The Royals Have Sunk to the Bottom

The A’s have spent most of this season as the laughingstocks of the majors. Stripped of their most talented players as ownership focused on sneaking out of Oakland, they carried a .207 winning percentage into June, putting them on pace to beat the 1962 Mets’ modern-day record of 120 losses. With their recent seven-game winning streak — remarkably timed to coincide with the Nevada state senate debating and finally approving a bill to build a stadium on the Las Vegas strip, all but sealing their fate in Oakland — they’ve edged above what we might call the Throneberry Line. All the while, the Royals, losers of nine straight and 12 out of their last 13, have actually slipped below them in terms of winning percentage, .265 (18–50) to .267 (19–52).
This actually isn’t the first time the Royals have had a worse record than the A’s this year; Oakland won its first and fourth games of the season, whereas Kansas City lost its first and started 1–6. It took until April 8 for the Royals (3–6) to move ahead of the A’s (2–6). Since then, the two teams have spent a few days with the same record and winning percentage — on April 21 (4–16, .200), April 24 (5–18, .217) and May 6 (8–26, .235) — but the Royals had never been worse than the A’s until this week:
Where the plight of the A’s has captured national attention, that of the Royals has largely evaded it. That’s largely because the team’s ownership isn’t in the process of trying to relocate the franchise, which isn’t to say it doesn’t want a new stadium. But entering Friday, Kansas City was in a virtual tie for the sixth-worst winning percentage of any team since 1901 and is playing at a pace that would produce a 43–119 record, which would tie the 2003 Tigers for the second-highest total of losses in a season, behind only the 1962 Mets’ 120. Even if the Royals can’t catch the Mets, they’ll have to play much better ball to avoid surpassing the franchise record of 106 losses, set in 2005.
Tm | Year | W | L | W-L% |
---|---|---|---|---|
Athletics | 1916 | 36 | 117 | .235 |
Braves | 1935 | 38 | 115 | .248 |
Mets | 1962 | 40 | 120 | .250 |
Senators | 1904 | 38 | 113 | .252 |
Athletics | 1919 | 36 | 104 | .257 |
Tigers | 2003 | 43 | 119 | .265 |
Royals | 2023 | 18 | 50 | .265 |
Athletics | 2023 | 19 | 52 | .267 |
Pirates | 1952 | 42 | 112 | .273 |
Senators | 1909 | 42 | 110 | .276 |
Though they lost 97 games last year and haven’t posted even a .500 record since 2016, the Royals weren’t supposed to be this bad, even while running the majors’ sixth-lowest payroll ($92 million) via a roster that currently contains more homegrown players (14 out of 26) than all but one team (Houston, with 16). Certainly, the hope was that by turning the page on the Dayton Moore/Mike Matheny tandem via new general manager JJ Picollo and manager Matt Quatraro, they’d show signs of improvement — particularly on the pitching side, where they’ve been haunted by developmental failures — and get their nucleus of young players to progress.
Indeed, this is a comparatively young squad. Weighted by plate appearances, the Royals have the youngest hitters in the majors, with an average age of 26.7 years, 0.2 younger than the Guardians and Rays. And while they have just one rookie playing regularly (Maikel Garcia), four of their players placed on our Top 100 Prospects list in 2022: shortstop Bobby Witt Jr. (no. 2), right fielder/catcher MJ Melendez (no. 21), outfielder/first baseman Nick Pratto (no. 47), and first baseman Vinnie Pasquantino (no. 111); Garcia made the midseason update list at no. 66.
There’s an argument to be made that the Royals are actually not that bad, at least based on their Pythagorean and BaseRuns records:
Team | W | L | Win% | Run Df | Pyth W | Pyth L | Pyth Win% | Dif | Base W | Base L | Base Win% | Dif |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Royals | 18 | 50 | .265 | -107 | 23 | 45 | .341 | -5 | 27 | 41 | .401 | -9 |
Athletics | 19 | 52 | .267 | -196 | 18 | 53 | .250 | +1 | 21 | 50 | .290 | -2 |
Their run differential is just over half that of the A’s, they’re the better team by almost 100 points in terms of Pythagenpat winning percentage (based on runs scored and runs allowed), and they’re over 100 points better in terms of BaseRuns projected runs scored and allowed. That they’re five wins short of their projected total via Pythagenpat and nine short via BaseRuns doesn’t exactly say great things about them, though it does suggest that some positive regression might help them draw closer their projected record.
Very little is going right for the Royals on either side of the ball, though. Both their 3.75 runs scored per game and 5.32 runs allowed per game rank 28th in the majors, ahead of the A’s and one other team (Tigers in scoring, Rockies in run prevention). Their 83 wRC+ is last in the AL, and their .295 on-base percentage is second-to-last; their .233 batting average and .381 slugging percentage are among the AL’s half-dozen worst.
Individually, just four Royals regulars have hit for a wRC+ of 100 or better, but on Wednesday they learned that one of them would miss the remainder of the season, as Pasquantino, who landed on the injured list with right shoulder instability on Saturday, will undergo surgery to repair a torn labrum. The 25-year-old first baseman, one of the team’s most popular players, was hitting a modest .247/.324/.437 (106 wRC+) with nine homers, a notable step down from last year’s .295/.383/.450 (137 wRC+) showing in 72 games after debuting on June 28. He missed 14 games late last year with the same problem; an MRI taken on Monday showed that the tear in his labrum had become too substantial to manage without surgery.
“We made an educated decision [after the imaging] of what will be the best outcome not only for me but for the organization moving forward,” Pasquantino told reporters. “The way we look at it is this is the best way to ensure… having a long and successful career here.”
Pasquantino’s shoulder woes help to explain his offensive decline. His average exit velocity fell from 91.2 mph to 89.3 mph, with his barrel rate, hard hit rate, xBA, and xSLG all dropping as well. In his absence, the plan is for the 24-year-old Pratto to get the bulk of the first base duty. After a dismal showing as a rookie (.184/.271/.386, 82 wRC+) and a three-week stint at Triple-A Omaha in April, Pratto has been one of the bright spots with a team-high 118 wRC+ (.278/.362/.424), splitting his time between first base and the outfield corners. He hasn’t fully unleashed his 70-grade raw power, as his four homers, .146 ISO, and 106.8 mph maximum exit velocity illustrate, and his 33.3% strikeout rate is a significant concern, but the Royals have far bigger problems.
The two other regulars producing at a league-average clip or better are outfielder Edward Olivares (.257/.319/.446, 107 wRC+) and catcher Salvador Perez (.274/.310/.506, 116 wRC+). With the recent DFAs of Hunter Dozier (who refused assignment to Triple-A and was released) and Jackie Bradley Jr., the 33-year-old Perez is the lineup’s only regular over 27, and also the last man standing from the 2014–15 glory days. As for the rest of the lineup, which now generally features players in their ages 23–27 seasons, the Royals have turned over most of the spots relative to last year, not always with positive results:
Pos | 2022 | Age | PA | WAR | 2023 | Age | PA | WAR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | Salvador Perez | 32 | 473 | 0.5 | Salvador Perez | 33 | 258 | 0.9 |
1B | Carlos Santana | 36 | 212 | 0.3 | Vinnie Pasquantino | 25 | 260 | 0.2 |
2B | Nicky Lopez | 27 | 480 | 1.2 | Michael Massey | 25 | 204 | 0.2 |
3B | Emmanuel Rivera | 26 | 211 | 0.0 | Maikel Garcia | 23 | 137 | 1.0 |
SS | Bobby Witt Jr. | 22 | 632 | 2.3 | Bobby Witt Jr. | 23 | 291 | 1.5 |
LF | Andrew Benintendi | 27 | 390 | 2.0 | Edward Olivares | 27 | 192 | 0.6 |
CF | Michael A. Taylor | 31 | 456 | 1.5 | Kyle Isbel | 26 | 96 | 0.1 |
RF | Kyle Isbel | 25 | 278 | 0.7 | MJ Melendez | 24 | 261 | -0.7 |
DH | Vinnie Pasquantino | 24 | 298 | 1.5 | Franmil Reyes | 27 | 65 | -0.6 |
MJ Melendez | 23 | 534 | -0.2 | Nick Pratto | 24 | 174 | 0.3 | |
Hunter Dozier | 30 | 500 | -1.0 | Jackie Bradley Jr. | 33 | 113 | -0.6 | |
Whit Merrifield | 33 | 420 | 0.7 | Nicky Lopez | 28 | 103 | 0.6 | |
Michael Massey | 24 | 194 | 0.6 | Hunter Dozier | 31 | 91 | -0.3 | |
Nick Pratto | 23 | 182 | -0.4 | Matt Duffy | 32 | 85 | 0.3 | |
Edward Olivares | 26 | 174 | 0.3 | Freddy Fermin | 28 | 63 | 0.1 | |
Ryan O’Hearn | 28 | 145 | -0.3 | Nate Eaton | 26 | 55 | -0.8 |
The midseason trades of Benintendi, Merrifield, and Santana, as well as various promotions and demotions, make this a less clear-cut exercise than the table suggests. Each cell is based on which player has the most innings at the position, save for DH, which has the top player unassigned to any of the fielding positions; the ones not in the lineup round out the 16 most-used players in terms of plate appearances. Even illustrating this year’s lineup obscures more recent changes, such as Drew Waters taking over center field in late May in the absence of Isbel (who suffered a Grade 2 left hamstring strain in early May and began a rehab assignment on Tuesday) and the abysmal production of Bradley (.133/.188/.210, 4 wRC+ in 113 PA), but as you can see, there aren’t a lot of happy stories.
The other regular besides Perez whose job has carried over is Witt, who’s hitting just .244/.282/.425 (89 wRC+), down from last year’s .254/.294/.428 (99 wRC+). He’s chasing over 36% of pitches for the second year in a row and walking less than 5% of the time, though to be fair his 90.3 mph exit velocity, 12.5% barrel rate and 43.1% hard-hit rate all represent substantial improvements. He’s 24 points shy of his xBA, 97 shy of his xSLG and 54 shy of his xwOBA; in both of those last two categories, his gap is the majors’ seventh-largest. On the other side of the ball, his defense has improved markedly, frrm -7 to +5 in terms of RAA and -18 to -3 in DRS, though as MLB.com’s Mike Petriello noted, this is more about his not messing up easy plays than it is making great ones.
Strong defense, good contact, and good plate discipline are propping up Garcia’s WAR, but his 92 wRC+ and lack of power make him a less-than-ideal corner player. Melendez split the catching duties with Perez last year, but his defense was so shaky (-18 DRS, -15.7 framing runs in just 578.1 innings) that he’s been reduced to a third catcher while regularly playing right field. He has impressive contact numbers (93.6 mph average exit velo, 12% barrel rate, 52.4% hard-hit rate) but is also striking out 29.1% of the time and has had some bad luck; his .355 SLG is 77 points short of his xSLG.
If playing the kids isn’t yielding good results, at least you can see the rationale for exploring what they can do, though another veteran or two in the lineup wouldn’t have hurt. Where things are really breaking down for the Royals is the pitching. The rotation, which ranked just 26th in our preseason Positional Power Rankings, has the AL’s third-worst FIP (4.77) and strikeout rate (19.2%) and second-worst ERA (5.47) and strikeout-walk differential (10.8%). Zack Greinke may be a future Hall of Famer, a mad scientist, and an endless font of wisdom at age 39, but his 4.65 ERA and 4.36 FIP suggest he doesn’t have a whole lot left in the tank. At least his 18.5% strikeout rate is up six points from last year, giving him a reasonable shot at reaching 3,000 by the end of the season (he needs 64 more).
Greinke isn’t the problem, though. Jordan Lyles, who’s somehow 0–11 with a 6.89 ERA and 5.82 FIP, and Brady Singer, who has a 6.58 ERA and 4.63 FIP, are just getting crushed on a regular basis. The team signed the 32-year-old Lyles to a two-year, $17 million deal on the heels of a serviceable season with the Orioles (179 innings, 4.42 ERA, 4.40 FIP), but the quality of just about all of his pitches has eroded, according to Stuff+, with his overall score dropping from 88 to 84. His strikeout-walk differential has fallen from 11.9% to 9.1%, and his homer rate has soared from 1.31 per nine to 2.03. He’s given up five or more runs in eight of his 14 starts, four or more in 12 of 14, and has yet to record a single quality start. The Royals are 0–14 in his outings, yet one writer for the Kansas City Star suggested that he might be some contender’s idea of a trade target.
The 26-year-old Singer, meanwhile, is coming off a breakout season in which he posted a 3.23 ERA and 3.58 FIP in 153.1 innings. He’s lost 1.4 mph off the average velocity of his sinker and 1.3 mph off his slider, and his overall Stuff+ score has declined from 97 to 89. Both his sinker and slider are getting hit harder, he’s been unable to develop a third pitch in which he has confidence (changeup or sweeper), and his strikeout rate is down while his walk and homer rates are up.
It doesn’t help that Brad Keller, Ryan Yarbrough, and Kris Bubic, all of whom were expected to help round out the rotation, are on the injured list, with Bubic done for the season due to Tommy John surgery. Keller has been out since mid-May due to a shoulder impingement but could be back by the end of the month; Yarbrough has been sidelined since suffering multiple nondisplaced fractures around his left eye after being hit by a batted ball on May 7 and won’t return until late July or August. With two slots in the rotation open behind the, uh, big three, lately the Royals have been rolling with rookie Daniel Lynch and a series of openers, which doesn’t work too well with a bullpen that owns a 4.85 ERA (second-to-last in the AL) and 4.10 FIP (ninth).
The relievers do at least miss bats; their 25.5% strikeout rate ranks sixth in the AL, but their 11.2% walk rate is the circuit’s second-highest. The standout is Aroldis Chapman, who’s trying to put his career back together after steering it into the ditch in New York. Not only did he pitch badly in 2022 (4.46 ERA, 4.57 FIP, -0.2 WAR), but he also lost his job as closer, missed three weeks due to a tattoo-induced infection in his leg, and skipped a mandatory workout before the Division Series. Signed to a one-year deal for $3.75 million plus incentives, he’s pitched mainly in the seventh or eighth inning in front of closer Scott Barlow and recovered his dominant form, posting a 2.70 ERA and 1.69 FIP with a 41.8% strikeout rate, his first time above 40% in this many innings since 2018. So long as he remains healthy, he should fetch something useful at the trade deadline, though his spotty reputation — which includes his 2016 suspension for violating the league’s domestic violence policy — could limit the return at least somewhat.
Last year, the Royals had a stockpile of veterans to deal at the deadline, not that they brought back anything better than a handful of 40/40+ FV types. Picollo has largely eschewed that approach to this year’s roster and recently shot down any notion of dealing Perez. Lopez, Olivares, and Barlow could be on the move, though they won’t yield any game-changing prospects. Lacking a single Top 100 prospect this year (!), they don’t have much imminent help on the horizon, so at best these Royals could be shuffling the deck chairs for awhile as they try to find a seating arrangement that avoids ignominy. That’s better than the fate of the A’s, but it’s not pretty.
Brooklyn-based Jay Jaffe is a senior writer for FanGraphs, the author of The Cooperstown Casebook (Thomas Dunne Books, 2017) and the creator of the JAWS (Jaffe WAR Score) metric for Hall of Fame analysis. He founded the Futility Infielder website (2001), was a columnist for Baseball Prospectus (2005-2012) and a contributing writer for Sports Illustrated (2012-2018). He has been a recurring guest on MLB Network and a member of the BBWAA since 2011, and a Hall of Fame voter since 2021. Follow him on BlueSky @jayjaffe.bsky.social.
Witt has me hoping pro baseball players are better at improving their plate approach/discipline and contact skills than basketball players are at improving their jump shooting. One might have all the physical tools in the world but being deficient in those areas makes it pretty tough to live up to the prospect hype
Witt has decreased his strikeout rate year over year, and it’s a pretty reasonable 20.6%. He isn’t drawing a lot of walks, but his .359 xWOBA suggests his biggest problem is bad luck, and is 4th best among shortstops. He’s got the 5th biggest gap between wOBA and xWOBA among qualified hitters. Wander Franco, for example, has a near identical .361 xWOBA, a .362 wOBA, and is running a 138 wRC+.
And he’s been worth 1.5 WAR anyway. The Royals have a lot of problems, but I don’t think he’s one of them.
I think I agree with you here on all the key points but if he could learn to take a walk it would be an enormous benefit for him. I don’t know how to teach that either but it would give him a solid offensive floor when the BABIP bounces go the wrong way.
The weird thing is he had no problem taking a walk in the minors. Now, sure its easier in the minors because pitchers just are not as good but it seems like the bigger change is he has started to just swing at everything in MLB.
The amount of times I have seen him swing at the first pitch he see’s is astounding.
Unfortunately it is his performance that is very definitely a big part of their problems. He simply HAD to be a 5+ WAR player for the Royals to begin their rebuild. While he isn’t carrying a negative WAR his failure, thus far, to be anything resembling a cornerstone has stopped their plan in its track.
That’s just wholly untrue. Only having a 3-4 win SS is very far down the list of problems for the Royals. Witt could be the next coming of Trout and the Royals would still be awful.
The rebuild has stopped in its tracks because literally not a single pitcher they drafted since 2018 has panned out. Most are not even MLB worthy and one (Lacy) looks like he has never even seen a baseball before.
Teams need great players and those that have that potential, and only a few do, have to be what they were projected to be for a team to thrive. Baseball is hard and I am not blaming Bobby Witt, Jr. for not yet coming up to the level of performance that was anticipated but if he had already been that player the Royals would be quite a bit better. There are lots of other reasons everything isn’t up to date in Kansas City but Bobby Witt not reaching his potential is certainly one of them.
I think that’s reasonable. The first comment read a lot more like blaming Witt, which is a thing bad franchises do — blame their best player(s) for their weaknesses
They shouldn’t have promoted him. All they did was to give away service time with no benefit. 166 minor league Ks in 661 ABs, with roughly a 2.6 K/W is pretty meh. He’d likely be a better player, with more service time left, had they given him some more minor league ABs.
He posted a 144 wRC+ at AA and a 142 wRC+ in AAA. Both years he had nearly 300 PA’s. Also had a BB% over 9 and K% around 23-24 in the minors. Both of which are more than respectable.
There wasnt much reason to keep him in the minors.
The reason not to promote him was to not give away service years when they weren’t competing.
He hit well in 2021, but it really wouldn’t have been some atrocity to have him play a full season at AAA last year.
They weren’t going to be competiting for years so if that’s your only argument it doesn’t hold much water.
Leaving BWJ in the minors to beat up on clearly inferior competition simply to save service time would have been a terrible development strategy.
A guy with a 142 wRC+ over nearly 300 PA’s (and who is named minor league player of the year) has no legitimate reason to stay in AAA. He has clearly shown he is above that level and needs to move on to further his development.
Kinda potato po-tot-o… I’m merely suggesting that not a lot of water needs to be held to suggest a couple hundred more PAs at AAA…
“They weren’t going to be competing for years….”
They are in, what, year eight of the rebuild?
Hindsight is always 20/20. There is never a guarantee when is the best time to bring up a top prospect. Ho looked ready and virtually everyone has been surprised to see him struggle as much as he has.
As long as BWJ plays above avg defense (which he is) and hits for power (which he has) he will be fine. He may not ever reach the lofty potential he had as a prospect but he will still be a 3-4 win SS which is nothing to sneeze at.
The far, far, FAR bigger issue is the pitching. Its a tire fire on top of a dumpster fire.
I mean, he’s only 23. He has kind of the Byron Buxton power/speed offensive game right now, which is pretty damn good if he can also stay on the field. Sure, you’d like to see better pitch selection, but if his results matched his xWOBA he’d be on pace for a 6-7 WAR season.
its not just Witt. The Royals offence might be the unluckiest thing I have ever seen. It seems like every other guy hits a screamer right at someone. Its uncanny.
And it doesnt appear to be just my eyes. They are 6th in Hard hit %, top 10 in exit velo and barrel % but basically tied for dead last in wOBA. .391 xwOBACON as team.
The stats back that up to a certain degree: Witt himself has 6 OAA on his batted balls: Statcast Outs Above Average Leaderboard | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com)— meaning when he hits the ball, fielders are fielding at +6 OAA level. The Royals, as a whole, are fourth in most OAA on their batted balls: Statcast Outs Above Average Leaderboard | baseballsavant.com (mlb.com), though it apparently pales in comparison to the Brewers, who appear to have broken a mirror by opening an umbrella underneath a ladder while stepping over a black cat.