The Last Time We Saw That Guy: Mark Buehrle

“That’s why I haven’t said anything. I haven’t talked to anybody. I just kind of let it go. Hopefully one day it just kind of got forgotten, and five years down the road (people said), ‘Where’s that Buehrle guy? Is he still around?'”

Mark Buehrle on his retirement, 2017

It’s the final Sunday of the season, and the Toronto Blue Jays are playing meaningful baseball. That battle, at least, is already won. They clinched the division a few days ago, a postseason berth just before that — an August and September that, homer by homer, hammered two decades of futility into the dirt. With a win today and a loss from the Kansas City Royals, they could guarantee home-field advantage through a hypothetical ALCS. That is not why this game is important. The camera keeps panning to a nervous group of people, sitting in the stands under shadow, waiting out the top of the first, as the Blue Jays go silent — waiting for Mark Buehrle, who steps onto the Tropicana Field mound to face the Rays for the second time in three days. They can count out the numbers they are hoping for on their hands. Six outs. Six outs to get to 600, to 200 innings — to 3000 innings, spread with shocking consistency over 15 consecutive seasons. 

John Gibbons was questioned about this decision, of course. That the Jays are in the postseason at all seems a tenuous enough position to maintain. He knows, and everyone knows, that they should reach for every advantage they can get. And yet everyone knows, at the same time, that there can be multiple important things happening on a baseball field — that personal milestones, arbitrary as they are, are meaningful; that what is meaningful to one player can be almost as meaningful to the entire team. Six outs.

***


When Mark Buehrle’s career as a professional baseball player began, he was something of an unknown entity: drafted in the 38th round by the White Sox, he was unheralded, lacking the instinct for attention-seeking. He was “boyish” and “quiet,” according to some early headlines; “Mark Buehrle does not care for too much fuss,” reads the opening line of a 2003 profile in Baseball Digest. Even at what was perhaps the height of his fame, as the ace leading the 2005 White Sox to their eventual World Series victory, Sports Illustrated opened a profile of him with this: “Soft-spoken and unassuming, White Sox left-hander Mark Buehrle has never liked being the center of attention.”

Even as he kept adding to his list of accomplishments, he never stood out, sharp and brash and huge, like some other pitchers of similar talents. He stayed level, with the same mid-80s fastball, the same comfortable, predictable rhythm: a harmonious undertone, a solid root around whom a complex chord could be built. It was hard to imagine him having a sudden decline. When he got going in the later years, as he did in stretches of 2014 and 2015, it was hard to imagine him putting a full stop on his career at all.

***

On the first play of the game, Ryan Goins boots the ball. 

***

Why do people keep watching baseball games, over and over, every day, for entire seasons, entire lifetimes? Even when the basic structure is always the same, even when the entertainment value is sub-par and the product unsatisfying? It can’t be because there’s nothing better to do — there’s almost always something better to do. Part of it has to be the simple impulse to find out what happens next. I want to know if this guy will get better or worse, if that team will finally get over the hump. I want to know who will win, to understand how they got there, how others are planning to get there in the future. What will happen next? What will happen next? It can be the only thing that gets you out of bed in the morning, sometimes, that banal drive towards continuity. 

As far as the 2015 regular season goes, and as far as the 22-year Blue Jays playoff drought goes, the story is done — we know how it goes. We have known how it ended since the Jays clinched. We don’t know, yet, what will happen in the postseason — but we’re not there yet. This is not that moment. This is a strange moment, caught in between two points of history: it is part of a longer story, a story with a gentler arc than the hard spike of a sudden surge towards success. A moment of uncertainty.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

***

Josh Donaldson snags a sharp grounder to first. He gets the out at second. Nothing else. The camera pans to the people in the shadows, the people wringing their hands. The air is flat.

***

No-hitters, perfect games — these, too, are strange in-between moments, self-contained interstitials. A perfect game has never ended a pitcher’s career, or marked the culmination of a team’s season. It is not a predictable story point, rising action, climax, denouement; it could happen any time, anywhere. It’s a day among days — one impossibly special, serendipitous day. And then life goes on. Life always goes on.

Just as well as he knows the moments of triumph, of curse-breaking and championship, Buehrle knows these moments. His first no-hitter came against the Rangers in 2007; his perfect game, against the Rays, too, came at home in Chicago in 2009. Buehrle is 36, now, certainly not too old to keep playing, but old enough that a shoulder is plaguing him, that there’s talk of this being his final game ever. It might not be, though. He hasn’t said anything about it. No one is saying goodbye just yet, though the possibility hangs in the air regardless. No one is looking for fireworks. Just five more outs.

Two singles — Evan Longoria, Mikie Mahtook — load the bases. Steven Souza Jr. lobs a soft liner to the infield, and for a moment, it seems like the hardly-rangey Edwin Encarnación will somehow manage to soar over and reel it in. Instead, the ball bounces off the side of his glove. A run comes in. In the stands — dismay. The bases are loaded again, and out in the bullpen, Ryan Tepera begins to warm up.

Buehrle induces a popup on the next pitch, but quickly loses Tim Beckham on a walk, keeping the bases loaded. And on a full count to Joey Butler, he leaves one middle-middle, 85 mph. It takes 10 seconds to leave the yard. Kevin Pillar hangs off the wall, his efforts useless.

And as Butler rounds the bases — today will be the final day of his big-league career, too — Buehrle meets on the mound with Pete Walker and Russell Martin, a covered, quiet conversation. Walker makes his somber walk back to the dugout, and Buehrle continues his striving. Four, now. Just a few more.

When Luke Maile, the ninth batter in the lineup whose average and OBP are both .171, hits a swift double to left-center, it is over. Buehrle pulls his cap down, heads into the dugout, navigates through the waiting high-fives; out in the stands, tight-lipped grimaces accompany a standing ovation, slight shakes of the head. This moment, this particular story — a 15th consecutive season with 200 innings pitched — is over. He disappears down the tunnel, and though it seems doubtful anyone respects 198 2/3 any less, it is still sad. It seems so little to ask for: A round number. A satisfying, complete exit. No unfinished business.

It takes a lot going right to get 27 outs without allowing a baserunner. Sometimes it takes a lot going right to get any outs at all.

***

In 2002, in his final game of the season, Buehrle was four outs away from becoming the first White Sox pitcher to win 20 games in almost a decade. A homer in the eighth, though, put them behind, and the Twins put the game away in the top of the ninth. It was disappointing, of course — for Buehrle, to whom the milestone was most personally meaningful, but perhaps more so to the rest of the team, the batters who felt they had let him down.

A year later, Buehrle told Baseball America that it wasn’t the four missing outs that frustrated him the most. It was the focus on him, the tension that it created in the players — tension that, perhaps, contributed to their inability to score runs.

“I could tell in the clubhouse, but they shouldn’t have been that way,” he said. “They should have just went out there and played just like every other game.”

***

Buehrle didn’t address his retirement publicly for around two years. He never announced it. He moved out to his beloved ranch in Missouri; he bought an RV, apparently, and joined a beer league. When his number was retired by the White Sox, he finally explained why he chose to just leave, in a way that few high-profile players do. He told the Chicago Tribune: “I didn’t want all the attention… I’ve always told people I was a young guy that came into the big leagues unknown, kind of snuck into the big leagues. I wanted to sneak my way out.”

***

After the game, Toronto headlines describe the start as “disastrous.” Buehrle is left off the postseason roster. He remains coy about whether or not he will continue playing. But in a few days, the division series begins in Toronto — the first since 1993 — and his lost four outs are all but forgotten in the tense excitement, the initial elation, the sinking despair as the Jays drop the two games at home. You don’t have to look too hard, though, to see him still there in the background: there, in the dugout, talking to Marcus Stroman, clapping his teammates on the back, still present.

And after that home run in Game 5, in the maelstrom of flying bottles and people storming the field, shaking the stadium down to its concrete foundations, somehow, only a single player was ejected. Look on the broadcast, and you won’t be able to find the moment — the camera had so much else to focus on. But there was a player who wasn’t on the roster, who wasn’t supposed to be there on the field. The umpires tossed him — nobody knows when.

What we do know, though, is that he made his way back onto the field after it all ended, when the game was won. There are pictures of him there, grinning widely and hugging Marcus Stroman. When asked, days later, why he had been ejected, he smiled: “Was I?”





RJ is the dilettante-in-residence at FanGraphs. Previous work can be found at Baseball Prospectus, VICE Sports, and The Hardball Times.

24 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
recoveringbucsfan
6 years ago

I loved seeing this guy play! If nothing else, he’ll always be remembered for that behind the back flip to first.

BufordMember since 2016
6 years ago

Actually, it was a between-the-legs flip to first base with his glove as he tumbled to the ground which made it even more memorable.

recoveringbucsfan
6 years ago
Reply to  Buford

Yea, you’re right! Still a heck of a play and a heck of a unique career.

JV19
6 years ago

The behind the back flip was Bartolo. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zp-27Sb-Vyg

tomerafan
6 years ago

I love it. The model of pitching consistency. 52 WAR with a K/9 ratio that barely cracked 5.0. Hard to think we’ll see that again in the near future when baseball returns.

CC AFCMember since 2016
6 years ago

My favorite thing about Buehrle was how quickly he worked. Never got terribly bored watching a Buehrle start.

Sleepy
6 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

https://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/CHA/CHA200504160.shtml

I’ll never forget this game. We had seats a dozen-ish rows up from the third base dugout. When the game started, the shade was a couple rows behind us and headed in our direction–figured we’d be in the shade by the 5th-ish inning.

It never got there.

drewsylvaniaMember since 2019
6 years ago
Reply to  Sleepy

1:39!

MikeSMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  CC AFC

We saw a Buehrle/Johan Santana game once. I went for hot dogs and literally missed the entire 4th inning. The lines weren’t even all that long.

Baseball4ever
6 years ago

You’ll never see it again because it used to be about pitching and not throwing. Power, strikeouts are sexy and that is the game now.

The problem is no matter how many strikeouts a pitcher gets, there will always be more pitch to contact outs in any game over the course of an entire pitchers career. The real game on defense is to make outs in sucession or as quickly as possible – and defense starts first and foremost with the pitcher and catcher.

Lets say a pitcher gets 10 strikeouts per game, all season long, through 33 starts, real easy math, that is a 330 strikeout season. 27-10 = is still 17 contact outs, which is still most of the game, and realistically, how many pitchers have 300 strikeout seasons, even given this high strikeout era? Not many.

Buerhle was also great because he played defense, defended his position from the pitchers’ mound. I believe he typically got an inning worth of outs while pitching each game, which is pretty impressive.
Go back to getting quick contact outs as part of the pitchers game, it keeps pitch count lower. Thank you Mark for the great memories. It was a great career.

Six Ten
6 years ago
Reply to  Baseball4ever

a) A pitcher who gets 10 strikeouts a game is pitching, not throwing. There hasn’t been an all-star caliber starting pitcher who just tries to throw it hard and not worry about where it’s going in like 60 years.

b) A pitcher who gets 10 strikeouts a game is not going to have 17 contact outs per game, because he’s not going to get all 27 outs every game.

c) No pitcher can control all of the contact outs. Many pitchers can control some of those outs, but that control is partial. Many pitchers have almost no control of them. The reason to prefer pitchers who get strikeouts is because the uncontrolled part is much closer to zero, not because it’s “sexy,” to use your word. If any pitcher had firm control over contact outs, all the best pitchers would throw 81 pitches a game, all in the strike zone, all designed to generate easy-to-field contact on any swing, all with an ERA of 0.00. They’re not idiots and they’re competitive. They’re gonna do the thing that helps them win, and if they don’t, their general managers will find someone who will.

Baseball4ever
6 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

you mixed up my points and got it wrong. The point there was if you get 300 strikeouts, its only a select few that can do this, that was the point, it was NOT about pitching versus throwing there. Regardless, the primary job of the starter, is to be efficient, so that he can go as long as he can. Contact outs lessen the load and pitch count is more efficient, and there is more contact outs in any game, than there will ever be strikeouts, on balance over the long haul. Sure there is Kerry Wood and Roger Clemens’ gems, but we are talking about 2 guys out of 20000.

Six Ten
6 years ago

I don’t think Buehrle should be in the Hall of Fame, really, but if he got elected I’d still be happy about it. He did everything as well as he could possibly do it: worked quickly and efficiently, didn’t walk anyone, fielded his position as well as anyone ever has, held baserunners as well as anyone ever has, and made it impossible to see which pitch was coming until it was well on its way. Look at this release point graph!

http://www.brooksbaseball.net/scatter.php?player=279824&b_hand=-1&y_axis=mph&gFilt=&pFilt=FA|SI|FC|CU|SL|CS|KN|CH|FS|SB&time=month&minmax=&x_axis=z0&s_type=2&startDate=03/30/2007&endDate=04/20/2020

That’s his whole career! Most guys are lucky to be that consistent for half a season. And the result is that he was extremely good at limiting hard contact.

There’s that cliche about guys making the most of their gifts, which we usually hear applied to players who aren’t that good but who try really hard. Buehrle was actually really good, and the reason he was good is that he made the most of his gifts. His pitches themselves were only so-so, but everything he did around those pitches was faultless.

olethrosMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Six Ten

I would absolutely vote for Buehrle if I had a ballot. He’s a lot closer in WAR/JAWS than most people think, but the 15 seasons of 200IP (yes, I’m counting that last one) combined with a no-no, perfect game, and being the ace on a championship team tip the scales for me. The IP one especially – unless the writers/VC surprise the hell out of me, he’ll be the only pitcher in MLB history with 14 seasons of 200 IP without a plaque.

jarhead659
6 years ago

Thanks for the article, Rachael, beautifully written, and probably the first sports-related article I’ve ever read that included the word “interstitials”! I was at the Ray’s game you wrote about, pulling for my Rays. Knowing what I know now maybe I would have pulled a bit less for them, and a bit more for Mark…at least for 2 innings.

bglick4
6 years ago

While I love the stories of supremely gifted players living up their potential like with Strasburg, I think I like the stories of the “less gifted underrated guys who make good” even more. I always put him an Jaime Moyer together. It’s interesting that they both went out on disastrous outings (though Moyer’s was far worse).

AJP
6 years ago

Get this man in the Hall!!

Mahoney
6 years ago
Reply to  AJP

He’s #90 in career JAWS, just ahead of Andy Pettite. If he had stuck around into his 40s and had a graceful decline over those final years, I could see him having a real shot.

olethrosMember since 2020
6 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

There are 80 pitchers in the HoF, so being #90 in JAWS when combined with Buehrle’s other achievements merits serious consideration.

OddvarkMember since 2020
6 years ago

Mark Buehrle is the only pitcher in MLB history with 3 nine-inning CGs in which he faced the minimum number of batters (27). His perfect game obviously, his no-hitter in which he walked one player who he then picked off, and a 2-hitter in which both players who singled were retired via double play.

Only 4 other pitchers have 2 such games (Cy Young, Sandy Koufax, Walter Johnson, and Frank Hiller). Buehrle has 3. This singular accomplishment — along with all of his other achievements — merits serious Hall of Fame consideration, in my opinion.

Kevbot034
6 years ago

Cool guy, he probably had another year or 2 in him and been a real Hall of Fame candidate. Not make it, but have more fighting for him.

Gavin
6 years ago

I was for the start at the time, but this game ended up costing the Jays home field against these very Royals in the ALCS, where they lost on the road in Game 6. Pitching Buehrle on short rest to get to 3000 was the wrong call.

NATS FanMember since 2018
6 years ago

With 52.3 fWar he does have more fWAR than several hall of farmers, so I’d be cool if he made it, but not sure if I had a vote I’d vote for him. He is real close on the math though. Closer than one would think on memory alone for sure.

jdcrymes
6 years ago

Rachael McDaniel is a tremendous talent. I hope Fangraphs can hold on to her a long time because this is the only sports site I read.