The Most Improved Players Thus Far by Projected WAR
What follows represents an attempt by the author to utilize the projections available at the site to identify the five major-league hitters whose WAR projections have most improved on a rate basis since the beginning of the season.
For every batter, what I’ve done is first to calculate his preseason (PRE) WAR projection per every 550 plate appearances (or 415 for catchers), averaging together Steamer and ZiPS forecasts where both are available. What I’ve done next is to calculate every hitter’s rest-of-season (ROS) WAR projection (again, prorated to 550 PA and using both Steamer and ZiPS when available). I’ve then found the difference in WAR per 550 PA between the preseason and rest-of-season projection.
Only those hitters have been considered who both (a) are currently on a major-league roster and (b) have recorded 100-plus plate appearances and (c) weren’t accidentally omitted by the author, who is a moron. Note that PRE denotes the player’s preseason projection; ROS, the rest-of-season projection; and Diff, the difference between the two. Note also that all figures are expressed as prorated projections (per 550 PA for field players and 415 PA for catchers). Data is current as of Monday.
5. Seth Smith, OF, San Diego (Profile)
| Proj. | PA | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE | 550 | 9.4% | 22.2% | .296 | .246 | .323 | .407 | 105 | 0.7 |
| ROS | 550 | 10.7% | 19.9% | .305 | .261 | .346 | .442 | 125 | 2.4 |
| Diff | — | 1.3% | -2.3% | .009 | .015 | .023 | .035 | 20 | 1.7 |
Notes
When Smith appeared on a similar list to this one at the beginning of July, his combined rest-of-season projection called for him to produce a 118 wRC+ and 2.0 WAR per every 550 plate appearance — a considerable improvement, that, over his preseason forecasts. Now, a month-plus later, he’s projected to produce a 125 wRC+ and 2.4 WAR per every 550 plate appearances — in other words, even better figures. While extending Smith might have been weird, that probably has more to do with the Padres specific circumstances and not Smith’s own ability.
4. Emilio Bonifacio, UT, Atlanta (Profile)
| Proj. | PA | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE | 550 | 7.8% | 20.1% | .319 | .255 | .314 | .334 | 78 | -0.2 |
| ROS | 550 | 7.0% | 19.2% | .324 | .262 | .315 | .345 | 86 | 1.6 |
| Diff | — | -0.8% | -0.9% | .005 | .007 | .001 | .011 | 8 | 1.8 |
Notes
More than the other four players to appear here, Bonifacio’s improved projections are largely a product of defensive metrics. Between 2011 and -13 — which is to say, a not entirely unreasonable sample for defensive metrics — Bonifacio was worth about -9 runs defensively overall, accounting both for positional adjustment and runs saved (or not) per UZR. This season, Bonifacio has saved 8 or 6 runs according to UZR and DRS, respectively, while receiving a positional adjustment of +1.0 by virtue of playing mostly second base and center field. One can see the likely effects of this recent performance in Bonifacio’s current projections. After producing a combined defensive projection of about -8 runs overall over a whole season for Bonifacio, Steamer and ZiPS now project about a +2 or +3 figure for him — average, that, for a second baseman or center fielder.
3. Kevin Kiermaier, OF, Tampa Bay (Profile)
| Proj. | PA | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE | 550 | 6.1% | 19.7% | .301 | .245 | .299 | .344 | 82 | 0.4 |
| ROS | 550 | 6.3% | 19.7% | .305 | .254 | .307 | .380 | 97 | 2.5 |
| Diff | — | 0.2% | 0.0% | .004 | .009 | .008 | .036 | 15 | 2.1 |
Notes
In most ways, Kiermaier’s preseason and rest-of-season offensive rate projections resemble each other pretty strongly. Walk and strikeout rate: about the same. Batting average on balls in play: nearly identical. Overall batting average and on-base percentage: again, similar. His projected home-run rate, on the other hand: different. In 1,649 plate appearances across basically every level of the minors, Kiermaier hit 15 home runs. In 236 plate appearances with Tampa Bay just this season, however, the 24-year-old has hit nine of them (i.e. home runs). Projected originally to produce a .099 ISO, Kiermaier has instead recorded a .228 ISO mark. The influence of that newest data is visible in his improved ISO projections — about 36 points higher, those, than that aforementioned preseason mark.
2. Steve Pearce, 1B/OF, Baltimore (Profile)
| Proj. | PA | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE | 550 | 10.0% | 20.3% | .288 | .248 | .333 | .408 | 102 | 0.9 |
| ROS | 550 | 9.8% | 20.7% | .303 | .262 | .342 | .441 | 119 | 3.0 |
| Diff | — | -0.2% | 0.4% | .015 | .014 | .009 | .033 | 17 | 2.1 |
Notes
No member of the Baltimore Orioles — not even Nelson Cruz, what with his league-leading 31 home runs — has produced a park-adjusted batting line as high as Pearce’s 136 wRC+. Moreover, he’s tied for second on that same club with J.J. Hardy in wins above replacement despite having too few plate appearances to qualify. The discerning reader will note that Pearce’s rest-of-season batting projection has actually declined since the last iteration of this exercise, from 121 wRC+ to 119 wRC+. Either figure represents a considerable improvement, however, over his preseason numbers.
1. David Peralta, OF, Arizona (Profile)
| Type | PA | BB% | K% | BABIP | AVG | OBP | SLG | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRE | 550 | 3.4% | 15.9% | .271 | .245 | .274 | .361 | 69 | -0.9 |
| ROS | 550 | 5.0% | 13.1% | .313 | .288 | .326 | .438 | 109 | 1.9 |
| Diff | — | 1.6% | -2.8% | .042 | .043 | .052 | .077 | 40 | 2.8 |
Notes
A brief inspection around Peralta’s player page reveals pretty quickly that he’s the product of unusual circumstances. Regard, by way of illustration, this embiggenable image:

One finds a couple years of pretty competent offensive performance from an old prospect and then, prior to that, two non-seasons from a teenage Cardinals prospect in the middle of the aughts. The reason: Peralta, a native of Venezuela, was a pitcher in those Cardinals season. And then he wasn’t one. And then he was — like four years later, that is — he was an outfielder in no fewer than two independent leagues. Signed by the D-backs last summer out of one of those independent leagues, he’s now probably the most improved player in all of baseball by WAR.
Carson Cistulli has published a book of aphorisms called Spirited Ejaculations of a New Enthusiast.
uhh… michael brantley?
I thought the same thing. Brantley. I guess he was projected higher than I remember. If so, great projection.
+2 My immediate thought was Brantley
hi. room for one more?
What about Devin Mesoraco? Devin Mesoraco
Yeah, that was my first thought.
How Is Josh Harrison not on this list? I have nothing to back this comment up, but I’d have to think he has seriously improved WAR from the beginning of the year?
fwiw, this is based on WAR projections. Without even looking at his player page, I’m going to assume he hasn’t done enough to substantially change his projection.
But I don’t think that’s how this works. Every guy on here has an ROS projection that’s 75% production to date and 25% projection. ZiPS thinks Josh will end at 4.7 WAR (495 PA), which I’m confident is more than 2.8 WAR above the preseason projection. I dunno; maybe it’s all about the pro rating to 550 PAs?
Where’s some love for me?
Hah!!
Brantley went from about 1.5 WAR preseason to 3.1 now, so must have just missed the cutoff (Smith at #5 was +1.7).
Harrison went from 1.5 preseason to 2.5 now, so in this case the projections actually thought that Harrison was close to being an average major leaguer, despite being relatively unknown heading into 2014.
Mesoraco 2.6 -> 3.5, so projections already thought he was above-average starter.
Nobody in the top-5 was projected to be worth even 1 WAR per 550 PA when the season started. The better the projections think you are coming into the season, the more difficult it is to improve them.
OK, but if Mesoraco played more, he would have a much higher WAR. He has, what, 3.1 WAR now for basically half a season, that is 6+ for a full year. Seems to me that 3.5 for ROS really undersells him. Not to mention that he’s rated higher on other sites.
Bottom line for me: He trails only Abreu in AB/HR; is top ten in wRC+; and is top 5 in WAR/PA. All the games he hasn’t played have made it too easy too overlook just how good he’s been when using a counting stat like WAR.
This article doesn’t use WAR as a counting stat, but rather WAR/550 ABs or WAR/450 ABs for catchers.
Trashman, he has 5.2 WAR per 415 ABs right now.
I am extremely surprised to not be on this list.
Scroll up a bit and read on, my friend.
I think people are confusing the results of this post to be “Who has exceeded their projections the most this year,” in which case I’m sure the likes of Brantley and Harrison would be right at the top of the list (not to mention Kluber, and I’m interested to know how close he was to making this list btw!)
But actually, reading further, I suppose its only hitters lol
Dee Gordon?
Did I miss the pitching one?
How about me? I am having a decent year. Better then that Ike guy. What happened to him anyways?
I think Josh Harrison is so exponentially ahead of the pack on this that Carson simply missed it. Either that or it’s just some meaningless, disconnected metric that doesn’t actually tell you anything or have any value, like judging a beer by width.
or how WAR is calculated. If it’s then vs now, how about forget the positional adjustments and look at say batting runs per 600 PAs?
The discrepencies are most likely to lie in the preseason projections – because projections are hard, especially playing time projections – not the calculation of WAR. Turns out the preseason projections liked Josh Harrison more than most people not related to Josh Harrison. I’m finding it hard to construe that as a demerit.
Do you know that, or is it a guess? I never know where to find preseason projections after the fact.
I feel like you didn’t really understand this post.
Starlin Castro, jake arrieta?
EMBIGGENABLE, THE MAN USED THE WORD “EMBIGGENABLE”!!!
J.D. Martinez must have been pretty close to making this list, I’d imagine.
I think a lot of people are missing the point of this article. It’s trying to find who the PROJECTION SYSTEMS see as legitimately improved, (i.e. are projecting forward much better than they projected at the start of the season). It’s NOT about actual production. For example, I thought I would see Dee Gordon on this list, but the Steamer and ZiPS don’t think he’s really improved much – they still have him at about a win and a half over 550 plate appearances (from about 2/3 of a win before the start of the season), even though he’s put up nearly 3 wins in about 500 PAs so far this year. For Josh Harrison, Steamer and ZiPS saw about 1.5 WAR/550 PAs, and now project him forward at 2.5 WAR/550 PAs. Excellent improvement, but still misses the list by a significant margin.
Thanks for the numbers on Josh. That was indeed a favorable projection, and also a not amazing new projection (I know that Brian above basically agrees with this).
For the record, Josh’s actual performance this year has been 5.5 WAR/550 PAs, and Brian has done research showing that most players who see this kind of breakout year do maintain a big chunk of their improvement. IOW, ZiPS is probably being a bit conservative, but not egregiously so. If Harrison is now a league average player or a bit better, that’s a huge step up!