The Currently Exploding Jackie Bradley, Jr.

It’s difficult to figure out where to start with Jackie Bradley Jr. You could start with his incredible defense, and actually that’s probably the right place to begin. You could look at this play, or this play, or this play, or if you have four minutes and 31 seconds you can watch some defensive highlights from 2014. Or just use Google. I’m sure you’ll come up with something good. That’s because Bradley is an exceptional outfielder. Someone with his defensive skills shouldn’t have to hit much to play regularly. “Not much” is still more than “none,” though, and it’s the difference between these two that has held Bradley back.

Bradley was called up four times in 2013, including at the beginning of the season to serve as the club’s starting left fielder. He hit .097/.263/.129 and was sent down as soon as the team got healthy enough to do so. He was called up three other times with varying degrees of failure, but the end result was a .617 OPS on the season. Even so, Bradley had hit at every level of the minors, including posting an .842 OPS for Triple-A Pawtucket in 2013 in between trips to Boston. The team decided he would be their starting center fielder in 2014. And he was. And his defense was close to perfect. His hitting was also perfect — though only on opposite day. Now, though, he’s hitting on all the regular kinds of days, too.

There’s that story of Ted Williams standing out in left field practicing his swing with his glove during the game. That’s what Bradley’s results suggested he was doing, but in reverse. Picture a guy standing in the batter’s box and practicing jumping up to make a catch at the wall. That’s how badly Bradley hit. He hit like he couldn’t hit. By the time the Red Sox gave up and sent him down he had compiled a slash line of .198/.265/.266. That’s a .531 OPS and a wRC+ of 46. Bradley didn’t have enough plate appearances to qualify for the batting title in 2014, but if you drop the required number to 400, Bradley jumps to the bottom of the list as the worst hitter in baseball, a good (bad!) nine points of wRC+ ahead (behind!) of Zack Cozart. Bad (bad!)!

Then Bradley went down to Pawtucket and hit .212/.246/.273. Shortly afterwards the Red Sox signed Rusney Castillo to a six-plus-year contract. Mookie Betts also asserted himself and, as Boston already had a second baseman signed until forever, they dropped him in the outfield as well. This past offseason they added Hanley Ramirez, ostensibly an outfielder, on a four-year contract. That’s sending a message that the Red Sox had seen enough. There wasn’t any more room for Jackie Bradley.

This season, Bradley has been back to his old self at Triple-A, putting up an .853 OPS for Pawtucket. Bradley was even called up occasionally, and got some at-bats with the parent club. They went about as well as they had ever gone. He got into six games in mid-May and in 13 plate appearances he had zero hits. Then he was called back at the end of June and got into six games. This time he had a hit! He even hit a home run, and the end result was better, but you still wouldn’t call a slash line of .211/.273/.368 “good” because it’s not. He was sent back down, but he returned again at the end of July. He had 24 plate appearances in nine games and hit .053/.208/.053. Again. Yuck.

With the exception of the almost five months where he was the starter in Boston, most of these chances involve incredibly small samples. Six games here, nine games there, not enough to tell you anything about a player from an analytical standpoint. But while that’s true, so is this: they confirmed every fear Bradley had already created about his play. He struck out in close to 30% of his plate appearances and hit for almost no power and he did it repeatedly.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

On August 9, Bradley was hitting .121/.254/.172 on the season. So… yeah. That day, though, he had two hits, a triple and a home run. The next day he had two more hits including another triple. The next day he had another hit, then three more, then Saturday he hit three doubles and two more homers. Yesterday he doubled and walked in five plate appearances. He’s now hitting .247/.340/.494. This more than qualifies as the “not much” mentioned earlier.

Major-league hitters can hit a pitch in the center of the strike zone hard more often than not. Here you can see what Bradley did against pitches in the center of the strike zone in 2014.

JBJ2014

Not much at all. Now here’s what he’s slugging on pitches in the zone this season.

JBJ2015

Much better!

We can even break it down further to all the games since August 9.

JBJAug92015

Fun!

It’s difficult to say why a player all of a sudden gets it, but in Bradley’s case there are some obvious mechanical adjustments that he made to his stance and swing this past off-season. If you watch Bradley in 2014 two things stand out. The first is before the pitch. He starts with an open stance and he moves the bat around quite a bit. These images are from Bradley’s at-bat against David Robertson in the ninth inning of the Red Sox game against the Yankees at Fenway Park on August 2, 2014.

JBJ 2014 stance

The second is during the pitch, where he closes his stance then re-lifts that same front foot before placing it down again.

JBJ 2014 mid stance

Here you can see Bradley’s has his front foot up on his toes. What you can’t see is that the foot is actually coming back up. He’s already picked it up, put it back down, and now he’s lifting it up again. Look where the pitch is. There’s no way Bradley will be able to swing at that pitch with anything remotely resembling power. And indeed he doesn’t, swinging and missing on it for strike three.

There’s one more image from this at-bat I want to show you.

JBJ ball behind bat

Bradley’s bat is right on the pitch but he’s so late to it that the ball is actually behind his bat yet not quite in the catcher’s glove yet. It takes a special kind of lateness on a pitch to achieve artwork like that.

Here’s video footage from earlier in that game that provides a side view of Bradley’s 2014 swing:

Players make all sorts of strange ticks and mechanical oddities work for them, but with all the movement and timing involved, Bradley often had to rush to get himself in position to swing. Rushing often means lateness.

This season Bradley has ditched much of the pre-pitch movement and closed up his stance.

JBJ 2015 stance

This helps keep things simple and keep him balanced. The less movement the less there is that can go wrong, and the less chance there is that the hitter will be late in his swing. Bradley’s toe-tap has also been replaced with a leg lift that helps him start his momentum going forward. Effectively Bradley cut out the first part of his swing where he repositions himself at the plate (goes from open stance to closed) and then took his toe-tap to its logical leg-lift conclusion.

The strange part is that all of this didn’t work. Bradley was still hitting .121 with a .426 OPS just a bit over a week ago. But then, poof, it did work! I’ve watched video of Bradley early this season and he has made in-season adjustments. Over the course of the season he’s dropped his hands a bit, and increasingly added to his leg lift. Here he is on May 16

JBJ May 16

…and on August 9…

JBJ Aug9

The toe-tap is still sort of there in the earlier image, but by early August, it was gone.

Here’s the most recent version of the swing, from yesterday’s game at Fenway:

Perhaps it was as simple as getting his foot down and getting his weight moving in the right direction. Like most of Bradley’s major-league career, we’re forced to draw conclusions from an incredibly small sample size. But like the previous small samples that confirmed every fear about Bradley, this small sample has confirmed what it was hoped he could do and what he had actually done for much of his career in the minor leagues.

Just like any hot streak, good fortune has played a role here. For example, during Saturday’s game when Bradley hit three doubles and two homers, two of those doubles probably should have been caught, both landing on the warning track while helpless Mariners outfielders did their best impressions of the Twitter shrugging emoticon. But the other three hits weren’t flukes. Each of his two homers traveled over 400 feet and have been classified by ESPN’s Hit Tracker as “plenty.” In other words, they weren’t cheap.

None of this is to say Bradley has turned a corner and is now the player the Red Sox thought they had when they made him the starting center fielder back in March of 2014. Bradley could very well hit .121/.230/.121 over the next month. He’s done it before. This looks different though and that’s why it’s so promising. The player looks good, the mechanics look good, and for once where Jackie Bradley and big league pitching are concerned, the results look good too.





72 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Mike L
10 years ago

Interesting. Baseball can always use another star (even if he is on the Red Sox) but it’s likely that pitchers will adjust, and he will regress to whatever his true talent level is from this current insanity. What type of historical precedents for someone like him to be really awful, and then rise to star level. Mike Schmidt (not comparing) was also gruesome with the bat as a 22/23 year old, and did fairly well after that.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  Mike L

As most reasonable people would have said going into the season, he likely isn’t as bad as he’s been…and now that he has a successful streak, he certainly isn’t this good either.

I’ll be looking for the usual type of performance we’ve seen from his career as a whole, which is to say, one that involves getting on base at a good clip.

Zack D
10 years ago

“Each of his two homers traveled over 400 feet and have been classified by ESPN’s Hit Tracker as “plenty.” In other words, they weren’t cheap.”

Wasn’t 1 off the backup catcher who was pitching? Worth mentioning.

Andy
10 years ago
Reply to  Matthew Kory

Felix in his career worst performance, and a position player.

bill
10 years ago

One of the homers did come off of Jesus Sucre…

Mr Punch
10 years ago
Reply to  bill

Sucre would be #3 in the Sox rotation

tz
10 years ago

His skill set really isn’t much different from a certain guy who’s been worth almost 8 WAR in his first year and a half in the majors:

http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=11038&position=OF

And JBJ’s only 3 days older. It just seems like he’s a bust because he was rushed into the Opening Day lineup a few years ago and was overmatched for quite a while.

Grant
10 years ago
Reply to  tz

KK has been above average offensively, in addition to amazing defence. Bradley’s not even sniffed that. For every guy with that skill set who become an impact player there are 5 guys who can’t get beyond 4th OF. Time will tell which one Bradley falls into, but the odds at this point probably aren’t in his favor.

I
10 years ago
Reply to  Grant

Kiermaier’s MLB career 103 wRC+ is technically above average I guess. He’s only had a 90 wRC+ this season, and a lot of his offensive contribution come from his baserunning.

He and Bradley put up similar minor league numbers. The book isn’t finished on either of them yet.

jmei
10 years ago
Reply to  Grant

Yes, Bradley’s offensive production in the major leagues is still pretty bad (career 62 wRC+), but it’s come in all of 630 plate appearances, which is still a fairly small sample. Meanwhile, he has a career .296/.395/.463 minor league line in 1252 plate appearances, most of which have come at age-appropriate levels and without the aid of extreme home parks, which should still inform our projections of him.

Considering his defense, if he hits the Depth Charts projection of 86 wRC+, he’s a Lagares-esque above-average starter. If the mechanical adjustments described above represent a legitimate true-talent improvement and he’s even a league-average hitter, he’s a Kiermaier-esque star.

Jeff
10 years ago
Reply to  Grant

Lol, KK isnt above average offensive player… He has a sub .700 OPS and a .270 OBP.

Catoblepas
10 years ago
Reply to  tz

Which is why saying the Red Sox said there was “no room” for him because the Red Sox signed a bunch of outfielders is ridiculous. I would hope that no one in the organization gave up on him after less than a full season’s worth of PAs, but that doesn’t mean counting on JBJ to become a contributor in time for Opening Day 2015 would be a good strategy. Sign and develop players you think are good, and things will almost assuredly work out.

state the obvious
10 years ago
Reply to  Catoblepas

I’m excited for opening day 2015 O.o

Baron Samedi
10 years ago

Take out that one day and everything gets a lot less exciting

ed
10 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

but dat day tho

Barney Coolio
10 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

But why take it out? It happened, leave it in.

AC
10 years ago
Reply to  Baron Samedi

Willie Bloomquist hit .455/.526/.576 over his first 38 PAs. When JBJ puts together a good string of 500 PAs, then I’ll believe it might be legit. One month is less than nothing.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  AC

One full season with a clearly broken and overmatched state of hitting also is less than nothing (“less than nothing” meaning “misleading”). For reference, Xander Bogaerts says “hi!”

And in case you don’t follow, this is the same Xander Bogaerts with a failure free track record and a huge sampling of being a good hitter, including in the MLB World Series, who suddenly became the most lost hitter I have ever seen in late May 2014 through the start of September 2014.

So as of the start of 2015, the vast majority of his MLB record was atrociously bad. Does that make it more legit that the MUCH bigger, and excellent, track record for the rest of his career? As we are seeing now, no, no it does not.

We definitely don’t know that Bradley can keep this up. It was utterly foolish, however, to conclude going into this season that he definitely COULD NOT hit, either. Let it reveal itself.

I
10 years ago
Reply to  redsoxu571

English is one of the several languages Bogaerts speaks, so I don’t doubt that Bogaerts has said “hi” at least once in his life. But I’m not sure that quote was relevant.

Neil Roberts
10 years ago

he was the 2010 College World Series Most Outstanding Player – must have some talent in order to get that award.

Reality Check
10 years ago
Reply to  Neil Roberts

…and Mark Kotsay won a Golden Spikes award. What’s your point?

Graham
10 years ago
Reply to  Reality Check

Mark Kotsay wasn’t bad…

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  Reality Check

Kotsay had a five year stretch of very good play. What, you don’t like peak 4 WAR players?

You should revisit the list of Golden Spike winners. It’s an impressive list of talent. Winners of the award are FAR more likely to pan out into good or better MLB players than your average top 100 prospect.

kevin
10 years ago

The Red Sox have never shied away from integrating young players into their team, however it is incredibly difficult to do while also being competitive each year. I remember reading Ben Cherington say that the Sox FO felt they needed to give young players at least 900 plate appearances before they can truly evaluate them. That’s what they gave Middlebrooks, and aside from his initial promotion to the bigs in 2012, he struggled all the way to SD, and where he struggles still. JBJ is currently at 630 PA. Maybe this is him coming into his own, in that time frame Cherington talked about.

Also something to note, I think a large part of the results over the last 2 seasons can be attributed to Jackie’s struggles. I don’t want to say I am pinning the results on him, but from a roster construction stand point, I think the Red Sox FO put a lot of faith in him becoming at least a solid, every day regular in CF, with the potential for more. As a comp, I would find it hard to believe the ’07-’09 Red Sox would be more or less the same if Pedroia had not taken off in May of ’07. Certainly other things have gone wrong as well – rotation, Hanley, Pablo, etc. But attempting to replace Ellsbury with JBJ, and having him struggle so mightily, definitely contributed.

slm
10 years ago
Reply to  kevin

I find this ridiculous though. You’re the front office. You’re paid to be able to do something better than “herp derp play him for almost 2 seasons and see what happens”.
Boston needs a real shakeup at the top. Get rid of the mentality that every move they make has to be some kind of high risk/high reward adventure.

kevin
10 years ago
Reply to  slm

I don’t think FO execs fall into the categories of either a. herp derp just play them or b. know exactly how each player is going to hit the ground running.

Forecasting player performance is an inexact science. I think you are overestimating just how much control they have over the outcome of situations. There is a lot of randomness that goes on, and while it’s possible to predict some of, it’s foolish to think FOs should be able to predict all of it. And this applies to all facets of life, not just baseball.

On twitter last week Nassim Taleb tweeted a quote by William James: “Our science is a drop, our ignorance the sea.”

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  slm

As someone who wants to see Boston win, I do NOT want the team to listen to people like you.

j-bones
10 years ago
Reply to  kevin

“the Red Sox have never shied away from integrating” is perhaps a poor way to start that

Scott
10 years ago
Reply to  j-bones
GoOppo
10 years ago

Thank goodness he has hit, so the world can know about his sublime defense. In my opinion, just my humble opinion he is the best defensive center fielder I’ve ever seen. I’ve only been watching baseball for 25 years, but he makes plays that no other center fielder makes and makes them look easy

Grant
10 years ago
Reply to  GoOppo

Maybe plays no other BoSox CF has made. Not sure he’s better than Lagares, Pillar, Gose, Bourjous … all of those guys are great CF. No matter how great they are defensively they need to able to hit better than a pitcher to be impact regulars. Jury is still out on most of that group, with the stick.

state the obvious
10 years ago
Reply to  Grant

lol he said gose is great.

chin music
10 years ago
Reply to  Grant

lorenzo cain

dennetOTM
10 years ago
Reply to  Grant

As a defender, I would take Bradley over all the guys you listed with the exception of Lagares.

Billy Corman
10 years ago
Reply to  GoOppo

I have been a Cardinal fan since Lou Brock. I would give Jim Edmonds hell on his best days but still respected his defense. I saw him pull too many back over the wall to not mention him here.

GoOppo
10 years ago
Reply to  Billy Corman

I would agree with Edmonds, bc they play similair styles, playing shallow and chasing down extra base hits, I would say his arm strength and accuracy (96+) on the gun on statcast separates him from lagares. He had 8 double plays last year as an outfielder in limited playing time, that alone is incredible, bit I would say Edmonds is up there and Andruw, but JBJ just makes it look so easy. He doesn’t get his due credit IMO. Probably never will unless he hits enough to stay around to make people see.

I’m trying not to sound biased as I thought Franklin Gutierrez, and a couple of Lorenzos seasons were great, but if JBJ had played a full 160 ish I think he could have set records in assist/double plays started from center last year if he didn’t already. we can agree to disagree on his D

billy bob beane
10 years ago
Reply to  GoOppo

andruw jones

Sean C.
10 years ago

I agree with this.

Reality Check
10 years ago

Steve Finley.

Roger
10 years ago

Judging by those zone charts, pitchers should be pounding him down and away, and they haven’t done it at all during his hot streak.

Moonshadow
10 years ago

Those swing gifs look exactly alike, fwiw.

slm
10 years ago
Reply to  Moonshadow

Minus the toe-tap, which is kind of the point of the exercise…

Boxkutter
10 years ago
Reply to  Moonshadow

I’m not sure if maybe the same one was posted twice on accident, and the problem was now fixes, but I think there are definite differences, and I am not very good at analyzing mechanics from videos. The second one is missing the initial toe-touch that JBJ used to do. Also, in the first one, there is a hitch in his swing. A pause right before he starts to come forward, but it doesn’t look natural. Almost like a re-positioning or something.

arc
10 years ago
a eskpert
10 years ago

I was expecting a Mortal Combat style GIF of JBJ actually exploding. I’m now disappointed.

#Bringbacknotgraphs

ktn
10 years ago

How is that 3rd catch anything other than routine?
The first catch was quite good (although a poor (94%) route), the second was probably a little bit under a 50% play.
I mean he’s a plus outfielder was a ++ arm, but it’s actually rather expected that you run sometimes to make a catch.
And you don’t show the ball that clanked off his glove for a double, or the one that he pulls off and the ball nearly hit him in his foot, or the misplayed hops in RF.

Remember all the Jose Iglesias greatest SS *ever* nonsense?
-3 DRS in 2015.

The Red Sox are 14th in DE in the AL

pft
10 years ago
Reply to  ktn

Well, UZR has him at +3.9, so who the hell knows what is real value has been. Also, we all know less than 1 yr, even 1 yr of these metrics are SSS and don’t represent true talent level. Furthermore, he did miss a year with stress fracture and he may have lost a step. Anyone who has watched him would know the defensive projections were not hype.

Lastly, I do believe bad pitching can skew an IF’ers defensive stats. Positioning is based on a pitcher hitting his spots, and when bad pitchers miss by so much, balls get hit harder (so more get through), and not always to the spot where fielders are positioned. Tigers pitching has been pretty bad

hebrewMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  ktn

he took a 94% route on a ball hit directly over his head, that he had to catch over the shoulder.

Thats INCREDIBLY GOOD, and you not thinking so proves your ignorance.

oh, and Jose Iglesias is 9th in the MLB this year in UZR/150, worth 2 runs more than average. Not less.

Thanks for coming out, though.

jdbolickMember since 2024
10 years ago
Zack D
10 years ago

600 PAs of horrible production = small sample size
1 week of hitting = showing true potential

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  Zack D

Let me create the full (rather than the cherry-picked snark) narrative for you:
High potential pedigree player
1300+ PAs of consistent minor league success
Player promoted to the major after ONE full professional season struggles in 600 PAs that look nothing like his scouting profile or minor league results
Most recent MLB results before the hot streak involved very sporadic playing time
Player gets a short stretch of full playing time and does really well…maybe it’s a sign of the hoped for turnaround

There, that wasn’t so bad, was it? It never ceases to amaze me how myopic people can be.

Damaso
10 years ago

holy heck that is a ton of words spent talkkng about a 25yr old failure with a one week hot streak. couldn’t even wait a few weeks before splooging. never change, boston media.

and what is it with every good defensive boston kid (bradley, Iglesias, vazquez, etc.) being instantly awarded Super Elite Defense status before ever proving anything? just bizarre.

and then people are surprised when the red sox never live up to the hype.

Top CF UZR/150, 2013-2015 (Min. 500in):

M.Bradley: 32.4
K.Kiermaier: 32.4
J.Dyson: 31.1
A.Almonte: 23.2
C.Gentry: 23.0
J.Lagares: 22.3
E.Incarte: 21.9
A.Pollock: 21.3
B.Hamilton: 20.7
L.Cain: 17.7
S.Fuld: 16.5
C.Gomez: 14.7
J.Marisnick: 14.2
J.Bradley: 14.2
L.Martin: 11.7

yeah yeah yeah i know – “too small sample we just know he’s super awesome and deserves to be treated like a super elite defensive player becaus4 we say so.”

jmei
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Uh, you know they can scout defense in the minor leagues, right? In fact, defense is one of those skills that requires the least extrapolation between the minors to the majors. All of the major national prospect sites (Kiley McDaniel, BA, BP, MLB.com, Keith Law, etc.) have long held Iglesias/Bradley/Vazquez’s defense in high regard, and they’ve all shown those defensive chops in their time in the majors. I mean, maybe a +14 UZR/150 center fielder isn’t the best of all time or anything, but it’s absolutely still elite.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  jmei

yes, for some reason red sox prospects get their scouting reports treated as gospel, even in the face of mkb failure, while all other prospects are forced to actually earn their laurels.the minor leagues and major leagues are filled with elite defenders who can’t hit….and guys who have shown much better defense than these red sox kids.

GoOppo
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

You don’t think Iglesias and Vasquez are elite defensive talents? is it bc you don’t like the sox or you don’t like the eye test or numbers test?

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

there is nothing in the numbers for the 3 of them which indicates they are the “all world” defenders they have been treated as.

BenjaminMember since 2019
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

Milton Bradley is a little too old and a lot too crazy to play CF at a high level these days. I believe you mean Michael Taylor.

Everdamaso, blue jays homer
10 years ago
Reply to  Damaso

I hate the Red Sox 🙁

me
10 years ago

His Blue Jays homerism takes a back seat to his Red Sox haterism.

Damaso
10 years ago
Reply to  me

you guys use “Hate” and “Homer” to insuate my opinion is biased and inaccurate, when reality says otherwise.

reality
10 years ago
Reply to  me

Like hell I did!

Eric M. Van
10 years ago

The best thing about the catch in Detroit, which you can see in the Statcast version, is that there were two outs, and Henry Owens, who had played with Bradley in Pawtucket, starts backing towards the dugout as soon as it’s hit. He pointed this out to reporters after the game when asked if he were surprised that he made the catch.

tribefan15
10 years ago

I like JBJ. Always have. I’ve thought all along that Boston made a mistake by convincing themselves they could compete this season, which left Castillo and JBJ out of the majors for much of the year. In any event, I’ve also always thought that JBJ just needed some MLB seasoning. Despite his numbers, he’s shown promise all year long. The walk and strikeout rates have been better; the only thing lagging was the BABIP. Now that is rising, and we’re seeing the results. I think JBJ is here to stay.

redsoxu571
10 years ago
Reply to  tribefan15

It wasn’t a mistake for the team to think it could compete, as it totally could have. But too many players didn’t offer the expected defense, and the offense collapsed, and when a team’s supposed strengths aren’t even there losses are set to follow.

Castillo also was not ticketed for the minors, aiming to win or not. But there was a log-jam in the OF, and he missed a lot of time in spring training, so he needed minor league playing time to get back up to speed. Once he got hurt early on in the minors, it was another setback, and then when he initially struggled once he was brought up to the MLB team it was time for him to settle in in the minors until he got his groove back.

Bradley, meanwhile, definitely needed time in AAA to get his approach at the plate back, so that wasn’t a mistake. It would have been nice for the team to give him a real and everyday opportunity earlier in the season, though.

yankeesfan
10 years ago

I think the first picture you have tagged as David Robertson is Adam Warren. Unless D-Rob’s socks only appear on the follow-through.

papasmurf
10 years ago

What I wanna know if why it took so long for BOS to take the front foot shenanigans(clearly a mess) out of his hitting mechanics. I mean cmon, it’s obvious to even an untrained eye like mine.

arc
10 years ago
Reply to  papasmurf

Bradley has been vocally resistant to changing his swing for years.

redsoxu571
10 years ago

I’m surprised that Bradley’s clear K% in AAA this season didn’t merit mention.
2012 AA- 18.1 K%
2013 AAA- 20.1%
2013-2014 MLB- 28.7%

2015 AAA- 13.8%

Clearly something has changed in that regard, and THAT coupled with a return to success in a large AAA sampling is what has had me feeling good about Bradley’s future, more than anything else (except his defense, of course).

Eric M. Van
10 years ago

Cute reading the doubting comments. After all, if a guy who had struggled terribly in MLB hits .309 / .400 / .636 in 65 PA, it has to be a meaningless fluke, even if he had a tremendous pedigree, has made dramatic swing adjustments, and at the time of his call-up had been the best 25-and-under hitter in AAA.

Since this appeared a bit over two weeks ago, Bradley has hit .364 / .429 / .750 in 49 PA.

Eric M. Van
10 years ago
Reply to  Eric M. Van

What was my rush? Three days later, it’s .411 / .459 / .839 in 61 PA.

wily moMember since 2020
10 years ago
Reply to  Eric M. Van

one of the homers was off a backup catcher though