The Most Exciting Game Ever?

The last day of the regular season was perhaps the best evening of baseball I’ve ever seen. It was the kind of unbelievable night that justifies the “once in a lifetime” tag. And yet, exactly one month later, we’re sitting here recovering from a World Series game that might just have been the most exciting game in the history of the sport.

There were 108 plays in last night’s game – 46 of those occurred when the leverage index was at least 1.50. Perhaps more staggeringly, there were 18 plays where the LI was above 3.00 and 11 of those came with an LI of 4.00 or higher. When you think about some of the great World Series games of all time, we think of specific moments – Kirk Gibson‘s home run in 1988, Joe Carter‘s in 1993, Luis Gonzalez’s bloop single in 2001 – but most of those were isolated instances within that game. Those games offered one great, unbelievable moment – last night offered us about a dozen of them.

Colby Lewis batting with the bases loaded. Lewis missing the bag on Matt Holliday’s groundball to first. Yadier Molina drawing a bases loaded walk to tie the game. Holliday getting picked off third base by Mike Napoli, who threw from his knees not long after twisting his ankle running the bases. Back-to-back home runs by Adrian Beltre and Nelson Cruz to give the Rangers the lead back. Those were all pretty incredible moments in their own right, but they all have to take a back seat because of what happened later.

David Freese was one strike away from ending the season when he launched his triple to right field that tied the game in the ninth inning. That one play pushed the Cardinals win probability from 8.7% to 62.4%, a whopping .537 WPA with one swing of the bat. Given the context of the situation, that pitch produced one of the largest changes in championship expectancy in the history of the sport.

Then, in the 10th inning, a gimpy Josh Hamilton hit his first home run in over a month, and seemingly erased Freese’s heroics with a great moment of his own. His HR made the Rangers 92.3% favorites to win at that point, and he was credited with +.422 WPA for that swing.

We weren’t done yet, though. The bottom of the 10th gave us a couple of singles, a great (if likely unintentionally fantastic) bunt by a pitcher pinch-hitting for another pitcher who was pinch-hitting for the actual pitcher, and then eventually Lance Berkman’s single to center field that tied the game back up. Because it put the winning run 90 feet away, in addition to tying the game, Berkman’s base hit was actually worth more WPA (+.468) than Hamilton’s home run.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

The epic finally ended with David Freese’s walkoff bomb in the bottom of the 11th. Because the Cardinals were already the favorites to win at that point, the WPA of his home run was “just” .368. But, really, that just about sums up last night – the extra-inning home run from the local hero to save the season and force a Game Seven was fourth most important play of the game.

Freese’s heroics in both the 9th and 11th innings are historically unmatched – he posted the highest WPA (.969) of any position player in a postseason game in history. It doesn’t end there, of course – Lance Berkman’s .832 WPA was the fourth highest total in postseason history. What we experienced last night was essentially analogous to Kirk Gibson and Reggie Jackson being teammates and having their legendary evenings in the same game – only if those performances had come with the World Series on the line.

Given all the errors, the questionable decisions made from the dugouts, and the mental mistakes that permeated the entire game, it’s hard to call last night’s game “the best ever”. Besides, trying to compare the heroics of a 10-9 extra inning game to Jack Morris‘ performance in Game Seven of the 1991 World Series, or quantifying the craziness of Randy Johnson pitching on zero days rest is likely beyond the scope of what we can actually measure.

But, for just sheer quantity of epic performances, last night’s game is tough to beat. Toss in the elimination-game factor from St. Louis’ perspective, and few baseball games have ever been played under such a high level of continuous tension. As much as I’m looking forward to tonight’s game, there’s almost no way it can live up to what we were treated to last night.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

91 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Well-Beered Englishman
14 years ago

It was one of the most exciting games I’ve ever seen. But The Most Exciting Game Ever? I think we’re starting to get carried away.

Well-Beered Englishman
14 years ago

Now that I think about it, though, the only game I really know how to compare last night to was the 34-38 Pats-Colts AFC championship game in 2006.

Telo
14 years ago

Best baseball game ever.

For
Eh
Ver

DCN
14 years ago

Ah, great comment.

Ed Wade
14 years ago

Not if you are an Astro’s fan.

John
14 years ago

Damnit, Dave… I fell asleep early last night.

TK
14 years ago

I will be mentally preparing all day to be massively disappointed by an 8-2 game tonight with a 5-run 2nd inning by one of the teams. I sure hope I’m wrong.

chuckb
14 years ago
Reply to  TK

I, too, fear that’s what will happen. The series has been so close, it really should come down to the 9th.

Mark
14 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

Small sample of course, but several classic game 6’s have been followed by very exciting game 7’s — 1975, 1986, 1991, and if you want to stretch, 1987. Only dud game 7 following great game 6 I can recall is 1985.

Dave StudemanMember since 2017
14 years ago

The winning home run of a dramatic tie game is often not the one with the biggest WPA swing. That was also true of Mazeroski’s home run in the seventh game of the 1960 World Series. A guy named Hal Smith had a bigger (in terms of WPA swing) hit an inning earlier.

I also like to refer to the table in this article for the relative impact of specific games in postseason play.

http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/blog_article/the-tht-annual-and-the-postseason/

It’s not necessarily the best way to apply these metrics, but it is one very interesting way.

Dan
14 years ago
Reply to  Dave Studeman

The table suggests that Game 7 is likely more epic than anything Game 6 can produce. Seems right.

But for a stand alone game, last night was simply silly.

barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  Dan

Make it a stand alone game and every regular season game comes into play.

JG
14 years ago
Reply to  Dave Studeman

I remember reading something that said the biggest WPA swing in terms of championship likelihood was Tony Womack’s double in 2001 Game 7.

Andy
14 years ago

“There were 108 plays in last night’s game – 46 of those occurred when the leverage index was at least 1.50. Perhaps more staggeringly, there were 18 plays where the LI was above 3.00, topping out, and 11 of those came with an LI of 4.00 or higher.”

“An average (or neutral) LI is one, high leverage is 1.5 and above, and low leverage is below one. 10% of all real game situations have a LI greater than 2, while 60% have a LI less than 1.”

Do you have any more historical data to put this context? I would love to see number of times a play was LI 4 or higher in every game this season. Have we had a higher number of LI >2 plays in this post season vs. other post seasons? How much do I have to donate to get you a kick ass SQL database server that can run all this?

barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  Andy

The claims made in these paragraphs say nothing about correlation of the LI values. Wasn’t the LI in the 18 inning 1-0 decision much higher / the tension much larger?

MX
14 years ago

This game is so dramatic because of poor defense, poor pitching and poor managing. I feel like I was watching a little league baseball game or a community softball game.

It was a great game if you look at the scoreboard. But it’s far from a great game at its competitive level.

Dan
14 years ago
Reply to  MX

I don’t mind poor execution. They had to execute much better to ever get this chance. A GREAT game is DRAMATIC, and last night felt like an entire series of drama played out in four hours.

R. Johnston
14 years ago
Reply to  MX

This. A thousand times this.

Game six was a cover-your-eyes-in-horror game that should have made everyone watching wonder how these two teams managed to get this far. My reaction while the game was happening is that it was one of the worst World Series games I’d ever seen.

Doug Lampert
14 years ago
Reply to  R. Johnston

I commented to my wife around the 3rd inning that this is why playing baseball this late in the year is a bad idea.

I think the cold had a lot to do with the quality of the play.

Choo
14 years ago
Reply to  MX

Like my grandfather always used to say, “When the Greek God of Amazing Baseball Games smites his mighty genitals across your face, don’t complain about the flavor.”

Nate
14 years ago
Reply to  Choo

What??!!! Your Grandfather sounds like a pretty colorful character.

CircleChange11
14 years ago
Reply to  MX

I’ve seen both Little League games and community softball games. The only thing in common are the mistakes. The “mistakes” IMO don’t define this game.

When the defense and baserunning are off, it’s obvious and people call it sloppy or childish. But when the batters are off, chasing at everything, missing most, we call it a great, classic pitcher’s duel.

The game had errors. There were good plays, huge hits, and the like … which aren’t as common as we’d like to think.

Black_Rose
14 years ago
Reply to  CircleChange11

Your comment reminded me of Tim Lincecum’s 14K shutout against the Braves in Game 1 of the 2010 NLDS. Lincecum looked like he didn’t pitch well at all, since he lack pinpoint control, but the Braves hitters were swinging at pitches way out of the strike zone, and Lincecum had like a >33% swinging strike rate in that game!!

Well, Lincecum got 14 Ks, 1 BB, and a shutout in a postseason game. That’s all that matters!

Truly great game of pitching (or inept batting).

williams .482Member since 2016
14 years ago
Reply to  CircleChange11

This.

Tell me. were you really thinking about a couple of errors in the early innings when Freese hit that triple? and when Hamilton untied again? and when Berkman re-tied it? and when Freese finally won it? Because I certainly was not.

Game six included some rather poor defense, yes. It also included some of the most exciting, improbable beyond belief clutch hitting I can remember (granted, I am not exactly old) in the later innings.

Seriously, If there are no errors in this game, and the cardinals win 5-3 on a two run single my Matt Holliday in the 6th (as a random example), is it a better game?

PeteF3
14 years ago
Reply to  MX

That sounds exactly like Game 6 in 1986. A game full of errors (and not just Buckner), sloppy play (not just the WP), and bonehead managerial moves (and not just leaving Stapleton in the dugout) in addition to the dramatic hits. A game does not necessarily have to be well-played to be exciting or dramatic.

Vin
14 years ago

Don’t you just love baseball? I mean, wow.

1986 Game 6
14 years ago

I shoulda been a contenda!

Joeiq
14 years ago

Sorry, none of the above. The most exciting game ever was the Rays game to end the season.

d_iMember since 2016
14 years ago

last night was great, but being a Twins fan, I have to vote other: game 6 of 91′ series with Puckett’s walk off. I was only 5 but I remember it. Buck copied the call exactly last night too, “we’ll see you tomorrow night.” Freese pumped his right arm going around first just like him as well.

barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  d_i

“Freese pumped his right arm going around first just like him as well.”

Does Freese even ride a bike?

B N
14 years ago
Reply to  d_i

I have to say, even being a Red Sox fan, that Twins one was my favorite WS game. Not my favorite GAME, as those would be a number of the 2004 ALCS ones (the later few…). That Twins game was amazing though. I remember watching that game when I was in a hotel for some reason and basically just not wanting to leave the room all night because I might miss the action. Turned out to be a very late dinner as a result.

Hurtlocker
14 years ago

Top ten for sure which really makes us fortunate to have seen it live.

Mike D
14 years ago

We need a ranking of average (and maybe volatility) of the leverage index of every game to determine what was the “most exciting”. B-Ref doesn’t do that, does it?

Nuggetpalooza
14 years ago

Those leverage indexes reflect only the game situation with no adjustment for the fact that all those ridiculously tense situations occurred in GAME 6 OF THE WORLD SERIES. Correct?

Just incredibly dramatic. Baseball is a great sport.

Max
14 years ago

Undoubtedly exciting, exhilarating, but also so sloppy that it detracts a bit–it was sloppy play that made these enormous WPAs possible.

Matt
14 years ago

2 reliever shutdowns and 8 meltdowns in this game.

DD
14 years ago

The 01 WS game 7 with Gonzo’s walk off – the comback against the invincible Yankees, and Rivera no less, with a bloop hit to win it was just priceless. And it being right after 9/11, everyone though it was the Yanks destiny to win their 4th straight title. Besides maybe the 04 ALCS, it was the best anti-Yanks moment ever.

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago
Reply to  DD

I agree. I hate the Yankees, ’01 is my favorite world series and game still. Although as a Braves fan I think Houston vs Atlanta 2005 18 innings was pretty damn epic too. Big home runs to tie it, Clemens coming in relief, 18 scoreless innings of drama, a walk off home run by Chris Burke.

Trotter76
14 years ago

I was flying from Florida to my home in Colorado with a layover in Dallas during the ’01 WS. I missed my flight from FL and got put on a later one, but there was no connection to CO until the next morning. I ended up watching the last 3 innings of that Game 7 in a Dallas airport bar that stayed open for all us flight-missing-schlubs that were hanging out for the night. Funny how I don’t even mind that Gonzo was (probably? allegedly?) ‘roided up that season.

Josh
14 years ago

How is Game 6 of the ’86 World Series not included in the survey? The Buckner game not included?

Mets are down 2 runs in the tenth inning nobody on and come back to win, without a HR.

barkey Walker
14 years ago
Reply to  Josh

I think you answered your own question with that last clause.

siggian
14 years ago

In general, I find perfectly played (mentally and physically) games less interesting. Mental and physical errors cause chaos, and chaos is inherently interesting (although not always pleasant).
Perfect plays are somewhat predictable and therefore carry at least some element of boring. This just isn’t about baseball either. The same can be said for other sports.

From a technical POV, this series has been a mess. From an interest POV, this series has been perfect.

Andy
14 years ago
Reply to  siggian

Well put. I have a similar feeling about live rock concerts. While I want the band to sing on-key and perform competently, I don’t want to hear the perfect rendition they nailed in the recording studio. A voice crack, a small irregularity in the beat, an extended solo that appears to be spontaneous…that is part of the charm of live rock.

Keith
14 years ago
Reply to  siggian

Exactly. Every ball not at Adrian Beltre felt like it contained at least some reasonable chance to result in chaos. A high pop-up was my queue to lean in towards the TV, not get up and go to the fridge before the next batter gets up.

Josh
14 years ago

whoops, meant to say down 2 runs, two out nobody on and the Mets win.

Shaun
14 years ago

The downside of last night was the defensive ugliness and some of the other bonehead plays (like the Holliday pick-off). Don’t know how much that affects the excitement level. I wasn’t alive for Game 6 of 1975 and have only seen highlights but it seems there were more memorable, truly good-great plays in that game.

Sean
14 years ago

I find it funny that people are downplaying this game when the World Series has been so bad in recent memory.

Grebe
14 years ago

Man, two one-run games to start the series, the second involving a 9th-inning comeback.The best performance by a starter in a WS game since Morris. A player hitting three homers in a WS game. Another game won in an 8th-inning rally. And of course, last night’s game.

Totally lame. We’d have been so much better off with Phillies v. Sox or Yanks.

Well-Beered Englishman
14 years ago

Oh don’t get me wrong. That may not have been The Most Exciting Game Ever, but this is undoubtedly The Best World Series Of My Lifetime.

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago

You too young for 1991 or 2001? Maybe there’s a 10 year trend for awesome WS.

Shaun
14 years ago

Not to take anything away from last night’s game. It’s hard to imagine it wasn’t one of the top 3-4 games ever but I also think the expanded playoffs make it less appealing. I think the Cardinals are the 6th or 7th best team in baseball this season.

Maybe we shouldn’t consider whether we are actually seeing two of truly the best teams in baseball when determining whether this game was the most exciting ever, but I can’t help but think about it. For me that does take a little away from last night’s game, fair or not.

siggian
14 years ago
Reply to  Shaun

Ok, you are certainly entitled to your opinion, but I don’t see how the expanded playoffs detracted from what some people have called “the greatest final day of the regular season.” I also don’t see why the Cardinals being “the 6th or 7th best team” detracts from last night’s game being “one of the top 3-4 games ever”, as you put it.

But if you want to detract from the game (and you are BTW), go right ahead. I’ll just keep enjoying the magic of 2011.

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago
Reply to  Shaun

That’s a really stupid thing to say. A 90 win team and a 100 win team aren’ that much different. Just 1.66667 wins per month. In a short series of 5-7 games, the win expectancy (baseed on win %) is virtually the same.with trades, injuries, and streaks, it’s not that unlrealisitc for the 100 win team to have a 95 win season and the 90 win team to have a 95 win season. It’s bullshit really and it’s a damn good thing they expanded the playoffs.

John
14 years ago

which is more statistically significant? Winning 10 more games in a 162 game season or winning 1 more game in a 7 game series? Playoffs are fun, but pretty bad at determining the best team. Not to take anything away from this postseason, it’s been amazing to watch, and the Cardinals are a great team that got hot at the right time.

That being said, this is probably the most exciting season of baseball I’ve seen. Races going to the last day of the season, lots of close games and lead swings in the playoffs. I’m glad they have playoffs, just somewhat disappointed that people who are supposedly stat heads would treat them as a good way of determining the best team.

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago

John, winning 10 more games in a 162 game season, when there are trades that can drastically make a team better/worse is NOT all that statistically significant. All teams in the playoffs are pretty much equal. That’s my point . It’s not “some crappy team won because of the watered down playoffs”.

chuckb
14 years ago

And David Freese’s triple, in actuality, had a higher WPA than .537. He had a 1-2 count, which meant the Cards had an even lower win probability than when Freese came to bat, which is what WPA measures. It doesn’t measure it per pitch, though we could calculate it if we wanted to, so the triple was an even bigger hit than is measured by WPA.

Jake
14 years ago

1960 World Series Game 7.
Pirates jump out to an early 4-0 lead. They blow it with a run in the top of 5 and 4 spot in the top of the 6th. Then Yankees then proceed blow a 3 run lead in the bottom of the 8th. The Pirates now blow the newly acquired 2 run lead in the next half. With the game now tied, Bill Mazeroski takes the 2nd pitch of the bottom frame over the fences for the only Game 7 walk-off home run in World Series history.

I wasn’t alive and I might be a homer but it gets my vote.

http://www.baseball-almanac.com/box-scores/boxscore.php?boxid=196010130PIT

PiratesHurdles
14 years ago
Reply to  Jake

Amen, but everything that happens now is automatically better than the past right? LOL

Phrozen
14 years ago

I’ve got to say that this was NOT the most exciting game ever, for me.

That has to be chosen from a much shorter list of games I’ve attended in person, trimmed down to teams I care about. Probably Games Four or Five of the 2008 WS, even as crappy as Game Five was that year, or perhaps this game in Seattle
http://www.baseball-reference.com/boxes/SEA/SEA199508240.shtml , at the beginning of the Refuse to Lose run.

Your mileage may vary, of course, but I cared absolutely dick about this game. The bad play (walking Pujols to pitch to Berkman? batting the pitcher with the bases loaded? Holiday being picked off third?) and the teams involved take away from any excitement for me.

Well-Beered Englishman
14 years ago
Reply to  Phrozen

By the 8th inning, I was just ready for it to end. The Rangers homers cheered me up because I was sick of watching the errors and godawful management and misplays.

But still……………. FREAKING BASEBALL

IvanGrushenko
14 years ago
Reply to  Phrozen

As an A’s fan I wasn’t that emotionally invested in the outcome either, other than I wanted to see a Game 7, but as someone WHO ATTENDED THE GAME, it’s the most exciting game I’ve ever seen.

Well-Beered Englishman
14 years ago

When was the last season as awesome as 2011?

pudieron89
14 years ago

Last evening of the season beats this, in terms of narrative, elimination games, heroics, and managerial decisions. The synchronicity of the Rays win and the Red Sox loss was something mystical.

IvanGrushenko
14 years ago
Reply to  pudieron89

What about the Cards win and Braves loss which made all this possible?

Antonio Bananas
14 years ago
Reply to  IvanGrushenko

It’s been real magical for the cards. Chipper loses a ball in the lights, they get 3 walks and a wild pitch to win against the Cubs, Cliff Lee doesn’t pitch well, the rain out of game 6 which makes Carp available for game 7, getting 2 big hits with 2 outs and 2 strikes. All without their best starter, and with a pretty old team taht shouldn’t be playing this well.

Just paranormal shit going on for the Cards.

tylerv
14 years ago

This morning I thanked Larry Stone from avoiding hyperbole though he admittedly wanted to. Cmon Dave. It was a good game but not that good. It was a bit sloppy to be too tense.

J. B. Rainsberger
14 years ago

Sorry, folks, but this is laughable. Jays 15, Phillies 14. Greatest. World. Series. Game. Ever.

Telo
14 years ago

Your beard is laughable

J. B. Rainsberger
14 years ago
Reply to  Telo

Burn!

Tommy Lasordas Pasta
14 years ago

That was a fun game.

John
14 years ago

Man, I was a 13 year old Phillies fan when I watched that game. I don’t think I’ve had that many emotional ups and downs ever. Makes me miss being young when I cared that much about a baseball game. 🙂

Barkey Walker
14 years ago

How can it be the best game ever when the final call was homage to another game 6? The best are the best not by reference but by being the real thing.

chuckb
14 years ago
Reply to  Barkey Walker

It can’t be the best b/c Joe Buck’s a douchebag?

That’s silly.

Grebe
14 years ago
Reply to  Barkey Walker

I don’t remember Gary Thorne referencing another game 6. Was there some kind of alternate broadcast I wasn’t aware of?

Devon
14 years ago

“Given all the errors, the questionable decisions made from the dugouts, and the mental mistakes that permeated the entire game, it’s hard to call last night’s game “the best ever””

…I’ve heard that logic all day, using a variety of phrases. Anyone who says that though, is confusing “best game” with “best played game”. See, this game had a little of everything that could happen in baseball… everything from brilliant great plays to an array of errors. The errors didn’t take away from the greatness of the game IMHO, they actually added to it. It made it more entertaining… more thrilling…. more baseball. This game was baseball. Yes, if I had to show a non-baseball-fan any game to try to make them interested in the sport, I’d show them this one from top to bottom and explain it all as we went along. It couldn’t have been a better game if there weren’t any errors & miscues & mental lapses.

stratobill
14 years ago

Can someone please enlighten me about Lohse pinch-hitting for Jackson who was pinch-hitting for the pitcher? Why would Larussa announce Jackson as a pinch-hitter and then immediately turn around and send Lohse up to bat in Jackson’s place? How is that even within the rules?

I know a pitcher who is brought into a game must face at least one batter. I thought there was also a rule that a pinch-hitter must face at least 1 pitcher unless the pitcher he was brought in to face is removed first. Obviously I must be wrong about that, but if Larussa wanted to use Lohse to execute a bunt, why did he bother first announcing Jackson? Was it a bluff or what?

Mitch
14 years ago
Reply to  stratobill

when you look up overmanaging in the dictionary you will see a picture of Tony LaRussa.

Tommy Lasordas Pasta
14 years ago

Watching as a mostly impartial viewer – a baseball fan- last night was not the Greatest Game Ever. Way too sloppy to achieve that title. However, Most Entertaining Game Ever? Quite possibly. Even my girlfriend came running in after a long day at work to watch the last 2 innings, and she has “tolerated” me watching every game thus far.
The last day of the season was probably the Best Day of Baseball Ever- so many teams, so many games, so much happening, such improbabilities.

The WPA graphs for all these things are just crazy. Things of beauty.

Mitch
14 years ago

i guess overall it was up there with 10-25-86.

CircleChange11
14 years ago

I still think it’s awesome that someone in the game 6 chat called David Freese “Spicoli”. Per-fect.

channelclemente
14 years ago

One gets excited at a Little League game, and that game was exciting, but come on, 3 blown saves, god knows how many errors, scored and not. Spare the hyperbole, it was at the core, an embarassing series of misques, supported by a cast of burned out pitchers. Now if Carpenter comes back with a 3 hit shutout tonight, that’s great baseball.

Anonymous
14 years ago

Game 6 of the 1986 World Series?

chasfhMember since 2018
14 years ago

Mazeroski walkoff. Let’s see one of those tonight.

akas247
14 years ago

why do we hate to rate everything. it was a great game to watch, and we should be thankful we got to see it.

Mitch
14 years ago
Reply to  akas247

“hate” or “have”?

Eric M. VanMember since 2019
14 years ago

An (admittedly insane) thing you could do with WPA graphs, and analysis of dramatic swings in WPA, to better reflect the actual ebb and flow of a game, is to graph an appropriate percentage of the expected WPA from batted balls that are not fielded as expected. The true moment-by-moment WPA graph of 1975 Game 6 has an extra dramatic spike in the Reds’ favor as Morgan’s fly is in the air, that comes rocketing back down as Evans catches it. I voted for Game 6, in fact, because it did have a dramatic game-saving catch in addition to the clutch hitting heroics, which this Game 6 lacked. But I think it was the best game I’ve seen since.

Wade8813
14 years ago

This article was quoted by Ronald Blum, an AP sports writer.

Jon L.
14 years ago

Game 7 of the 1960 World Series sounds like a terrific candidate. Personally, I’ll take Game 6 from 1986, but then, I’m too young to remember Game 6 from 1975, except by reputation.

Also, let’s just admit that very few of us are giving games from before our time much shrift.

PackBob
14 years ago

Strange game. Certainly exciting. It seems like leverage could be interpreted as a liklihood index. It was very unlikley the Cardinals would come back from a 2-run deficit one stike away from losing in the 9th. It was very unlikely they would come back again in the 10th. An unlikley game, but play enough World Series and it’s likely to happen. Pretty cool to see it.

If there is no statistical basis for clutch hitting, or pitching, why is leverage important, other than identifying game situations or assessing manegerial decisions? Did Freese come through in the clutch or is he a good hitter that hit well at just the right time? Can a player control when he is on or off? The mantra for just about all hitters these days is to just put a good swing on the ball, not try to do too much. Cruz plays the ball better and Rangers win.

Two of the Rangers’ hottest hitters, Napoli and Cruz, and their best overall hitter, Hamilton, were hobbled for game 7 (Holliday too, but that might have been a good thing). That was more a let-down than the final score. That’s part of baseball, blah, blah, but I’d have much rather seen full-strength teams go at it.

Al V.
14 years ago

For me, the most exciting game ever was game 7 of the 1992 NLCS. One of only two games when a team went from losing a championship to winning a championship on a single (walkoff) swing. Francisco Cabrera’s single drove in the tying and winning runs.

The other instance was Bobby Thomson’s “shot heard round the world”.

Al V.
14 years ago

Oh, and the Pirates were 74% to win before Cabrera’s single, so that’s a +.74 WPA on the single.