The Cubs Are the Best Base-Running Team, Too
You know about the Cubs. It’s the team that entered spring training as the consensus World Series favorite. It’s the team with the already impressive collection of young stars who tacked on with a splashy offseason. It’s the team that already threw a no-hitter. The team with the potentially historic blend of discipline and power. Maybe you’re tired of hearing about the Cubs already. Maybe you think the coverage and attention has been overkill. Or maybe you think they’re deserving of more coverage, and more attention, considering they’re 14-5 with a run differential (+64) nearly as large as the next two best teams by that measure combined (Cardinals and Nationals, +74).
Whatever your stance, you’re getting one more Cubs post for the time being, because for all the attention the lineup and rotation has received, there’s another area in which they’re deserving of attention, an area that often goes overlooked but that can very much matter. In addition to the lineup having a top-five adjusted batting line with the most runs scored, the rotation being the best in baseball by ERA and second-best by FIP, and the defense leading everyone in Defensive Runs Saved, the Cubs have also been the best base-running team in the sport. Not only is it a continuation of last year’s success in that department, but it’s something that was seemingly improved by one offseason acquisition, and perhaps more importantly, amplified by another.
First, the numbers. Right now, the Cubs lead baseball with five additional runs above average coming by way of their base-running. Team base-running can be broken down into three components: base stealing (wSB), double-play avoidance (wGDP), and efficient advancement (UBR) — in other words, taking extra bases while avoiding unnecessary outs.
Cubs base-running runs and ranks
- wSB: 0.0, 14th
- wGDP: +0.9, 4th
- UBR: +3.9, 1st
The Cubs are 11-for-16 on steals. Perfectly average. They’ve avoided double plays better than most, but it hasn’t made a big impact thus far. The area where the biggest impact can be made is taking extra bases and avoiding extra outs, and it’s also the area where the Cubs have been the best in baseball.

| Team | BT | OOB | XBT% | 1B to 3B | 1B to 3B% | 1B to Home | 1B to Home% | 2B to Home | 2B to Home% |
| Cubs | 23 | 4 | 46% | 15/43 | 35% | 6/12 | 50% | 15/23 | 65% |
| League | 17 | 7 | 39% | 9/32 | 28% | 4/9 | 44% | 10/19 | 53% |
OOB: Outs on bases
XBT: Extra bases taken
1B to 3B: First-to-third on single
1B to Home: First-to-home on double
2B to Home: Second-to-home on single
They’ve done a better job advancing on tag-ups and taking advantage of balls that get past the catcher. They’ve made fewer outs on the bases, while being more aggressive. They’ve gone first-to-third, first-to-home, and second-to-home all at a better-than-average rate. There isn’t anything not to like here.
Last year’s Cubs were the second-best base-running team in the league, and now they look better. The obvious place to look is the additions, and therefore Jason Heyward. Heyward hasn’t yet hit much this year, but he’s played his always-stellar defense in right field, and has also been the best individual base-runner in the game. These are the ways in which Heyward can provide value even without elite offense, the kind of things that keep his floor so high, the kind of things that allow a team to feel comfortable handing out nearly $200 million to a guy without an upper-echelon bat. Heyward was a top-five base-runner last year, and has always been among the best at taking the extra base, despite not being a traditional speedster.
He’s gone second-to-home on singles and forced bad throws:
He’s gone first-to-third on balls hit to left field:
Heyward mixes good speed with good instincts and well-timed aggression. Not everyone picks up on that deflection off Nick Ahmed’s glove as quickly as Heyward while having the speed to make it to third. He’s not a burner, but he’s got enough speed and enough smarts to be a plus on the bases, like his teammate, Kris Bryant.
The Cubs were already a good base-running team, and Heyward makes them better, but there’s another part of this equation that’s equally important as the base-running itself, and that’s allowing the base-running to manifest itself. In order to run, you’ve got to have the opportunity to run, and in order to have the opportunity to run, there’s got to be a ball in play. Last year’s Cubs were an efficient base-running team, but they limited their opportunities to capitalize on that ability with their league-worst strikeout rate. Shortly after their postseason ended, general manager Theo Epstein had this to say about the club’s future plans, per The Daily Herald’s Bruce Miles:
“I think we can get better as a situational hitting team and as a contact-hitting team, and that’s something you can address through player personnel if the right player is out there, the right fit but also through emphasis and coaching,” Epstein said. “We’ve already talked — Joe [Maddon], Jed [Hoyer] and I — about how situational hitting is going to be an emphasis in spring training.”
The Cubs wanted more contact. They went out and got Heyward, who makes an above-average amount of contact. They went out and got Ben Zobrist, who makes an exceptional amount of contact. Presumably, they worked with some of their existing players and focused on getting more contact out of them. Last year, no one struck out more than the Cubs. This year, only six teams have struck out less than the Cubs, who have cut down their team strikeout rate by nearly five percentage points. Bryant’s strikeouts are down, Addison Russell‘s strikeouts are down, Jorge Soler’s strikeouts are down, and adding Heyward and Zobrist can only help.
Who knows whether the Cubs are actually a better lineup with fewer strikeouts. Could be that with more contact, they’re actually sacrificing some other part of their offensive game. Tough to say what strikeouts mean in the big picture. Through the lens of base-running, though, more balls in play is objectively a positive.
This particular sequence caught my eye as a fun way to wrap this all up:
Heyward puts a ball in play with two strikes. Fowler gets a good read and takes the extra base at home. His aggression forces a throw that allows Heyward to make a good read and take the extra base at second. Extra bases for everyone!
Last year’s Cubs were good. This year’s Cubs look better. They’ve hit with the best of them. They’ve pitched with the best of them. They’ve even fielded and run the bases with the best of them. We’re seeing one of their points of emphasis from the offseason pay dividends, and it’s something that amplifies their ability on the basepaths. Remember how uniquely captivating rookie season Mike Trout was, at one time leading the league in offense, defense, and base-running value, while patching up weaknesses on the fly? That’s essentially been this year’s Cubs.
August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.
Can’t wait for the comments on this one…
What’s the over/under on johnforthegiants comments?
25.5
3 unique posts on the thread, 22.5 troll responses
Basically, he’s replacing Free_AEC guy for top FG troll.
#TrollGraphs
But what does johnisforthegiants think?
Stupid Cubs fans, ignoring all of the evidence against their team because they are convinced it’s their year. Other than walks, runs, runs allowed, defensive runs saved, baserunning runs, etc. there’s nothing that even shows why the Cubs shouldn’t be contracted, let alone the favorites.
New money, suit and tie. I can read you like a magazine.
Have we set the date and time for the parade yet? Might want to get on that.
Also, where is BigDaddyCool now that his Cubs are finally getting the level of coverage he thought they deserved? I miss that guy.
So what you’re saying is that when it comes to captivation factor above replacement, 25 Cubs equals one Trout.
So you’re saying that when it comes to other elements of passion, 25 children will be returned.
He already said what he thinks. The cubs big strength is their fielding (see last year’s def stats, plus they’ve added heyward) and it’s strange that people are focusing on other things which are much more questionable.
Defensive analytics are basically the most questioned thing in the sport. The cubs are well built all the way around, there is no 1 area they are bad in is the point.
We’re also talking about the team that just set the National League record for most strikeouts generated by pitchers with 1431 K’s in 2015.
But no, it’s just their defense that is any good.
Also, where is BDC now that his Cubs are finally getting the level of coverage he thought they deserved? I miss that guy.
None of my posts have claimed that cubs aren’t a great team. I just don’t agree on what’s great about them.
I think people are just getting on you for the amount of posts, not what you said.
If his posts were sausage and bacon pizzas, I’d be full after each article.
ignore the cubs’ fans, john. negativity about the cubs is not to be tolerated ’round these parts or anywhere else on the internet. Of course they are a great team, but unless you acknowledge that they are the greatest team of all time and are going to break the 2001 Mariners single season record for wins, they will berate you.
Take comfort in the fact that it’s an even year, and your team will likely win the wild card game and then beat the cubs in the NLDS, causing a meltdown of epic proportions in Wrigleyville and calls to eliminate the postseason and just award the BaseRuns Championship to the Cubs.
Charts Dear said:
April 25, 2016 by 22:01
Skip Cubs fans, John. negative for pandas can be tolerated in these areas, or anywhere on the Internet. Sure, they’re a great team, but if you do not recognize that they are the best team of all time, and the browser to save the season to win, they will berate you.
Comfort in the fact that even many years and your team can do unpredictable game, then beat the hatchlings in a container of molten groom epic proportions in Vrigleiville and demands the withdrawal of here, and the prize for the winner of the BaseRuns Cubs.
I think the Cubs are actually gunning for the own record for most wins in a season.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/this-cubs-lineup-might-be-the-most-disciplined-lineup-ever/#more-216813
There is a whole lot of you in that comment section.
Yes, and i was arguing that it’s a good sign for the cubs that they are cutting down on their strikeouts this year, whereas almost all of the cubs fans there were claiming that there’s no problem with a team which strikes out a lot. Read what was actually wrotten there.
Is wrotten pronounced with a short ‘o’ or a long ‘o’?
Yes, due to the fact that this is a good sign for the children, who were reduced to a failure, and almost all Cubs fans have said that there is no problem with people who do not rest van. Read what he actually said.
“Spartacus says:
April 18, 2016 at 12:13 pm
@GiantsFanJohn,
Small sample size of course, but it 2015 Cubs Hitters’ walk rate was 9.1 and K rate was 24.5. This year their walk rate is 13.3 and K rate is 20.5 (which is 7th best in all of baseball).
Meanwhile their pitchers walked 2.52 per 9 innings last year and struck out 8.81 per 9. This year their walking guys 1.92 per 9 and struck out 8.36 per 9….
johnforthegiants says:
April 20, 2016 at 12:10 pm
Congratulations, the cubs have managed to beat up on some weak teams for 9 games. Why is it so important to try to draw grandiose conclusions from that?
but how many RBI’s do they have?
Lots and lots of them. If you’re the best baserunning team you’re going to score when the coach waves you home. That makes the hitters even clutcher, since they can be aggressive knowing that they’ll get their RBI’s.
Wow, this post is beautiful. Scholars will be studying it for years.
Bill James thought that there were some measurable indices – baserunning being one of them – that were good proxies for general baseball intelligence. And the Cubs just strike me as a really smart team. Even when I look at insignificant things like the success of their pitchers at the plate this year, I wonder if it’s b/c they have a lot of players who are just really good at figuring shit out.
And a totally unrelated point: Cards fans got a lot of crap this past week for bemoaning the loss of Heyward (the thinking was that they only had him for one year, so how attached could they really be?). This article illustrates one of the reasons why they loved him so much – he’s pretty much a perfect baseball player fundamentally. I watched probably 150 of Heyward’s games last year and he virtually never made a baserunning error, or took a bad route, or threw to the wrong base, or even hacked at a bad pitch. He really is a joy to watch.
Braves fans too. Though with the money they saved on Heyward, they not only have Markakis, but can also pay Olivera AND install state-of-the-art infield turf at their new stadium.
Speaking to your unrelated point… I just think there’s a lot of layers to the Heyward signing. They lost a potential young superstar and and traded a young pitcher for Heyward as a result. The Cardinals have been great at keeping potential free agents that they traded for… but this time they lose him to a rival that actually has their shit together for the first time ever. I have a feeling that most of them have a good grasp on the situation, but there’s a vocal minority making them as a whole look bad…(that whole BFIB mixed with the vocal minority and the Astros scandal is an easy target) and to your first point… yeah, since Theo has come on board, they really have become a smart team. It’s been amazing to watch it all happen up close.
Honestly, it is early to be making any conclusions of this team, but since Theo took over, he’s been very transparent about his plan… and the things he said early on have slowly happened. People are reacting to the plan becoming a reality.
Oh yes – I absolutely agree that there were many more layers to the Heyward signing that upset Cards’ fans so: the fact that he went to a heated rival that had just knocked them out of the playoffs, the fact that he was so young when he left (as opposed to Pujols when he left), the fact that it went against the Cards’ playbook (where typically players came over as rentals, bathed in the friendly atmosphere at Busch, then signed long-term contacts at the end of the season, often at below-market value, e.g., McGwire, Edmonds, Holliday). All of those factors were at play. But I do think another big reason is that Cards fans just flat-out loved watching him play.
As for a vocal minority making Cards fans look bad – I mean, sure, if you listen to vocal minorities.
I brought up the vocal minority as a big reason why Cards fans were getting crap for bemoaning the loss. There’s some nasty stuff out there, and it’s not something that one has to search hard for… just go on Twitter or Facebook. What I’m trying to say is that you guys as a whole are getting crap for what they’re doing. Just like I know there are ass clown fans in my own fanbase. I know the majority of you guys aren’t bad and sincerely liked him.
“As for a vocal minority making Cards fans look bad – I mean, sure, if you listen to vocal minorities.”
Minority…?
Got it, thanks Cornflake. And Jason B, I mean, I can’t say for SURE whether these degenerate fans are a minority or not. There must be somewhere in the neighborhood of 5 or 10 million Cardinals fans in the country. If you’ve got some data as to the mindset and habits of several million of them, please let us know.
“If you’ve got some data as to the mindset and habits of several million of them, please let us know.”
THAT DATA IS PROPRIETARY!!1!
I see what you see, my Wookie friend. I was watching the game yesterday, and on a deep fly to right center, I watch Heyward glide effortlessly towards the track towards the ball. Then I saw Fowler running to the same spot and started having flashbacks to the Schwarber injury. But Heyward just stepped behind him at the last second, yielding to the CF as he should and backing him up just in case. Nice to see the little fundamentals out there. Heyward has them all.
He plays the game the right way, both by the eye test and by the estimated values of these “little things” that end up baked into his WAR.
If he stays healthy over the next 12-15 years, Heyward could take the Beltre path to the HOF.
Huh?
Heyward would need to become a ++ hitter at some point to make this true, no?
What I find interesting is that in their careers, Eaton and Heyward are nearly identical offensively – 760/781. Heyward has had a couple more years under his belt, but the big difference between the two was the defensive value. This year, Eaton shifts to right field and he now has the most DRS in baseball – whereas in center he was below average. It makes you wonder just how smart it was of the Cubs to sign Fowler back; much of Heyward’s value might have been negated by a positional switch.
Beltre had already had an MVP caliber offensive season by this point in his career, while Heyward has not shown much improvement offensively since his rookie year. Not only that, but Beltre played a golf glove caliber defense at a more valuable position and he stayed at that level for longer than almost anyone that has played the game. Outfield defense has shown a bit more volatility than infield defense, and it has not aged as well.
Calling a guy like Heyward a potential HOF’er, when he really hasn’t had a single HOF season – I know many will point to last year, but much of that is tied to defensive metrics that aren’t as reliable or well thought of as offensive metrics – in his career. Let’s not get carried away.
How good is a golf glove? Heyward might end up in the hall of very good. Bat takes a little step forward and I can see him making it though. With saberheads probably making uo the voters in 20 years.
You think i have an anti-cubs bias? Stop with this about mvp and hall of fame, that’s decided by sportswriters who don’t understand anything. Heyward is an awesome player in terms of winning the world series, which should be the most important thing. Who cares are mvp and hall of fame? I would have absolutely loved to see the giants sign him although i can’t deny that they were right to go after starting pitching.
Huh?
Haivard + + became a fighter at some point occur?
What I found interesting is that in his career, Eaton and Haivard tonnes-nearly identical 760/781. Hayward has a few years behind, but it’s a big difference between the two is the neck defensive actions. This year, Eaton moved to right field and now have DRS best in baseball, while in the Centre, it was below average. I wonder how intelligent She is writing the Mets; Haivard value is limited by the switch position.
Bergeron had an MVP caliber season for attacks at this stage of his career, and Hayward did not show much better than poietniikoj attack of the year. Not only that, but Bergeron played golf glove caliber defense in a valuable position, and held at that level until we all play the game. Protection for the Court to find more of the fluctuations of the courts, defense and brings annually as is.
I called this type of Haivard potential Hof Hof where it’s not seasonal I know that many people in the last year, but much of it applies to untrusted data or listen to ideas such as the attacks in his career. We will not get carried away.
“The law of small numbers: Judgmental bias which occurs when it is assumed that the characteristics of a sample population can be estimated from a small number of observations or data points.”
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/so-about-byung-ho-parks-strikeouts/
Byung Ho Park (K%): 50% => 32%
https://twitter.com/incugator/status/720994933084000256
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/tyler-white-already-looks-for-real/
Tyler White (last 7 games): 3 for 28 (.107)
Hey August, beware of small sample size.
Rather ironic to call someone out for using sss by using a…7 game sample size
The Minor League track record.
Which you didn’t mention as a point of contention in your post.
well, his point is valid in the sense that there have been a lot of posts around here pointing out numbers and player changes in the first couple weeks in the season based on sss. I do understand why these posts exists, however, because websites need to generate content and if we can’t talk about sss results early in the season really there’s not much to write about.
I’m well aware of sample sizes and stand behind everything that I wrote. Thank you.
The Cubs were the second-best base-running team for all of last year (162 game sample), added an elite baserunner, and added an elite contact bat to help take advantage of their already-good and now-improved base-running roster. I have 0 concerns with sample size issues with this post. I could’ve written it before the season. That they’re leading baseball in BsR is just icing on the cake.
Park and White are rookies who were having anomolous seasons when I wrote the posts. This is a daily baseball website. Are we not allowed to point out interesting developments early in the season because of small samples? Should we not produce content until June? I never claimed Park’s K% or White’s production were sustainable. I took note of something people were interested in, gathered as much information possible to learn more about the subject, and did my best to share my findings with my audience.
Also, your argument against Tyler White is batting average over seven games? Beware of small sample sizes.
I wish someone warned ME about small sample sizes. 🙁
Moreover this is 2016, and more importantly this is Fangraphs. I don’t think any writer at Fangraphs should feel obliged to put “SSS” disclaimers in the pieces they post here, provided it’s obvious the writer is aware of it — and that table makes it obvious: if there were just percentages listed, there might be a question, but when we can see the denominators we can an add that caveat ourselves.
At least the smart readers can. The others, the ones who who can’t figure it out or — more commonly — the narcissists who have nothing to actually contribute to the conversation but feel compelled to quibble in order to look smart in front of others (and do the opposite by doing things like quoting dictionary definitions) should just be ignored.
You do a good job of responding to criticism, August, and you did a great job here responding to something that was both trite and hilariously, intrinsically flawed. But I worry you’re wasting time on things that don’t deserve your attention, time you could be spending churning out additional, interesting pieces.
http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/rule-5-pick-joey-rickard-might-be-for-real/
http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=13277&position=OF
You can look at the strikeout improvement as potentially even greater than mentioned here when removing pitchers. http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=np&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=0&type=8&season=2016&month=0&season1=2016&ind=0&team=0,ts&rost=0&age=0&filter=&players=0&sort=9,a
I would think the absence of Schwarber is almost as notable as the addition of Heyward when it comes to the Cubs improvement running the bases?
Schwarber had a +2.5 BsR last season. Sure, he might not sustain that, but to say his loss is comparable to the addition of one of the game’s best is completely baseless.
Yeah, I don’t think people realize what a great athlete Schwarber is. He’s not a fat, oafy toad. He’s too thick to catch full time, and he made some inopportune plays when the spotlight was on him. He’ll never be a Gold Glover, but he’s capable of doing more than just hitting the ball.
Dude’s built like a linebacker.