Why the Pirates Always Limp to the Finish

We can fairly well predict that the Pirates are not going to make the playoffs this year, for the 20th straight season. They still have a fighting chance at their first winning record in two decades, as they stand at 74-74 after Game 148, but that looked almost like a lock before their 11-17 August and their 4-13 September.

So why do the Pirates always suck in September? If you look at the team’s win totals, month by month, from 1993-2011 — their record 19 straight losing seasons, you see a remarkable pattern emerge:

1993-2011          
March/April W 191 March-August W 874
  L 244   L 1103
  % .439   % .442
May W 233 August-Sept W 419
  L 294   L 622
  % .442   % .402
June W 227
  L 283
  % .445
July W 223
  L 282
  % .442
August W 210
  L 316
  % .399
September/October W 209
  L 306
  % .406

The 1994-1995 strike accounts for the fact that there are fewer games played in April and September than in the other months. But you can see: for the last two decades, the Pirates have been a much, much different team from March through July than in August, September, and October — which is to say, before and after the trade deadline.

Before the trade deadline, from 1993-2011, the Pirates were a .442 team — that’s 72-90 over a full year, 9 games under .500, not good but not catastrophically awful. However, after the trade deadline, they were a .402 team — that’s 65-97 over a full year. The difference is crucial: it measures the difference between a team that is a hot streak away from a winning season for most of the year, and a team that never has any hope.

It’s not a complete surprise to see that the Pirates have been worse, historically, after the trade deadline. After all, they have often been sellers at the deadline, getting rid of Aramis Ramirez and Brian Giles in 2003, Kris Benson in 2004, Oliver Perez in 2006, Jason Bay and Xavier Nady in 2008, Ian Snell and Jack Wilson and Adam LaRoche and Nate McLouth in 2009, and so on.

But they weren’t always sellers, and actually have made their share of misguided win-now trades. They traded Mike Gonzalez for Adam LaRoche in 2007, and a few days later traded Rajai Davis for a completely washed up Matt Morris; they brought in Derrek Lee in 2011; and in 2012, they got Chad Qualls, Travis Snider, Gaby Sanchez, and Wandy Rodriguez before the deadline. Obviously, none of it worked. It isn’t obvious that their habit of getting rid of stars at the deadline is the sole explanation for their late-season ineptitude.

A better reason is almost certainly their catastrophically bad draft history. It’s not just that the Pirates don’t have much to call up in September. It’s that the Pirates have hardly ever had any organizational depth to speak of, so as the season wears on and injuries mount, they inevitably lack good replacements.

Case in point: In 1992, the Pirates had a great year: they won 96 games, finished in first place in the NL East, and drafted Jason Kendall. It was the last time that they finished above .500 for two whole decades, as we know. It was also the last time that they drafted an above-average player for a whole decade.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

After Kendall, the team did not draft a single good player until Paul Maholm in 2003. (Andrew McCutchen came in 2005.) The only major leaguers of note that the team drafted in between Kendall in 1992 and Maholm in 2003 were Kris Benson, drafted in 1996, whose career was almost exactly average, and Sean Burnett, who’s a decent enough setup man. And they signed Aramis Ramirez as an amateur free agent in 1994. That’s it.

When current general manager Neal Huntington got his job in late 2007, he inherited a team whose earth had been scorched in both the majors and the minors for 20 years, thanks to the strategic short-sightedness and talent-blindness of GMs Cam Bonifay and Dave Littlefield. Huntington immediately moved to address his team’s depth, and those fire sale trades in 2008 and 2009 were his doing. Some of the players that he brought in have paid dividends, like Derrek Lee, or, at least for the first half of 2012, James McDonald. Others have not, like Brandon Moss, Craig Hansen, and Andy LaRoche.

This year isn’t the first time that the Pirates have come tantalizingly close to a good season only to come up disappointingly short. You only have to remember back to 2011 for another example of that. But it’s remarkable how robust the pattern has been over the past 20 years: the Pirates play decently for a while, and then they fall off a cliff. Rinse and repeat.

Of course, with the strides that Pedro Alvarez has made, and the tantalizing flashes of ace potential shown by McDonald, and Neil Walker’s solid comptency at the keystone, there are the makings of a baseball team here, especially considering that their center fielder is a perennial MVP candidate. But it’s hard to say Wait ‘Til Next Year. To quote Battlestar Galactica, all of this has happened before.





Alex is a writer for The Hardball Times.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Doug Gray
13 years ago

72-90 is 18 games under .500 because it would take them 18 wins to get back to .500.

Daniel
13 years ago
Reply to  Doug Gray

18 more wins would put them at 90-72…

Justin
13 years ago
Reply to  Daniel

Doug is right. Just Google some examples. Wins minus losses or vice versa is how it’s always done.

Doug Dirt
13 years ago
Reply to  Doug Gray

I bet the Pirates trade for Billy Hamilton because they are STUPID!

Billy Hamilton is terrible and would fit in perfectly with their talentless team.

Doug Gray
13 years ago
Reply to  Doug Dirt

What the crap are you talking about?

Jason
13 years ago
Reply to  Doug Dirt

You’re stupid. And that is an observation, not an insult.

PiratesHurdles
13 years ago

“the Pirates play decently for a while, and then they fall off a cliff.”

This just isn’t true, they have been buried at the break many times. Generally they have played bad baseball all year. Its really just the last two years that fit. The previous annual trade deadline sell off explains most of your combo data.

Your article offers no potential answers for the current collapse. Let me help you in 2011 it was a collapse of SP, in 2012 its been a perfect storm of inconsistent hitting, SP, and bullpen. Clint Hurdle ain’t helping.

PiratesHurdles
13 years ago
Reply to  Alex Remington

This team just doesn’t fit the profile you’re describing. These are the records at the AS break since 2000.

2000 – 34-44
2001 – 38-49
2002 – 33-53
2003 – 38-48
2004 – 39-47
2005 – 39-48
2006 – 30-60
2007 – 40-48
2008 – 44-50
2009 – 38-50
2010 – 30-58

Their season was done by July in all cases sans maybe 2008 when they sold everyone off. They may play slightly worse over the 18 years in teh second half, but a late collapse is novel to 2011 and 2012. You have to be up before you can collapse.

PiratesHurdles
13 years ago

BTW, this is the latest in a season that the Pirates have been .500 since 1992. They are usually buried well below by now with the exception of 1997 and 1999.

PiratesHurdles
13 years ago
Reply to  Alex Remington

I agree, they are in much better shape under Huntington. I’m not sure he’s the guy to close the deal, but at least you can see a scenario where they can win in the near future,

Bill
13 years ago
Reply to  Alex Remington

It is poor reporting to compare Huntington to previous Pirates gm’s. Compare him to other gm’s around baseball and he won’t grade out very well. However, in fairness the minor league philosophy of handling prospects is absurd. Everyone in charge of development needs to go. It is’t like Huntington has not drafted talented players, they just haven’t been developed.

Paul
13 years ago
Reply to  PiratesHurdles

@PiratesHurdles: I was very skeptical of the Wandy deal and other very minor deals at the deadline where they punted on picking up an impact player and instead just got a few guys in exchange for prospects they won’t miss. As Alex implies, while this season’s growth is nice, do you think they should have been more aggressive? I’m thinking the Brewers would have peed on themselves if offered Hanson to headline the Grienke deal instead of settling for Segura, for example.

maguro
13 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Yeah, wouldn’t it have been great to sell the farm for Greinke and THEN collapse and get passed by the Brewers.

kick me in the GO NATS
13 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Wandy is an above average pitcher. I liked that deal.

Paul
13 years ago
Reply to  Paul

Both Wandy and Grienke have pitched in 11 games for their new teams. bWAR counts are .3 to 1.0, respectively. I can understand if you’re argument is that they just were not a playoff team to begin with. But then why bother adding anybody at all? It calls into question whether or not they will actually ever go for it. We have the same issue in Kansas City, where management keeps talking about some crescendo of talent reaching the big club at some point. It just usually doesn’t work that way, and often times when it does life gets int he way and your perfectly planned Utopiateam is undone and you’re back to rebuilding.

chri521
13 years ago

Alex can you compare / contrast this cliff diving with my favorite masochistic fandom choice? I saw SNY put up a stat saying that the Mets have been equally as bad as the Buccos the past few years in the second half.

Preston
13 years ago

It’s pretty simple. They have been in rebuild mode for a long time. So they often trade away their better players. Even if they don’t do a fire sale, they usually deal one of their back end relievers or start benching veterans in order to see what they have in younger players.
In the case of years when they haven’t struggled and then fallen off it’s a case of them playing over their head. Nobody picked this team to be good at the beginning of the year. The only team that has less talent are the Astros, and really that’s entirely because of Andrew Mccutchen.
Although I actually have some hope that the Buccos are turning it around. Cole and Taillon are top flight prospects, Mccutchen, Marte, and Alvarez could be a good start to building a lineup and management seems to be making smarter moves lately.

mickeyg13Member since 2020
13 years ago

The Mike Gonzalez for Adam LaRoche trade was not at deadline deal; it occurred during the offseason prior to 2007. Also, your Mike Gonzalez link points to a Catcher born in 1890 🙂

I don’t have data to support this, but I imagine some of the post-deadline dropoff is not *directly* related to lack of organizational depth but rather to being more likely to give playing time to rookies that would still be in the minors if the team were in contention. This might be splitting hairs though, as better depth would have meant that class of players would have been more talented.

Bob
13 years ago

A few minor quibbles. A Mike Gonzalez trade for Adam LaRoche isn’t a bad deal when you’re trading a decent closer for an average 1B. Trading for Travis Snider and Wandy Rodriguez shouldn’t be classified as a misguided win-now trade. Rodriguez and Snider have value for this year and in the future.

Also, Kris Benson may be league average, but he was pretty equivalent to Paul Maholm in quality. For an overall #1 pick he may not have been great and was a bit of a no brainer draft pick, but that’s a heck of a lot better than Tim Beckham or Bryan Bulling*sh!#*.

Oh, and no credit for signing and trading for Joey Bats?

TKay
13 years ago
Reply to  Bob

Yeah, we drafted Joey Bats! And Bronson Arroyo was probably a good pick too.

But looking at the drafts, the idea that the Bucs didn’t draft a single good player from ’94-’03 is shockingly true, if you just amend it to draft, sign, and get production out of that player.

Super depressing.

Jason
13 years ago

So the hypothesis is that they don’t have as much organizational depth as other teams performing at a .440 winning % level?

Seems pretty weak, but I guess you could test this by looking at the distribution of WAR across their roster. If they are more top heavy in WAR than a typical terrible team than maybe they would be more prone to a September swoon then other similarly situated terrible teams. then again… who cares?

Grld Chz
13 years ago

Chad Quals really??? In the 8th inning, really??? I mean Grilli’s arm isn’t gonna fall off if he goes another inning Clint!!! He’s been a real idiot lately in the decision making department! Pinch run for Fat Rod after he makes it to 3rd base?? Chase could have scored from first if dumb ass Clint would have pinch run him from 1st base!! Did Clint undergo a brain transplant sometime in late July?? Just asking? Maybe he’s got John russels brilliant mind now?? Dunno, just askin?? Nuttings so tight you couldn’t squeeze a fart out of him! Please, I beg u, please sell this team to someone else!!! Mark Cuban anyone? He likes to spend money!

Steve
13 years ago
Reply to  Grld Chz

Grilli has been awful in the 2nd half if you haven’t noticed. ERA well over 4 and a 1.36 WHIP last I looked. But I do agree that Qualls was an awful choice. I’d pick anyone else

Sir Spicious
13 years ago
Reply to  Grld Chz

I would have thought that a Fangraphs reader would be smart enough to know that Nutting has been nothing resembling cheap. He has spent more than anyone in baseball on the draft since becoming the managing partner. There are other expenses to a MLB team than major league payroll. Mark Cuban doesn’t want to buy the Pirates. Not yesterday, not today, not tomorrow.

I get the argument that Huntington hasn’t done enough in the draft with the money he’s been given. But the “Nutting is cheap” idea is a crutch that dumb yinzers continue to use with no basis in reality.

Ruki Motomiya
13 years ago

I just hope they finish over .500. I want to see them actually do that once. I think it’d be cool.

It’s too bad they won’t make the playoffs, though…could you imagine a Pirates/Orioles WS?

Antonio Bananas
13 years ago
Reply to  Ruki Motomiya

Until they collapsed, I wanted to see Nats/Pirates NLCS and Athletics/Orioles ALCS. Bud Selig kills himself.

Baltar
13 years ago

… and it will all happen again.

SomeGuy
13 years ago

I thought they limped because of their peg legs……

Bob
13 years ago

In the two years before NH took over the Pirates, they posted negative run differentials of -106 and -122.

Then, in his first four years, they were:

2008 -149
2009 -132
2010 -279
2011 -102

So twelve months ago, it’s fair to say that Neal’s stewardship had been basically a disaster. He’d taken over a bad team and kept them bad — except for 2010, when they should’ve been relegated to AAA.

Maybe this year’s .500 team is part of an improvement trend. Or maybe it’s a blip. I honestly can’t tell.

But the only GM’s I would definitely want running my team *less* than Huntington, are Dayton Moore and Jack Z.

Paul
13 years ago
Reply to  Bob

I agree with this. He should have been absolutely charred for the decision to draft the one unsignable player in a draft that featured new rules that pushed more on the fence signable guys to signable than ever. Also, doing that knowing that unlike in the past, if you don’t sign that guy you don’t get to allocate the money elsewhere. If they had a dynamite farm system with depth up and down, maybe he could slide. But their farm system is very top heavy and overall still pretty bad. Just a horrible, terrible, no good decision. A fireable offense in my book.

Givejonadollar
13 years ago

I’m not a Pirates fan by any stretch, but they have the makings of a pretty good team starting to come together. While the article acknowledges the 20 years of failure………I did not really see a concrete reason other than weak drafts.

This team has better pieces than I’ve seen in years, of which, should help them in trades as well. I imagine they will beef up and be more than competitive in 2013.

gonfalon
13 years ago

Nice article, but I’d like to add one point. The 2003 trade of Aramis Ramirez and Kenny Lofton to the Cubs was a MLB-mandated salary dump:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=5493589

Then-Pirates GM Dave Littlefield compounded the disaster by getting jack sh!t in return, but rules are rules, and it’s not like Bud Selig can intervene with secret loans to teams. The same thing happened a few years back, when the Mets were short on cash and forced to trade 3B David Wright and his salary.