The Most Improved Players Thus Far by Projected WAR

What follows represents an attempt by the author to utilize the projections available at the site to identify the five major-league hitters whose WAR projections have most improved on a rate basis since the beginning of the season.

For every batter, what I’ve done is first to calculate his preseason (PRE) WAR projection per every 550 plate appearances (or 415 for catchers), averaging together Steamer and ZiPS forecasts where both are available. What I’ve done next is to calculate every hitter’s rest-of-season (ROS) WAR projection (again, prorated to 550 PA and using both Steamer and ZiPS when available). I’ve then found the difference in WAR per 550 PA between the preseason and rest-of-season projection.

Only those hitters have been considered who both (a) are currently on a major-league roster and (b) have recorded 100-plus plate appearances and (c) weren’t accidentally omitted by the author, who is a moron. Note that PRE denotes the player’s preseason projection; ROS, the rest-of-season projection; and Diff, the difference between the two. Note also that all figures are expressed as prorated projections (per 550 PA for field players and 415 PA for catchers). Data is current as of Monday.

***

5. Seth Smith, OF, San Diego (Profile)

Proj. PA BB% K% BABIP AVG OBP SLG wRC+ WAR
PRE 550 9.4% 22.2% .296 .246 .323 .407 105 0.7
ROS 550 10.7% 19.9% .305 .261 .346 .442 125 2.4
Diff 1.3% -2.3% .009 .015 .023 .035 20 1.7

Notes
When Smith appeared on a similar list to this one at the beginning of July, his combined rest-of-season projection called for him to produce a 118 wRC+ and 2.0 WAR per every 550 plate appearance — a considerable improvement, that, over his preseason forecasts. Now, a month-plus later, he’s projected to produce a 125 wRC+ and 2.4 WAR per every 550 plate appearances — in other words, even better figures. While extending Smith might have been weird, that probably has more to do with the Padres specific circumstances and not Smith’s own ability.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

***

4. Emilio Bonifacio, UT, Atlanta (Profile)

Proj. PA BB% K% BABIP AVG OBP SLG wRC+ WAR
PRE 550 7.8% 20.1% .319 .255 .314 .334 78 -0.2
ROS 550 7.0% 19.2% .324 .262 .315 .345 86 1.6
Diff -0.8% -0.9% .005 .007 .001 .011 8 1.8

Notes
More than the other four players to appear here, Bonifacio’s improved projections are largely a product of defensive metrics. Between 2011 and -13 — which is to say, a not entirely unreasonable sample for defensive metrics — Bonifacio was worth about -9 runs defensively overall, accounting both for positional adjustment and runs saved (or not) per UZR. This season, Bonifacio has saved 8 or 6 runs according to UZR and DRS, respectively, while receiving a positional adjustment of +1.0 by virtue of playing mostly second base and center field. One can see the likely effects of this recent performance in Bonifacio’s current projections. After producing a combined defensive projection of about -8 runs overall over a whole season for Bonifacio, Steamer and ZiPS now project about a +2 or +3 figure for him — average, that, for a second baseman or center fielder.

***

3. Kevin Kiermaier, OF, Tampa Bay (Profile)

Proj. PA BB% K% BABIP AVG OBP SLG wRC+ WAR
PRE 550 6.1% 19.7% .301 .245 .299 .344 82 0.4
ROS 550 6.3% 19.7% .305 .254 .307 .380 97 2.5
Diff 0.2% 0.0% .004 .009 .008 .036 15 2.1

Notes
In most ways, Kiermaier’s preseason and rest-of-season offensive rate projections resemble each other pretty strongly. Walk and strikeout rate: about the same. Batting average on balls in play: nearly identical. Overall batting average and on-base percentage: again, similar. His projected home-run rate, on the other hand: different. In 1,649 plate appearances across basically every level of the minors, Kiermaier hit 15 home runs. In 236 plate appearances with Tampa Bay just this season, however, the 24-year-old has hit nine of them (i.e. home runs). Projected originally to produce a .099 ISO, Kiermaier has instead recorded a .228 ISO mark. The influence of that newest data is visible in his improved ISO projections — about 36 points higher, those, than that aforementioned preseason mark.

***

2. Steve Pearce, 1B/OF, Baltimore (Profile)

Proj. PA BB% K% BABIP AVG OBP SLG wRC+ WAR
PRE 550 10.0% 20.3% .288 .248 .333 .408 102 0.9
ROS 550 9.8% 20.7% .303 .262 .342 .441 119 3.0
Diff -0.2% 0.4% .015 .014 .009 .033 17 2.1

Notes
No member of the Baltimore Orioles — not even Nelson Cruz, what with his league-leading 31 home runs — has produced a park-adjusted batting line as high as Pearce’s 136 wRC+. Moreover, he’s tied for second on that same club with J.J. Hardy in wins above replacement despite having too few plate appearances to qualify. The discerning reader will note that Pearce’s rest-of-season batting projection has actually declined since the last iteration of this exercise, from 121 wRC+ to 119 wRC+. Either figure represents a considerable improvement, however, over his preseason numbers.

***

1. David Peralta, OF, Arizona (Profile)

Type PA BB% K% BABIP AVG OBP SLG wRC+ WAR
PRE 550 3.4% 15.9% .271 .245 .274 .361 69 -0.9
ROS 550 5.0% 13.1% .313 .288 .326 .438 109 1.9
Diff 1.6% -2.8% .042 .043 .052 .077 40 2.8

Notes
A brief inspection around Peralta’s player page reveals pretty quickly that he’s the product of unusual circumstances. Regard, by way of illustration, this embiggenable image:

Peralta

One finds a couple years of pretty competent offensive performance from an old prospect and then, prior to that, two non-seasons from a teenage Cardinals prospect in the middle of the aughts. The reason: Peralta, a native of Venezuela, was a pitcher in those Cardinals season. And then he wasn’t one. And then he was — like four years later, that is — he was an outfielder in no fewer than two independent leagues. Signed by the D-backs last summer out of one of those independent leagues, he’s now probably the most improved player in all of baseball by WAR.





Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.

33 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
brian
12 years ago

uhh… michael brantley?

fsoyer
12 years ago
Reply to  brian

I thought the same thing. Brantley. I guess he was projected higher than I remember. If so, great projection.

Garyth
12 years ago
Reply to  brian

+2 My immediate thought was Brantley

Brendan
12 years ago
Reply to  brian

hi. room for one more?

Brad
12 years ago

What about Devin Mesoraco? Devin Mesoraco

Andy
12 years ago
Reply to  Brad

Yeah, that was my first thought.

BUCCO BIAS
12 years ago

How Is Josh Harrison not on this list? I have nothing to back this comment up, but I’d have to think he has seriously improved WAR from the beginning of the year?

Brad JohnsonMember
12 years ago
Reply to  BUCCO BIAS

fwiw, this is based on WAR projections. Without even looking at his player page, I’m going to assume he hasn’t done enough to substantially change his projection.

JRoth
12 years ago
Reply to  Brad Johnson

But I don’t think that’s how this works. Every guy on here has an ROS projection that’s 75% production to date and 25% projection. ZiPS thinks Josh will end at 4.7 WAR (495 PA), which I’m confident is more than 2.8 WAR above the preseason projection. I dunno; maybe it’s all about the pro rating to 550 PAs?

Robert Kral
12 years ago

Where’s some love for me?

LaLoosh
12 years ago
Reply to  Robert Kral

Hah!!

Matthew Murphy
12 years ago

Brantley went from about 1.5 WAR preseason to 3.1 now, so must have just missed the cutoff (Smith at #5 was +1.7).
Harrison went from 1.5 preseason to 2.5 now, so in this case the projections actually thought that Harrison was close to being an average major leaguer, despite being relatively unknown heading into 2014.

Matthew Murphy
12 years ago
Reply to  Matthew Murphy

Mesoraco 2.6 -> 3.5, so projections already thought he was above-average starter.
Nobody in the top-5 was projected to be worth even 1 WAR per 550 PA when the season started. The better the projections think you are coming into the season, the more difficult it is to improve them.

Andy
12 years ago
Reply to  Matthew Murphy

OK, but if Mesoraco played more, he would have a much higher WAR. He has, what, 3.1 WAR now for basically half a season, that is 6+ for a full year. Seems to me that 3.5 for ROS really undersells him. Not to mention that he’s rated higher on other sites.

Bottom line for me: He trails only Abreu in AB/HR; is top ten in wRC+; and is top 5 in WAR/PA. All the games he hasn’t played have made it too easy too overlook just how good he’s been when using a counting stat like WAR.

Trashman
12 years ago
Reply to  Andy

This article doesn’t use WAR as a counting stat, but rather WAR/550 ABs or WAR/450 ABs for catchers.

Andy
12 years ago
Reply to  Andy

Trashman, he has 5.2 WAR per 415 ABs right now.

Josh Harrison
12 years ago

I am extremely surprised to not be on this list.

Jason B
12 years ago
Reply to  Josh Harrison

Scroll up a bit and read on, my friend.

jon
12 years ago

I think people are confusing the results of this post to be “Who has exceeded their projections the most this year,” in which case I’m sure the likes of Brantley and Harrison would be right at the top of the list (not to mention Kluber, and I’m interested to know how close he was to making this list btw!)

jon
12 years ago
Reply to  jon

But actually, reading further, I suppose its only hitters lol

Steve May
12 years ago

Dee Gordon?

Jake Arretia
12 years ago

Did I miss the pitching one?

Lucas Duda
12 years ago

How about me? I am having a decent year. Better then that Ike guy. What happened to him anyways?

You're Joshin', Right?
12 years ago

I think Josh Harrison is so exponentially ahead of the pack on this that Carson simply missed it. Either that or it’s just some meaningless, disconnected metric that doesn’t actually tell you anything or have any value, like judging a beer by width.

Brian Cartwright
12 years ago

or how WAR is calculated. If it’s then vs now, how about forget the positional adjustments and look at say batting runs per 600 PAs?

Cato the Elder
12 years ago

The discrepencies are most likely to lie in the preseason projections – because projections are hard, especially playing time projections – not the calculation of WAR. Turns out the preseason projections liked Josh Harrison more than most people not related to Josh Harrison. I’m finding it hard to construe that as a demerit.

JRoth
12 years ago
Reply to  Cato the Elder

Do you know that, or is it a guess? I never know where to find preseason projections after the fact.

Jack
12 years ago

I feel like you didn’t really understand this post.

Skmd
12 years ago

Starlin Castro, jake arrieta?

Patrick
12 years ago

EMBIGGENABLE, THE MAN USED THE WORD “EMBIGGENABLE”!!!

BritDawg
12 years ago

J.D. Martinez must have been pretty close to making this list, I’d imagine.

Dave Pomerantz
12 years ago

I think a lot of people are missing the point of this article. It’s trying to find who the PROJECTION SYSTEMS see as legitimately improved, (i.e. are projecting forward much better than they projected at the start of the season). It’s NOT about actual production. For example, I thought I would see Dee Gordon on this list, but the Steamer and ZiPS don’t think he’s really improved much – they still have him at about a win and a half over 550 plate appearances (from about 2/3 of a win before the start of the season), even though he’s put up nearly 3 wins in about 500 PAs so far this year. For Josh Harrison, Steamer and ZiPS saw about 1.5 WAR/550 PAs, and now project him forward at 2.5 WAR/550 PAs. Excellent improvement, but still misses the list by a significant margin.

JRoth
12 years ago
Reply to  Dave Pomerantz

Thanks for the numbers on Josh. That was indeed a favorable projection, and also a not amazing new projection (I know that Brian above basically agrees with this).

For the record, Josh’s actual performance this year has been 5.5 WAR/550 PAs, and Brian has done research showing that most players who see this kind of breakout year do maintain a big chunk of their improvement. IOW, ZiPS is probably being a bit conservative, but not egregiously so. If Harrison is now a league average player or a bit better, that’s a huge step up!