The One-Third Season Mike Trout Update

We’re doing it. It’s happening again. We’re forgetting about Mike Trout. It’s like collectively, we’re a second-grade teacher with a real-life wizard in our classroom and yet we never call on him or her to be the volunteer for any of the science experiments, so as not to single out the wizard kid while also ensuring that we remain impartial to the other, more normal children, except we know damn well that the normal kids would rather see the wizard kid perform science experiments rather than do it themselves. Call on the wizard kid! Mike Trout is right there!

Y’know how I know we’re forgetting about Mike Trout again? It’s June 1. We’re one-third of the way through the baseball season. Trout has been tagged in exactly one FanGraphs post since Opening Day. It was a post about whether Bryce Harper is better than him. Since that post, Harper’s hit .207 with a 115 wRC+. Trout’s slugged .641 with a 198 wRC+.

For the year, Trout’s been the most valuable position player in baseball. He’s been a top-three bat mixed with a top-three base-runner. He’s seventh in the league in on-base while also ranking among the league’s top-20 power hitters. He’s projected to finish the season with 9.7 WAR (yawn, but it’s not 10), which would give him 47.3 WAR over his first five full major-league seasons. And that’d be the ninth-best five-year peak of any hitter, ever. And Mike Trout is 24.

Even though we, the collective second-grade teacher, don’t call on the wizard kid in class, we’d be lying to ourselves if we said we weren’t curious what he or she were doing at all times. We’re curious what the wizard kid does at recess, we’re curious what the wizard kid eats for lunch, we’re curious what the wizard kid does at home, we’re even curious how the wizard kid gets to school. Broom? Honda Odyssey? Intangibility?

We want up-to-the-minute updates on the developments of wizard kid’s life, so we should want up-to-the-minute updates on the developments of Mike Trout’s game, too. Let’s now briefly discuss five things that are different about Mike Trout.

* * *

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

He’s more aggressive and is making more contact.

Trout is currently running both the highest swing rate and the highest contact rate of his career. The differences may seem small — a two-point increase in swings, a three-point increase in contact — but coupled together, it’s actually a pretty substantial difference. By multiplying the two figures together, we can get an overall percentage of pitches that led to contact. So, last year, Trout’s “total contact percentage” was 30.5%. This year, with more swings and more contact, it’s up to 33.6%. That three-point increase is the ninth-largest among 100 qualified batters from last year to next. In other words: fewer strikeouts (he’s back to that 2012-13 level) and plenty more balls in play. It’s important to note, too, that Trout’s chase rate hasn’t budged. All of the extra swings are coming against hittable pitches inside the zone. All of this, particularly for a player with Trout’s speed, seems like a good thing, although it sure is weird that…

He’s no longer reaching on infield hits.

From 2012 to -15 — Trout’s first four full seasons — he recorded infield hits at a rate like no one else in baseball. A higher percentage of Trout’s grounders went for infield hits than any other player in baseball during that time, leading to 96 hits. This year, he has one, as many as Miguel Cabrera; he’s produced a lower percentage than Justin Bour. The league leader has 15. Trout’s actually pulling more grounders than he ever has in his career, which might reasonably lead to more infield hits, so we’re left with two explanations, both of which I’d wager are in play: luck and declining speed. A big part of getting an infield hit is getting lucky — how do you think Miggy got his? — and I’d guess some of this is just noise. But we can’t ignore the possibility of declining footspeed, toward which Jeff Sullivan presented some evidence late in the 2014 season. In that post, Sullivan recorded some home-to-first times on infield hits and double plays, watching five plays each. I also watched five plays, and will add to Sullivan’s work below:

Mike Trout average max-effort home-to-first time

  • 2012: 3.98 seconds
  • 2013: 4.05 seconds
  • 2014: 4.13 seconds
  • 2016: 4.18 seconds

The fastest time I clocked was a 4.14, slower than the average that Sullivan observed in 2014. Trout’s been a more aggressive (and efficient) base stealer this year, but stealing a base is about plenty more than just speed — technique and the opposing battery play a huge role. Looking just at the times when Trout’s really legging it out, he’s lost roughly two-tenths of a second off his home-to-first time since his rookie year, and it’s costing him some infield hits.

He’s seeing fewer fastballs.

This one doesn’t need much explaining. For his career, Trout’s seen four-seamers 40% of the time, as high as 44% in in 2014. This year, it’s all the way down to just 34%. His rate of two-seamers and sinkers seen is mostly unchanged from his career norm. Sliders, cutters, curves and changes are all at career-highs. The fun part is, he’s making more contact against breaking and offspeed pitches than he has since his rookie year.

He’s becoming a… high-ball hitter?

This might be the most interesting Trout development, because it was the one covered most extensively last year. You know the story by now: Trout’s one weakness was the high fastball, teams realized this in the offseason between 2014-15, Trout last year started seeing way more elevated fastballs, it didn’t really matter. A logical line of thinking after the league’s adjustment failed to yield positive results might be that things would just go back to normal. “Welp, that didn’t work, might as well just go back to what we were all comfortable doing in the first place.” Nope. Trout actually looks like he enjoys the high pitch now:

TroutSLG

That’s Trout’s slugging percentage heatmap progressing from 2014 to -16. He’s crushed the high pitch this year. And now, the location of the fastballs he’s seen over those same four years:

Trout4Seams

He’s actually getting pitched low in the zone now! How about that! It’s come full circle.

He’s turning his arm into a strength.

Trout’s other weakness — beyond the previously perceived weakness against elevated fastballs — has been his arm. It’s the main thing that’s held down his defensive value over the years, costing the Angels roughly 10 runs since his debut. Coming into this season, Trout had registered just seven career outfield kills, as tracked by Baseball Info Solutions, and had allowed 60% of base-runners with an opportunity to advance to do so, with league average for a center fielder around 54%. This year, Trout has already registered three outfield kills, tying a career-high, and has held opposing base-runners to a 50% advancement rate, which ranks in the upper-third of qualified center fielders.

* * *

I’m never quite sure how to end Mike Trout posts. Nothing more needs to be said, but everything needs to be said. He’s just amazing, and this game is constantly changing, so watch him play baseball as often as you can, lest you miss something.





August used to cover the Indians for MLB and ohio.com, but now he's here and thinks writing these in the third person is weird. So you can reach me on Twitter @AugustFG_ or e-mail at august.fagerstrom@fangraphs.com.

44 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Jeff Sullivan Salmon Feast
10 years ago

Great article. The only thing better than a salmon feast is a Trout kill 🙂

rustydudeMember since 2021
10 years ago

Not mentioned… more aggressive and yet drawing more walks.

JeonghunKim
10 years ago
Reply to  rustydude

That’s why we call him he’s not a human being. he’s a trout..

CJ03
10 years ago

Imagine his obscene counting stats if he actually had a good team supporting him

JimboMember since 2016
10 years ago
Reply to  CJ03

He’s actually on pace to have very good counting stats this year.

JeonghunKim
10 years ago
Reply to  CJ03

Pujols isnt enough….

BubbaMember since 2016
10 years ago

FG’s depth charts have him finishing with 9.7 WAR, actually. Still not 10 *Yawn*

AnonMember since 2020
10 years ago

Was looking at the leaderboard recently and it occurred to me that the only players currently in the top 30 that are likely to maintain (or exceed) their current production are Trout, Cabrera, Harper and Goldschmidt. There are certainly others that MIGHT keep up a hot early season but those 4 are the only ones that you look at and say, “That looks about right”.

WARrior
10 years ago

Any day now, he will be the fWAR leader over the time period from 2009 – present. He just barely trails Miggy now. Didn’t play, of course, in 2009 or 2010, and very little, and mostly poorly, in 2011.

He seems to be combining the best of 2013–when he had a career low K rate and a career high BB rate, a career high OBP, and close to a career high BA–with the 35-40 HR power he’s had the past two seasons.

halidonhill
10 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

Yep. It’s fun seeing a developing hitter of his caliber learning at the big league level.

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
10 years ago

I honestly think we need more articles so we don’t just begin to take him for granted. We are in a time where, statistically, we are witnessing one of the greatest players ever in a sport that has been around 145 years and had almost 19,000 players.

Mahoney
10 years ago

Thing is, you could set up a “TroutGraphs” section of this page, put together a new tidbit about Trout every day, and I bet you’d never run out of interesting stuff. You would just have to keep away from the “another season, another 9-10 WAR (yawwwwn)” type stuff.

paulkrugman
10 years ago
Reply to  Mahoney

Here’s one. In between Marlon Byrd’s two PED suspensions, Mike Trout has had 38.8 WAR, most in the majors.

Mahoney
10 years ago
Reply to  paulkrugman

Trout had almost 5 WAR during Byrd’s initial 50-day suspension.

WARrior
10 years ago

WAR leaders at end of May (three site average):

Trout 3.25
Machado 3.24
Fowler 2.77
Altuve 2.75
Zobrist 2.72
Bogaerts 2.62
Arenado 2.59
Cano 2.55
Murphy 2.49
Ozuna 2.40

Best hitters in May (wRC+)
Bradley, Jr. 213
Ozuna 210
Ortiz 206
Zobrist 203
Murphy 192
Trout 191
Seager 186
Cano 184
Pearce 183
Cabrera 179

The Ghost of Johnny Dickshot
10 years ago
Reply to  WARrior

Is that Corey or Kyle Seager?

FrancoeursteinMember since 2020
10 years ago

Corey

'Tungsten Arm" O'Doyle
10 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

+1 for the user name.

WARrior
10 years ago
Reply to  Francoeurstein

No, it’s Kyle. In case it wasn’t clear, the WAR list is season-to-date, the wRC+ list was just for the month of May.

wildcard09
10 years ago

In-season Trout update…
August Fagerstrom…
What have you done to Jeff Sullivan?

Jeff Sullivan Salmon Feast
10 years ago
Reply to  wildcard09
wildcard09
10 years ago

Oh I’ve always known about the Jeff Sullivan Salmon Feast, and am also a loyal Banknotariate.

I also always knew that August was secretly plotting Jeff’s demise so he could overtake his position. I just didn’t know it would happen so soon. RIP Jeff, Fangraphs Audio won’t be the same.

dtpollittMember since 2016
10 years ago

Good god when we will see his final form.

Hurtlocker
10 years ago

I’m glad the comparisons to Harper have stopped, Harper would have to replicate last season 4-5 more times to be compared in my view.
Fun fact, Willie Mays averaged 9.6 WAR per year over 12 consecutive years.

Hurtlocker
10 years ago
Reply to  Hurtlocker

Babe Ruth average 10.05 WAR over 14 consecutive seasons.

paulkrugman
10 years ago
Reply to  Hurtlocker

Yuniesky Betancourt averaged -1.02 WAR over 5 consecutive seasons.

CCSAGE
10 years ago

The final sentence from that Dave Cameron article in April: “…by this summer, we might have to acknowledge that this is now Bryce Harper’s game, and Mike Trout is the one trying to play catch up.” Harper was absolutely locked in all of last year and carried it over to the beginning of this year, which is extraordinary. But Trout lives his life in a state of locked in-ness that is almost without peer. His swing is so short that he can easily adjust. He has lost half a step, but he is still blazing fast with little effort. He never gets hurt. He’s a true leader and commands respect in the clubhouse. The dude shits Tiffany cuff-links every morning. Harper, conversely, has a long swing, is a max-effort runner, is injury-prone, and his attitude makes him a divisive presence. I will concede that Harper’s beard is in the 99th percentile while Trout has about 5 total whiskers on his chin, but Harper < Trout in every other meaningful category.

halidonhill
10 years ago
Reply to  CCSAGE

Funny stuff. It is still Trout’s world by a hair but it has nothing to do with any of the stuff you’re talking about. Harper doesn’t have a long swing. That’s laughable. Dude sweats at max effort because he hustles all the damn time. Who gives a crap about his attitude as long as he’s giving max effort all the time on the field?

Shirtless Bartolo Colon
10 years ago
Reply to  CCSAGE

Shitting Tiffany cuff-links? Imagine how good he’d be with better eating habits.

London Yank
10 years ago
Reply to  CCSAGE

Trout needs a .130 BABIP advantage just to equal Harper’s OBP. Harper’s BABIP is currently .100 below his career average. How long do you think that will last?

David PalardyMember since 2022
10 years ago

One of my favorite “Effectively Wild” bits is that you know that stats are beginning to stabilize when you look and see Mike Trout at the top of the leaderboards.

Snoth
10 years ago

Can someone explain to me how Trout has the 3rd highest wRC+ but only the 8th highest wOBA? Is Angel stadium really that much of a pitcher’s park? It doesn’t seem like that would account for the discrepancy …

halidonhill
10 years ago
Reply to  Snoth

Oakland, Seattle, and Minute Maid are all playing as neutral or pitcher’s parks as well this year. Arlington is the only really hitter friendly park in that division.

If you go back to last year’s stats then 12/16 AL parks played as pitcher’s parks and some of them pretty severely.

Dave42
10 years ago

There are exactly two players since 1900 with career WAR in the top 500 all-time position players and fewer than 10 seasons – McCutchen (8th season) and Trout (6th season). If Trout does finish with another 6 or so WAR this year, he’ll likely move into the top 200 all-time. At age 25.

Parenthetically, Ted Williams put up 11.0, 11.6, missed three years fighting in WWII and then put up 11.8 and 10.5. He finished 38 WAR behind Ruth for #1 all-time. He was 19.9 behind Mays for 3rd.

clance
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

In 1951 Williams also put up 7.1 WAR while in 1954 he put up 8.4. In the two years in the middle he only played 43 games because he was fighting in a war again. If he didn’t miss almost 5 seasons he would likely be the all time WAR leader by a not to small margin.

Dave42
10 years ago
Reply to  clance

And the awesome thing about Williams is that he flew 39 combat missions in Korea, choosing not to be a PR guy like most ballplayers (who did at least serve).

clance
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

And he’d likely still be a great player today unlike many who in all liklihood benefitted massively from a smaller talent pool. When I looked into his service record I saw that he still holds a navy student record in reflexes, coordination and reaction time – skills that obviously translate very well to baseball. The guy was and still would be a freak. His athleticism might not be up to modern standards but as a pure hitter he would potentially still be unparalleled.

ChippersJonesing
10 years ago
Reply to  Dave42

Man, he’s cool.

david k
10 years ago

Regarding trout’s declining infield hits total: a lot of times, an infield hit comes from hitting the ball weakly, in the right spot. Perhaps one cause of his infield hit total being low is that he has less of those slow rollers off the bat? And if that’s the case, that shouldn’t be a negative for him.

jmsdean477
10 years ago

Its not that we have forgotten him, its more that its hard to be excited about a player, even one that awesome, when he’s on a team and franchise that so obviously don’t deserve him…

Hmmbug
10 years ago

Wait. Harper managed to have a 115 wRC+ with a .207 batting average?

Mahoney
10 years ago

From the time he was the second-grade wizard kid until now, Mike Trout has had the 35th most wins above replacement among MLB position players:

http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.aspx?pos=all&stats=bat&lg=all&qual=y&type=8&season=2016&month=0&season1=1999&ind=0&team=&rost=&age=&filter=&players=&page=2_30

Greg SimonsMember since 2016
10 years ago

Mike Trout is good. Very good even.

clance
10 years ago
Reply to  Greg Simons

Yeah he is definitely above average