The Braves’ NBA-Style Rebuild
Keith Law did not like this week’s trade (ESPN Insider article) that saw Touki Toussaint and Bronson Arroyo go from the Arizona Diamondbacks to the Atlanta Braves. It’s not that Law didn’t like the trade from the perspective of one team or the other. It’s that he didn’t like the spirit of the trade, period: it was, indisputably, a swap of contracts instead of an even exchange of on-field talent.
What does a league look like where plenty, if not most, trades are motivated by their financial implications? Well, it’s not the end of the world: this is what the NBA has been about for years. The NBA combines baseball’s almost entirely guaranteed salaries with a soft cap, like baseball, that, unlike baseball, is restrictive enough that even mid-market teams can unwittingly bump up against it. “Expiring” contracts — or, inefficient deals with less than a year remaining on them — have been a long-coveted NBA asset: salary albatrosses are willingly taken on precisely because they will end quickly enough for the team to have an even more valuable asset — space and flexibility underneath the cap — in time for the offseason free-agent market.
The Toussaint/Arroyo deal is far from the first trade with layered financial implications that the Braves have made since last October’s promotion of John Hart. Although I can’t quite track the thinking behind all of Hart’s transactions — I don’t think I’m the only one who is mystified about the presence of Nick Markakis and Jonny Gomes — I think he has been admirably clever and proactive in quickly implementing an NBA-style rebuild.
Because the Braves are in no danger of running into baseball’s sky-high luxury tax line, the Braves haven’t been pursuing expiring contracts. (Their largest is Juan Uribe at $4.6M.) There’s one adjustment required to translate this strategy from the NBA to the MLB: the Braves have been pursuing — or perhaps a better way to say it is that they’ve been unafraid to take on — dead money. According to numbers from Spotrac, 28.3% of the Braves’ current payroll is wrapped up in dead salary. Most teams are under 5% dead salary. A few are at 0%. There are only three other teams in the Braves’ neighborhood, and they’re all there for entirely different motivations. The Los Angeles Angels (16.6%) are there because of the Josh Hamilton fiasco. The Los Angeles Dodgers (18.9%) are there because of their famous largesse: willing to pay Matt Kemp, Dan Haren, and Brian Wilson to leave and thereby free a roster spot. The Arizona Diamondbacks (22%) owe Cody Ross, Trevor Cahill, and Mark Trumbo in an attempt to clear the slate for next season.
The thing is, that 28.3% portion hardly covers all of the Braves’ contracts that we think of as “dead.” Arroyo’s $9.5M is presumed a sunk cost — as was Cameron Maybin’s $7M (and $8M in 2016) at the time of his eve-of-the-season trade and before his convincing resurgence. These are two of the four largest contracts on the Braves’ active payroll, Markakis and Freddie Freeman being the others.
In the course of taking on so many “toxic” assets (quotes because of Maybin’s awesome turnaround), Atlanta has acquired a high volume of premium prospects in an incredibly short span of time. Unlike Jeff Luhnow’s Astros or Dayton Moore’s Royals — two teams which had to be rebooted basically from scratch — the Braves already had a contention-worthy nucleus in place. Instead of wandering in the desert for three or four years, their efforts over the last eight months look like an incredibly effective one-year pivot, sped up exponentially by the team’s willingness to temporarily hold a bad contract.
The results have already shown at the major-league level — and this is before the Braves’ small army of recently acquired top-200 prospects have arrived in Atlanta: Rio Ruiz, Max Fried, Ricardo Sanchez, Tyrell Jenkins, Manny Banuelos,Matt Wisler, and Toussaint. It’s already shown at the major-league level before the Braves’ bounty of early picks in this month’s draft have started their trip through the minors. (Atlanta selected at 14, 28, 41, 54, and 75 this year after having only two picks in the top 100 [32 and 66] last June.)
Measuring offensive production only from players who are 25 and under, last season the Braves ranked second in plate appearances and second in WAR. But, aha, the lion’s share of that production came from Jason Heyward, who is dramatically different from most 25-year-olds, as he played a full season at age 20. Even after trading Heyward, though, the Braves’ total production from under-25 position players has remained virtually the same in 2015: Atlanta is third in plate appearances and fourth in WAR.
Atlanta’s pitchers under 25 have been even more impressive. Last season, the Braves finished sixth in innings pitched and fifth in WAR from under-25s. This year, they are first and first in both categories. It’s not very close in the innings pitched category, either: 60 of the Braves’ 71 games have been started by a pitcher 25 or younger, and they have nearly double the total innings over the second-place Oakland A’s. Considering the team is relying this move on pre-prime players, hanging out around .500 has to be considered an accomplishment.
Perhaps the best part of Atlanta’s plan: just like an NBA team taking on dead salary-weight, the Braves are effectively purchasing future flexibility. Next season, that gargantuan portion of dead money dwindles down to a negligible $300,000. The Braves have the eighth-smallest amount of money committed to next year’s team (the linked chart does not predict next winter’s arbitration deals in its totals), ahead of eternally threadbare teams like the A’s, Tampa Bay Rays, Miami Marlins, and Pittsburgh Pirates.
So why aren’t the Braves buzzed about like the presumptive dynasties that the Cubs, Astros, Royals have meticulously pieced together? Well, when your team-building strategy includes actively trading for players like Carlos Quentin, it establishes a pretty strong anti-buzz forcefield. That doesn’t mean the Braves’ strategy will be any less effective in the years to follow. Look for this rebuilding team to acquire even more underwhelming veterans at the trade deadline — it’ll be on purpose.
Miles Wray contributes sports commentary to McSweeney's Internet Tendency, Ploughshares, The Classical and Hardwood Paroxysm. Follow him on Twitter @mileswray or email him here.
Nice article!
An interesting aspect of the rebuild is the construction of a high OBP, low strikeout, low power team that looks set up to remain that way for a while. The Braves could trade for a LF with some pop, but the future looks fast and light. Unmentioned in the article is Mallex Smith, who came over from the Padres’ system, has 80 grade speed, and is posting career highs in walk rate and wRC+. He just got promoted to AAA, so look for them to deal Maybin by this winter. With the speed of Jose Peraza as well (if they can figure out where to put him now that Jace Peterson looks like a major league regular at 2B), the Braves could be the fastest, most light-hitting team in the league. The lineup falls apart without Freeman in the middle, but it’s a fascinating attempt to make the Braves into a Royals-like blend of pitching, defense, OBP, and speed, when they were a homer-or-nothing team just last year.
They don’t need to trade Maybin. He’s not so valuable in CF that he must play there. He’s a better option than anything they have for LF.
As for Jace Peterson, he can play third if Peraza comes up.
Of course the odds that both Maybin’s rebirth and Peterson’s emergence will last into 2016 are probably less than great.
Every indication out of ATL is that they love Peterson’s play at second, particularly his chemistry with Simmons.
Pereza looks like he will be a slightly better ben revere. Hair more pop, hair better arm. So basically nothing special but still some value.
I agree; there is not rush to trade Maybin unless a contender knocks your socks off. Move him to LF (or dare I say it, RF, and Markakis to LF) and finally sit Gomes.
I agree; there is no rush to trade Maybin unless a contender knocks your socks off. Move him to LF (or dare I say it, RF, and Markakis to LF) and finally sit Gomes.
bob which part of cal are you in
The reason why the Braves aren’t being talked about like the Astros, Cubs, and Royals is because they are receiving either damaged goods prospects (Fried, Banuelos) or fading star prospects (Toussaint, Jenkins).
Other players like Ruiz and Wisler are not impact prospects, either. They have done a great job of building up the depth of their system, but there’s no Kris Bryant/Carlos Correa fronting the top of their Top 10.
The Braves are stockpiling interesting options, but there’s no outlook as sunny as the other three teams you referenced.
How is Toussaint a fading star prospect? He is 19 years old, was drafted a year ago and then deemed expendable by an organization that doesn’t currently possess the highest regards for long term prospects.
A fastball that isn’t the same as when drafted. Pedestrian stats in Low A.
Man, pedestrian start in Low A in his first full year as a professional. Might as well start measuring the casket, I guess.
Its low 90s right now to hold the velo later. Its above average still. His stats dont matter except walk rate, hes not allowed to throw his best pitch (plus plus curve). Its just him working on fastball command and improving the change. He has the highest ceiling of any atlanta pitching prospects but he is so far away. They still have no impact bats on the farm and pitching prospects are scary creatures. If 2 of them have tj within a year it would shock no one. Astros cubs and royals were headlined by bats. Springer, correa, singleton. Bryant, baez, shwarber. Mouse, hosmer, myers. There in lies the difference.
“Its low 90s right now to hold the velo later.”
Doesn’t all evidence suggest this would not be a thing? Velo might hold steady, but it almost never just comes back
Later in the game, not career…
he’s barely used his best pitch
I haven’t heard any scouts report a decline in the quality of his fastball. All I have heard is that coaches have him dialing back the effort to increase his control. Now, could Toussaint amount to nothing? Possibly, statistically probably even. No matter how well regarded, only a fraction of prospects manage to graduate from A ball all the way to the Majors. But, I still find it way to early to label him as a fading star prospect. From everything I have read, he is developing right on schedule according to expectations. Those expectations just don’t put him in the majors until the 2018 season. The Diamondbacks currently are building for the 2016 season.
I suppose Law would have had a problem with the Babe Ruth deal as well.
I feel pretty confident in saying Touki Toussaint is not Babe Ruth.
Good luck in the Rule 5 in a few years
Isn’t Cahill ATL’s largest expiring contract?
I think that Dan Uggla is their biggest expiring contract.
Most of it is paid by the d backs.
The Markakis signing makes total sense – he’s a Georgia native with good name recognition and a not-unreasonable contract. Worst case scenario, he puts some fans in the seats and puts some cover on a rebuilding season or two where the Braves won’t be competing. But maybe he gets dealt in a year or two to a competing team for useful prospects. Or maybe he can still provide 2-3 WAR on a competing team in 2017.
Actually, I think worst case scenario in terms of his contract is the Braves do well, he does poorly, and the Braves wish they had his $11 million to spend elsewhere.
Maybe by then, he’ll have hit a home run
Nick Markakis?! Yeah sure, that’ll put butts in the seats!
Maybe his family; he did attend high school and college not too far away from where the Braves play.
Comment if the year
I have a big pee pee
Would be very interesting if the Braves are active in Free Agency this off-season to go after a certain right fielder. They will certainly have the money for it.
They need a LF, too. Let’s get the band back together!
no
How often does that happen? (I.e. team trades player away, then signs him as a free agent 1-2 years later.) I’m sure it has happened, but I can’t think of an example off the top of my head.
Hammel is a recent example
There was a Reddit thread on the subject a few months back.
http://www.reddit.com/r/baseball/comments/2p6fhr/thinking_of_jason_hammel_how_many_players_traded/
Interesting. Thanks!
Cliff Lee, though everyone knew the Mariners were unlikely to keep him in the long term because of money. It’s a different situation when someone is traded to a team with a large budget (like the Cardinals). In fact, the Mariners’ playoff run fizzled that year, so they also went on to trade him: the Phillies resigned him after the year.
Hart did it in 97/98 with Kenny Lofton.
John Coppolella is the real genius behind the Braves moves… Not Hart…
Hart makes the decisions. No need to oversell anything.
Pundits need to stop scratching their heads when rebuilding teams spend money on veterans with highly regarded leadership skills.
I have no idea what the value of a “clubhouse guy” is, but I’m not willing to sit here and say they have no value at all just because it can’t be quantified.
So disagree all you want with “leadership” signings, but let’s not act like it’s something new or a “head scratcher.”
The question isn’t “what are they thinking?” it is “how much are clubhouse guys worth?” and/or “what impact do leadership types have on younger players and their development?”