The Diamondbacks Get Cheap

The idea of this is to present Arizona’s side of the trade but frankly I have been sitting here for an hour and still cannot even come close to justifying this. The argument that I have heard is that the Diamondbacks needed to shed payroll. I do not have any special insight into their balance sheets so I won’t bother refuting that. I will point out that they were already losing some $30 million in contracts this winter so I’m unsure how low they feel their payroll needs to get. However, even granting that premise, this trade is horrendous.

Make no mistake, Dan Haren is still a very good pitcher and he wasn’t a drain on their payroll. Haren was more than worth his contract. That value obviously makes him an easier commodity to move, but the point then would be to get good assets back. We do not yet know the identity of the player to be named later but have heard that it is not Mike Trout, the Angels only really exciting prospect. The known portions of the trade return range from intriguing but far away (Corbin) to generic (Rodriguez) to downright horrendous (Saunders). Joe Saunders probably doesn’t even make sense to retain given that he’s making almost $4 million this year and would expect to see a raise to the $6 or $7 million mark if he went through arbitration.

That is not a good haul; it’s not even a decent haul. It’s downright bad. It’s the sort of return you’d more expect if the person getting traded was a liability due to his contract, not an asset. The Diamondbacks just acted as if they have no understanding of Haren’s .350 BABIP or that their home park is prone to serving up home runs. The Diamondbacks just acted like Dan Haren was Scott Kazmir. He’s not and whoever eventually takes over as the full time GM in Arizona will rue this day as one that set back the organization significantly.





Matthew Carruth is a software engineer who has been fascinated with baseball statistics since age five. When not dissecting baseball, he is watching hockey or playing soccer.

newest oldest most voted
Eric22
Member
Eric22

This article should be re-titled………..

“The Diamondbacks Get Stupid.”

Ivdown
Guest
Ivdown

Correction

The Diamondbacks Remain Stupid

Trading Scherzer and Schlerith for Edwin Jackson and Ian Kennedy was a dumb, dumb move.

CodyG
Guest
CodyG

I’m not 100% sure what’s Scherzer’s ceiling is as a pitcher, but from what I understand they were worried he didn’t have enough pitches to make it as a a starter. so in their eyes they saw 2 starters for 2 relievers which makes sense especially if they can get some return for Jackson in a trade.

CodyG
Guest
CodyG

again that’s me assuming they trade jackson, I’m sure they can get some prospect that will is useful at the major league level.

valuearb
Guest
valuearb

Except that Kennedy and Jackson have been way better than Scherzer this year, and Schlereth has control problems. That trade was predicated on trading an injury risk that can’t get deep into games (Scherzer) for two solid starters who can give you tons of innings Max can’t. So far it’s gone pretty much like that.

Dan
Guest
Dan

Remember that time that Ian Kennedy was good?

And Max Scherzer was destined for a bullpen?

And Edwin Jackson has been a serviceable #3, and would be a lot more valuable if the team hadn’t gone down the crapper?

And Schlereth was horrendous (still) and can’t find the strike zone?

Apparently not.