The Nationals’ Bullpen Problem Isn’t Just a Closer Problem
Over the winter, the Washington Nationals were interested in a bunch of closers. Most notably, they were the runners-up in the Kenley Jansen bidding, with Jansen publicly stating that the Nationals offered him more money than the Dodgers did. The team was also linked heavily to David Robertson in trade rumors, so it was a fairly surprising development when the team ended up not acquiring anyone to replace Mark Melancon, instead leaning on their internal options to fill the ninth inning void.
So far, it hasn’t gone well, with Shawn Kelley blowing another ninth inning lead yesterday, the third time this year the Nationals have lost a game they led headed into the ninth inning. Kelley’s blown save included his sixth home run allowed this year, a staggering total for a guy who has thrown just 11 1/3 innings so far in 2017. Blake Treinen and Koda Glover haven’t been much better, with Treinen walking too many guys and Glover striking out too few, so while the Nationals maintain a comfortable 7 1/2 game lead in the NL East, it’s becoming more and more obvious that the team will be making a trade for another closer this summer.
But while acquiring an available closer certainly may help, the reality is that the Nationals 2017 bullpen issue doesn’t appear to be as easily fixed as it was in 2016. Last year, the team had a bunch of quality setup guys pitching well in front of Jonathan Papelbon, and was able to solidify an already-strong unit by bringing in Melancon to anchor the squad. This year, though, the problems are running much deeper than just the ninth inning.
As a group, the Nationals relief corps has been just about the worst in baseball to this point. Their .356 wOBA allowed is dead last in the game. They are 28th in reliever FIP and 25th in reliever BABIP, which isn’t a very good combination. They have 24 meltdowns, nearly three times as many as the Rockies, who outbid the Nationals for Greg Holland over the winter.
But team-level totals can sometimes be skewed by a few lousy performances. For instance, the Tigers bullpen also rates as one of the worst in baseball so far, but that’s mostly because Francisco Rodriguez and Anibal Sanchez have combined to give up 38 runs in 32 innings pitched; their four other relievers with 10+ IP all have ERAs under 2.00. The Tigers had a closer problem, so they swapped out K-Rod for Justin Wilson, and they have a long-reliever problem, so they’ll probably cut Anibal Sanchez, but beyond those two, their bullpen is doing okay.
That isn’t the case for the Nationals.
| Name | IP | ERA | FIP | xFIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blake Treinen | 16.2 | 8.10 | 4.51 | 4.76 | 0.0 |
| Enny Romero | 16.2 | 4.86 | 4.39 | 4.16 | 0.0 |
| Matt Albers | 14.2 | 0.61 | 2.74 | 2.76 | 0.3 |
| Joe Blanton | 12.1 | 9.49 | 8.60 | 4.72 | -0.5 |
| Shawn Kelley | 11.1 | 7.15 | 8.83 | 4.90 | -0.8 |
| Koda Glover | 10.2 | 3.38 | 2.26 | 4.30 | 0.4 |
| Jacob Turner | 10.1 | 2.61 | 2.82 | 4.76 | 0.3 |
| Oliver Perez | 8.1 | 4.32 | 4.69 | 4.58 | -0.1 |
| Matt Grace | 4.1 | 6.23 | 3.24 | 4.40 | 0.0 |
| Sammy Solis | 4.1 | 8.31 | 6.70 | 5.25 | -0.1 |
To this point, their bullpen has been saved by Matt Albers and Jacob Turner, both of whom began the year in the minors. Those two are the only ones with ERAs under 3.00, and Glover is the only other guy under 4.00, though he (like Turner) isn’t missing enough bats for that to last long-term. By xFIP, Albers is #1 at 2.76, and then the next lowest mark on the team is Enny Romero’s 4.16; the league average reliever has a 4.14 ERA/FIP/xFIP this year, for reference. You really don’t want to have only one guy in your bullpen better than that, and you especially don’t want that one guy to be Matt Albers, a 34-year-old journeyman with a grand total of +1.2 WAR in over 600 career innings pitched.
Now, of course, almost everyone on that list should pitch better going forward than they have to this point. Kelley, Treinen, and Blanton were all very good relievers last year, and Glover’s stuff helps him project as a solid relief arm even without a lot of big league experience. While there might not be a guy that Dusty Baker will entrust the ninth inning to among that group, our forecasts suggest that the Nationals bullpen should pitch at roughly a league-average level going forward.
But for a team that is very likely headed to the postseason, a league average bullpen probably doesn’t cut it, and with guys like Kelley and Treinen pitching their way out of Baker’s circle of confidence, the Nationals may need to start thinking about whether they need to acquire multiple relievers this summer. It’s basically guaranteed that Mike Rizzo will trade for a closer at some point before July 31st — whether that be Robertson, Kelvin Herrera, or someone else — but given the total meltdown of basically every non-Albers reliever in the team’s bullpen, perhaps the Nationals would be better off making a trade that brought back multiple relievers instead.
For instance, the A’s could potentially offer a combo package, perhaps combining Ryan Madson and Sean Doolittle together to give the team potential upgrades from both the left and right side. Doolittle would have to get back on the mound before that kind of deal would be possible, but a deal like that could actually have a larger impact on Washington’s relief corps than simply adding a ninth-inning guy and hoping the rest of the holdovers can get him a lead. Or perhaps the team could simply ask the White Sox to kick in one of their surprisingly effective setup guys, either Tommy Kahnle or Anthony Swarzak, to go along with Robertson in order to get that long-rumored deal done.
Depending on who else ends up as sellers, perhaps the Nationals could simply choose to make two trades, getting a ninth inning guy from one team and then another setup guy in a separate deal. That’s what the team did last year, when they acquired Mark Melancon and Marc Rzepczynski in separate trades with Pittsburgh and Oakland, after all. But if they can find the right package deal, a single trade for two relievers might ensure that they don’t get outbid in trade talks like they did in free agency. And with the volatility of reliever performance, the team may be better off with two upgrades rather than one anyway, since you can’t really count on that one shiny acquisition pitching well enough to carry an entire bullpen through the month of October.
The dumpster fire that is the rest of the NL East gives them time to be patient, to not have to panic into an early overpay for an inferior option, but it’s tough to look at this current group and think that the Nationals only need one more reliever to be set for October. In looking for bullpen upgrades, Mike Rizzo might want to start thinking about how to buy in bulk.
Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.
Is Victor Robles for Robertson, Nate Jones, AND Swarzak too video-gamey to get done?
Yeah, it is, I know.
Seems reasonable – you’d basically trading for 2-3 innings of high leverage pitching per game. Worth a top 20 guy IMO.
ChiSox would never do that. Robertson + Swarzak = Robles + stuff could happen, but Nate Jones is too controllable and too cheap. He’s worth more.
Jones is certainly the most valuable of the three relievers, but I don’t think he’s worth more than Robles. At the end of the day, he;s still an RP, and his injury issues are starting to look like they might be recurring at this point.
Robles is worth significantly more than Robertson Jones and Swarzak, and typically packages of prospects get traded for one star major leaguer, not one star prospect getting traded for a package of mediocre major leaguers.
Robles would have gotten Robertson straight up in the offseason, and the Nats said “no”. Now they are somewhat more desperate, and that’s not going to make Robertson cheaper or incentivize the ChiSox to add more bullpen talent to the package.
Especially not Jones. Jones is worth MORE than Robertson. He is. Contracts matter.
Contracts do matter.
However Nate Jones is not very much younger than Robertson, has more history of injury than Robertson and is currently on the disabled list (again).
Contracts matter, sure. But there are reasons why Jones is is being payed so much less than Robertson.
Well Robles is a 60 or 65 FV prospect, worth about $60-70M. Swarzak’s had a great first month, but I’m not sure Robertson for a year and a half + Jones and Swarzak is worth $60-70M in value.
I’m a Yankees fan and hearing Robles for Swarzak + plus is giving me a heart attack
I’m wondering the same thing about Cain+Soria+Herrera for basically robles+soto or fedde
my rationale: soria has be great again this year, herrera is controllable and cheap because he hasn’t closed before. would likely have to overpay bc trade deadline for controllable bullpen pieces. cain is best cf available.
world’s smallest violin for the nats right now
This comment made me laugh and I’m a Nat’s fan.
Cubs & Nationals trade coming up soon. Trading Wade Davis to the Nats.
Why stop with Davis? Let’s send the rest of the Nats’ farm system for Arrieta/Lackey and Jon Jay and Uehara too. I mean, if the Cubs are selling their guys at the deadline in this universe something must have gone very wrong…
Why would anyone want Arrieta, Lackey or Jon Jay? You’re right though, Uehara could have some interest as well
Why not? In this hypothetical world, who knows what else is going on?
They should look to sell. Too many holes to actually compete this season.
It’s basically the exact same team as last season, except minus Fowler and plus Schwarber. Will they win 103? Probably not at this point, but to suggest they can’t compete at all is to ignore or deny the track records of the majority of the players on the team.
An A’s trade might work out because Beane has his own opinion on which minor leaguers he wants, and they don’t always line up with the rest of the league. So while the rest of the league is trying to get Robles (who Rizzo understandably doesn’t want to give up) they might be able to entice Beane with some other assets.
Do the Nats have any up-and-coming horrible defenders who could platoon in the corner outfield?
I was thinking short pitcher with dominating stuff who everyone else is worried is going to wind up in the bullpen. And don’t forget the lousy infielders too with interesting offensive skills (Barreto, Semien). The only prospect who fits any of those molds is Carter Kieboom–nice bat, really slow for a middle infielder. But he’ll also ask about Soto. Everyone will ask about Soto.
Also: Wow, that bullpen looks awful.
It’s amazing, the entire pen got the yips. It puts a huge question mark on Baker and Maddux jobs. There was nothing wrong with any of these guys last year. I’d send treinen down to AAA to get his pitches and confidence back, the gut it out with Glover closing, and Kelley and Albers setting up.
I’ve noticed that when players perform well, it’s a credit to the players. When they perform badly, it is the fault of the managers/coaches. Kind of a Catch-22, that.
The entire pen had what looks like a confidence failure. It’s not about speed, it’s all location. It’s Occams razor.
I’ve never noticed the coach blame thing your talking about. Do you remember Ron Gardenhire basically had the opposite–all the good was his fault.
Hence the title of a Jim Bouton book, “I managed good but boy, did they play bad.”
And Baker and Maddux were there last year too…
Bjd1207, your comment reflects the obsession with linearity in baseball. Not everything is that simpe. Baker and/or Maddux could be in one situation and bad in another. I’ve had bosses like that, really great at managing the team in one environment and then, when the wind changed they just weren’t right for the job anymore.
I don’t get what people are voting down here. Nonlinearity? Yeah, that’s here to stay. It’s just not in any sabr models.
Baker is performing poorly according to his own metrics. He said he wants everyone to know their roles. Their roles change almost daily. What is Treinen’s current role? Is the expectation that he remains a 9 ERA pitcher? If so, why keep him. If not, how is he going to get better and how will we know if he is riding the bench. Everyone knows he had it and I suspect he could have it again. What is the plan to get there?
“Is the expectation that he remains a 9 ERA pitcher?”
I have not seen this Treinen gentleman throw a single pitch this year. Not one.
I can confidently say, however, that no, he is not expected to remain a 9.00 ERA pitcher. I can also say (quite confidently!) that no other pitcher currently on an MLB staff is expected to be a 9-ERA pitcher.
Bring back Papelbon!
This Braves fan is happy about this!
This Nats fan doesn’t begrudge you the happiness. Given that the current Braves’ situation likely isn’t providing you much on its own.
Very magnanimous of you…since the Nats are 7.5 games up on the next team and 9.5 up on the Braves.
As has been mentioned, perhaps several trades from different teams could work to fix the non-closer side of the problem. Joe Smith may not cost too much, Jerry Blevins has pitched well in DC before if you look away from his ERA as a Nat (good K numbers and independent numbers). Brad Hand may not cost too much.
Not the sexiest names, but all would be upgrades to more than half of the Nats pen (even a the loogy-ish Blevins)
Then again, the aggregate of a series of moves like that, plus the cost of a closer probably equates to a bigger deal with one team like the sox or royals.
I like Kahnle a lot, and might rather have him than Jones. in the kind of package Dave mentions.
Finally, the last post about Jerry Blevins that appeared on this site was a Notgraphs post, I am of the belief that that bears mentioning.
If they make a deal for Blevins now that the Mets seem to be out of it, they may as well look into getting Reed as well. He’s been terrific since coming to NY, and in 18.2 innings he’s given up 18 hits and 0 walks with 23 K’s this year. He developed a HR problem, but unless you think he’ll continue to give up a HR every 3 innings, he’d be a solid late-inning reliever for them.
Despite this bullpen and somewhat inconsistent starting pitching, Nationals have managed to be division leader for a month and built the best lead over their division rivals (tied with Astros – 7.5 games up).
I agree with Dave and many other comments. You should expect the current bunch to perform better while keeping an eye out for multi-relievers deal or multiple deals for relievers.
It is amazing that this team contends almost every season while consistently having issues at two positions (CF and closer) almost always.
I mostly agree with your assessment, but I think Denard Span would disagree that CF almost always is a problem for the Nats. It’s really just been the Ben Revere disaster that was a CF problem, the other 1.5 years of issues were injuries of Span’s oblique and Eaton’s ACL. Those aren’t performance issues in the same way the Nats have struggled to find a top line closer.
I’m a Yankee fan so I have to think what my team can offer because Nationals have prospects I like. The only player that makes *some* sense is Betances.
Let’s say the Yankees suck for two months, since they’re a really volatile team, would Cashman dangle Betances? Talk about it.
After losing his Arb1 hearing to stay cheap, and with two more Arb years left I’d guess that Betances would get a relative king’s ransom back in trade.
That being said, I can’t imagine the scenario where Cashman would seriously entertain trading him. The NYY rapid rebuild is really only just beginning to come into fruition, and Betances is a much desired piece of the 2018 and 2019 contending sqauds.
I agree. I doubt Cashman would but if the package is right, why not?
No. Despite Levine’s comments on Betances they’re not trading a guy striking out 40% of batters. Cashman knows he has a deal and can contend in a year, Steinbrenner doesn’t like to sell, and Rizzo isn’t meeting the astronomical price.
Ugh, I almost hate to play the game of proposing trades, but the Nationals could probably upgrade in CF for one year as well as the bullpen. A closer for this year and next makes sense given the Murphy / Harper contract situation. A deal with KC for both Herrera and Cain would fill those spots. I’m not going to argue that a 2d bullpen arm does not make sense, but, what is a reasonable price to pay for Herrera and Cain? Does Soto (BA #59 after April)/ Fedde (#48) get it done?
“that was just a blind dart article (like 85% of stuff on here)”
And yet you still come back…? Seems to say more about you than about the writers at this point.
“retards in the comment section”
I truly wonder what happened to make you such a hateful, emotionally immature person.
Most of the players listed in the chart above have a FIP that is not far off from ERA. However LHP Matt Grace’s FIP (3.24) is far lower than ERA (6.23). What does that say?
I hope the Nationals don’t panic, because at the end of the day, they can always move Joe Ross to the bullpen either as a long reliever/setup or potentially a closer. He’s not excellent vsL, but his 2016 stats show a >50% GB%, 2.68 xFIP, and 28% K% the first time through the order.
In the playoffs, that’s pretty good. Until then, they don’t even seem like they care about him getting starting reps out of the rotation over Cole/Turner and they basically already did this with Turner.