The History of Clayton Kershaw’s Postseason Bullpens
Clayton Kershaw looked on from the dugout while the inning he started lived on. It was the seventh inning of Tuesday night’s Game 4 of the NLDS between the Dodgers and the Nationals in Los Angeles, and Kershaw was responsible for all three of the men on base in a three-run game. Pedro Baez took the mound in an attempt to preserve the lead. Baez threw one pitch, it hit Jayson Werth’s elbow, a run scored, and out went Baez. Kershaw might not have flashbacks, but he’s seen this situation before. The camera panned to the dugout.

In came Luis Avilan. He threw two pitches, the latter of which hit Daniel Murphy’s bat, landed in the outfield grass, and two runs scored. Game tied. The camera panned to the dugout.

The Dodgers went on to win the game, 6-5, forcing a Game 5, so in hindsight, what happened in this inning doesn’t much matter. But Kershaw’s pitching line won’t change: 6.2 IP, 7 H, 5 ER, 2 BB, 11 K, 0 HR. I’m not alone in saying Kershaw pitched much better than that line might indicate. In fact, all things considered — pitching on three days rest, throwing a 27-pitch first inning, being asked to throw 110 pitches and face Bryce Harper three times, despite those two preceding points — I’m guessing I wouldn’t be alone in saying Kershaw pitched brilliantly. And yet, he’s been charged with five earned runs. His ERA for the day was 6.75.
Kershaw’s ERA for his entire postseason career is now 4.83 in 76.1 innings. The narrative lives on. The world’s best pitcher somehow crumbles in October, the naysayers claim. But is it really Kershaw who’s crumbled, or has it been his bullpen?
It started back in 2008, when a 20-year-old Kershaw came out of the Dodgers bullpen in the sixth inning of Game 4 of the NLCS against the Phillies, relieving Derek Lowe. Kershaw put Ryan Howard and Pat Burrell on with a walk and a single before Shane Victorino bunted them over and Kershaw was pulled. In came Chan Ho Park, who retired the first batter he faced, then threw a wild pitch that allowed Howard, Kershaw’s runner, to score.
Game 6 of the 2013 NLCS against the Cardinals. Ronald Belisario allows Kershaw’s runner, Matt Adams, to score when the opposing pitcher, Michael Wacha, puts the ball in play on what led to a fielder’s choice. The next year, Game 1 of the NLDS against the Cardinals, Baez’s home run to Matt Holliday blows the game open and brings in the only runner Kershaw left for Baez.

The first game of last year’s NLDS against the Mets, Kershaw again hands the ball to Baez, this time with the bases loaded, and Baez promptly allows a single to David Wright, bringing in two Kershaw runners.

Accounting for Baez and Avilan’s joint efforts to bring in all of Kershaw’s runners last night, that’s 15 base-runners Kershaw has handed over to his relievers in 15 postseason outings, eight of which those relievers have allowed to score. That’s 53% of the base-runners over which Kershaw no longer had control that have been tacked onto his ledger. The Dodgers bullpen, during the years in which Kershaw has pitched in the postseason, has allowed 28% of its inherited runners to score. He’s now been charged with having allowed 41 earned runs in his postseason career. Kershaw was sitting in the dugout when 20% of his postseason runs have scored.
| Date | Game | Runners On | Runners Scored | IR% |
| 10/10/2008 | NLCS G2 @ PHI | 1* | 0 | 0% |
| 10/13/2008 | NLCS G4 vs. PHI | 2* | 1 | 50% |
| 10/8/2009 | NLDS G2 vs. STL | 2 | 0 | 0% |
| 10/15/2009 | NLCS G1 vs. PHI | 1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10/18/2013 | NLCS G6 @ STL | 2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10/3/2014 | NLDS G1 vs. STL | 1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10/9/2015 | NLDS G1 vs. NYM | 3 | 2 | 67% |
| 10/11/2016 | NLDS G4 vs. WAS | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| 15 | 8 | 53% |
And that just isn’t fair to Kershaw. His postseason Fielding (and, apparently, Bullpen) Independent Pitching mark in 10 starts since 2014 is an elite 2.25, yet his ERA is 4.57. He has, of course, pitched far better than his surface-level postseason numbers might indicate, and this is a perfect example of why ERA — particularly in small sample sizes — can sometimes be a misleading measure of pitcher performance.
That being said, I don’t think we can use these repeated bullpen meltdowns to bail out Kershaw completely. Even if his bullpen stranded all eight of those inherited runners who came around to score, Kershaw’s postseason ERA would be 3.89, which is be perfectly fine figure, but also significantly worse than what we’d expect from a pitcher of Kershaw’s caliber. And taking all eight runs off his ledger is disingenuous anyway; we should expect about 30% of inherited runners to score. That would put Kershaw’s postseason ERA at 4.31.
In that 2008 relief appearance, Kershaw left two men in scoring position for Park after recording only a single out on a sac bunt. The only reason Park’s wild pitch scored a run is because Kershaw set it up that way. The only reason Wacha’s ground ball brought Kershaw’s runner in is because he gave up three consecutive hits to start the inning. The Dodgers were already trailing 5-0 in the fifth when Kershaw left that game. He’d allowed six hits in the seventh inning of the first Baez meltdown and had already blown a 6-2 lead. Three walks loaded the bases and set up the second Baez meltdown the following year. The bullpen didn’t put those guys on base. The bullpen just also didn’t leave any of them there. Regardless of the shape in which Kershaw has left his games, there’s no denying that his bullpen has still allowed nearly twice the expected number of inherited runners to score, which has nothing to do with Kershaw himself, yet reflects negatively on his track record.
It’s also worth considering just how much the Dodgers have asked of Kershaw. It’s sort of a catch-22 of him being the best pitcher on the planet, in that he’s been asked to pitch on three days rest more often than most teams in the postseason since he’s entered the league — and even then, he’s been given an exceptionally long leash. Kershaw’s only been pulled from a game after he’s been stretched to the absolute maximum limit of his capabilities, and so when he hands the ball over to his bullpen with two or three guys on, it is, in a sense, a testament to his ability in the first place. Most starters get pulled several batters before Kershaw, or maybe don’t even start that final inning.
It’s tough. Because when the Dodgers have left Kershaw in for that final inning, it’s because they believe he can get the job done. And there’s no denying the fact that he, himself, and no one else, has had some brutal final innings, even before a reliever takes over. Whether you want to put the blame on the Dodgers or not for routinely stretching Kershaw so far, it’s still Kershaw out on the mound, and he’s still put his bullpen in some sticky situations. The bullpens have then turned the sticky situations into downright disasters, which, unfairly, reflects entirely on Kershaw in the statline. This isn’t meant to be a handwaving excuse that absolves Kershaw of all his postseason runs. He’s still his own man. It’s just that one man can’t do it all.
August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.
Kershaw struck out Harper twice in the 7th inning last night on perfectly located fastballs low and away. He finished the 7th giving up 0 runs. Tom Hallion blew the lead for the Dodgers, not Kershaw, Roberts, or the bullpen.
I just watched the Harper at-bat looking for what you claim. The 1-2 pitch was close — looked low to me, and Grandal pulled it up trying to get the call. No other pitch was even close to a strike 3. The 2-2 was a curve that missed inside. Then two fouls, and ball 4 clearly outside and low.
http://m.mlb.com/video/topic/94951848/v1205637083/wshlad-gm4-harper-grinds-out-eightpitch-walk/?game_pk=487615
I thought the 1-2 pitch was close – to me it looked like it caught the bottom of the zone given Harper’s stance. But watching that at-bat, I have to give Harper tons of credit for holding off the curve at 2-2. That was a nasty pitch and Harper juuust managed to hold off it. Was a great match-up between the two all night.
Yes, look at Pitch #4:http://www.brooksbaseball.net/pfxVB/cache/numlocation.php-pitchSel=477132&game=gid_2016_10_11_wasmlb_lanmlb_1&batterX=58&innings=yyyyyyyyy&sp_type=1&s_type=3&league=mlb&pnf=&zlpo=&cache=1.gif
That’s a damn good take/could’ve been a strike.
Wasn’t it game 4 not 2?
The more important question is why Clayton Kershaw is so totally ineffective in the playoffs.
small sample size?
He just happens to be dominant in the regular season and then suddenly for no reason becomes awful in every single playoff series? Not buying it.
Because it’s also not true…?
Question: have you read this article?
Not only have I read the article, I have watched every playoff game he has ever pitched in along with a ton of non-playoff games that he’s pitched in. He is not the same pitcher in the playoffs – he chokes. And the bullpen didn’t put those runners on, he did.
Until and unless he ever dominates a playoff series Kershaw will remain a choker in my book. Bumgarner consistently pitches the playoffs like the hero he is; meanwhile, Kershaw pitches them like he’s Shelby Miller. Or terrified. Or both.
That’s cool, bro.
Well, I’ve watched every game he’s ever pitched, all the way back to little league, and every side session he’s thrown, too. And I sit outside his house with a powerful microphone and listen to his breathing as he sleeps, and I say you are full of shit.
You know, elite professional golfers have been known to miss three foot putts in major tournaments when under pressure, and there doesn’t seem to be a huge stigma about acknowledging that these guys may have simply choked under the pressure…it happens. So why is it so hard to accept the possibility that an elite major league pitcher might miss his spot in a key at bat because he’s feeling the pressure…not just because it’s the playoffs, but also because he knows he’s come up short in these situations in the past?
Kershaw chokes in the playoffs. Consistently.
Here’s hoping that the Dodgers advance to the NLDS and Kershaw finally overcomes his fears and dominates it.
I’ve seen post-season David Price with the Rays. I’ve seen post-season David Price with the Jays. I just witnessed post-season David Price with my Red Sox.
Post-season Clayton Kershaw is no post-season David Price.
Man these screenshots of a downtrodden Kershaw just make me sad. Watching him is such a treat.
Not in the playoffs. In the playoffs he mysteriously turns into Shelby Miller. And I’m a Dodgers fan.
I remember the time Shelby Miller struck out 12 while only walking 2, plus getting a huge double, all while on three days rest in an elimination game. Ah, good times.
Sigh.
FWIW, he seemed absolutely dismissive when his manager came out last night; sure, the team asks a lot of him, and it is on the manager if he feels he should pull a player but the player convinces him not to, but Kershaw was starting to get hit hard by that point and could have not blown off that mound visit … which is to say that he could have come out before leaving the bullpen with the bases loaded.
I don’t understand most internet down votes. What was so wrong with a rather cautious suggestion that was observable (and even remarked on by announcers)?
Well, I’m a Nats fan, but the crazy thing about the decision to go on 3 days rest is that Kershaw was so obviously laboring in his first start. (I think he threw at least 100 pitches in 5 innings). What about that combined with being on the DL a little over a month ago makes you think 3-days rest is a good idea!? Surely the probability of 8 innings and 2 ER outing was infinitely small on 3-days rest, whereas it would be a much higher probability on 4-days. I feel like the Dodgers made a huge miscalculation in Bayesian math.
If they had pulled him after 6 innings and 90 pitches, leading 5-2, it would have looked like a great decision, and it would have been the best outing by any Dodgers starting pitcher during this NLDS. If they had let him face the bottom of the order in the 7th, and pulled him when Turner came up for the 4th time, my preferred spot, he would have left with a 5-2 lead, a man on first, and 6.2 innings with 11 K’s, even better.
Pitching him on short rest was very stupid. There is no question about that.
Except he went 6 IP with 10 K and 2 ER, or 6.2 IP with 11 K and 2 ER, both of which are outstanding pitching lines he should have had if Roberts had pulled him at the right time.
Nice excuse.
what does this mean
See Dave Cameron’s post on this topic from Tuesday.
The problem with just focusing on how Kershaw looked on short rest is that they knew after Game 3 that they need to win both Games 4 and 5, and their upside from pitching Kershaw on short rest is starting Rich Hill on short rest – which he’s never done before – in Game 5.
I’m blaming Corey Seager as much as I am Baez and Avilan for last night, Kershaw got two outs, then he got Turner to softly ground into a fielder’s choice to his SS, only Seager, somehow, couldn’t make a 10 foot throw to beat Danny Espinoza. It honestly might’ve could’ve been an error, because errors are weird.
Of course Kershaw didn’t have to walk Harper after that, but, well it’ll happen, including a crazy difficult take by Harper with two strikes.
Yeah, it seemed like there was no reason for him to leave his feet on that play.
OMG Im so tired of Kershaw’s apologist…. don’t load the bases next time, dont barely make it through the first inning next time. If this happened to Cueto or dozens of other SP that aren’t Kershaw nobody would write an article apologizing for him. If Kershaw pitched “brilliantly” then what do you call the other 10 pitchers who have thrown better than him already this postseason? Is this a popularity contest or do we actually watch the games and look at the numbers. If almost a dozen pitchers can have better stats in the same postseason then guess what HE NOT GOOD IN THE PLAYOFFS. HE GETS SHAKEN UP. ITS OBVIOUS. STOP APOLOGIZING FOR A SUB PAR PLAYOFF PITCHER.
SO HAWT!
Zero postseason starting pitchers have a better DIPS this postseason than Kershaw’s 1.44: http://www.espn.com/mlb/stats/pitching/_/sort/DIPSERA/type/sabermetric/order/false
Zero postseason pitchers have a better K/BB this postseason than Kershaw’s 6:1: http://www.espn.com/mlb/stats/pitching/_/sort/strikeoutToWalkRatio/type/expanded-2
Of all postseason starting pitchers, only teammate Rich Hill has a higher K/9 this postseason than Kershaw’s 14.54: http://www.espn.com/mlb/stats/pitching/_/sort/strikeoutsPerNineInnings/type/expanded-2
And in two starts with 11.2 innings pitched in the 2016 playoffs, Kershaw has a pathetic ERA of 6.17.
Shelby Miller’s disastrous 2016 ERA? Only 6.15.
It’s almost like this article was about the context of that ERA, and why SSS ERA is a terrible indicator of performance.
The article pointed out that with better reliever luck he would STILL have an ERA well over 4. Choke.
Syndergaard, Lester, Moore, Roark, Cueto, Bumgardner, Happ, Kluber, Estrada thats just off the top of my head and most did it against way better offense than the Nats…
In Kershaw’s two postseason starts, hitters have a line-drive rate of 33.3%. DIPS can be a woefully unreliable metric if it fails to consider the type of contact. Is it the fault of the Dodger defense or bullpen that hitters have been squaring up on Kershaw’s stuff this postseason?
“NOT GOOD IN THE PLAYOFFS. HE GETS SHAKEN UP. ITS OBVIOUS. STOP APOLOGIZING FOR A SUB PAR PLAYOFF PITCHER.”
Except for the spelling, grammar, and syntax, you are 100% correct.
This is an Internet message board not a dissertation fuk face. How do you like that spelling of your name?
I never encountered anyone before who was so stupid that they couldn’t even spell a four letter obscenity correctly. You also left out a comma.
Ayo Johnston man I like your baseball opinions but you insulted my grammar when Im typing really fast alt tabbing so I don’t get caught at work reading baseball articles all day 🙂 $$
I love, love, *LOVE* that Johnston thought he finally found a kindred spirit to agree with his lone voice in the wilderness…only to get called the same term that was on Bill Ripken’s bat in that 1988 Fleer card.
It’s like I stumbled into a convention of Trump supporters, where everyone cusses everyone until they get their juice boxes and put down for a nap…
I don’t need any “kindred spirits” on this. I’ve watched Kershaw choke, over and over. His playoff ERA is worse than Shelby Miller’s godawful regular season ERA was, i.e. the one that got him sent down to AAA. Kershaw should be a major playoff asset, like Bumgarner is. Bumgarner, however, is always in the playoffs to win; Kershaw to date is in only them to choke.
My biggest question is why Roberts went to Baez and Avalan after stretching Kershaw as far as he could go and more. Wouldn’t the whole point of stretching Kershaw be to create a bridge to Blanton and Jensen so you wouldn’t have to bring in the sketchy 6th and 7th inning guys? Crazy that Roberts didn’t go with Blanton and Jensen for the last seven outs.
PITCHERS IP H R ER BB SO ERA
M. Moore 8.0 2 2 1 2 10 1.13
THIS is what the line of a quality playoff starting pitcher looks like.
And Moore was facing a better team than Kershaw has been.
someone needs a nap
It’s Kershaw who needs the nap.
Man I know you are hurting but find a better way to deal with it.
Hurting? No. The best regular-season in baseball consistently turns into Shelby Miller in the playoffs doesn’t hurt me, it amazes me and disgusts me. Compare his performance in the playoffs to Bumgarner’s! Kershaw consistently collapses while Bumgarner consistently elevates his game. Bumgarner’s career postseason ERA? 2.12. Kershaw’s? 4.83.
Exactly! The Dodgers should trade Kershaw for Matt Moore! You know what? That’s not enough, the better include Seager and Pederson too, I mean just look at that 8 inning sample size.
I have a 75+ innings sample size of playoof baseball for Kershaw if youre interested? (the misspelling is correct) that almost half a season, nobody said trade…Im talking about win or go home people… alert it not the regular season anymore.
The point, which was missed, is that the line I posted is what a quality starting pitcher’s line SHOULD look like in the playoffs.
Matt Moore has a playoff ERA that is 4.07 runs better than Kershaw’s.
CHOKE!
Kershaw is still better at playoff pitching than you are at anything in your miserable life.
The most egregious thing, in my opinion, was letting him face the top of the order for a 4th time, at about 100 pitches. He was clearly ready to go for this game, and, like many of his other playoff starts, there is a point at which, if you cut it off there, it looks like he was totally dominant. In this instance, that place was pretty predictable: coming off an injury, on 3 days rest after throwing his season-high post-DL pitch count in the last game, approaching that same pitch count, facing the Nats lineup for the 4th time, I mean…
Roberts answer for why he left him in was completely unsatisfying, but it does sort of get you a window into how this keeps happening. He said Kershaw was throwing the ball well. Well of course he was, he is Clayton Kershaw, but doesn’t every great pitcher throw the ball well until he doesn’t? In this way, Kershaw has been a victim of his own reputation, in a few ways:
1. In the regular season he averages over 7 IP per start, and regularly goes 8. Managers seem to just assume he will also do so in the playoffs, ignoring the fact that, even if he can, they should be managing more conservatively and pulling him well before the same place they would in the RS.
2. He pitches so well in innings 1-6, compounded by the fact that he seems to exert himself even more in the playoffs. His PS FIP and xFIP really show how dominant he is, but this is another thing that deceives his manager: the manager sees how good he is pitching, so that when he gets fatigued (usually around the time the lineup is seeing him for the 4th time) it blindsides the manager even though it is the manager’s damn job to anticipate that happening especially in the playoffs.
And, of course, ERA is the type of stat that punishes meltdown innings way more than FIP does, and the managers, every year, brew up a recipe for meltdown innings, always right in the 7th, hmmmm…
On the other hand, in the 1st game of the 2014 NLDS against the Cardinals, Kershaw came into the 7th inning leading 6-2 and got left in through 6 hits which put the Dodgers behind 7-6. Leaving him in in a sticky situation didn’t work out either.
It is the same problem. He was left in too long yesterday also. I don’t think the point is that they should have left him in to face Werth and Murphy at 110 pitches.
Be honest, If he had struck out the side on 9 pitches, would you still say he was left in too long?
Well, as you can see in my other comments, I was ok with him facing the bottom of the lineup a 3rd time. The 7-8-9 hitters were due up and he got two of the three. I would have pulled him before facing Turner.
But, in general, even incorrect baseball moves always have some chance of working. If Kershaw had gotten Turner or Harper out to finish the inning scoreless, I don’t know if I would have remembered for more than five minutes that I disagreed with the move. I would be mainly glad he got through it. But I’m a fan, and it is not my job to send notes to Roberts. It doesn’t mean it wasn’t the wrong move.
If I had seen your other comments, (I used the newest option which unfortunately for me put this first) I would have seen your stance on letting him face the 7-8-9 of the order. I unfairly assumed hindsight influenced your opinion.
Does anyone question why Roberts didn’t go to Jensen instead of Baez to relieve Kershaw? Bases loaded with the go ahead run at the plate in the 7th seems like a high leverage spot. Then have him start the 8th with a clean slate…. Would that have been a Miller scenario?
NVM. I was late to that party.
Question: with this article talking about % of inherited runners scored, were the exact RE24 scenarios taken in to account? I mean, if Kershaw is leaving games with man on 2nd and 2 out, and the guy scores, that’s a much less likely scenario than if he leaves with men on 2nd and 3rd with no outs.
I take back everything bad that I ever said or wrote about Clayton Kershaw. Faced with having to save a game after the closer had nearly lost it, Kershaw didn’t choke, got the save, and it was gutsy.
I was wrong about him. He CAN pitch in the playoffs. He just needs to close and not start. 🙂
If you would do us all a favor and get pancreatic cancer, that would be great.
That comment is far worse than anything Johnston has ever posted.