The Case for Rafael Devers
Yesterday, Nick Stellini noted that there might be an AL East bidding war for third basemen this summer. The Red Sox’ current third basemen are a collection of misfits, while the Orioles could choose to shift Manny Machado back to shortstop to replace J.J. Hardy if they find there aren’t that many appealing options in the shortstop trade market. Both teams are playing well enough to expect to be buyers, and in some form, the left side of the infield looks like a place both teams could make real improvements.
But if I’m Dave Dombrowski, I’m probably not planning on trading for a third baseman this summer. I think there’s a pretty decent chance that the Red Sox’ stretch-run third baseman is already in the organization.
You probably know the name Rafael Devers already. He’s not any kind of under-the-radar prospect; Eric Longenhagen had him at No. 22 overall on his preseason top-100 list, and he was mentioned frequently in trade talks over the winter as Dombrowski pushed in on his win-now agenda. But while the team shipped out a bunch of good prospects (and Travis Shaw, a useful big leaguer who would make this entire post moot) in the Chris Sale/Tyler Thornburg trades, the Red Sox hung onto Devers. And by jettisoning Shaw and Yoan Moncada, without bringing in any real veteran to hold down third base, the Red Sox actually cleared the way for Devers to become the obvious third baseman of the future.
But with Pablo Sandoval, Brock Holt, and Josh Rutledge injured and/or struggling, the team is currently starting Deven Marrero at the hot corner. Marrero got the call because he can actually catch balls hit in his general direction (setting him apart from Rutledge), but he’s simply not a guy that a contender should be counting on in a regular role. And that means that Devers may very well also be the best internal option for third baseman of the present.
The general case against promoting Devers is simply that he’s 20, and the 128 plate appearances he’s accumulated in Double-A are the only ones he’s ever had above A-ball competition. It’s pretty unusual for guys this age, with this lack of high-level experience, to make the jump to the big leagues, and especially to take over an everyday job for a team trying to win it all.
But as a counter, I’d like to point out that what Devers is doing in Double-A is also pretty unusual. Over the last decade, 43 players have been assigned to Double-A to begin their age-20 seasons. I’ll spare you a table of 43 season lines, but just for fun, here are the top 10, by wRC+.
| Name | Season | Age | PA | BB% | K% | ISO | BABIP | wRC+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carlos Correa | 2015 | 20 | 133 | 11% | 19% | 0.342 | 0.447 | 226 |
| Giancarlo Stanton | 2010 | 20 | 240 | 18% | 22% | 0.417 | 0.325 | 204 |
| Rafael Devers | 2017 | 20 | 128 | 10% | 18% | 0.261 | 0.365 | 176 |
| Starlin Castro | 2010 | 20 | 121 | 7% | 9% | 0.193 | 0.404 | 170 |
| Oscar Taveras | 2012 | 20 | 531 | 8% | 11% | 0.252 | 0.323 | 159 |
| Xander Bogaerts | 2013 | 20 | 259 | 14% | 20% | 0.192 | 0.378 | 153 |
| Colby Rasmus | 2007 | 20 | 556 | 13% | 19% | 0.275 | 0.300 | 149 |
| Jonathan Singleton | 2012 | 20 | 555 | 16% | 24% | 0.213 | 0.350 | 148 |
| Cody Bellinger | 2016 | 20 | 465 | 13% | 20% | 0.221 | 0.287 | 142 |
| Gleyber Torres | 2017 | 20 | 115 | 11% | 17% | 0.188 | 0.321 | 141 |
Of the 43 different 20-year-olds who’ve started their year in Double-A, only two have hit better than Devers is hitting right now. And those two spent their summer punishing major-league pitching.
This is effectively the same point at which the Astros decided that Correa needed a new challenge, moving him from Double-A to Triple-A, and a few weeks after that (once the Super Two date had coincidentally passed), Correa was summoned to the big leagues; he went on to put up a 135 wRC+ and produce +3.4 WAR for the Astros over the rest of the year.
Now, Devers isn’t destroying the league in the same way that Correa was, and his prior minor-league track record isn’t as strong either, so what Correa did in 2015 is an unreasonable expectation for Devers, or anyone else really. And Devers doesn’t have Stanton’s power, so you don’t want to look at the 118 wRC+ and +2.7 WAR that Giancarlo put up after getting called up to Miami as the baseline for Devers either.
But it is worth noting that Devers is showing the kind of power that is really rare for a player his age at this level. Of those 43 guys who started the year in Double-A at age 20, only the seven you see among that top-10 wRC+ posted ISOs over .200. Of the 43 young-for-Double-A guys, 36 didn’t have this kind of power, and if you look at the primary separator between guys who got to the big leagues at age 20 and performed well, it’s power on contact. The guys who have been impact hitters in the big leagues at this point in their careers have been those whose power developed early enough to allow them to overcome the too-aggressive approach that is common for this age.
So while Devers has always controlled his strikeout rates, it’s the big spike in ISO that suggests that he might have the skills necessary to be a useful big leaguer this year. And while 128 PAs is indeed too small of a sample to conclude that Devers now has useful big-league power, his power spike actually began last summer.
In his first three months in High-A last year, Devers hit .233/.298/.335. The walk and strikeout rates were fine, but he ran just a .101 ISO and a .268 BABIP, and wasn’t doing much damage on contact. Only 16 of his 60 hits from April through June were extra-base hits, and only four of those 16 XBH went over the wall.
From July through the end of last season, though, the story was entirely different. He hit .333/.375/.557, running a .224 ISO and a .393 BABIP, while keeping his strikeout rate at essentially the same rate. Thirty-five of his 82 hits over the last few months of the season went for extra bases, nearly doubling his XBH%, but it was still mostly doubles and triples power, as only seven of his 35 XBH were home runs.
This year, he’s already launched seven home runs, and 16 of his 38 hits have gone for extra bases. The power spike hasn’t just carried over from the second half of last year, but he’s now converting some of those doubles into home runs. And he’s done it without sacrificing contact.
Dating back to last July, Devers has now run a .235 ISO, while maintaining an 18% strikeout rate, in his last 392 PAs. This is the combination of tools that lets hitters this age hold their own against big-league pitching.
That isn’t to say that Devers should be expected to immediately step into the lineup and hit like Correa or Stanton. But the Red Sox don’t need him to do that in order to be worth calling up. Steamer projects him for a 90 wRC+ over the rest of the season, and while we don’t have an official ZiPS ROS projection yet, ZiPS was 10 points higher on the preseason wRC+ forecast than Steamer was, so it’s likely that ZIPS probably pegs him as close to a league-average hitter right now.
And those projections are basically going up every day, as Devers is showing that he’s ready for another challenge. Since May started, Devers has taken his control of the strike zone to another level, drawing 11 walks against just 10 strikeouts in 64 PAs. As Double-A pitchers have figured out they want no part of Devers, he’s been content to let them put him on first base, the kind of lesson that 20-year-olds usually don’t learn. But the walks haven’t slowed his power spike: he’s running a .358 ISO this month.
In another month or so, when the Super Two deadline is passed and Devers is magically now ready for consideration for a promotion, it’s quite possible that both ZiPS and Steamer will see Devers as ~95 to 105 wRC+ hitter right now. And as Nick pointed out, when your alternatives are Todd Frazier and David Freese, there’s no real reason to give up talent to get one of those guys when you already have someone capable of performing at their level in your system.
Of course, there’s no guarantee that any prospect will come up and hit, and Jon Singelton hangs out on that list as a reminder not to take anything for granted. But there are also no guarantees with MLB veterans, and regardless of what they decide to do, the team will be taking a risk on a flawed player. With enough talent elsewhere on the roster, the Red Sox just need competence at third base, and tossing in a bit of upside wouldn’t hurt.
Given what Devers is doing in Double-A, at his age, the organization should be encouraged that he can be that competent, reasonably productive third baseman down the stretch. At the very least, he should get a shot before they settle for a Frazier or a Freese, or even a Mike Moustakas. If you call Devers up in mid-June and he looks overwhelmed for a month, there’s still time to make a trade. But guys who hit like this in Double-A at this age? Sometimes, they just carry your lineup in the second half of the year.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
That table is why ZIPS loves Correa so much. What numbers he put up.
I’m a Deve Cameron supporter.
How does this involve sending Mitch Moreland to Saint Helena?
One note on Devers’ power last year: he was in Salem, which is like hitting in the grand canyon. Moncada and Benintendi combined to hit 1 homer there.
Kept looking for Trout in that list and then remembered he started his age 20 year in AAA and then was called up to MLB permanently at the end of April.
I guess he is only looking at actual age 20 seasons, because Heyward was 19 when he hit AA and put up 190 WRC+ in 190 PAs.
Definitely on board with Devers’ offensive upside, not sure how much of an improvement he would be defensively. It’s worth noting that Boston hasn’t just struggled to get good ABs out of the 3B spot, they’ve also had a ton of errors over there, which is not a good sign considering that the pitching staff tends to generate a fair amount of ground balls.
I think they will take the improvement over this even if the glove is the same.
http://www.fangraphs.com/leaderssplits.aspx?splitArr=36&strgroup=season&statgroup=2&startDate=2017-03-01&endDate=2017-11-01&filter=&position=B&statType=team&autoPt=false&sort=15,1&pg=0
Scouts are very high on Devers’ defense, and people who
have seen him (including me) have raved. Last year BP had him at +26 FRAA/150 for Salem, and he’s +11 this year. Clay Davenport’s similar metric has him close to that.
Eric gave Devers a 40 PV grade on Defense in the Red Sox Top 15 Prospects list in April.
Devers’ glove is…polarizing. When he gets to the majors I’m going to be interested to see what his metrics look like.
Realistically, is there any downside to Devers’ development if you call him up early? Will it crush his confidence if he fails dramatically? Will he be able to make all of the adjustments necessary in the majors, or would it be better for him to work gradually?
I don’t know the answer to these questions. I’m intrigued by calling him up right away. There’s a decent chance Dave is right, and he’s about as safe a bet to hit as any minor leaguer. But as one of the best bats in minors right now, and I’d hate to see him go by the wayside. I’d rather trade a low-level prospect for a stopgap option (e.g., Trevor Plouffe) if I have questions about his development.
I don’t think that there’s much downside to his development. If he’s clearly overmatched, send him back down so that he can continue his development by playing everyday at AA or AAA.
The only real downside I can see would be roster management considerations. Devers isn’t currently on the 40 man roster, so adding him would take up a spot and also use 1 of his 3 option years. I don’t think that the latter point is that big of a deal: a 20 year old with his pedigree crushing AA pitching is almost certain to be up as an everyday MLB starter before he uses up 3 option years.
The 40 man spot also shouldn’t be any sort of big issue if he can in fact help the team, but it would be a spot that’s being taken up needlessly if Devers comes up, isn’t ready, and then gets sent back down. I’m not familiar enough with the Red Sox to know if they face any sort of crunch for space on the 40 man roster, but it is a potential downside if Devers isn’t ready.
It’s not just about his development, as Dave mentions in the article.
If they brought him up full time now, then (1) he would likely qualify for super 2, and (2) the red sox would lose the 7th year of team control.
If they keep him down a few more weeks, then the red sox avoid an extra trip through arbitration ($10m+ in savings) and get an extra 3/4 of a season of team control (could be worth 10s of millions of surplus value).
That 7th year is far more valuable than a couple months of a 20 year old who at best is a league average hitter. Even if he is the best internal candidate right this minute, the NPV of that 7th year is almost certainly positive.
/edit because i’m kinda dumb… the service time is irrelevant for the purposes of whether to call him up now or in august. He’s already past the point of being able to accrue a full year of service time in 2017, so it’s all or nothing.
The super 2 deadline though, as Dave mentioned, is still an issue with 8 figure ramifications.
“Marrero got the call because he can actually catch balls hit in his general direction (setting him apart from Rutledge)”
dave pls
So from a fantasy perspective, if you only have roster room to hang on and hope with Devers or Amed Rosario, how do you hold? Points league. Freezers forever.
An entire article on the subject, and yet no mention of Miguel Cabrera?
Simply put, Devers is the prospect clone of Cabrera, in a scary way. With Devers having the same kind of breakout in his AA/age 20 season that Cabrera had, I would challenge you guys (I’m sure it can be done) to find two more identical prospects in terms of projections, physical makeup, and performance. It’s scary how similar they are. And, of course, Cabrera made the same AA-to-MLB jump that is being discussed here.
It should also be noted that Devers IS destroying the league; he always starts slowly, and after his initial month of adjustment to AA he’s had an OPS over 1.250. Right now the even split between the two months hides the jump, but if he keeps it up it won’t be long before his AA line looks pretty incredible.
If you’d like to see further details, check out my comment (second primary comment from the top, same username) in this article- http://www.overthemonster.com/2017/5/18/15654846/rafael-devers-red-sox-third-base-situation
Devers is mostly likely going to be good and maybe excellent and I think he’s probably a Top 10 prospect at this point. But I’m pretty sure there are many other prospects who had similar breakouts at AA at 20 (and even played 3B) as well. We just don’t think of them because they didn’t have careers like Cabrera.
How irresponsible and short sighted of Dave not to compare a 20 year old in AA ball to argueably the greatest RHH of the past few decades
That inspired me to look up to compare to one other name who is definitely in that conversation (Pujols), and interestingly enough Pujols and Cabrera currently have exactly the same career wRC+ of 152. They’ve gotten to that point a bit differently with Pujols’ decline in recent years, and in fairness to Pujols he currently has about 1,600 more career PA’s than Cabrera.
#FreeDevers
Devers is a special prospect. Since destroying the Dominican Summer League as a 17 yo, to every stop along the way, his continued growth on both sides of the ball has been remarkable. Given his age to level and the home parks that he has played in, it’s going to be a matter of time, a very short amount of time, before this precocious 20 yo (!!) finds his way to Fenway.
When trying to project MLB power one has to consider the juiced ball in MLB relative to the minor league ball. Hitters who make contact have shown HR rates jump as much as 50-100% in MLB. I don’t know enough about Devers batted ball profile and plate discipline to know if he would be one of them. Id like to see him get some AAA experience first. 2016 Judge and Moncada show that the ball wont help if you cant hit it but Sanchez, 2017 Judge, 2015 Bird, 2016 Story shows the other end of the spectrum.
Fenway of course is not a great HR park for a LHH unless he can hit FB to LF but he should rake when they go to little league parks like YS3 and to a lesser extent the other AL East parks
One thing they’ve always said about Devers is that he has great opposite field power. Fenway’s a weird place to hit but Devers might be fine no matter what stadium he’s in.
I think what could help devers is his robust contact and plate discipline profile. He has pop but also makes contact and takes some walks.
I think kind of balanced hitters like this have an easier time adjusting to higher levels than kind of extreme profiles like gallo or even buxton.
Not saying balanced guys who are about in the same percentile in walks, Ks abd ISO can’t struggle but in past years they have done better at least from my subjective feeling.
Now a guy can of course go from everything above average to everything a little below average with the majors jump (not unreasonable to assume Ks up and BB down) but at least it is unlike that he falls of a cliff. Maybe his contact will go from 55 to 45 temporarily but not all the way to 20 like buxton and moncada when they first came up.
That doesn’t mean he will be better than moncada and buxton in his career but at least initially he should have an easier transition.
Still it would be a super aggressive assignment of course and not risk free. I prefer players to have at least 500 AA and or AAA games combined to see what you have got unless it is a very advanced college hitter.