The Slow Decline of Alex Rodriguez

“Time waits for no man.” ~ Age-old aphorism or, alternatively, Jasper Fforde.

Getting old sucks. Regardless of what we do, we can’t stop our bodies from aging and slowing down. Muscles get weaker, it gets harder to get in shape, and our reflexes slowly fail us. Time cares nothing for our fond remembrances or youthful delusions; in the words of Joe Posnanski, age is undefeated.

It can be difficult enough to accept that we’re slowly getting older and losing our physical skills, but in some ways, it’s more painful to watch your favorite athletes age. These guys are supposed to be living gods: chiseled, millionaire athletes that are impervious to many of the daily cares and concerns that plague us. In my mind, that’s a large part of what gives sports their charm – they’re a form of escapism from the rest of the world. Athletes aren’t supposed to be like the rest of us; kids grow up believing that they exist in their own world, where their largest concern is the batting slump they’re in right now and their team’s position in the standings. We can watch the game at night and escape from our lives, being pulled into baseball’s universe instead.

Or at least, that’s what I think baseball starts out as when we’re young. When we grow up, we find out that this delusion isn’t true; baseball players are people, too, each with their own flaws, and some of them are jerks (or just plain stupid). And hey, baseball players get old, too… even the really, really good ones. But still, even though we realize this, I think everyone feels a punch in the gut when they watch one of their favorite player’s struggle toward the end of their career. We root for our favorites to stay eternally young, so that way we don’t have to be reminded that we’re getting old, too, and that we know what it feels like to fail.

But anyway, enough with that digression: I’m here to talk about the Yankees, and no, not Derek Jeter or Jorge Posada. While both players have dominated the tabloid headlines this year, there’s one player whose decline is hiding in the background: Alex Rodriguez.

I remember a time when Alex Rodriguez was the yearly consensus first pick in fantasy baseball. People would try to argue for other players depending on the year, but for a long stretch of time in the middle of his career, A-Rod was the best player in baseball. Sure, Barry Bonds was flashy for a while and Albert Pujols made lots of noise, too, but there’s no denying that Rodriguez was a superstar — a yearly threat to hit 45+ homeruns and take home the AL MVP award. His reign of dominance seemed unstoppable.

But slowly, over the last couple years we’ve seen A-Rod’s shadow begin to dim. He’s entering his mid-to-late 30s now, and there’s no denying that he’s no longer the player he used to be. He hasn’t cracked more than 35 homeruns since 2007, and his wOBA last season was a very human .363. He had to deal with a hip injury in 2009, and it took him a long time to fully recover from it. While he used to be the best player in the game, now it’s debatable if he’s even the best third baseman in the American League.

At 35 years old, Alex Rodriguez already has over 600 homeruns — 622 to be exact. Of all the other players with over 600 homeruns, Alex was the quickest one to reach this milestone; Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, Babe Ruth, and Ken Griffey Jr. had all just cracked 500 homeruns by this point in their careers, while Barry Bonds was only sitting around 450 homeruns. All these players weren’t just great home-run hitters — they were great late home-run hitters as well.

So what’s going to happen with Rodriguez? He’s hit 30 home runs each of the past few seasons, so it’s tempting to think his totals are only going to keep decreasing from here on out. But as we’ve seen in recent years with players like David Ortiz and Jim Thome, it can be very difficult to predict how sluggers are going to age, and many times they have more left in the tank than we give them credit for. Each player has a unique body, and everyone ages slightly differently when they get old: some drop off quickly due to injury or age, while others can linger on for many years.

The truly great players tend to age well. Ruth, Mays, Aaron, and Griffey averaged 180 home runs after they turned 35 years old, and none of them retired until after they turned 40. Hark Aaron lasted the longest of any of them, hitting 40 home runs at age 39, but even he didn’t have much left in the tank after that. If Rodriguez can do something similar to what these players did and hit 150 home runs over the rest of his career, he’d be able to pass Ruth, Aaron, and Bonds on the all-time list with relative ease.

But here’s the question that none of us knows the answer to: will Rodriguez follow the career path of all these other great sluggers? As tempting as it can be to say, “Of course!” we really have no way of knowing. The future is a crapshoot; at this point, the only thing we know for certain is that A-Rod is no longer the player he once was. He may still have a few seasons of greatness left in the tank — which I think is likely, considering how talented he is — but regardless, his time is numbered.

For all the fans of the Yankees, enjoy these next few seasons with A-Rod and soak up all the good memories. Because as we’ve seen with Jeter and Posada, things have a way of getting ugly eventually. Sooner or later, time always wins.





Piper was the editor-in-chief of DRaysBay and the keeper of the FanGraphs Library.

96 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Evan
12 years ago

Elephant in the room is how the juice affects A-Rods past performance and how influences his decline

descender
12 years ago
Reply to  Evan

No, not really.

ghjgtyre
12 years ago
Reply to  descender

for sale high quality n i k e shoes and other sporting goods.

FREE SHIPPING AND PAYPAL ACCEPT

best running shoes

http://www.overstockcn.net

A-rod's nuts
12 years ago

we disagree

B N
12 years ago

Well, firstly- there’s no need for accusations, A-Rod already admitted to juicing. It’s on the record.

Secondly, it’s possible that the decline we’ve already seen- from around 45 HR annually to around 30 HR annually is already partly a result of parting ways with steroids. So if he lost 5 due to age/playing time and 10 due to lack of the extra bump of juicing, that would actually project for better results I would think.

I mean, let’s think about rates for decline:
– Player A loses 10 HR annually over 3 years entirely due to aging. We then expect him to probably lose another 10 due to aging in the following 3 years.

-Player B loses 5 HR due to aging over 3 years, and drops 5 HR annually because they stop juicing. It’s not like they’re going to stop juicing twice, so we’re now expecting them to only lose another 5 HR over the next 3 years.

So Player B’s projected results might actually be better. While steroids might inflate the raw numbers, unless they have the long term effects that aging has, there’s no reason to think that power lost due to stopping juicing is going to continue to impact a player going forward.

So in my opinion, this means that the age component of A-Rod’s power decline might not actually be as drastic as it looks at first glance. He might have just lost a few extra due to lack of pharmaceutical support, meaning he’s actually lost less to age than one would generally assume.

A Reasonable Man
12 years ago

Totally agree. Glad to see we’re both rooting for a Mark McGwire HOF bid.

William
12 years ago

Except he juiced from 2001-2003, and A-rod was really, really, really, really good at baseball outside of those years as well.

DavidCEisen
12 years ago

Even if steroids didn’t influence his numbers (questionable), they could be having a negative effect on his body now. We don’t know exactly what he took and how he took it, so there are a lot more question marks with A-Rod than other past players.

west
12 years ago

Cheating is cheating

Kurt
12 years ago

Steve, I’m with you on this…

1) Until the end of the 1919 season it was legal to use a spitball, so we should kick out all the pitchers in the HoF before 1919, right?

2) All the players like John McGraw who used to hold guys by the belt to keep them from advancing on flyouts and who tripped runners in the baseline should be removed from the Hall of Fame as well right?

3) Back in the 30s, 40s, and 50s it was considered BAD to workout and lift weights, that it might cause you to get “injured”, so the only thing they did was jumping jacks, leap frog, and other non-sense. So when Ted Williams lifted weights, he had an unfair advantage over his peers, so we should remove him from the HoF, also, right?

4) Players should not take steroids because it gives them an unfair advantage, right? Yet if you can’t see the pitch out of the pitchers hand to judge movement, don’t have good hand-eye coordination to manipulate the movement of the bat, or lack strong depth perception to judge velocity, you can’t hit a baseball, but we forget about those requirements for the subject of juicing, right?

5) Following the line of thinking that steroids require an unfair advantage, let’s consider that to take steroids, you have to workout twice as long for it to be effective, the main benefit to steroids is recuperation of muscles between workouts and the ability to heal tears in the muscles caused from working out, but yet everyone acts like it’s just “given” to them and they all of a sudden hit a baseball a country mile, not true.

6) Do you know who first took steroids? It’s not possible that Willie Mays, Hank Aaron, George Brett, Roberto Clemente, etc. took steroids? They were all the size of Alfonzo Soriano and maybe even shorter than him in some cases, yet they hit 200 more homeruns than Soriano in a deadball era that saw pitchers like Bob Gibson pitch to an ERA in the low 1.00s. We don’t know when steroids started to occur, but if you think it started in the 90s than you are crazy. It’s been around a lot longer and testing didn’t even begin until 10 years ago in baseball.

7) Tell me what era of baseball didn’t have advantages over other eras and I’ll tell you a player that is in the HoF free from scrutiny. Let’s remember, the biggest part about being in the HoF is that the player was the best of his time period, and regardless of the conditions faced by players in his era, he was the one that best handled those conditions and was able to perform at a higher rate than other players from the same period of time.

8) If Steroids gives you more homeruns, than what about the bat speed gained where you swing so fast you pull the ball foul and if your bat speed was slower the ball would have cleared the fence in fair territory? What about the texas leaguer bloop hits that traveled out to the outfielder and lowered the average of the player. What about the constant injuries faced by steroid taking players? It can go a lot of ways.

9) Should players have to work out an exact amount of time per day in the gym and on the field in order to eliminate competitive advantage? I mean if Albert Pujols works out 5 hours a day and practices baseball 3 hours a day doing drills, shouldn’t he be considered a cheater for working out longer and practicing more than other players in the league? After all, the argument is about competitive advantage. The topic is not health, it is not about being a role model, it’s about “cheating” which means it’s about COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE… There are lots of ways to get competitive advantage, read the book by Derek Zumsteg “The Cheater’s Guide to Baseball”.

You can’t stand against one type of corruption and blindly turn away from another. To oppose one injustice is to oppose all injustice. All other forms of condemnation are just varying forms of hypocrisy.

A-Rod is a dochebag, but he’s not a cheater, he just lacks a conscience and for that he is a perfect fit for the Yankees. Cold, calculated, all business. I find it impossible to root for A-Rod, just like I find it impossible to root for the Yankees.

psychump
12 years ago

Ivan Rodriguez ?

Tom
12 years ago
Reply to  Evan

I have to totally agree with Evan. He was “great” while he was using illegal steroids and he was always a chump (for yelling and clapping while running behind a player to distract them, for trying to reach into a players glove to knock the ball out). He doesn’t play with respect and he doesn’t deserve respect.

Derek Cheater
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Does that make Jeter a chump too for faking a hit by pitch? In both cases, each player was doing something to help the team win. Not that I agree with their actions, I just hate how A-Rod is vilified, but Jeter is worshiped for similar on-field actions.

Jerome S.
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Haters gonna hate, all I can say.

Comments bashing Rodriguez were the most predictable thing I’ve seen today. It’s very easy for people to say these things from across the tubes of the internet. Since it’s no longer 2004, or even 2008, can we agree to not do pointless attacks on his character and instead to focus on his relative strikeout rate or BAbip? It just doesn’t seem right to do this.

Clutchtangibles
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Alex Rodriguez killed my dog and banged my wife. I hate him.

Everett
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Or what about Pedroia trying to knock a ball out? Was tha bush league, or was it gritty?

MikeD
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

I have it worse. A-Rod killed my wife and banged my dog.

Llewdor
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

The phantom double play makes Jeter a chump.

Jeter and A-Rod might be my two least favourite players, and it has nothing to do with how well they hit or whether they take PEDs.

kick me in the GO NATS
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

Derek Cheater… I will go on record for disliking them both! All cheating is wrong always, unless it was done with the intention to save lives.

mattinm
12 years ago
Reply to  Tom

So, if Jeter and A-Rod both give money to their charities proportional (or at least positively effected by the amount of money they have) to their income, and increased income (by adding to stats, showing “gamesmanship”, winning games, etc) was the sole outcome of all their cheating, it was okay?

Got it.