The Remarkably Unclutch Oakland A’s

At the very bottom of the 2015 standings, you’ll find two unsurprising teams tied for the worst record in baseball: the Phillies and the Brewers. The Brewers have been a disaster, already firing their manager, and the Phillies are paying the piper for years of making moves to maximize short-term returns. But do you know which team is only a half game ahead of that pair of disasters? Well, you probably do if you clicked on this post, given that I put them in the subject, but yes, it’s the Oakland A’s, who currently stand at 12-21 after getting swept in Seattle over the weekend.

The A’s were expected to take a step back this year after trading away Josh Donaldson and a bunch of his friends, but while they spent the first half of the winter getting younger, they also went out and landed Ben Zobrist, Billy Butler, and Tyler Clippard, showing that they weren’t just punting on 2015. While they churned half the roster in an effort to set themselves up better for the future, this was supposed to be a team that could at least hang around the Wild Card race and maybe make another run at a division title if things broke right. Instead, after weeks of baseball, the A’s are 8.5 games behind the Astros, and their playoff odds have shrunk from 33% on Opening Day to 15% today.

While it’s still early enough to turn things around, there is a point at which the hole gets too big to dig out of, especially because other teams will likely start calling about impending free agents like Zobrist, Clippard, and Scott Kazmir in the next month or so. If they don’t start winning pretty soon, you can bet that Billy Beane won’t hesitate to make another flurry of trades to bring in even more young talent, so the A’s clock is ticking, and it won’t be too long before they have to decide if they’re in it for 2015 or not. Despite their miserable start to the season, I wouldn’t suggest giving up on this A’s team just quite yet.

If you’ve read FanGraphs for a while, you know we generally don’t suggest evaluating a team’s quality by their in-season Win-Loss Record. Especially earlier in the year, there can be an awful lot of non-predictive variables driving the results, and a team’s record isn’t always indicative of what they should expect going forward. In this specific case, no team has a larger gap between their underlying performances their current win-loss record than the 12-21 A’s.

One of the best tools we have here on the site is our BaseRuns Standings page, which gives an expected Win-Loss record (and expected runs scored/allowed rates) for every team based on the context-neutral values of every play they’ve been involved in throughout the season. BaseRuns is the best public estimator of how well a team’s individual events should add up to runs and wins, but if teams end up clustering their hits (or hits allowed) together, they can produce results that are quite a bit different than what a context-neutral estimator would suggest.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.

2015-May-BaseRun-Differential

No team is diverging from their BaseRuns expectations at anything near the rate that the A’s are. Instead of being 12-21, BaseRuns actually expects that the A’s would be 18-15 at this point, a .539 expected winning percentage that would have them as the 11th best team in baseball. No other team in baseball is underperforming their BaseRuns record by more than three wins, and since 2002, no team has underperformed their BaseRuns by more than 11 wins over the course of a full season. At their current pace, the A’s would win 54 fewer games than their BaseRuns total, which, you know, isn’t going to happen.

As is usually the case when teams have massive divergences like this, the first place to look is the bullpen, and the A’s bullpen has been a disaster. Their bullpen’s 5.16 ERA is 28th in MLB, as is their 4.44 FIP; their 4.50 xFIP ranks 30th. But again, those are context-neutral numbers, and BaseRuns is including those struggles in the calculations. But it’s context-specific performances where the A’s pitching staff has really let them down, and this is how you play pretty well overall but still lose 21 of 33 games.

2015-May-wOBA-Leverage

In low leverage situations, the A’s have allowed a .266 wOBA, third best in baseball. In high leverage situations, they’ve allowed a .411 wOBA, second worst* in baseball. For context, their pitchers have turned opposing hitters into Alexi Amarista in situations where the battle isn’t that close, but allowed them to morph into Mike Trout when the game is on the line. And that is why the A’s are 1-10 in one run contests this year.

* The Indians have allowed a .511 wOBA in high leverage situations. .511! Babe Ruth’s career wOBA was .513.

Bullpen disasters are frustrating to watch, leading to things like trading for Edward Mujica because trying anything else feels like a better option than sticking with the status quo. But as hard as it is to watch lead after lead get squandered, the good news is that this kind of thing is about as random as baseball gets. For instance, note which team is just a few spots down from the A’s on the chart above; the Baltimore Orioles. Those same Baltimore Orioles that have been defying the BaseRuns gods for years by putting up some of the great clutch bullpen performances in baseball history.

When we’ve suggested previously that the Orioles deviations from their BaseRuns expected record could be explained by simple random variation, Baltimore fans have argued strenuously that we were missing out on the fact that Buck Showalter has just figured out how to game the system, and the model just doesn’t apply in that case. And yet, with Showalter still in charge and a bullpen of mostly the same guys who have been fantastic the last few years, the Orioles relievers have been highly un-clutch this year, leading the O’s to underperform their own expected record by three wins.

This shouldn’t be a huge surprise, given the fact that pretty much every study of the issue has shown that there’s little or no predictive value in winning one-run games. This is the kind of thing that has a big impact on the standings, but shouldn’t really drive much of our expectation about what will happen going forward. As frustrating as it is to watch your team lose by one run over and over, it’s a lot easier to flip the switch and start winning those games than it is to stop getting blown out.

So, realistically, we should still think the A’s are mostly what we thought they were going into the season; a slightly better than average team, a fringe contender who needs a few things to go right to make a strong run. Unfortunately, they’re now starting the race at a significant disadvantage, and even with Zobrist and Doolittle returning at some point int he not-too-distant future, it won’t be easy for the A’s to climb back in the race. They’re going to need their bullpen to stop blowing leads now, and they’re probably going to need to get some clutch performances to win more games than we’d expect going forward if they’re going to run down the four teams ahead of them in their own division.

But the Astros probably aren’t a great team, even if they’ve played really well for the first month and change of the season. The Mariners and Angels look pretty flawed as well, and the Rangers probably aren’t a serious contender, so if there’s a division to try and make a big comeback in, it’s the AL West. But it’s starting to get late for the A’s, and they can’t wait much longer to turn this around. Beyond just getting Doolittle back, their bullpen is going to have to get things figured out in a hurry, because the rest of the team is playing well enough to keep the A’s in the race. If the A’s relievers don’t hold up their end of the bargain pretty soon, a decent team could find themselves as mid-season sellers.





Dave is the Managing Editor of FanGraphs.

75 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Nick
11 years ago

Hmm… 1 month from Baltimore is > 3 years? Good to know.

MikeMember since 2018
11 years ago
Reply to  Nick

This would be a great comment if you are trolling, but it’s even better because you are serious.

pinch
11 years ago
Reply to  Nick

least surprising thing about this comment section is that it’s all about the paragraph on the orioles instead of the entire piece on the a’s

Jargon
11 years ago
Reply to  pinch

Becasue Cameron put the bait out there?

Joshua Northey
11 years ago
Reply to  Nick

“I rolled 6 sixes in a row, I must be blessed by the gods.”

“Keep rolling you are not blessed by the gods.”

“Darn I rolled a 1”

“See I told you”

“You going to believe my 1 roll or the 6 before that?”

:rolleyes:

AF
11 years ago
Reply to  Joshua Northey

Beg the question much?

Oliver
11 years ago
Reply to  AF

Please sir, may I have another question?

CrazyPants
11 years ago

It seems a little weird to be using the O’s here to be making a point since the premise sort of strengthens the argument that these O’s are better than what their small sample fueled record would indicate at the moment. We all know that sample sizes matter and random variation as explanation subsides the longer the time range and bigger the sample size, so if the O’s have outplayed the predictors for 3+ years then maybe the predictors are flawed in some way.

The Humber Games
11 years ago
Reply to  CrazyPants

Saying that a statistic has little predictive value doesn’t mean that you can’t have a chain of seasons where the statistic is the same. It just means you can’t reliably have a chain of seasons where the statistic is the same. At least as far as one run games go, when you fixate on three seasons in a row you’re basically doing the same things as saying “hey, something’s up with this coin” when it comes up tails three times in a row.

One run game success is up there with turnover differential in football and really high % three point shooting in basketball – it’s really fun when you go on a run, and easy to convince yourself that you’ve got a secret formula behind it, but given enough time it’ll flatten out.

CrazyPants
11 years ago

I’ve never been one to claim that Showalter found some secret formula to beat the projections or whatever. I just think that the projections might be underrating run prevention somewhere along the way. As it is, defense is hard to quantify, and somewhere over the past 15 years or so, the game has shifted to a battle of bullpens to some degree. There are almost no good teams that don’t have really solid and deep bullpens. But there are good teams that don’t hit for power… this is the shifting paradigm that the O’s, Giants and Royals might be leading…

Tigers
11 years ago
Reply to  CrazyPants

Bro, don’t be so assertive about Bullpens.

We all know
11 years ago
Reply to  CrazyPants

Dave likes the narrative too much to wait longer than one month

Robert Hombre
11 years ago

Just as 3 seasons > 330 seasons.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/the-orioles-and-accepting-random-variation/

Is Dave being intentionally abrasive? Yes. But it’s quite a succulent bit of trolling.

highrent
11 years ago
Reply to  Robert Hombre

He just enjoys seeing the Orioles rage especially given some of the offseason remarks. He might as well take satisfaction they are always going to disagree with him until he start writing love letters to the orioles. The Angels had a much compelling case but in the years since Scoiscia has lost the magic and can’t seem to the do the same. There really isn’t a sustainable magic bullet. Having a great bench or bullpen can possibly put you in a better place to over-perform in high leverage situations but there is no way to turn into a skill. As said this is from years of research not just done by fangraphs but many analysts before them. 1 run victories are basically coin flips.

Jason B
11 years ago

the Rangers probably aren’t a serious contender

Fixed!

YouNeverKnow
11 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

Nick Martinez, resurgent Colby Lewis, and the offense stays healthy. “You Never Know”

ReuschelCakes
11 years ago
Reply to  Jason B

“But Sometimes You DO Actually Know…”

marechal
11 years ago

But, but… Dave told me Mujica was like a clone of Uehara.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/red-sox-clone-koji-uehara-sort-of/

Deelron
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

Even the URL couches it with a “sort of.”

chuckb
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

You left out the words “a year and a half ago.”

Convenient.

Drew
11 years ago
Reply to  chuckb

Also left out the part where that’s not written by Dave

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Drew

But other than misstating the title, misattributing the author, and misrepresenting the timeline, you are spot on!

DoffBHoya
11 years ago

The Cubs are third on this list. I know this is a long-term rebuild, but if they are really supposed to contend in 2015 then they have to fix their bullpen

HappyFunBall
11 years ago
Reply to  DoffBHoya

Well they’re not REALLY supposed to contend. They’re got some definite bright points tho, and it’s easy to look at good young hitters and talk yourself into the team outperforming projections. The unsexy underbelly of a leaky bullpen is where those dreams often go to die.

The good news is that a bullpen is probably the easiest thing to upgrade, both in season and off.

DNA+
11 years ago

To be fair to the Orioles, it is possible that their formula for beating base runs works (strong bullpen), just that they have not performed to their formula so far. What you want to see is if there is a correlation between the strength of the bullpens and the difference between actual record and base runs record. To test this I ran the correlation between Bullpen WAR and the difference in real and base runs wins. There was no correlation (Pearsons r=0.139, t=0.744, df=28, p=0.463). This supports Dave’s position.

DNA+
11 years ago
Reply to  DNA+

Fooling around with the data, while it is loaded into R, there is a better negative correlation between bullpen ERA and the difference between real and base runs records (r=-0.358, p=0.052).

More interesting yet, there is a surprisingly strong correlation between saves and the difference between real and base runs record (r = 0.573, p=0.001). I guess saves is capturing doing well in close games, so perhaps these are just two different ways of saying the same thing.

Hank
11 years ago
Reply to  DNA+

Speculation on my part… I think a “stars and scrubs” bullpen may be more likely to outproduce run differentials. In close games and you have the stars focused on high leverage spots and the scrubs turning 1-2 run deficits into 5 run deficits. This might be more likely to produce a team outperforming their run differential.

Could have sworn I saw someone do a study on this to suggest it’s a possible loose correlation, but I can’t find the link. In theory a really good and deep bullpen should both secure 1 run leads and maintain 1 run deficits so you won’t necessarily see gains in close games.

Not sure if what you did could be tested by some sort of bullpen variance metric, but that might be interesting to check out.

marechal
11 years ago

The randomness argument would be stronger if the high- vs low-leverage situations were distributed randomly amongst relievers. In reality, relievers that pitch high-leverage situations tend to be different than those that pitch in low-leverage situations. Unless you are controlling for reliever usage, the data tells me that most of the variation comes from poor performance of relievers used in high-leverage situations (e.g. Tyler Clippard), and not necessarily from chance.

Taylor
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

Yeah, this is my thought too. I accept that players are not clutch compared to themselves, but I’m not so sure that teams cannot be clutch or unclutch because their roster is different in high and low leverage situations (their bullpen).

In other words, if you say that clutch does not exist at the team level, and bullpens are a driver of clutch, then are you not saying that bullpens are completely unpredictable ex-ante?

marechal
11 years ago
Reply to  Taylor

Absolutely. Looking at the opposide extreme of the table, the difference in talent between the Betances/Miller pair and the Shreve/Rogers/Martin/Carpenter quartet is probably more responsible for the Yankees ranking last than simple luck.

Taylor
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

Exactly, and certainly one would be correct in predicting ex-ante that Betances/Miller would be better than the rest of their ‘pen. So perhaps their is a correlation between difference from BaseRuns record and the difference in bullpen quality within each team. I would be interesting in seeing this!

pinch
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

I think you’re right, but I think Betances/Miller are the exception rather than the rule. High-leverage situations might be weighted toward the later innings, but not overwhelmingly, and for most bullpens, the gap between their best and worst relievers (and, correspondingly, pitching quality in the 8th/9th vs. 1st-7th) is much smaller than it is for the Yankees.

highrent
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

Not all of those are weighted to the lower innings. Its actually more if those good pitchers are capable of being pulled into any threatening situation. Being able to put in Kelvin herrera in the 6th inning was an incredible advantage. A lot of runs get scored after the 3 time through the order for a starter and if you could put 1 war plus relievers in to pitch the next half of the game I suspect you’d have a pretty clear advantage. The Orioles and few bullpens have that ability just having great 8th and 9th guys doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll always be clutch. Games can be lost in the 5th and 6th.

wally
11 years ago
Reply to  marechal

The problem hasn’t really been Clippard, its been everyone else. And that failure has been distributed pretty evenly throughout the bullpen (except maybe Scribner and Clippard).

And usually its relievers that come in in relatively low leverage situations (say 6th-7th inning up by 3), but create a high leverage situation then blow it. Basically, they pitch OK-ish, get a couple outs, but put runners on, then in the 2-out situation with runners on and the game on the line, they seem to blow it every time. The blown games aren’t of the variety of losing a tie game in 9th. Though that does happen, the bullpen problems are mostly in the 6-8th inning and wasting a lead. Leading to a already down by 1 or 2 situation in the 9th.

Kevin Gregg
11 years ago
Reply to  wally

What on earth are you talking about?

Reade King
11 years ago
Reply to  Kevin Gregg

He is responding to marechal’s armchair analysis of the A’s disastrous bullpen performance in high-leverage situations, where he mentions Clippard as an example of poor performance in high level situations.
wally is correct about what has transpired to make the A’s bullpen perform so horribly. Clippard has barely been used. The relievers who have gotten themselves into high-leverage situations have either failed on their own or been replaced by another reliever who blows the game. Usually in the middle innings.

marechal
11 years ago
Reply to  Kevin Gregg

I’m actually sitting on an ottoman.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Kevin Gregg

But which one? Famous Turkish magician Zati Sungur? He’s been dead since 1984. (Which would allow time for the requisite stiffening to support your body weight.)

Wally
11 years ago
Reply to  Kevin Gregg

Thanks Reade King. I didn’t think there was much there to not get. But happy to discuss with you further Kevin, just more specific questions can help.

Elmer Fuld
11 years ago

Hmmm, I guess Dave might be onto something.
OTOH, we could simply note that Jokeland just can’t catch the damn ball and go from there…?

Forrest Gumption
11 years ago

A’s also are playing just plain bad defense too, the errors being made arent the “it wouldnt be an error if he didnt have such good range” variety, they are the “stone glove, regrettable footwork, holy crap do your job” kind.

Also trading Brandon Moss for Joey Wendle and then watching Wendle be pretty great at AAA while Eric Sogard stinks up the joint on a daily basis is troubling. Yeah Zobrist is coming back in two weeks, but Sogard is not an everyday player and Lawrie at 2B isn’t working either.

YouNeverKnow
11 years ago

I noticed Wendle is doing well, and it’s not like he’s 20 years old or anything and needs to learn much more still. I don’t know how Wendle will be as a pro, but Moss was electric “IN THE CLUTCH” IN THE PLAYOFFS. I can’t see that trade being good for the A’s other than the age variation as in Wendle is younger. Moss is only 31 and in his prime. $$$ is a factor in that trade too.

Forrest Gumption
11 years ago
Reply to  YouNeverKnow

Moss isn’t that great (he was one of the worst defensive 1Bs) and has short career ahead of him due to his hip injuries. Ike Davis is outhitting him right now so he’s not missed.

Playoffs? Pipe dream right now but like the article maintains, its actually impossible to be this bad for too long and there are no standout teams in the AL West. A 10 game winning streak before the ASG puts them in prime contention.

One Mississippi
11 years ago

The Astros.

Forrest Gumption
11 years ago

The Astros have a team OPS+ of 99 and were handed wins on a plate via the A’s crummy bullpen. They aren’t real.

Forrest Gumption
11 years ago

It still is mind blowing that a Edward Mujica trade comes before a Rafael Soriano signing. How is Soriano still a FA???

YouNeverKnow
11 years ago

I’ve been wondering the same thing. There are teams that don’t have great closer situations and he’s got experience closing. Go figure. Maybe he’s asking for way too much $$$ is my guess. If he lowers his salary expectations he would sign, otherwise, he might not pitch this year in MLB.

vivalajeter
11 years ago

Didn’t Soriano work out for a few teams last month? Maybe he just doesn’t have the same stuff he had in the past. He certainly sucked at the end of last year.

AF
11 years ago

If performance in one-run games is random chance, why is “the first place to look” the “bullpen”?

Max
11 years ago
Reply to  AF

Because we are explaining wide variation from a pattern typically observed. So the first place we would look is the place most typically subject to random chance.

Although Cleveland turning average hitters into Babe Ruth may be beyond random chance…

AF
11 years ago
Reply to  Max

I don’t understand the answer. Why are relievers more subject to random chance than other players?

Max
11 years ago
Reply to  AF

I can only answer it as I understand it:

Small sample size as to each player in the bullpen, wide variations from most players on a year-to-year basis (think how quickly some relievers emerge and how quickly some decline).

maqman
11 years ago

For many years it seems that the A’s have exceeded expectations more than any other team, maybe this season is just their regression to the mean. Billy Beane is the best but he’s still human

VORP is too nerdy
11 years ago
Reply to  maqman

I don’t think regression works the way you think it does.

Forrest Gumption
11 years ago
Reply to  maqman

So many people have been waiting to say that. He’s already made mistakes with the Holliday trade and subsequently punting the 07-11 years. This bullpen and defense shouldn’t be this bad. He cant control on field performance.

Kevin
11 years ago
Reply to  maqman

That’s not what “regression to the mean” means. It means that over-performance returns to some average-level performance after enough iterations, not because the over-performance will be followed by under-performance to ‘cancel things out’, but rather because we expect average-level performance to ensue for long enough to cancel out that over-performance.

So, while Oakland has won six fewer games than we’d expect (using BaseRuns), it doesn’t mean that they’re about to go on a stretch where they’ll win six more games than BaseRuns would predict. Regression to the mean implies that Oakland will, over the course of the rest of the season, win the same number of games as BaseRuns will predict, leaving them six games below expectations at the end of the season.

Similarly, it’s unwise to expect that Baltimore will suddenly underperform BaseRuns, or lose an excessive amount of one-run games this year. An unusually negative outcome for Baltimore is exactly as unlikely as an unusually positive outcome was last year (or the last three years). Rather, we should expect them to win a normal amount of one-run games, and have their BaseRuns prediction match their outcome (which would probably leave them short of the playoffs).

NatsLady
11 years ago
Reply to  Kevin

OK, I’ve never understood this argument. Let’s take the Mets. They went on a tear and built up a 15-5 record and an 8-game lead over the Nats. So folks said, “those ten wins are IN THE BANK. All they have to do is play .500 ball and they’re a lock for 88-90 wins and a wild card. And they are about a .500 team on talent.”

But that’s not the way it works. Playing .500 ball doesn’t man you win one, lose one for 142 games. The Mets hadn’t gone through any losing streak, and barely met any good teams. When the talent evaluators said the Mets were a .500 team, they meant OVER THE SEASON, a season which can include 10-game winning streaks and long periods of sub-.500 ball, just like a player with a long track record will likely end the season with his career stats (barring injury or age-decline).

April is the cruelest month.

colin
11 years ago
Reply to  NatsLady

Strength of schedule is a valid argument, but pointing out that teams can have a 10-game winning streak and still go .500 is definitely a misunderstanding of regression to the mean. If you take a group of teams that have .500 level rosters and let them each play a season, they will finish with a wide distribution of records, some above .500 and some below. Even if their April performance does absolutely nothing to change your opinion about the Mets true talent level, they have definitely increased their odds of being one of the teams that finishes at the top of the distribution.

ReuschelCakes
11 years ago
Reply to  maqman

agreed on the regression to the mean comments…

Also, I seem to recall that the A’s consistently UNDERPERFORM BaseRuns… I can’t seem to navigate the site to get there now, but I know in 2014 that was the case.

PackBob
11 years ago

The FIP and xFIP points to a bell pen that has been bad. Robinson Cano has been bad with 0.1 WAR so far, which would be 0.5 WAR over a full season, same as Eric Sogard. I expect Cano to improve, Sogard not so much. Is the Athletics’ bull pen Cano or Sogard?

What kind of games are the one run losses? The article implies that it’s the bullpen giving up late leads. Is there any difference for one run games between those that start tied in the 9th inning and those with one team leading by a run going into the 9th?

Forrest Gumption
11 years ago
Reply to  PackBob

Considering Doolittle has yet to appear for the A’s, and Pomeranz being in the rotation instead of the pen, I’d lean to the pen being more Cano than Sogard. When Doolittle returns, with Scribner and Fernando Rodriguez keeping being good and Clippard not being terrible, its going to get better.

Reade King
11 years ago
Reply to  PackBob

Dave’s correct analysis of the A’s bullpen perfomance in high leverage vs low leverage situations is spot on.

His conclusion that this is what causes a 1-10 record in 1-run games is facile. And not entirely accurate, either. A fair number of the 1-run games were lost in the middle innings when a couple of high leverage situations resulted in a large lead for the opponent, and then in the late innings the A’s mounted a comeback that got them within 1 run or to a tie but were unable to pull ahead. Obviously, every extra inning game has a lot of high leverage situations, and predictably, the A’s have lost all 4 of them by 1-run margins.

However, the bullpen has also turned several close games with the A’s leading into larger than 1-run losses, too.

Milton Friedman
11 years ago

I agree. It’s better to understand reality through theoretical models, not through the things we have observed that undermine those models.

Helladrcimal
11 years ago

This is the downside of “just good enough to make the post-season” roster construction.

brendan
11 years ago
Reply to  Helladrcimal

I think that it was a concious strategy, i.e. either we compete for the wildcard or sell off at the trade deadline, and be satisfied with either outcome — I’m hoping kazmir brings back something nice, maybe from STL?

mtsw
11 years ago

It’s kinda weird the Orioles fans who insisted 2014’s team was good are still being treated like they’re crazy because the 2012 Orioles were legitimately lucky.

The 2014 Orioles put up a huge positive run differential and were repeatedly written off as a lucky aberration because they outplayed projection systems (even at the tail end of the season, FG predicted the 96 win +100 run O’s as an under .500 team RoS) Orioles fans were angry about that because a really good team was dismissed due to not aligning with projection systems. I don’t know any O’s fan who’d argue the 2012 team with the negative run differential was better than the 2014 team or the (actually somewhat unlucky) 2013 team.

The whole argument about the Orioles has been that all of those teams (including 2012 who were true talent below average when they were projected to be atrocious) dramatically outplayed the PRESEASON projections even using advanced measures like BaseRuns, and Pythagorean W/L not that their W/L somehow represents their true talent level better than other measures.

Second biggest douchebag
11 years ago

You win. Everything is about the Orioles.

Pastajoe
11 years ago

Given their run production, the A’s should have a better record. But stats aside and having gone to quite a few games, I think this team is lifeless and its defense is awful. This team, more than any other A’s lineup in recent years, looks like a collection of flawed spare parts. It’s like Gertrude Stein said of Oakland many years ago, there is no there there. I’d say Beane has collected a large assortment of chronic underachievers just happy to be collecting an MLB salary. This is a 65-75 win team.

third base line
11 years ago
Reply to  Pastajoe

Huh, I have an almost opposite assessement of the team based on my own in-game observations – the offense has scratched and clawed to win games I’ve been to only to watch the bullpen be a seive. I suppose it goes to show that subjective observations are meaningless. And, yeah, it doesn’t look like a good team w/ that record, though at times I think otherwise.

Matt
11 years ago

What can the relievers do to fix it? I mean, what are they actually doing wrong? Is it something mental, or just an unprecedented stroke of bad luck?

Gertrude Stein
11 years ago

Billy is an overrated fop who makes stupid trades just to get his name in the press. If he worked for any other team, he would have been fired a decade ago, when he gave away Tim Hudson for a fistful of magic beanes.

Philip Christy
11 years ago
Reply to  Gertrude Stein

I never realized Gertrude Stein was so dense.

Jason B
11 years ago
Reply to  Philip Christy

Her density is about 985 kg/m3, give or take a little.

Adam
11 years ago

And it continues tonight…team is absolutely snakebit.

Mike13
11 years ago

The division in the AL West can go in almost any direction as of now

here goes nothing
11 years ago

lol of course after reading this i wake up to “Sandoval walks off in 11th, Sox down A’s 4-3”

:(((((((

it’s a really intriguing team and i’m so surprised it’s been the bullpen, not the rotation, that’s fallen apart.

BJ Rassam
11 years ago

The A’s are off to a very rough start to the 2015 season.

That Guy
11 years ago

Two days later and we’re still a top article here.

Congrats Billy Beane. You won May again. I know you’re reading this.