The Case for Starting Chris Sale

Yesterday, the Red Sox offense finally woke up, rallying from an early deficit to score 10 unanswered runs, keeping their division series going for at least one more game. Thanks to the bats of Hanley Ramirez and Rafael Devers, David Price’s four brilliant innings of relief work weren’t wasted this time, and now the Sox live to fight another day.

That day is today, and with the season on the line again, John Farrell will hand the ball to Rick Porcello, saving Chris Sale for a potential Game 5 rematch with Justin Verlander. And the logic behind that decision is pretty straight forward.

The Red Sox have to win both of the next two games to move on to the ALCS. Chris Sale can only pitch in one of those two games. Since they have to win both, their odds of advancing don’t increase by simply changing the date of the game he pitches, and in fact, their odds might very well go down if they move him up. Sale has started on three days’ rest just once in his career, back in 2012, and he wasn’t very good in that outing. Pitchers generally perform worse on short rest, even the great ones. And over his last six starts, Sale has allowed 12 home runs, so his most recent performances have created a bit more concern than the Red Sox would like to have about their ace right now.

So, yeah, throwing Rick Porcello for a few innings on Monday and saving Sale until Wednesday makes plenty of sense. However, I think the way the series has played out has created a specific set of circumstances that could make Sale-on-short-rest the right call anyway.

The Weather

Any discussion about Game 4 strategy has to begin with the weather, because, well, this is the Weather Underground forecast for Fenway Park today, beginning at the scheduled time of first pitch.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

It might not be raining when the game begins, but barring a significant change in the forecast, everyone should expect to get rained on at some point this afternoon. And the later the game goes, the more confident the meteorologists are that things will be falling out of the sky. There’s a pretty decent chance that Game 4 involves some kind of rain delay, or at least messy conditions while everyone tries to get this thing in the books before a delay is necessary.

And that means the team that gets an early lead could be at a pretty significant advantage. You really don’t want to be trying to come back from down a few runs on a wet field, when the chances of taking extra bases or getting a ball through the infield are less likely. So getting an early lead could be vital on Monday, and short rest or not, Sale is less likely to give up runs in the first few innings than Rick Porcello is.

Plus, if a significant delay comes and forces both starters out of the game, the cost of using Sale on short rest is somewhat diminished, since he wasn’t going to go deep in the game to begin with. And that reality leads us into the second significant factor.

The Bullpen Usage

Because of how the first three games have played out, Craig Kimbrel has thrown all of one inning in this series, getting used in the eighth inning of the team’s Game 2 loss. It’s the only inning he’s thrown since September 30th, so Kimbrel has now thrown 16 pitches in the last eight days. That means, with another off day on Tuesday, Kimbrel is pitching on Monday regardless of the situation, and if ever there were a time that he’ll be available to get six outs, it’s Game 4. This is the most rested Kimbrel has been all year. The Red Sox should head into Monday’s game planning on getting at least six outs from Kimbrel.

In all likelihood, Kimbrel would be available for multiple innings of work in a Game 5 situation on Wednesday, too, but if the Red Sox hold Sale for the Game 5 start, they’re actually going to get into a situation where they might have too many options available. David Price has been unbelievable out of the bullpen in his two outings thus far, but having thrown 57 pitches on Sunday and 38 pitches just two days before that, he shouldn’t be available on Monday.

But, by Wednesday, you can bet that Price will be John Farrell’s first option out of the pen, and likely be lined up for another multi-inning affair. But if he hold Sale for a Game 5 start, he’s now looking at getting nine innings from Sale-Price-Kimbrel in some fashion, meaning that either Sale won’t work deep in that game anyway, or one of the team’s two relief aces will end up with a bit of a reduced role in the winner-take-all contest.

Having the team’s three best arms share Game 5, with only Kimbrel pitching in Game 4, might be a bit inefficient. In reality, you probably want Price to be coming out of the pen to replace the weaker starter in the two games the team has to win, and Sale certainly doesn’t fit that description. If the Red Sox can get to a Game 5 on Wednesday with Sale available for another extended outing, John Farrell can afford to pull Eduardo Rodriguez or Drew Pomeranz or whoever makes that start as soon as he gets in any trouble at all.

Or, they could just forego the whole Price-as-a-reliever thing and give him the start in Game 5, knowing that it will be all-hands-on-deck anyway. Having Price available in Game 5 makes Sale less necessary in that game, especially if Kimbrel is around to get a bunch of outs in that one, too. Counting on 12 to 15 outs from Price and Kimbrel in the potential winner-take-all game doesn’t leave much room to benefit from having a fully rested Sale to start the game.

And that brings us to the final reason to consider pushing Sale up to Game 4.

The Platoon Advantage

Under the Rick Porcello plan, the Red Sox are going to start a right-handed pitcher, then spend most of the game throwing right-handed relievers after him. Kimbrel, as mentioned, will likely go multiple innings on Monday. Addison Reed and Carson Smith threw just seven and 13 pitches, respectively, on Sunday, so they’re obviously going to be available for work in Game 4. Eduardo Rodriguez is the only lefty the team would be likely to use on Monday, and given how he’s been used in this series, I’m not sure how much we should really expect to see him, especially if the team thinks they might not need a long guy available for post-delay baseball.

So, on Monday, the Red Sox might very well be throwing a bunch of right-handers at the Astros. Then, if that works, they’ll use the left-handed Price to relieve the left-handed Sale on Wednesday. Platoon advantages aren’t everything, but that seems less than ideal.

If, as Boston’s manager, you’re throwing a bunch of righties after whoever starts on Monday, then you’d probably rather start a lefty and let the righties face a lineup that was set based on an opposite-handed starting pitcher. It’s a small thing, but in the postseason, sometimes small things make big differences.

In general, when a club is down 2-1, it’s not worthwhile to push an ace to start Game 4 out of some kind of belief that only that game matters, since winning both games is necessary to advance. And I don’t think holding Sale back for Game 5 is some huge strategic blunder. But given the particulars in this situation, I think I probably would use Sale on Monday. It feels like the Red Sox have a better chance of winning both games if Sale pitches in one game and Price in the other than if they double down on their ace lefties in the same game.

If I’m John Farrell, I wouldn’t want to get eliminated with both Sale and Price watching from the bench.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
JasonMember since 2016
9 years ago

Would they be even better using Kimbrel to start, see how many outs they can get, then go to Sale followed by Reed/whoever? Gets the most out of platoons going R L R and you’re assured to get the absolute most out of your best two pitchers. I’d imagine the main argument for Sale being first is the prep to “start” and players being use to certain roles etc.
It’s probably all moot as Farrell is a dinosaur and about to become extinct.

Les Vegetables
9 years ago
Reply to  Jason

Farrell is neither smart enough nor brave enough to pull a move like that.

snoop god
9 years ago
Reply to  Les Vegetables

Literally zero managers would do this

Rahul Setty
9 years ago
Reply to  Jason

The first inning is the most important one! #Bullpenning

aff10
9 years ago

The weather presents too much of a risk for me to do this. The Red Sox need at least 18 innings to win this series, and I think ideally you want Chris Sale to have 5 or 6 of them. I feel like starting Sale today and running the risk of losing him in the 2nd inning or something because of a delay is ill-advised. Everybody except for Price is available out of the bullpen, so I think I’d go Porcello the first time through, E-Rod or Thornburg for an inning or so, and ride Reed, Smith and Kimbrel in some order the rest of the way in Game 4 and hope for the best.

SubmarineSailor
9 years ago
Reply to  aff10

The weather is the main thing for me too. Given there’s a zero percent chance of a weather delay in Game 5 at MMP, I’d feel much better about getting 5 innings from Sale, two or three from Price, and 1 or 2 from Kimbrel. Porcello in G4, plow through every arm in the pen except Price, who’s almost certainly unavailable, and try to scratch one out today. Then, they’re set up much better for Game 5.

Bobby Ayala
9 years ago

Thornburg has been out all year.

aff10
9 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

Not sure how I missed that not-so-minor detail, thanks. Would’ve been E-Rod then, but, moot point now, I definitely don’t love the Sale out of the bullpen thing for the same reasons

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  aff10

Add in the fact that Sale has struggled the last couple of months and running him out on short rest seems short-sighted. And also, Thornburg had reverse platoon splits last year, so maybe you don’t use him as a specialist but I doubt he’s a major liability because of matchups.

If we’re trying to avoid Porcello to get a lefty in there, I’d actually rather run E-Rod out there as a starter. You’ve gotta win both games, and you don’t want to compromise Sale by running him out early.

snoop god
9 years ago
Reply to  aff10

A Thornburg comeback, while it would be most welcome, is probably not in the cards.

Twitchy
9 years ago

Start David Price? It’s a playoff game, Dave, you know he can’t win those!

Didnt you or someone else say that the Astros don’t have many lhb? So it doesn’t matter who starts, the Astros are still going to be at a disadvantage vs Boston’s rh pen arms. If you start Sale or Porcello you still see Bregman, Altuve, Springer, Correa, who are the main bats you have to worry about. Outside of McCann and Reddick, the Astros will generally have the platoon advantage vs lhp. So it doesn’t matter if Sale pitches and then Price from that perspective.

Even if you start Porcello for game 5 and go to Price, vs Sale and then Price, you’re still facing a mostly rh lineup.

That being said, it’s probably worth the gamble to start Sale for game 4, though all jokes aside, I think Price would do better in relief.

ItsPoPtime
9 years ago

Why are they playing this game knowing that the outcome of an incredibly important game will definitely be hinged on the weather and how it affects play.

Personally I think they should move this start back but hey, if MLB wants two teams to play 162 and have their season depend on whether they fall behind a couple runs and it starts pouring like cats and dogs, then that’s up to Major League Baseball

Bobby Ayala
9 years ago

Not much to write about during the playoffs, I guess. It’s like the baseball writers are drooling over these super-bullpens and thinking that trying to squeeze an extra couple percentage points out of win probability is worth throwing routine and preparation out the window.

CM52
9 years ago
Reply to  Bobby Ayala

Just a few years ago people said this trash about using a closer out of the 9th inning. Time to progress, you luddite.

Bobby Ayala
9 years ago
Reply to  CM52

Any context for your comment? Not sure what years or closers you’re talking about. Also, these are completely different things. RPs train and prepare to pitch everyday, SPs do not. That makes it a different ask of a SP because you throw off their routine. That matters, unless you think they’re robots.

Joeys Bat FlipMember since 2016
9 years ago

It seems to me that the biggest question is around effectiveness on short rest. Yes, the starter may only throw a couple of innings, especially because of the impending rain. But I’m not sure that you can assume that Sale on short rest reduces his ability to go deep in the game than it does his ability to throw particularly well on short rest.

And if we imagine Sale is only 80% of his normal self on short rest, even just for a few innings, you’d probably rather Porcello at 100%.

Yes, this sets up less than ideal scenarios around game 5, but you need to get to game five for that to be relevant to the decision-making process around pitchers in game 4.

ShauncoreMember since 2019
9 years ago

Just for a bit of fun: There is no scenario where a playoff game gets called after the minimum 4 1/2 or 5 innings right? If either side were up say, 10 runs, and the rain delay is going on three hours, MLB isn’t going to cut short a playoff game?

Watch someone respond to this with a B-Ref page of a playoff game that was called early.

YKnotDisco
9 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

Bud Selig: Major League Baseball to ban shortened postseason games

“All postseason games, All-Star games and that, will be full-length affairs, and the rule will be so written.” “Any game that has significance for the postseason, It will be very clear now. Everybody will know exactly.” -Bud Selig

This came shortly after the WS in 2008.

Bobby Ayala
9 years ago
Reply to  Shauncore

I believe Selig stated and Manfred reiterated that there will be no playoff games cut short due to weather, they will do everything they can to get the full game in, even if it means suspending it until the next day.

I’m sure it happened before but I will not be the one to link that BRef page:)

Michael
9 years ago

More east coast bias in the baseball industry. Always writing about the Red Sox even though the Yankees are also in a 2-1 deficit themselves.

Jetsy Extrano
9 years ago
Reply to  Michael

I thought it was funny!

stever20Member since 2017
9 years ago

the benefit of starting Sale on Wednesday is if he does have a good start and they win, they could possibly get away with not using Price, and have him maybe available to start game 1 on Friday. He had 57 pitches yesterday and Friday would be 4 days between outings. You would think he could go 70-80 pitches maybe as he’s been stretched out now. Thinking not just this series but also kind of long term. I know this is putting the cart before the horse, but it would present a positive scenario for Boston going forward.

John Autin
9 years ago

Given Sale’s consistent pattern of late-season fade, I question the premise that he on short rest is right now a better option than Porcello.

Counting Game 1, Sale now has 33 starts in September and October, with a 4.06 ERA and 4.45 RA/9. Despite excellent SO-BB data, he’s yielded 36 HRs in 206 IP, and 9.5 H/9. His August numbers are also a big comedown from the earlier months, and this pattern is so consistent across his 6 years as a SP that I am convinced it’s meaningful.

Porcello is no great shakes himself, but given they must win both games, I’d take my chances that Porcello can go effectively and fairly deep, setting up Sale (and Price) for Game 5.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

Hoo boy. Sale came in as a reliever, and now Verlander is coming in as a reliever. So both teams are piggybacking their Game 1 starter with their Game 4 starter. I don’t know what to think about this.

ScoreboardMember since 2016🏆 MVP
9 years ago

Dave – Not to be an ass, but where’s your actual data to back up this belief? You pose a lot of narrative reasons, but when push comes to shove Fox Sports actually had a pretty compelling graphic during the Yankees game showing short rest starters have a 5+ ERA in the postseason since 2014.

Okay okay. There are a ton of caveats with that data (i.e FIP instead of ERA, small sample since it’s only a couple years, what the baseline performance is on normal rest, etc.) but the point is the same. Why are we falling back on narrative arguments when the data’s sitting there? I think your argument is valid, but it should be the secondary component on top of what (recent) history has told us.

stever20Member since 2017
9 years ago
Reply to  Scoreboard

just looking in the last 4 years we have 14 guys who have gone on 3 days rest in the playoffs. The cumulative ERA of those 14 starts is 5.51. You say FIP. Well don’t have the league factor- but taking the walks, k’s, hr’s, and hbp, and it would add 1.06 to that. Knowing that the league factor this past year was like 3.13, that would mean that the FIP of those pitchers was probably right around 4.20 or nearly league average. The thing with that though is of those 14 starts- you have 6 that are Kluber and Kershaw combined. In those 6 starts, Kluber and Kershaw had using the 3.13 league number a 2.76 FIP. Not quite as good as normal, but still really solid. But those other 8 starters using that 3.13 league number had a 5.12 FIP(to go along with a 7.36 ERA). With the average length barely over 3 innings. The question would have been- would Sale have been expected to be in the Kershaw/Kluber range, or the other range. Fair to say that he would have been expected to be in the Kershaw/Kluber range.