The Teams Most Affected By Their Remaining Schedules

Toward the beginning of the season, strength of schedule isn’t all that important. The divergences in it are minuscule, not enough games have been played to differentiate team strength, and so on. There are projections, yes, but that doesn’t mean the actual season is never volatile. But as spring gives way to summer, providing a more accurate overview of the season, schedule strength becomes a variable that matters. Fans love to imagine that a contender would have an easier shot at reaching the playoffs with a cushy schedule, and it’s true. What kind of team wouldn’t want an easier road ahead?
Normally, early August would be a tad late to write an article on remaining schedule strength. But due to how late the season started, we’re only now two-thirds of the way in. Also, we just recently wrapped up the trade deadline, which saw some teams bulk up and others slim down, often at the expense of each other. It’s these additions and subtractions that have shifted the playoff picture. All in all, it felt like an an appropriate time to sit down, crunch the numbers, and figure out whose schedules are forgiving, and which are less so.
How do we estimate the impact of a team’s remaining schedule? To answer that question, I’m going to borrow a technique from Jeff Sullivan. As it turns out, FanGraphs makes our job much easier. If you go over to the Projected Standings page, the rest-of-season winning percentages listed there do not take strength of schedule into account. Head onto the Playoff Odds page, however, and the rest-of-season winning percentages there do consider it. There’s a crucial difference here, one that we can use to our benefit.
What I did is subtract the projected standings winning percentages from the playoff odds winning percentages, then multiplied that by the remaining number of games for each team. Doing so gives us an estimated number of wins a team stands to lose or gain from schedule strength alone. Below is a graph showing the (dis)advantage every team had as of yesterday’s games:

The interpretation is simple. On one end, we have the Cardinals, who stand to gain a little more than 1.5 wins from their schedule. On the other end, we have the Marlins, who stand to lose nearly two from theirs. Besides the Cardinals, the Mariners, Astros, Cubs, and White Sox are expected to tack on at least one win, albeit with a margin of error. Meanwhile, the Diamondbacks, Orioles, Rockies, and Rays are in a similar predicament as the Marlins. Overall, the resulting numbers are distributed quite evenly, with good and bad teams spread out across the graph.
Now, no offense to the Marlins, but their loss of two games isn’t a high-stakes matter. That difference isn’t what might take them out of the playoff race; they were out of it months ago. But the Cardinals’ league-leading win advantage, so to speak, is very interesting news. After trailing the Brewers for most of the season, St. Louis now sits atop the NL Central with slightly better odds to make the playoffs and claim the division title. That’s thanks to a remaining schedule that projects to be the breeziest in baseball. It’s easy to see why: Besides a series each against the Dodgers and Padres, there’s a whole lot of Cubs, Nationals, and Reds in the Cardinals’ future.
The Mariners, who are looking to make the playoffs for the first time in an infamously long while, are also notable beneficiaries. It helps that the AL West is a pushover besides the Astros and themselves, but they’ve also held their own against teams like the Yankees and the Blue Jays. Based on that, you could argue that the Mariners deserve their upcoming slate. Seattle’s playoff odds are looking pretty at 80.8%, and barring an irredeemable collapse, the drought should come to an end.
One curious detail is that while the White Sox are third in win advantage from remaining schedule strength, the Twins are 17th, neither harmed nor aided by their own schedule. The AL Central contenders share similar rest-of-season slates, but there are subtle differences. For the White Sox, the only real super-team they must face from now on are the Astros in a four-game series. Meanwhile, not only must the Twins face the Astros thrice, but they’re also tasked with two games against the Dodgers (starting today!) and four games against the Yankees as the visiting team. And it probably doesn’t help that our projections view the Twins as about the White Sox’s equal despite the former’s activity at deadline. All that plausibly accounts for a gap of about a win: small but, given the circumstances, significant.
There aren’t many teams on the playoff bubble whose schedules ahead could be detrimental, but the Rays do demand a deeper look. Consider their recent matchup against the Tigers as a mere respite; from here on out, it’s going to be a relentless onslaught of divisional rivals and those danged Astros. What’s worse, there’s half a lineup and an entire bullpen on the Rays’ injured list, meaning they’ll have to plough through with compromises and second-best options. Heck, even their pitching coach is injured. It’s just been one of those seasons for the Rays. They’re still in good shape, mind you, but one can imagine how things could go south for them. It won’t only be because of those injuries; it might also be because of who they have to face.
Baseball schedules, for the most part, are designed to be balanced. But the imperfections that do exist tend to become apparent toward the end of the season. Not that they don’t exist in the beginning, but we pay less attention, mainly because we’re occupied with where our teams stand. As contenders emerge and playoff races come down to the wire, though, any semblance of an edge looks meaningful. Schedule strength can be an actual advantage. The benefit it provides is usually no greater than a win, but then again, most teams are lucky to squeeze out that much value from a single deadline acquisition. The Cardinals and Mariners might make the playoffs because of their remaining schedules. The Rays might do so in spite of theirs.
Statistics in this article are through games of August 8.
Justin is an undergraduate student at Washington University in St. Louis studying statistics and writing.
The Jays play the Orioles 14 more times. This chart would have been much more favorable to the Jays if the Orioles were the 40-60 team everyone expected instead of the team with an actual bright future that they’ve turned into today.
Yup, and the Orioles probably deserve mention alongside the Rays as a fringe contender with a difficult schedule in their own right – there really isn’t much of a talent gap between these injury-addled Rays and the Orioles and both are plausibly competing for one of the last couple wild card spots!
Amazing that they have nearly 1/3 of their remaining games against Baltimore…
An interesting additional analysis would be to compare current expected strength of schedule to a preseason version – how many games would the Jays be expected to gain if the Orioles played down to expectations.
It’s kind of weird to me to talk about the Twins and WhiteSox razor thin one game strength of schedule margin while being completely silent on the team that’s both half way between them in the standings and strength of schedule metric.
Not to mention that that team has 6 extra home games the rest of the season vs 0 for the White Sox and -4 for the Twins.
8 games left between the Twins and Cleveland. Could their seasons just come down to those games? Certainly seems like must-watch baseball.
Ditto. The Guardians are a very young, somewhat unstable team with some holes, but you can’t fault the talent or the motivation.
Seriously, they’re not just the youngest MLB club. For most of the season they were the youngest team even compared to AAA teams. Iirc they still are.
Baseball Reference shows that their hitters have an average age of 26.0 years. The team with the next youngest hitters are the Pirates with an average age of 26.6. For pitchers the Guadians have an average age of 26.5- Next youngest are the Tigers at 27.3
BTW, I’m not 100% sure how these numbers are calculated. For hitters, BR says its “Weighted by AD + Games Played”. Which is a bit strange. And for pitchers, it says it’s “Weighted by 3*GS+G+SV”. Which is even stranger.
Anyway, the difference between the Guardians and the 2nd place teams is big enough that I’m not sure it matters much.
Sorry, should say “Weighted by AB + Games Played” above.
Good article, excellent timing. Perfect, really. (right after the trade deadline you folks are a little busy)
One simple and effective way to improve it. Discount that final series some. Decent chance you’re playing a good team’s bench guys 1-2 games of it.
Bad news for the White Sox since they only play 500 ball against below 500 times.
Good news for the White Sox since they play .500 ball against above .500 teams too!
This is the most frustrating season of White Sox baseball since 1984.
Tim Anderson missing the stretch run hurts the White Sox a lot. That sucks, he’s fun to watch.
It would be interesting to do the complementary analysis: in retrospect, who has had the easiest and hardest schedules getting to this point? As you say, teams start the season with “minuscule” (your word) “divergences” (ditto) in impact of schedule strength. So are the teams benefiting from weak schedules from here on just reaping the benefits of playing the good ones early? Consider the Dodgers so far: 38 games against teams at .500 or better, 70 against the sub-.500 mob. Or the Yankees: 70 against winners, 40 against losers.
Clearly one must take into account the fact that opponents’ records are colored by the results against one’s own team. LAD being 42 games above .500 has something to do with a majority of the guys they defeat being below .500. But the NYY discrepancy works in exactly the “wrong” direction. Likewise the Twins, who appear to be getting screwed by scheduling despite their weak division. So what’s actually going on with results to date?
Does this include the fact that BLue Jays don’t have to play any unvaccinated players in their home games?
I feel that there’s something wrong with the Brewers favorable outcome in this graph relative to the teams they’re competing with for these last NL playoff spots. Milwaukee in my opinion has a tougher remaining schedule than both Philly and SD. Post-deadline malaise may not be a factor in the graph, but it’s there. Also an unseen factor, they’re the one team in the NL on the outside looking in for both races. But most importantly, they have a very tough next two weeks with 7 against the Dodgers and 3 against StL after tonight’s game against TB. They could be out of the race in the same way that SF can be seen as out of the race before they even get to the 15 game ‘easy’ stretch in their schedule.
“Post-deadline malaise may not be a factor in the graph, but it’s there.”
Are you saying this is a real thing some teams collectively suffer from? If so, which ones are susceptible to it? Bear in mind it would need to be identified before the fact to have some predictive value rather than after-the-fact, when we’re just slapping the “malaise” label on a team that had a post-break slump.
The point of my post is that the Brewers likely do not have a more favorable schedule than PHI and SD over the balance of the season. You did not respond to that point, but rather to a comment that i made suggesting that the Brewers are also possibly battling a difficult to quantify issue arising from the trade deadline.
No process exists to identify how a clubhouse culture is affected by an event and apply that to a model to predict wins and losses. Models for statistics are only built on the on-field performance records of players, retroactively. There are no predictive capabilities for birth of a child, death of a teammate, etc. I can only assume that you were aware that the Brewers made a significant net subtraction at the trade deadline. Hader was a key component of their team, a leading part of the team’s greatest strength, a long-tenured presence in the clubhouse. Beyond the on-field impact, players have commented openly that his surprise subtraction has been a factor of some degree. So how is it a ‘factor’? Losing 5 of 6 to two of the three worst teams by record in the NL? I chose the words ‘malaise’ and ‘unseen factor’. The potential impacts are as many as you can imagine. Or, they’re nothing at all and as professionals the players move on and resume as they were.
The Brewers still play 10 of their next 13 against the Cardinals and Dodgers and could be out of the race by August 25.