The Forgotten Ace

Let’s start this article off with a little experiment. You have five seconds to think of the best pitchers in baseball. Ready? Go!

What names immediately popped into your head? Surely, CC Sabathia and Roy Halladay made your list. It’s also likely that Felix Hernandez and Tim Lincecum were two of the more popular choices. Some of you may have said David Price or Justin Verlander or Josh Johnson, and those are all acceptable answers.  Now, be honest, how many of you thought of Dan Haren?

Despite being an extremely durable and valuable pitcher over his career, Haren doesn’t seem to get the credit he deserves. Over the past five seasons, Haren ranks as the third best pitcher in all of baseball according to WAR (behind Halladay and Sabathia). Over the past six seasons, Haren has thrown at least 216 innings each year. While his strikeout numbers have been above average, Haren’s true value lies in his ability to limit walks (career 1.96 BB/9). Even though he clearly deserves to be mentioned as one of the best pitchers in baseball, Dan Haren seems to be the forgotten ace. How can a pitcher who has performed so well receive so little recognition?

Part of the problem has to do with the teams Haren has suited up for over his career. Haren first established himself with the Oakland Athletics, and while they were a competitive team at the time, the A’s didn’t (and still don’t) draw a whole lot of media attention. Despite his strong performances, Haren wasn’t even viewed as the ace of Oakland’s staff. That title still belonged to Barry Zito, who was just finishing up his career as an Athletic. Even though Haren was the better pitcher in 2005 and 2006, the baseball world still recognized Zito as the team’s ace. Once Zito left the team, giving Haren a chance to shine as the A’s true ace, the A’s turned in their worst season since 1998. For a team that already received little media attention when they were good, turning in a season like this made them nearly invisible to the national media.

The same thing happened with the Arizona Diamondbacks. Haren was now recognized as an ace, but he played for a team that receives little national media coverage. Haren posted his strongest seasons in Arizona (6.5 WAR in 2008 and 6.1 WAR in 2009), but had little to show for it. In 2008, the team finished second in the division, but managed to win only 82 games. In 2009, the team finished dead last in the NL West. The Diamondbacks were well on their way to another last place finish in 2010 when they decided to deal Haren to the Los Angeles Angels.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

Finally, Haren’s luck appeared to be changing. Not only was he joining a large market for the first time in his career, but the Angels had made the playoffs the last three seasons. It looked like everything was falling into place for Haren to finally get the recognition he deserved. Unfortunately, the Angels luck came to a screeching halt as they stumbled to a third place finish last season. Once again, Haren was overshadowed by another pitcher on his own team…Jered Weaver. Even entering this season, Weaver appeared to be the Angels’ ace. Haren would once again have to play the role of the sidekick.

Despite his strong performances over the years, it appears that a mix of playing in small markets, on bad teams, and with other well-regarded pitchers has clouded our perception of Dan Haren. Funny thing is, he’s doing it again as we speak. Haren currently ranks fourth in WAR among all pitchers this season, yet it seems like a surprise considering the lack of coverage he receives even today. There is absolutely no doubt that Dan Haren has been one of the best pitchers in baseball over the past 5-6 seasons. It’s about damn time we finally give him some praise.





Chris is a blogger for CBSSports.com. He has also contributed to Sports on Earth, the 2013 Hard Ball Times Baseball Annual, ESPN, FanGraphs and RotoGraphs. He tries to be funny on twitter @Chris_Cwik.

54 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Ben
15 years ago

I guess it just depends on the audience. I don’t think Haren is particularly forgotten on fangraphs or in the SABR community.

To be honest, when I saw the article’s title, I just assumed it would be about Cole Hamels, given the timing and his season-long performance.

Andrew
15 years ago

Ditto. Was looking forward to a Hamels article. Arguably a top 3 pitcher over the last calendar year.

Don G
15 years ago

Sigh…

From Dan’s Baseball Reference page:
December 18, 2004: Traded by the St. Louis Cardinals with Daric Barton and Kiko Calero to the Oakland Athletics for Mark Mulder.

Big JgkeMember since 2020
15 years ago
Reply to  Don G

When you get a shot at Mark Mulder, you don’t ask questions about the deal, you just pop the champagne and wait for the titles to roll in.

V
15 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

Except that the deal was bad the instant it was made – check Mulder’s second half with the As – he was hurt, and it was obvious.

(Not saying this with hindsight – I hated the deal at the time, though I thought Barton was more of a loss than Haren, lol).

CardinalRules
15 years ago
Reply to  Don G

Yeah. I wish I could forget about Haren. I was just lamenting that trade last night with my brother.

Matt
15 years ago

Haren is definitely underrated but honestly I think Verlander maybe even more. If you were to ask people who are the top 2 in WAR since the start of 09 I bet the vast majority of people wouldn’t say Verlander was one of them but he is. The only person to have more WAR than him in that time is Halladay, and even that is by less than 1 win. I just think people forget how good he has been.

Colin
15 years ago
Reply to  Matt

Ditto,

It’s funny, when I saw the title of this article, I thought there was a good chance it WAS about Verlander, the fact that it was about Haren though isn’t exactly surprising.

What is surprising is that Verlander was then left off the list of possible aces people might think of.

Now that is pretty funny.

Colin
15 years ago
Reply to  Colin

Then Chris changes that in the article and makes me look stupid…..well played. 😉

Colin
15 years ago
Reply to  Colin

Are you sure, I remember him not being there when reading the article…..didn’t take a screen shot (who would), guess I’ll have to take your word for it. Apparently I just missed it.

theperfectgame
15 years ago
Reply to  Colin

“The only edits I will ever make after an article goes live is grammatical changes.”

Anyone else find this sentence amusing?

Durf
15 years ago

Remember when the Yanks were gonna trade ivan nova and Joba for Dan Haren? They decided not to for whatever reason…The FO looked pretty stupid there

Blue
15 years ago
Reply to  Durf

Everything related to Joba makes the Yankees FO look stupid, actually.

Nox
15 years ago

Joe Saunders: Stud

Anon
15 years ago
Reply to  Nox

He’s a winner.

Ian
15 years ago

I think at least part of it is his weird tendency to have an insane few months followed by a kind of bad few months, or vice versa. Like for example, in 2009, when was incredible in the first half (2.01 ERA, 0.81 WHIP) but then blew up in August and September. Or last year, when he started off slow (5.35 ERA in April and May), but then turned it around and had an 3.24 ERA the rest of the way.

Overall, it makes him a great pitcher, but he hasn’t had an extended period of greatness the way Halladay or Lincecum have. That probably doesn’t help him get the recognition he deserves.

Sean
15 years ago
Reply to  Ian

Per start ERA standard deviation (2009):

Roy Halladay – 2.495
Josh Johnson – 2.505
Dan Haren – 2.629
Tim Lincecum – 2.976
Felix Hernandez – 3.407
CC Sabathia – 4.377
Justin Verlander – 4.464

Haren was as consistent as the group of elite pitchers mentioned in this article.

Big JgkeMember since 2020
15 years ago

Has a player ever been a part of more horribly lopsided deals than Haren? His StL to Oak and Ari to LAA trades are all timers for bad value.

Anon
15 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

Yes – check out all 5 Curt Schilling deals. In each, the team trading him just got beat up

DbacksSkins
15 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

Dude, Tyler Skaggs is leading all of Hi-A in strikeouts, and is third in all the minor leagues. That trade wasn’t nearly as bad as some seem to think.

Would it have been nice to have gotten more, if possible? Probably. Would it be nice to have Danny Haren this season? Hell yeah. But Skaggs is gonna be ready right when a bunch of prospects are making it through the system…

fredsbank
15 years ago
Reply to  DbacksSkins

he’ll be an excellent no.2 to ace Joe Saunders

Jason B
15 years ago
Reply to  Big Jgke

Tyler Skaggs is nice, but he’s no Boz.

MikeM
15 years ago

Even in his best seasons Haren has never won more that 16 games. And he’s had double-digit losses 4 of the last 6 years.

Clearly Mr. Haren hasn’t reached acedom because he just doesn’t know how to win.

Jason B
15 years ago
Reply to  MikeM

Welcome back to the internets, Joe Morgan! You have been missed, good sir. =)

Phils Goodman
15 years ago

I’m biased, but I thought this was going to be a Cole Hamels article. He’s taken the Next Step while “buried” at #4 in the rotation. He throws four pitches now and the peripherals bear witness to his improvement.

michael borne
15 years ago

We can give Haren credit for being awesome, but the Angels can’t give him run support…

reillocity
15 years ago
Reply to  michael borne

The irony is that Haren could easily outproduce any of their 3 regular OFs with the bat.

Criminal Type
15 years ago

Forgotten ace? At least people have heard of Dan Haren.

How about Daniel Hudson? He’s right there with those guys mentioned above, also plays for a team that refuses to score runs for him.

oscar
15 years ago
Reply to  Criminal Type

ian kennedy over hudson, kennedy can even pitch @ coors. kennedy only 1 bad game (* 9 ER against STL, a very hot offensive team)

hudson on the other hand has a bunch of losses -__-

kennedy for 2011. hudson for 2012 all the buzz preseason was how was he going to buildoff 8-1 start from last year. well hudson better have a magical rest of season to hop over kennedy.

Criminal Type
15 years ago
Reply to  oscar

I honestly am just learning what all these expanded statistics really mean, but Hudson ranks 5th among all pitchers in WAR (2.6) and Ian Kennedy ranks 26th at 1.7.

They’re both having fine seasons. They both have six wins.

Is W/L a good indicator of value?

Tim A.
15 years ago
Reply to  oscar

Guys… being the best pitcher on a crappy team (playing over their heads) does not necessarily make said pitcher an Ace.

Ton
15 years ago
Reply to  oscar

“hudson on the other hand has a bunch of losses -__-”

youd think fangraphs readers would know better…smh

oscar
15 years ago

james shields, sure he didnt start opening day, but he did last year nd the year before that,. hes AN ACEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE WOIOHOOOO

DavidYoungTBLA
15 years ago

If you’re going to throw David Price in there, don’t you have to consider Clayton Kershaw too?

Kershaw’s WAR in his first three seasons is 10.4 (’08-’10, 83 starts = .125/start) with 2.3 WAR this season so far in 13 starts (.177/start).

Price career WAR excluding his ’08 cup o’ coffee: 8.4 in 67 starts = .125/start. (.200/start in ’11 thus far)

(Hat tip to GScott)

Jesse Weissman
15 years ago

Your argument that he is overlooked is completely specious; your only justification for it was a made up hypothetical where you told us what we would think (and Dan Haren did in fact pop into my head). If you’re gonna make that claim back it up with statistics about media coverage and Cy Young votes and the like.

Ben
15 years ago
Reply to  Jesse Weissman

Yeah, agreed. I’m not a fan of just dropping random criticisms or saying an article is bad just to feel better about myself, but in this case we have an entire article that is based on a premise that is never really addressed or proven. SABR and fangraphs encourages us to ignore the ‘feel’ of things and look for evidence. In this case, there’s no evidence to suggest he’s underrated. Any effort at all – media coverage, all star games, awards votes, even some fantasy stats like ownership or starts – SOMETHING has to be provided to suggest he is underrated to make this worthwhile.

adr3
15 years ago

I know he’s hurt, but it seems like Wainwright would be the forgotten ace. No one has even mentioned him, and he’s much better than Hamels…

Jason B
15 years ago
Reply to  adr3

True, he is having a fantastic season…

adr3
15 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Yep, he looks pretty unhittable this year. But for real, the fact that he’s currently hurt is pretty irrelevant to his status as an ace….and his stats hold up against any of these guys.

dustin
15 years ago

Cliff Lee anyone?

alfredo simon
15 years ago

eh, i thought this was gonna be about Vogelsong… 🙂

jrogersMember since 2017
15 years ago

You mention Zito in Oak and Weaver in LA, but Haren was overlooked in Arizona for his first couple of years due to Brandon Webb, too. Even hurt I think he was seen as more the face of the D-Backs’ pitching staff.

Gary York
15 years ago

If Chris had titled the article “A Forgotten Ace” that would have rendered all this quibbling irrelevant.

CircleChange11
15 years ago

The Cardinals did a great job getting Carp from TOR and Wainwright from ATL, but Haren will always be the one that got away.

At the time of the deal, StL was running the NL, and likely thought they needed a veteran for the playoffs.

Since, John Tudor, StL has had horrible luck with lefties … Danny Jackson, Rick Ankiel, Mark Mulder.

I would not be surprised if OAK thought Barton was the big piece of the trade.

Looking back, this was at a time when control pitchers were undervalued as well.

Carpenter, Wainwright, Haren, Garcia, Lohse. That would be some serious poop for a rotation. Seriously, 4 All-Star caliber starters and one league average.

Haren could also be overlooked for both the number of teams he has played for and the quality of teams. When you hear the name “Dan Haren”, what team pops into mind?

JoncarlosMember since 2017
15 years ago

I agree that I expected a Hamels article, but where’s the love for Jon Lester?

DavidCEisen
15 years ago

Dear Internets: This article obviously wasn’t meant to be an exhaustive list of aces in baseball. It was about Dan Haren being underrated.

batpig
15 years ago
Reply to  DavidCEisen

seriously.

cutchisaboss
15 years ago

I sort of agree, but as a big time fantasy player, Haren has been my boy for the past two years. I think the big problem here is a lack of run support.

Colin
15 years ago
Reply to  cutchisaboss

I actually would suspect that it has more to do with having one year with a slightly inflated ERA.

For whatever reason, people seem to hold a negative outlier year against pitchers no matter what they do during that year or in following years.

reillocity
15 years ago

As a baseball fan I would have liked to see Haren stay in the NL and continue to hit. Perhaps only Gallardo is his equal with the bat amongst current MLB aces (with apologies to Mr. Zambrano, as aces of AAA clubs aren’t eligible in my book).

Young Gung
15 years ago

Surprised no mentioned some of his career pre and post all-star splits as to why some people over look the guy. Career pre all-star 3.20 era 1.09 whip, post all-star 4.07 era 1.30 whip, both 650+ ip samples.

His numbers always end good, and I think if you randomly mixed in his pre and post all-star #s and put together one full season maybe he’d get more recognition. He’s got a history of fading to many people and I’m sure that leaves a bad image of Dan Haren for a lot of people. I think most people weight second half performances higher than first half ones because of the idea of perceived improvement. No one wants to see someone regress or seemingly take a step backwards in the final months of the season.

zach
14 years ago

what about zack greinke

zach
14 years ago

also gio gonzalez has taken over this era of baseball