seems to be working so far. The strikeouts will probably always be something he’ll have to battle with but it looks like the power on contact/good approach at the plate is for real.
Even the strike out thing not a huge deal. Never had a full season over 25%
22% K rate since being called up for good after the Alonso trade
I’ve watched every at bat he has had the last three weeks. His pop is legit. He also takes walks and has made damn near mlb average contact since his call (back) up. SSS for sure… But this guy seemingly has a high floor w a very high ceiling.
Bat only because he’s a 1b and all 1bs are bat only or do you legitimately think he’s bad at defense? Because all reports and metrics state otherwise.
Obv scouting systems aren’t the final verdict on someone, but this guy might be able to fake an average defensive outfielder. It seems like scouts miss hard on tall guys in terms of athleticism frequently rating them average to well below average when it’s quite the opposite. Bryant, Zimmer and now Olson come to mind. For the sake of the argument let’s say it is less likely a 6’5″ retains his speed. Why does that matter now? If anything being taller would allow you to get to your athleticism more in games, not less.
Matt Olson has been the subject of much dreaming and much frustration, I have admittedly been extremely harsh on him and I felt justified as I thought he adopted the OBP approach to the extreme it looked like he was to much of a coward to swing at very hittable pitches.
So seeing this Matt Olson is very exciting, he is hitting strikes, taking bad pitches and he looks completely different. This Matt Olson is capable of a very respectable 250/340/450 type line with good enough power to clear 30HR’s, there is the swing and miss but a 20-25% whiff rate can be offset by a 12-15% walk rate.
Finally seeing the core together, most played together for many years now in the bigs, this obviously helps and it is great to watch a young group of offensive players really doing well even when the team loses we are putting up good runs, fun times, certainly take the growing pains over watching Plouffe et al again.
Lets hope to a better 2018 and beyond
Funny, I was looking at the exit velocity numbers on Baseball Savant just yesterday and saw he was high up there on average. I also noticed that his max evit velocity was much lower than the other guys who had similar average numbers. I’m not sure what to make of that. Probably nothing, just thought it stuck out as odd.
Could be interesting in Oakland very soon, what with Olson, Barreto, Semien, Chapman, Davis, Fowler, Mateo, Manaea, Boog . . .
If you dig back in his old scouting reports, you’ll see that Olson was considered a plus defender at first. He was a stud HS pitcher with a strong arm which let him play in RF but he really lacks speed. However, since he’s come up to the A’s he’s proven to be a very heady defender. Excellent range, soft hands, great arm. Check out the play where he goes back into RF to make an over the shoulder catch, then turns and fires a bullet to home for a kill at the plate. He’s a slow runner, but a strong defender. So more than just a bat-only guy.
Right now his defensive numbers are being dragged down by the time in the outfield overall.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaderssplits.aspx?splitArr=&strgroup=season&statgroup=2&startDate=2017-8-8&endDate=2017-11-01&filter=PA%7Cgt%7C100&position=B&statType=player&autoPt=true&sort=16,1&pg=0
Not to be nitpicky, but Robinson Chirinos is at the top of that list. Career high wRC+ in a half-season of PA, with an unusually high (for him) BABIP. Maybe he’s an elite bat now, maybe not.