The Cardinals’ Missing Magic
Over the last couple of years, we’ve talked a lot about the Kansas City Royals and the ability of certain teams to sustainably beat estimates like the BaseRuns expected records we publish on our standings page. Famously, the Royals have won far more games than our numbers thought they would — over the last three years, they’ve won 25 more games than their BaseRuns Win% would suggest — making two straight World Series appearances and winning last year’s fall classic along the way.
Interestingly, though, with less fan fare, Missouri’s other team has also been winning far more often than BaseRuns suggested was likely. Over the last three years, they’ve won 23 more games than their BaseRuns expected record, nearly as many as the Royals. Last year, they won 11 more games than expected on the strength of an historic clutch performance. As Ben Lindbergh noted in a Grantland piece last summer, the Cardinals pitching staff was insanely good at stranding runners last year, so their run prevention ended up being fantastic even as their pitchers routinely danced with danger.
Six weeks into 2016, however, the tables have turned. The Cardinals are just 20-18, already finding themselves eight games back of the Cubs in the NL Central, except BaseRuns thinks they should actually be 25-13, which would give them the second best record in all of baseball. A year after posting one of the largest positive differences between expected record and actual record, the Cardinals have already won five fewer games than expected, and if they continued at this pace, they’d post the largest negative differential for any team in a single season.
In a cruel twist of fate, the Cardinals are falling victim to the very thing that propelled them to such lofty heights a year ago. In 2015, the Cardinals pitchers performed at roughly an average rate with the bases empty, but were incredible with men on base and runners in scoring position. That has flipped on its head — though to a less extreme degree — this year.

| Cardinals | wOBA Allowed | MLB Rank |
| Bases Empty | 0.286 | 7th |
| Runners On | 0.320 | 15th |
| RISP | 0.311 | 13th |
This year, the Cardinals pitching and defense has been very good with the bases empty, but less so with men on, leading to a higher runs allowed total than expected; BaseRuns thinks they should only be giving up 3.8 runs per game, and they’re actually allowing 4.3 runs per game.
Of course, they’re scoring 5.6 runs per game, so even at their actual runs allowed rate, the Cardinals should have a much better record than they actually do; a team outscoring their opponents by 1.3 runs per game should not be playing .526 baseball. So it’s not just that the pitchers are failing to strand runners; they are failing to strand runners at the worst possible time.
As Jeff Sullivan’s linked post above notes, we have a stat here that measures a team’s clutch performance, and last year, the Cardinals racked up nearly 10 additional wins due to “clutch” pitching. The runner-stranding numbers were a big part of that, but above and beyond their ability to leave men on base, the Cardinals pitchers were excellent in high leverage situations. This year, the Cardinals pitchers are already at nearly -2 wins due to a lack of clutch performance, the second-worst performance by a pitching staff in baseball this year.
And unfortunately for St. Louis fans, the team’s hitters have actually been even worse. By the same clutch metric, the Cardinals hitters have been -2.2 wins relative to a team with an average clutch performance, ranking 27th in hitter clutch. The primary offender? Randal Grichuk, already at -1 win by himself, the second least “clutch” hitter in baseball through the season’s first six weeks. In 15 high-leverage plate appearances, Grichuk has managed just two singles, making 13 outs on his way to running a .118 wOBA in those 15 PAs.
This is a far cry from 2013, when the Cardinals were the best hitting team with runners in scoring position that anyone had ever seen. That year, the Cardinals rode their clutch hitting to the World Series, falling just short of the championship in a six game series loss to the Red Sox. Back then, the narrative was that the Cardinals had figured out the key to hitting with men on base, with Allen Craig being held up as the paragon of the approach; spraying line drives all over the field and avoiding strikeouts to increase the Cardinals chances of stringing singles and doubles together.
Overall, the Cardinals offense is still pretty good at all those things. They still run a better-than-average strikeout rate, they’re fourth in the majors in doubles, and they regularly hit the ball as hard as anyone, leading to a .311 BABIP. Their offense has been excellent with the bases empty, with men on base, and with runners in scoring position. But once you factor in the score and the inning, their excellence has dropped off as the game has gotten tighter; they are running a .360 wOBA in low leverage situations and a .343 wOBA in high leverage situations.
Lots of teams would kill for a .343 wOBA in high leverage situations, as that’s still a really good mark. But the fact that the Cardinals have distributed more of their hits into situations where they didn’t really impact the outcome of the game is one of the reasons the team is 2-5 in one run games, which is the easiest way to quickly underperform any calculation’s expected record.
Of course, no post about clutch performance would be complete without including this graph from Jeff Sullivan’s piece on the topic from last September.
That’s a plot of the relationship between a team’s first half and second clutch performances over the last 15 years, and as you can see from the flat line, that’s about as random as a scatterplot gets. In other words, a team’s first half clutch performance tells us nothing about what we should expect from that team’s second half clutch performance.
For the last three years, the Cardinals have been remarkably clutch — in differing ways — and have gotten big returns based on timing their events as optimally as possible. This year, they’ve regressed past the mean, and are now getting bitten by the very thing that helped prop up their win totals in previous years. The good news for the Cardinals is that there’s no reason to expect them to continue to perform this poorly relative to their expected record, and the fact that they’re playing like a .660 team to start the year suggests that they’re probably still a pretty good ballclub. The bad news is that they don’t get to play those 38 games over again, so they now have to overcome an eight game deficit that their lack of clutch performance helped build.
Catching the Cubs was never going to be an easy task, and they were going to need some of their #CardinalsDevilMagic to help them keep pace with the best team in baseball. Through the season’s first quarter, though, the magic has turned on them, and now the Cardinals are probably left fighting for a wild card spot. This the problem with magic; it isn’t the most reliable building block for success.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

Missing? Who took it?
Get the FBI involved, I demand an investigation!
They should look on the Astros’ servers, maybe it’s hiding there
This reminds me of something I have been thinking about in the past few days, with the advertisement of the June 9th draft. The Cards have 3 first round picks, albeit towards the end. If nothing is heard by the commissioners office in the next 3 weeks they will be able to retain all three. Odd there has been nothing but silence in some time.
MLB is waiting for final sentencing of Correa to punish the Cardinals. Correa has been trying to subpoena the Astros in order to prove that he was legitimately trying to figure out what they stole from the Cardinals in order to show that he had an innocent motive (at least at first) but the judge isn’t allowing it, at least not so far.
Correct, but I thought April was the original court date, not that attorney’s aren’t notorious for delaying proceedings.
Regression is a bitch
Where the Cards’ have regressed has little to do with luck. Garcia and Martinez have been pretty good, a pitch or two here or there and they would be excelling. The others have been pretty bad. And in all three cases their issue has been command and control.
Of course the porous defense hasn’t helped, although they have gotten outstanding outfield play, and of course behind the dish as always.
Luck, has not been the primary contributor to their lack of success on the mound, but rather some piss poor hurling.
They chose to sign mike leake though. I felt like that was on of the dumbest signings of the off-season. Offers no real upside.
Time will tell. He has pitched OK his last couple of times out. But his command hasn’t been up to snuff either. If he can get back on track, I bet he outperforms his career numbers, mostly due to getting out of GAB.
You said he would be the cubs number 3 starter before the season. That was funny.
Leake’s career ERA is exactly the same as John Lackey’s, he’s pitched in a tougher park, and he didn’t cost a draft pick like Lackey. Was it dumb for Hoyer to sign the older Lackey for the same price (albeit fewer years)? Sure he looked bad early on but I can’t imagine why you’d think it was a dumb signing.
2 years at $32 million is so drastically different than 5 years at $80 million especially with one guy coming off a season where he just has a 2.77 ERA over 218 innings. Not saying that is Lackey’s baseline because clearly that was a career year but at least he shows a higher upside than Leake does who has been at best completely average in his career. There is value in an average guy who can pitch 190 innings but I think a lot of Cardinal fans were expecting some big jump in value just by putting on a Cardinals jersey and it’s more likely he will be what he has always been.
Why does Lackey show a higher upside? He’s older and has pretty much the same stats. Is it the .7 more K/9? Leake’s outstanding defense and hitting more than make up that difference, not to mention the age.
-stan
Mike leake career era-100 career fip-107
John lackey career era-91 career fip-92
Those are both park and league adjusted so the premise that it was his home park is laughable. You are right that draft pick has some value, but so does additional long term payroll flexibility with higher short term upside.
I’m not sure where you got .7 strikeouts, it’s over 2 per 9 for their career and usually in the 1.5 and above range which I would say gives him a higher upside overall. You could say because of his age Lackey also has more of a downside which I probably would agree with but only having the 2 years on the contract it was basically no risk for the Cubs at all.
Jedi, the Cards offered large contracts to both Price and Heyward. Money is not an issue for St. Louis, particularly with the new TV contract, and quite possibly seeing Holliday’s contract coming off the books. They are flush, and $16mil a year isn’t putting them in some kind of pinch.
Wacha has been pretty good, too, and Wainwright and Leake have gotten better lately. It would be foolish to think that their pitching staff won’t wind up as a significant strength once all is said and done.
I would like to agree about Wacha, and up until his last outing he was starting to resemble his old self, but once again his command was poor, couldn’t get ahead of hitters, which aids his change-up use. Perhaps it was just a hiccup, but I have concerns.
It’s still pretty risky to pay a pitcher $16M for his age 37 and 38 seasons no matter who he is. There’s no telling how soon father time is going to catch up with Lackey.
Meanwhile, the Cardinals may have overpaid a little for Leake, but at the current market rate it’s not too bad a price for a consistently decent 28-year-old starter. It was certainly better than handing out $70M over 5 years plus a first round draft pick for Ian Kennedy.
I like how these bitchy little Cards fans piss all over their #1 guy from last year. The guy who was their #1 in the Playoffs – The only one who won em a game.
Well, Lackey has 1 WAR for the season so far & 1 WAR = about 8 mil.
At this rate the Cubs are on the hook for another 24 million We’ll see if Lackey can earn it all this year.
P.S. Leake has been worth less than 2 WAR a year on average for his career. He’s inconsistent and a 4/5 starter. Why lock up a no upside arm for Leake – Sure it’s a better than Kennedy, but so’s a lot of crap.
Except that “regression” doesn’t predict that teams/players/whatever exhibiting extreme tendencies will exhibit extreme tendencies in the other direction. In other words, if BaseRuns is an unbiased estimator of team record (I’m not saying it is), a team with extreme BaseRuns over-performance should “regress” going forward by performing close to their BaseRuns expected performance, not by severely underperforming their BaseRuns records.
As good as the Cubs have been, they are also actually a win behind in Baseruns….
Heyward and Lackey took the Magic with them when they left town, obviously.
I think they traded the magic for a curse placed on Heyward.
Losing Heyward’s defense probably had a lot to do with it, actually. Lackey was the biggest beneficiary of the Cardinals’ great defense last year and he’s also regressed back to his career norms this year in Chicago.
Chicago has the best defense in mlb, he actually has the lowest xfip of his career. Just a couple bad pitches with men on base leading to his low strand rate, will even out over the year.
Lackey’s FIP-, xFIP-, and SIERA so far this season are all better they were last year, and better than his career averages. He’s currently sporting his best FIP- since 2007 and the best xFIP- and SIERA of his career. BABIP is helping him but strand rate has not been his friend.
Remember: The only place BaseRuns wins championships is in yo momma’s basement.
Actually, I am not concerned about the Cardinals so much as I am the overall state of MLB and its races across every division. My concern is that 35-40 games in, only 1/4 of the season gone and I can already look up at the leader board and say to myself, those teams with 20+ wins right now will probably be in the playoff hunt all year. Whereas those that don’t have 20 wins right now probably will not be in the playoffs or even an inkling of the hunt. It almost seems like its a foregone conclusion. You have the very good teams beating up on the very bad teams and not much in between. I realize 75% of the games are left, injuries, trades, a lot can happen, I get it, but to me it seems like its pretty much over right now. Only time will tell I suppose. Doesn’t leave me very happy for my Detroit Tigers.
I dunno i can easily see the Phillies, Mariners and Marlins all epicly sliding out of contention. Otherwise though i think you’re right. Is that a problem for the the MLB or a reflection that general managers are getting better at deciding whether or not to go for it preseason? Could be both one or neither….he says with no insight
I think there is a big difference between “a foregone conclusion” and “almost”. That’s why they play the games.
Not really sure what makes you think that, here’s how I see the divisions:
AL East – I think the only teams out would be TB and NY. Unless of course you think TOR is actually a sub .500 team.
AL Central – Everyone but MIN still has a shot, unless you think the White Sox will actually win 102 games this year.
AL West – Worst of the 3 AL divisions, with 3 teams pretty much out of it.
NL East – Wide open with only ATL out of it, though MIA and PHI will probably drop out at some point, but still anyone’s division right now.
NL Central – Well, the Cubs. But, still have STL and PIT fighting for 2nd place and a wildcard.
NL West – 3 team race right now.
All in all, I only see one division with a clear cut favorite right now (NL Central). The others have at least 2 or 3 teams who could all easily win the division.
There are 13 teams with 20+ wins right now; last year through 5/19, there were 14, lets drop the .500 Padres [lowest win% of the group] just so we have equal numbers.
Those 13 took seven of ten post-season spots. Your assertion is that this year is different; here are the bottom teams in post-season odds with 20+ wins right now versus the top teams in post-season odds with 19 or fewer wins:
PHI 0.3%
MIA 24%
STL 37%
TEX 40%
vs
CLE 62%
TOR 37%
HOU 29%
PIT 28%
Playoff odds report seems to think there is a decent bet for some of the lower win teams to get in the mix…
One year ago today the Texas Rangers were 9 games back in the A.L. West.
Detroit led their division with a 23-14 record.
Toronto was in last place in the A.L. East, 5 games behind the Yankees.
The Pirates, who would go on to win 98 games, were just 17-20, and in 4th place 7.5 games behind St. Louis.
They gave Diaz too much magic, wasn’t enough left for rest of team.
Nah, Hazelbaker got a few whiffs of the magic dust, too.
I don’t think there’s any magic or mystery here. Their defense has regressed so they are stranding fewer runners. Its exactly what you would expect to happen when a defense isn’t performing.
Defense is definitely part of it but also last years numbers were completely unsustainable they were bound to regress.
I totally agree with this, although what’s odd is that the 2016 Cardinals (so far anyway) haven’t regressed to the mean – they’ve played far BELOW the mean in clutch situations. Karmically that may be how it should work (so that their two-year total is “average”), but realistically the law of averages has no idea the Cards were so good/lucky last year. Kinda reminds me of when the O’s were so off-the-charts superb in one-run games and extra innings a few years ago, and then the next year weren’t just randomly blah – they were terrible. It’s like the baseball gods decided to taketh what they had previously giveth.
In 2013 the Cards were crazy outliers with RISP. In 2015 the same was true with their pitchers stranding runners. This year it’s… pinch hitting! As a team their PHers are hitting .359/.432/.781 with 8 home runs.
That’s what I was thinking/recalling.
Am I mistaken here, or would the usual fangraph’s position be “Redbirds much better than their record shows?”
I mean, anytime, a team’s record doesn’t match the base run expectation … it’s pointed out as an indicator that the team just has some “bad luck” … or when they’re better than their base runs, it’s pointed out they’re getting good luck.
And, as always, it’s pointed out by someone else that if they were actually performing at their base run level, they’d be at their natural talent level.
I think, if regression follows its purpose, the cardinals performance in situations with runners in scoring position will get better, and the Cubs’ starting pitching ERA will get worse (or regress to norms). Unless the Cubs starting rotation really is 30 points better than any other team in the game (with 3 starters with ERA’s under 2).
I guess, as a Cardinals fan, I have to acknowledge that the 8 games difference is significant, and it really did happen (regardless of cause), and that’s an obstacle. But the Cards and Pirates are playing much closer to their expectations than the Cubs are.
In other words, the playoff race is still on.
Of course, St. Louis’ record has nothing to do with magic or the absence thereof — just like last year & 2013. Sure there’s always a sprinkling a luck with any team, but skill much more so.
As the author pointed out, the 2016 club is 2-5 in 1-run games (90% dumb luck games). With a 4-3 record in said games, their overall record would be 22-16 and on pace for 94 wins, which is pretty much right in line with their talent level.
The real question here is how will Cris Carpenter ever explain this to his son?
Wow. So Carpenter gets spiked in the back by Cueto 5 years ago; talks about how it bummed out his son; you somehow remember this detail, hold onto it all this time, then bring it up in response to an article which has nothing to do with it, just so you can belittle the dude who got spiked? Very classy guy you are.
Note the spelling: He’s not talking Chris Carpenter, the guy who started with Toronto, then pitched with St. Louis from 2004 to 2012 and won a Cy Young. He’s talking about Cris Carpenter, the guy who pitched for the Cardinals from 1988 to 1992 and ended his career with an ERA+ of 100 over about 400 innings.
I admit, I have no idea what Cris Carpenter has to do with anything, though. Maybe he had to explain being taken by the Florida Marlins in the expansion to his kid, which seems like a difficult thing to have to explain to anyone.
An ERA + of 100? How average was he?
Cristobal Carpintero having to explain things to his hijo will nunca not be chistoso para mi.
Luck giveth, and luck taketh away. Blessed be the name of the luck.
You must be from Indianapolis.
Just neighing.
Never been there. Wouldn’t go.
LMHAO, sounds like how I felt about Baltimore.
The Cardinals’ offense this year has also tended toward extreme outcomes by game. The overall offensive totals are good, but (as of about a week ago) the team is 1st in MLB in number of games scoring 8 or more runs (10 games) but also 2nd in number of games scoring 0 or 1 run (9 games). Rather predictably, the Cardinals were 9-1 in the former games but 0-9 in the latter. http://espn.go.com/blog/statsinfo/post/_/id/118019/cardinals-offense-is-one-of-extremes
That’s a good way for a team’s record to be worse than underlying stats, especially when combined with a poor record in 1-run games (which Dave mentions).