Brett Cecil’s Descent?

We spend a lot of our time at FanGraphs focusing on players who have bright futures ahead of them — or campaigning to have a blocked player finally get a chance in the major leagues. This makes sense, since it’s human nature to look for the positives and see the future with optimism. Unfortunately, life doesn’t always turn out that way for ballplayers. Many of them flame out at a young age.

Are we witnessing the same fate for Toronto Blue Jays starter Brett Cecil? Following his disastrous 2011 — during which he spent a stint in the minors — Cecil reported to camp this year having shed more than 30 pounds, but his velocity was down in the 87-89 mph range. In his latest start, he allowed five walks in only 2.2 innings, and he gave up five runs. While it’s true that it’s only Spring Training, this isn’t good news for a pitcher who has experienced velocity issues in the past, and was once was counted on to be a reliable middle of the rotation starter. Let’s take a look at Cecil’s development, and how it compares to where he is in 2012.

While not overly regarded as a prospect, the former sandwich pick out of the University of Maryland did clock in at No. 3 on the Baseball America’s 2009 list of top Blue Jays prospects – though it was a rather thin crop. Cecil was called up that year to make his first career start on May 5, and he finished the year with 93.1 IP and a 5.37 FIP. The high FIP can be attributed to his allowing 1.64 home runs per 9 innings. Despite the high homer rate, expectations remained high for Cecil, and he made his 2010 debut on April 23. This time, he got his home run problem under control and posted 2.6 WAR on the strength of a 4.03 FIP. One of the big reasons for the improvement was doubling his change-up use to 23.8% at the expense of his below-average fastball. Still, if we look closely at his game log and his velocity charts, we see a disturbing trend. In five September starts that season, Cecil allowed 20 earned runs in 26 innings to go along with a 12:9 strikeout-to-walk ratio. When looking at his velocity chart, it’s apparent that his velocity began to lag two-thirds of the way through the season. And it really fell off in September, as he averaged 90 mph on his fastball in just one of those starts.

Unfortunately, these results continued in his third year, too. Cecil was demoted to AAA after four starts. He’d posted a 6.86 ERA and failed to average 90 mph on his fastball in any game. After returning to the big-league rotation on June 30, Cecil combatted his reduced velocity with an increased reliance on his change-up — which went up to 32.7%. But it was too much of a good thing, and his wCH/C fell from 0.46 to -0.30. By September, his average fastball velocity was down to 86-88 mph, compared to 90-92 mph in his rookie season.

Of course, velocity isn’t everything, especially for a guy like Cecil. Lots of soft-tossers have been successful by using command and devastating change-ups. Unfortunately, Cecil doesn’t appear to have much of either. He has a career BB/9 of 3.09, compared to a SP league average of 3.03, and his change-up has been -0.2 runs below average. These factors, combined with a slightly below-average ground-ball rate, do not paint a pretty picture. The club is reportedly happy with his weight loss and the look of his change-up in Spring Training, though the lack of velocity is still disconcerting. Correlation does not necessarily mean causation, but Cecil’s 2011 performance was fairly in-step with his velocity. His results were at their best in July when his velocity was pushing 90 mph. And he struggled, mostly with the long ball, in April and September, when his velocity was down.

With Ricky Romero, Brandon Morrow and Henderson Alvarez penciled into the rotation — and Dustin McGowan, Jesse Litsch, Luis Perez, Carlos Villanueva and Kyle Drabek all having varying ability to start — Cecil’s leash won’t be long this year. While we don’t want to infer too much, it is difficult to imagine that the recent McGowan extension is good news for Cecil. With the addition of a second wild card playoff spot, there’s a strong possibility that the Jays will be contending within the next couple of years. And if Cecil isn’t going to contribute, the club might be looking to find pitcher’s who will.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed. We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member. 1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other. 2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off. 3. Dark mode and Classic mode! 4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them. 5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects. 6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.) 7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only. 8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO. 9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members. 10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features! We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it. In case you didn't read all that, here's the short version. Membership includes:
✓Ad-free browsing
✓Unlimited FanGraphs & RotoGraphs articles
✓Historical & platoon projections
✓Leaderboard & player-page stat heatmaps
✓One-click data exports
✓Customizable player-page dashboards
✓Dark & Classic site modes
✓Weekly Members-only mailbag
✓FanGraphs Walk-Off, your year in review
✓Optional homepage photo removal
✓Gift articles to non-members




29 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Andrew
14 years ago

Cecil is certainly a guy who won’t end the year in the Jays rotation, let alone make it through April there. He is a lock to begin the year in the rotation in the number 2 spot, slated to face Boston on Tuesday April 10th… that will be strike one.

Three strikes and he’s out to vegas… Hutchison is nearly ready, McGowan isn’t expected to miss much time, and there’s a plethora of arms a step behind.

AA has been talking up Cecil as if he was talking trade… Wouldn’t be surprised to see that before he crashes and burns his way to Las Vegas.

Andrew
14 years ago

By Number 2 spot, I meant number 4 spot… Number 2 on the home stand.

jerkstore
14 years ago

He seems like a prime candidate to head to the bullpen. I could see a scott downs type upside for him there. He might even be able to get his fastball to 90-91 in those short bursts.

Mike Wilner
14 years ago

But he’s pretty much Cole Hamels tho.

The obligatory explanation
14 years ago
Reply to  Mike Wilner

For those who don’t get it, Mike Wilner is a Toronto sports talk show host who recently compared Cecil to Hamels, essentially suggesting they were the same pitcher.

Josh
14 years ago

In fairness, he actually said they have the same stuff, but that Hamels has way better command. While equally stupid and wrong, he never said Cecil was as good.

BirdStackMember since 2020
14 years ago

UMD represent! We should probably just stick to basketball .

Joebrady
14 years ago

I’m a RS fan, but if I were AA, I’d be looking and hard at Villanueva and Drabek. Maybe you can make a case for letting Drabek develop and not start his clock be leaving him in the minors a while, but those two are probably as dependable in the 4/5 slot as Bard and Doubront.

James
14 years ago

I’m aware this is not the right section but don’t want to sign up. My question is how many wins would a team of replacements be (in reference to WAR). Or even do different positions have a different starting point to base these WAR’s off of. Answer to this would be nice but just pointing to the right direction would be ok too.

Anon
14 years ago
Reply to  James

Start here:

http://www.fangraphs.com/library/index.php/misc/war/

And just read through the links from that page, which should give you a pretty comprehensive idea of how everything fits together

NATS FanMember since 2018
14 years ago
Reply to  James

Depending on who you talk to 48 – 52 wins for an all replacement team.

OTerry
14 years ago

Great article Ryan.

I know it’s hard to speculate – but why is his velocity decreasing? He’s not nearly as old as Moyer, and he doesn’t seem to have any injury issues presently.

If he was hitting 92, and throwing wildly, then obviously he’d need to dial it down and focus on hitting his sports.

Very mysterious.

Fiery Furnaces
14 years ago
Reply to  Ryan Campbell

Yes – this. I’d bet the house he’s changed his motion a bit because something is hurting. It’s too bad. AA could probably put him in a deal as an extra to get something done/overpay a bit and move him. But individually I don’t know if any team would take the risk.

winfield wants noise
14 years ago
Reply to  Ryan Campbell

I’m not that high on Cecil. A mid 6 K/9, mid 4 ERA and a fastball on the wrong side of 90. Not very exciting in my books.

greenfrog
14 years ago

It wouldn’t surprise me to see a second-half rotation of Romero, Morrow, Alvarez, Drabek and Hutchison.

I think Cecil will be given a couple of months of starts, if only to try to build value for a possible deadline deal, but if he’s not producing by June or July I think he’ll be out of the rotation.

Yuniesky
14 years ago
Reply to  greenfrog

I hope it doesn’t take half a season to figure out he doesn’t belong in the rotation. We don’t need another Jo Jo this year. Between Villanueva and Drabek (once McGowan comes back) there doesn’t have to be any starting innings for Cecil.

Doug D.
14 years ago
Reply to  greenfrog

Disagree. I would be very surprised to see Drabek still with the big club in the second half.

Torgen
14 years ago

So in mid-May, with an FIP of 6 and having single-handedly doomed the Jays to 4th, Cecil will go on the DL for a TJ surgery he needed all along?

Ryan D
14 years ago

I wonder if the decrease in velocity is because he used to be a reliever in college and the Jays converted him. And if I recall correctly from an article somewhere that he may have also been abused a bit as a reliever in college.

bluejaysfan81
14 years ago

It’s weird to see a guy lose so many mph at such a young age. He mentioned in a interview with Greg Chisholm that he used to top out at 97-98 when he was in the cape cod league.

bluejaysfan81
14 years ago

*Gregor Chisholm

Budyzer
14 years ago

I think drabek should get cecil’s spot. But unfortunately in order to get anything for him in a trade Toronto will have to play him and hope he doesn’t implode. It’s more likely we will have to suffer through half a season of Cecil serving up bp taters to the rest of the AL east until Hutchison or McGuire get some more experience in the minors. I don’t see the upside to this guy at least not in a division with the sox and yanks.

Not much trade value
14 years ago
Reply to  Budyzer

Even with a good month or two or three Cecil’s trade value won’t be much. Can’t see AA mortgaging the season to improve his return on Cecil from 2 B- prospects into a marginal MLB lefty specialist or something. He’ll have a fair shot but also a short leash, to buy some SP prospects a little time to force the issue.

Richard Martin
14 years ago

I’ve always liked Cecil and root for him to do well but have a feeling he’ll end up more like a Jeff Fassero or Scott Downs. If anyone’s interested in more on Cecil’s career arc, check this out:

http://www.therichardandmartin.com/2012/03/23/projecting-brett-cecil/

John
14 years ago

Today’s start really should seal his fate for opening day. What a brutal line, and from the sounds of it, he was getting absolutely shelled. Gave up 7 straight hits I believe and was throwing 86-87 mostly, although he threw at least one that was 89, but that one was taken yard by Prince.

Ricky
14 years ago

Optioned to AA ouch.