The Collapse of Carlos Gonzalez

Carlos Gonzalez has been a very good hitter for quite a while now. Since 2009 (his first season in Colorado) through 2016, he was one of just 74 position players to accrue 4,000 plate appearances. Among those players, his 122 wRC+ ranked 26th.

As recently as last season, he was hitting the ball with authority, relative to his peers. In a February piece, Tony Blengino stated that his batted ball profile was one that “projects as a safely above average offensive ballplayer in any ballpark,” despite no longer being elite. That hasn’t been how Gonzalez’s season has played out, as he has looked like a shell of himself all season. Even in June, I was still hopeful. I said that I didn’t think Gonzalez had gone from “a .366 wOBA player to a .287 wOBA player overnight.”

The truth, unfortunately, has been worse. As we sit here today, Gonzalez has posted a .278 wOBA / 50 wRC+ for the season. His wOBA is ninth-worst among qualified players; his wRC+ is second-worst. The only qualified position player who has been worse by wRC+ is Royals shortstop Alcides Escobar, who is at least able to couple good defense and baserunning to bring himself back up to replacement level. Gonzalez has done no such thing. By WAR, he has been the worst player in the majors, qualified or not, and it isn’t remotely close:

Players With -1 WAR or Worse, 2017
Person Team WAR
Carlos Gonzalez Rockies -1.9
Albert Pujols Angels -1.2
Chris Herrmann Diamondbacks -1.1
Tim Anderson White Sox -1.0
Five players have -0.9 WAR.

This is certainly not what the Rockies, or anyone else, was expecting to see this season. Let’s investigate.

Carlos Gonzalez, Select Statcast Stats, 2015-2017
Season Total Batted Balls # 95+ mph EV % of Pitches 95+ mph EV Avg. Launch Angle Avg. xwOBA
2015 428 169 39.49 8.1 0.337
2016 456 189 41.45 8.6 0.344
2017 255 81 31.76 5.5 0.283
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

Certainly, we can see that Gonzalez is not hitting the ball as hard. His average launch angle has decreased, into a zone where you wouldn’t expect a hitter with below-average speed to be successful. The drop in average exit velocity is especially troubling. Just how bad is it? We need context. In order to find that context, I made a pool of every player who had similar batted-ball-event profiles to Gonzalez: at least 400 in 2015 and 2016, and at least 200 this season. From that pool of players, I wanted to see who had tallied these totals in consecutive seasons, with duplicate player entries allowed (in other words, Gonzalez from 2015 to 2016 was one entry, and Gonzalez from 2016 to 2017 was another entry). All told, I had 152 entries. Let’s take a look at the biggest year-to-year changes:

Biggest Year-to-Year Changes, Avg. Exit Velocity, 2015-2017
Year 1 Year 2
Player  Year BBE  Avg EV (mph)  BBE  Avg EV (mph)  Avg. EV (mph) Difference
Kole Calhoun 2015 472 85.9 2016 481 89.4 3.5
Eric Hosmer 2015 495 89.0 2016 477 91.7 2.7
Nick Markakis 2015 530 88.3 2016 507 90.6 2.3
Starlin Castro 2015 461 86.3 2016 465 88.4 2.1
Nelson Cruz 2015 427 92.4 2016 437 94.5 2.1
Gregory Polanco 2016 415 89.6 2017 262 86.4 -3.2
Dustin Pedroia 2016 564 88.5 2017 304 85.3 -3.2
Evan Longoria 2016 496 90.7 2017 364 87.3 -3.4
Albert Pujols 2016 524 91.5 2017 340 87.9 -3.6
Carlos Gonzalez 2016 456 90.1 2017 255 85.9 -4.2
SOURCE: Baseball Savant

Again, it’s not close.While this is not yet even three full years of data we’re looking at here, it’s still hard to discount the fact that Gonzalez has had the single-biggest year-over-year decline in average exit velocity.

For a hitter whose game was built around on-base percentage, this might not be a death knell. Gonzalez is not that player. His OPS has always been more SLG than OBP, and even with a high walk rate this season (for him), it hasn’t stemmed the tide. Looking through his FanGraphs player page, you don’t see anything that would refute this inability to drive the ball. His Soft% is at a career “high,” his HR/FB is at its lowest rate since his rookie season, and is significantly lower than most of his other seasons. He’s once again hitting more than 10 percent of his batted balls for infield pop ups. He’s swinging and making contact at the same percentages he always has, the ball just simply isn’t going anywhere once he does.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-Members
✓Full postseason coverage

While Gonzalez has been around for a long time, he’s only his age-31 season. This has all been unexpected, but the numbers don’t bear out any bad luck or that a change is imminent. If anything, it’s only getting worse:

As you’re looking at this, note that it starts with the 2015, the 2016 season starts at batted ball event 429, and 2017 starts at batted ball event 884. You can see that Gonzalez has established, a new, much lower baseline this season, and it’s one that obviously isn’t tenable for him. He’s now a corner outfielder with little range, little speed and little power. That is not the profile of a starter.

This hasn’t been Carlos Gonzalez’s best season. (Photo: Jennifer Linnea Photography)

The good news is that the Rockies don’t have to endure this. Colorado has long been an organization that prides itself on loyalty, but the team has plenty of options. There is an option on the roster in Raimel Tapia. The rookie has posted a perfectly acceptable 94 wRC+ in a fun-to-watch debut season. Is he .368 BABIP sustainable? In the long run, probably not! Even for a player of his profile, it’s still hard to sustain such a high BABIP. But as we have learned from Dan Szymborski, in-season results can be a lot stickier than season-to-season results, so it wouldn’t be a big surprise if Tapia kept this up for the rest of the season.

There are other options as well. Ian Desmond has been once again slowed by a calf injury, but he will likely be back at some point this month. There’s also Ryan McMahon. As Justin Vibber pointed out last week over at RotoGraphs, McMahon has basically been the minors’ best hitter this year. He posted a 150 wRC+ in Double-A and he currently has a 162 wRC+ in Triple-A. He’s certainly ready as a hitter. He is a third baseman by trade, but he’s never going to play that position in Colorado, and as such has spent time this season at first base, second base and designated hitter. Something tells me that flexibility will translate the outfield. If they don’t like any of those options, they could also trade for Jay Bruce or some other corner outfielder of good repute who comes on the market in the next two-three weeks.

There’s also nothing wrong with relying on multiple solutions. The Rockies are carrying 13 pitchers, as they have for most of the season. But as you can see on our handy pitcher usage tables, low man in the bullpen Zac Rosscup has thrown just 0.1 innings and just nine pitches in the past week. This is not a roster position that is being used wisely. The Rockies bullpen now lines up very well — two of Scott Oberg, Carlos Estevez, Antonio Senzatela and Chris Rusin for low-leverage/multiple-inning outings, Mike Dunn and Jake McGee for lefties, and Greg Holland, Pat Neshek and Adam Ottavino for high-leverage situations. Instead of carrying Rosscup or any other eighth reliever for those “just in case” situations that the team has fewer of now that they’re actually good, they’d be better served carrying another position player who can help compensate for Gonzalez’s shortcomings.

Expecting the Rockies to suddenly and permanently bench Carlos Gonzalez doesn’t jive with what we’ve seen from manager Bud Black and the organization throughout the season. Gonzalez has started each of the past six games, and 14 of the last 15. He’s not going to go to never playing again overnight. But it’s time for the Rockies to start cutting into his playing time. Whether it’s Raimel Tapia, Ian Desmond, Ryan McMahon or someone else (maybe David Dahl will have a miraculous recovery from his season-long injury woes), it’s clear that Gonzalez should not be an everyday starter for at least the remainder of this season, if not for the rest of his career.





Paul Swydan used to be the managing editor of The Hardball Times, a writer and editor for FanGraphs and a writer for Boston.com and The Boston Globe. Now, he owns The Silver Unicorn Bookstore, an independent bookstore in Acton, Mass. Follow him on Twitter @Swydan. Follow the store @SilUnicornActon.

48 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Sleepy
9 years ago

During his eight-plus years with the Rockies, he has a 98 wRC+ away from Coors.

“Carlos Gonzalez” is Venezuelan for “Dante Bichette.”

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Sleepy

I would be curious to see Bichette’s home/road splits for park adjusted offensive stats. He had one really good year of hitting (wRC+ of 133) but mostly he was a league-average hitter. I’d guess that after park adjustments, he probably wasn’t that much different on the road than at home.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  sadtrombone

During Bichette’s career, the average NL hitter put up a .259/.327/.399 line.

Bichette’s away line was .269/.306/.424, which comes out to a wOBA right around the .321 average NL wOBA for those years…which means that park factors were pretty spot-on!

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago

So basically, Bichette was about average on the road, and since his line was about average overall, he was about average at home. So unless I’m missing something (which I might, I’m tired) it sounds like CarGo and Bichette aren’t really comparable.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Ryan21
9 years ago

MLBTR noted yesterday that Gonzalez apparently turned down a four-year extension last spring–a decision that obviously looks like it’s going to deprive him of his last chance to land a lucrative multi-year deal. It’s stories like this one to keep in mind when people look to criticize a young player for signing away arbitration or FA years with a team-friendly extension. If a player like CarGo–with a long track-record of success and at the relatively early age of 31–can collapse so suddenly, it’s easy to see why younger players just breaking into the majors leap at the security of an extension.

Lanidrac
9 years ago
Reply to  Ryan21

I’m sure Allen Craig is glad he grabbed a contract extension when he could.

Free Clay Zavada
9 years ago

He’s beginning to look a lot more like Pablo Sandoval than a bounce back candidate, which is just about the last thing he’d want.

LHPSU
9 years ago

If he wants his weight to bounce back…

JimMember since 2016
9 years ago

LHP Jake McGee was just activated.

pedeysRSox
9 years ago

Cahd Huffman would probably be better, perhaps even a lot better.

southie
9 years ago

Question. Is the Coors affect on wRC+ a constant? Or if say Blackmon hit better on the road would his wRC+ be reflective of that immediately? Or does it move each game depending on park played that day?

mikejuntMember
9 years ago
Reply to  southie

wRC+ knows where the PAs take place. If Blackmon hit like he does at Coors on the road, it would help his wRC+. He doesn’t.

2017 Blackmon:

Home: 11% BB, 15.2% K, .398/.469/.815 That’s a 190 wRC+ even accounting for Coors.

Away: 4.6% BB, 22.3%K, .273/.313/.426, for a wRC+ of 90.

This isn’t just a season-long or sample-size issue:

Career Blackmon:

7.1% BB, 12.9% K, .344/.402/.599 for a 126 wRC+ at home.

4.6% BB, 19.6% K, .263/.306/.423 for a 95 wRC+ on the road.

Coors doesn’t just inflate home run numbers. Its the only park that substantially inflates every single kind of offensive measure, and it does so in ways that a hitter with Blackmon’s strengths and weaknesses gets more benefit from than others. His road K/BB rates are atrocious, but pitches don’t behave the same way at Coors, so he doesn’t have to face the same kinds of spin.

Coors has a gigantic outfield so more of everything happens:

More balls fall in for singles.

More balls hit to the gaps get through to the wall

More balls hit into the corners lead to extra bases.

Coors is responsible for something like 45% of all ground-ball triples hit in the major leagues, and Charlie Blackmon personally is responsible for about 1/3 of them. He is a very fast, left-handed hitter, and when he pulls a ground ball down the first base line in Coors field, he gets to 3rd base much more often than is normal. He’s also likely getting a lot more doubles on balls that are often singles for similar reasons (especially gap balls that can’t be cut off because outfielders are running 2-3 extra steps).

Blackmon’s lower than expected wRC+ for his slash stats doesn’t actually have to do with him being overly penalized for Coors Field. It has to do with the fact that he hits like Brandon Phillips when he plays anywhere else. 2017 Brandon Phillips.

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

Dustin Pedroia’s another guy tailor-made for his ballpark (.316/.380/.474//.332 BABIP/123 wRC+ at home, .286/.354/.412/.301 BABIP/109 wRC+ away).

The power of Monster Doubles, haha.

I am the Rockies fan
9 years ago
Reply to  mikejunt

While I agree that everything in here is true (I upvoted it since it’s tiring to explain to other fans in Denver that Charlie is not an MVP candidate) and Chuck Nazty does maximize his skillset in the spacious confines of Coors (as does DJ) I do want to add a point. wRC+ doesn’t really account for a Coors hangover, or the simple but noteworthy point that since Rockies hitters play most of their games in a radically different environment, hitting good breaking balls on the road becomes even more difficult for them than it is for literally every other team.

And strategies that work in Coors, don’t work anywhere else (like pulling ground balls down the 1B line and scoring inside the parkers.) Now of course the wRC+ adjustment wouldn’t have to be hugely substantial, but I do think it does a little unfairly penalize hitters who have rightly tailored their game for their home park, while not recognizing the difficulty of traveling and seeing something different than what you do at home.

That said I’m interested to see what Nolan does if/when he becomes a free agent. It’ll be a case study for sure if a peak all star type hitter takes up the trade outside of Coors, both in how he’ll perform and how the market treats him. The way the league treats him will teach us more about Coors field and its perceived effect on hitters than probably anything else.

southie
9 years ago

Great responses guys. Thanks

jfree
9 years ago

I do think it does a little unfairly penalize hitters who have rightly tailored their game for their home park, while not recognizing the difficulty of traveling and seeing something different than what you do at home.

On a purely statistical basis, I agree. And yes I agree that the ‘hangover’ effect is real. The problem is that Rockies increasingly have a batter ‘type’. Call it the anti-Helton. Guys who thru either selection/coaching/development/habit seem to lose their batting eye, their knowledge of their own sweet spots, and all plate discipline. It isn’t that that ‘works’ much better at Coors (Blackmon and DJ – who don’t fit that mold – are evidence that it doesn’t – pretty much everything a batter does works at Coors) – but those habits really age poorly. Cargo’s had this problem for years with lefties (and now righties too) and Tulo developed the habit in his last couple years with the Rockies. For the guys with those habits, their road stats really do become reflective of their actual skillset – and they aren’t so much ‘victims’ of some hangover – but lucky to play many games at Coors where those habits don’t cost them.

mikejuntMember
9 years ago
Reply to  jfree

Arenado has a big decline in his home walk rate this year, too, though his production is basically the same home and away.

81 games a year where the same spin breaks less has to make it really hard on lefties like Blackmon when they do face a lefty on the road. He gets so few reps against legitimately elite lhp breaking pitches.

And they maul him like against tiger.

timprov
9 years ago

Maybe in the next CBA there will be a vacation policy, where teams and players can agree to take an extended break with pay from the 25-man roster. Seems like a couple of weeks off could help CarGo and certainly would help the team.

AJ pro-Preller
9 years ago
Reply to  timprov

If I were a team I wouldn’t sign a player unless I could veto their contract if they did decide to go on vacation. I would also publicly call him a “whossy”

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  AJ pro-Preller

My dear A.J., you don’t veto contracts, you hide their medical records then trade them.

AJ pro-Preller
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

this site is not for people like you…

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  AJ pro-Preller

You are a master of irony JUICEMAINE

AJ pro-Preller
9 years ago
Reply to  victorvran

aww thx Vic, and you my friend are a great debater. The “master-debater”…no wait, I think I just thought of my 4th account name…

LHPSU
9 years ago
Reply to  AJ pro-Preller

I’m sure you know all about it.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  timprov

This is why the good lord invented the 10-day disabled list.

Baron Samedi
9 years ago

Can we talk about Albert Pujols?

Emil Cioran
9 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Ugh, let’s not. I know Father Time is undefeated, but he used to be so special to watch.

Basically, you could find and replace the words “Carlos Gonzalez” with “Albert Pujols”, and it would remain mostly true.

AnonMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Funny, I literally today was wondering what it would take for the Angels to just straight DFA Pujols. I know that it won’t happen because he has that personal services agreement with the owner/team so his deal is different than most deals but damn, he is absolutely killing the Angels. You could justify him the last couple years because even though his salary was terrible his numbers were at least playable but this isn’t even playable any more.

Four more years and a staggering $114M for a DH/1B (let’s be honest, he’s a DH now) with a .278 wOBA. You can’t even say he’s been unlucky since his xwOBA is .309 and with his pull tendencies and complete lack of speed, you would expect him to underperform his xwOBA.

That’s 1 year beyond when they have Mike Trout signed.

Four. More. Years.

Here’s a question: if the Angels agreed to trade Mike Trout but required the other team to take Pujols with him, what would they get back? I mean, given that Pujols is probably zero or less WAR for the next 4 years, you’re essentially asking other teams to take Mike Trout with a $60M salary for 3 years and probably a $70+M salary for that 4th year in 2021. That’s a lot of money. Would they even get anything back?

Cool Lester SmoothMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon

The thing is…Trout might genuinely overperform that, haha.

Lanidrac
9 years ago
Reply to  Anon

While I don’t think anyone expected Pujols to absolutely lose it quite this soon, this is why the Cardinals weren’t willing to match the Angels’ outrageous and ridiculously backloaded offer.

JoserMember since 2021
9 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

And why every commenter worth listening to said at the time the latter years of the Pujols contract where going to be ugly. And here we are.

It’s kind of sad. because had he stayed with Cardinals on any kind of sane contract, even at this point he’d be the beloved face-of-the-franchise easing into the good dark night punctuated by number retirements and the like.

Instead he’s going to be the albatross around the A’s neck for years to come — unless and until Moreno can swallow the thought of paying him while not playing him, freeing up a roster spot and allowing Pujols to take over as the new Bobby Bonilla.

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

I keep thinking about that late-June column where Jeff Sullivan semi-defended the Angels’ indignation over Albert’s low WAR because he had positive clutch stats, like 1.25 WPA.

His season WPA is now (predictably) in the red.

Scioscia had also noted that Albert was top-5 in RBI. He’s now out of the top 10. But I don’t think their management wants to revisit the issue….

Lanidrac
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

You’d think they could at least move him further down the lineup, though. Even if you believed in his clutch hitting, wouldn’t it be better to bat Trout 3rd and Pujols 5th or 6th?

AnonMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

While Jeter was good in 2012 and injured for most of 2013, he continued to hit 1st or 2nd all the way to the bitter end. His last year in 2014 he hit 2nd all but 15 PA on his way to a 256/304/313 line.

I suspect Pujols will remain 3rd for at least the rest of this year and then they will try to gently bring up moving him down the order during the offseason.

sadtromboneMember since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  John Autin

That take didn’t age well, and pretty much everyone knew it at the time. Of course, we also say a lot of things over 162 games. Many will be wrong.

bowie
9 years ago

i was enjoying this until i got to this very awkward sentence: “He’s not going to go to never playing again overnight.”

Jason BMember since 2017
9 years ago

It seems interesting that all five of the largest YOY changes in exit velocity occurred from 2015 to 2016, and all five of the largest *decreases* occurred from 2016 to 2017. Did the method of measuring exit velocity change from ’15 to ’16 to ’17? Or just a freak/random occurrence?

Pwn Shop
9 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

They changed the ball mid 2015.

Ryan DCMember since 2016
9 years ago
Reply to  Pwn Shop

Changing the ball wouldn’t affect exit velocity

Pwn Shop
9 years ago
Reply to  Ryan DC

Yes it would if you have read any of the research there are two components to the new ball, higher coefficient of restitution (leads to higher EV) and lower drag.

I am the Rockies fan
9 years ago

As the sole Rockies fan around (just kidding guys), I definitely have a hard time watching CarGo waste at bat after at bat in what should be big moments. I realize there is too much money and history for the Rockies to simply write off CarGo, but it’s a move other more progressive clubs might have made by now, at least putting him in a job share with Tapia or Parra or whomever.

While we are on the topic of progressive clubs, I have a hard time with all the sac bunts that Black likes to put down, especially with the way that Rockies commentators seem to love them so much. I know they like to praise players playing the game the right way and hitters taking “team at bats” but seriously a team at bat is whatever maximizes your chances to win. I love the Rockies but man do they ever frustrate sometimes.

Lanidrac
9 years ago

It has been proven that between two equal hitters, you’re less likely to score by bunting a man from first to second than just having both guys swing away (which doesn’t even account for the times the sacrifice attempt fails), therefore it only makes sense for pitchers or any other times when the guy on deck is a much better hitter.

Although, the odds are much more in your favor if you try to bunt with a guy on second and nobody out or runners on first and second.

victorvran
9 years ago
Reply to  Lanidrac

Giving up an out also makes a lot less sense when you play half your games in Coors.

I am the Rockies fan
9 years ago
Reply to  victorvran

Yep, and that’s why I hate it so much.

David OlsenMember since 2017
9 years ago

Could this be the same as when Adrian Gonzalez lost his power while dealing with shoulder issues (non throwing side)?