The Better Part of Valor

As of this morning, the Boston Red Sox are in third place, 6 1/2 games out of first place, with an estimated 18 percent chance of making the playoffs. The Los Angeles Dodgers are in fourth place, 8 games out of first place, with an estimated 4 percent chance of making the playoffs.

In the lead up to the trade deadline, the Red Sox laid fairly low, acquiring Jarrod Saltalamacchia and shipping out Ramon Ramirez, both minor transactions that will have little effect on how the team plays the rest of the year. The Dodgers did the opposite, engineering a trio of trades that saw them ship out Blake DeWitt and six minor league players in exchange for Ted Lilly, Octavio Dotel, Ryan Theriot, and Scott Podsednik.

The contrast in approaches couldn’t be any more striking. While Boston may not be resigned to finishing as an also-ran, they also refused to throw good money after bad, making a trade that would have, at best, pushed them from longshot to unlikely. The Dodgers, however, pushed their chips in to the middle and bet on the the team justifying the investment over the final two months of the season.

While inaction is usually looked at with scorn during deadline time, I would imagine the Dodgers will look back on their moves and wish they had exercised a little less aggressiveness.

No, they didn’t give up any sure things. Both James McDonald and Andrew Lambo have lost some sheen from their prospect status of a few years ago, and those are the two most talented players they surrendered. But the general rule with prospects is “the more, the merrier”, as a sheer quantity approach will usually result in a positive outcome or two. By giving up this much young talent, it’s likely that the Dodgers will eventually wish they had one or two of these guys back.

For a team with a one in 30 chance of playing in October, that just doesn’t seem like a wise use of resources. You could probably make a case for these deals if LA was a couple of games back and just trying to overcome one team, but they’ve got three clubs in front of them in their own division, two of whom have significant leads.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

There is a time for bold action, and there’s a time to accept that it probably isn’t your year. The passive approach that the Red Sox took to the trade deadline was probably the better course. Barring a miracle, neither team will make the playoffs, but at least the Red Sox will still have their farm system mostly intact.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

40 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bonestock94
15 years ago

Ned Colletti is a special GM.

TheUnrepentantGunner
15 years ago
Reply to  bonestock94

agree with dave’s point.

as for your point bone: it’s hard to pin too much blame on ned. sure he didnt have to gut the farm system but his job is probably on the line pending a new owner anyway, and he may have had a mandate from ownership that conflicted with the best interests of the franchise.

hard to ever fully blame a gm when ownership is such a mess

bonestock94
15 years ago

It’s not the first time though, this year is tame compared to what we’ve seen in the past.