The Silver Lining That Is Michael Conforto
This has been a forgettable season for the Mets.
With their playoff odds having been effectively reduced to 0%, with one of most promising staffs in the game decimated by injury, the club has recently raised something of a white flag by trading Jay Bruce and Neil Walker, though the season has felt like it’s been over for some time.
But there is one significant positive development for the club, and that’s the rebound of Michael Conforto, who not only has bounced back in a major way from his poor 2016 but also from his lull in June of this year.
Conforto ranks 12th in the majors in wRC+ (149). His ability to make improvement not only from season to season, but within a season, seems to speak well to a long-term ability to improve and extract performance from his considerable talent. Conforto’s quick and powerful left-handed swing has produced above-average exit velocities since his arrival, and he’s been among the top Statcast “barrel” producers.
Conforto started off the season on a tear, like he did in 2016, only to post a .206/.383/.317 slash line in June. Conforto never dug out from his slump a year ago. He has this season.
Eno documented and asked Conforto about his slump back in June.
Said Conforto:
“They’re [pitchers] definitely making me chase pitches outside of the zone,” Conforto said. “They want to start pitches in the zone and then have them fall out. Maybe they saw I was aggressive in the zone with fastballs, so they’re trying to use that.”
I updated and added to a table Eno employed in that referenced piece below. As we can see, opponents went lower and lower against Conforto leading into June:
| Month | Zone% | Low%* | O-Swing% | Swing% | FB% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April | 46.9 | 29.3 | 29.9 | 46.5 | 52.0 |
| May | 43.0 | 29.6 | 27.0 | 44.5 | 51.7 |
| June | 38.0 | 32.4 | 25.5 | 36.6 | 55.0 |
| July | 44.2 | 19.4 | 29.3 | 46.8 | 55.2 |
| August | 49.1 | 18.6 | 24.3 | 41.4 | 54.8 |
Consider some heat maps of Conforto’s isolated slugging per pitch in areas of the zone. His work from April and May:

In June, opponents stayed out of the zone — and were more often staying below the zone — and Conforto became less aggressive.

In July and August, opponents have retreated from targeting the lower portion, as he has proven he can do plenty of damage against pitches low in the zone and even below the zone.

And he has responded by crushing pitches all over the zone.
What happened?
Conforto didn’t lose his selectivity in June. He didn’t start suddenly expanding his zone, as we can see in the above table. He was not completely lost, or pressing. But he did perhaps become too passive. In June, he was swinging at 9.8% of pitches in the lower third and below the zone, according to Statcast. Since July 1, he’s been offering at 13.2%. (His average for the season is 14.4%.)
And he’s proven he can do damage to the low pitch. From Sunday’s action:
Wrote Eno back in late June:
He can still see where the zone is, he’s just gone into a defensive mode, swinging less, because they aren’t giving him much on the plate. When he can marry that selectivity with in-zone aggression a little better, he’ll be back on his feet. “I don’t think it’s anything big,” agreed the player. “Just a minor approach tweak and I’ll be back to doing what I do.”
There is a relationship between Conforto’s zone swing rate in 2015 and 2017 and his offensive production.

Perhaps Conforto is a hitter that needs to swing at a certain frequency to develop a level of comfort and feel. He’s back to being aggressive and not missing pitches, particularly fastballs in about every part of the strike zone.
He’s crushed fastballs all season, posting the sixth-most linear-weight runs against the pitch. The only players he trails? Paul Goldschmidt, Joey Votto, Bryce Harper, Charlie Blackmon, and a curiously productive Marwin Gonzalez. Decent company. And Conforto’s has played fewer games than everyone in that group but Gonzalez after the Mets and manager Terry Collins were hesitant to let Conforto’s performance dictate playing time in a crowded outfield earlier this season.
This season has been something of a disaster for the Mets, from Noah Syndergaard’s injury to Matt Harvey various troubles to the team’s general lack of performance. But Conforto’s emergence is important. He’s proven in 2017 that he’s an elite-level bat and a core player worth building around, a player you can even live with in center field in spurts (-4 DRS and a 1.0 UZR/150 games in 361 career innings there) — erasing some concerns about his defensive play.
The Mets have voids to fill and questions to answer, but with a return to health of their talented rotation, with Conforto in place and the promise of Amed Rosario, you can dream on 2018 if you’re a Mets fan or employee. Conforto is an important silver lining in the gray skies of 2017.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
I really feel for Mets fans. It’s been a tough rode for awhile, now, and the last 4 payments for the Madoff scandal are just starting this year, so we’ll see how much they spend.
As for Conforto, he made marked improvements against lefties this year, but is still a pretty mediocre .225/.303/.472 against them with a 35% K to 8% BB ratio.
Do you anticipate lots more improvement there? More selectivity? He’s shown some power against them. If not, do you see him being sat (or dropped in the order) against tough lefties going forward? Or do they just stick him out there against everyone and hope he improves a bit?
According to hit batted ball numbers, it doesn’t look particularly bad. I’d assume they would continue to let him face lefties http://www.fangraphs.com/statsplits.aspx?playerid=16376&position=OF&season=0&split=0.1
Conforto has the fifth highest wRC+ vs RHP in the Majors among LHB, min 200 PA- here are the top 15 and what they’ve done against LHP as LHB, min 70 PA:
155 Joey Votto
142 Charlie Blackmon
134 Daniel Murphy
122 Cody Bellinger
116 Freddie Freeman
108 Bryce Harper
106 Eric Hosmer
104 Michael Conforto
94 Travis Shaw
85 Yonder Alonso
76 Scooter Gennett
51 Jake Lamb
The median is a 107 wRC+ and Conforto is just a few points from that or essentially among his peers [LHB who kill RHP] he’s pretty typical against LHB
lol Joey Votto
People have covered the numbers on this already — my impression based on the eye test is that this is his biggest remaining area for improvement, and that I do expect him to improve his selectivity/strike-zone judgement against tough lefties in the next few years. He’s gone through a few stretches this year where you could see him struggling to lay off the breaking pitch at his feet. Sometimes the adjustment sticks and sometimes he’s regressed for a while, but it seems to me he’s working on laying off in a pretty focused way.
And Conforto’s has played fewer games than everyone in that group but Gonzalez after the Mets and manager Terry Collins were hesitant to let Conforto’s performance dictate playing time in a crowded outfield earlier this season.
i like the relatively subtle dig.
Hardly even a dig, it’s just a description. The Mets, flush with too many outfielders, spent this whole year trying to let Bruce and Granderson play their way into a trade, while the market collapsed under their feet. I don’t even think this was necessarily a strategic mistake, but it was definitely frustrating to watch.
Bruce and Granderson are also to blame for not completely sucking.
I think it is time to question the assumed talent of the rotation. It isn’t simply a matter of health. Their 3-5 have been horrendous when healthy this year.
Did someone really make grand pre-season claims about the talents of Chris Flexen or Rafael Montero? If so, I must’ve missed it.
I think Scott must have been referring to Harvey, Matz, and Wheeler. Those are the 3-5 in their rotation, but the problem is, when they’ve been pitching, have they really been “healthy”?
I honestly can’t figure out how people even mean to count 3, 4, and 5 among these guys. OK, let’s overthink this for a second.
I assume we’re talking about the pre-season expected starting rotation, so Syndergaard and deGrom are obviously 1 and 2.
Then 3 is probably Matz, I guess? Okay, Matz has struggled at times this year in ways that, at least, weren’t *obviously* driven by injury. This is probably where the claim is strongest, though I think there’s reason to suspect some underlying physical problems with him as well.
4 and 5 are some combination of Harvey and Wheeler — both returning from major surgery, obviously major health question marks around their ineffectiveness — and Lugo, who’s hit the DL repeatedly with shoulder problems that weren’t known before the season. Likely #7 Gsellman, too, has had unforeseeable health problems subtract from both his effectiveness and his playing time.
I just can’t see any way to substantiate the claim that the pre-season #3-5 starters have been ineffective for reasons unconnected to their health problems.
So again, long term who do you like Judge or Conforto?
Are they both going to be this generation’s version of “Willie, Mickey, and the Duke?”
Well, up until this season 99% of people would have picked schwarber over conforto (that was at least a reasonable comp, as their careers tracked very closely through the minors and their first seasons). I have Mets fan bias, but I would definitely take conforto at this point in time. Judge only has a half season (an ungodly, all time great half season) of elite production. Obviously any team in baseball would love to have either.