The Tools of Baseball’s Fly-Ball Revolution

There’s a revolution happening in the batting cage. We’ve noticed that batted-ball data is changing slightly and that hitters are saying different things about the intentions of their swings. But on the ground, where these hitters are training to improve, a few new tools have appeared that are helping those hitters to realize their intentions with better results. Those tools make a link between hitting and pitching that may open our eyes to the possibility of better development practices in both places.

They don’t look like the bats to which we’ve become accustomed.

Those are weighted bats from Axe. Weighted balls can improve pitch velocity for pitchers, and there’s evidence these bats can improve bat speed for hitters in much the same way. Maybe it’s no surprise, then, that Driveline Baseball — already a leader in weighted-ball training — has embraced these new tools and offered them to their hitters.

“I was up there for three days and my exit velo went from 103 to 106 and that was just working with the overload and underload bats,” said an awed Lucas Erceg of the Driveline campus in Kent, Washington. That’s the Brewers prospect who just hit the ball nearly out of the stadium this spring.

Of course, that’s just anecdotal. Results may vary, as they say. But there are more rigorous studies that back up Erceg’s enthusiasm for overload and underload bats. Coop DeRenne at the University of Hawaii did a study with 50 hitters which found a significant increase in bat speed using over- and under-weighted bats. Jason Ochart, the hitting instructor at Driveline, also did his own study, with 18 batters over eight weeks. The results were eye-opening.

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
Over- and Under-Weighted Bats and Exit Velocity
Comparison Over/Under EV Control EV % Change
Exit Velocity – Tee 3.3 1.29 156%
Exit Velocity – Front Toss 4.8 1.02 371%
Launch Angle 2.1 -1.48 244%
EV = exit velocity, represented here by peak mph

The overload bat, the weighted one, makes sense from a weight-lifting standpoint. It’s designed to work out a hitter’s baseball-specific muscles. It follows the same logic discussed by Andre Agassi in his autobiography Open. In it, Agassi recounts a conversation he had with his trainer, Gil Reyes.

I tell him about running with Pat on Rattlesnake Hill, how I feel I’ve hit a plateau. He asks, “How much do you run every day?
Five miles.
Why?
I don’t know.
Have you ever run five miles in a match?
No.
How often in a match do you run more than five steps in one direction before stopping?
Not very.
I don’t know anything about tennis, but it seems to me that, by the third step, you’d better be thinking about stopping… The trick is to throttle down, then hit, then slam on the brakes, then hustle back… You need to focus on building the muscles necessary for starting and stopping.

Baseball players work hard on adding muscle and will do bench press work, but how often are they pushing a weight with both arms off their chest during the game? The trick to training is to do baseball activities in a way that will make the player better at those activities. An overload bat allows the hitter to strengthen the muscles he requires to swing hard, so an on-and-off regimen with those bats, with rest and recovery built in, is akin to Agassi running more shuttle sprints than long jogs.

But there’s another aspect to the weighted bat that may not be obvious at first. The weight begets better mechanics. “One of the common themes is that many of our younger players just don’t get into the ground and use their body correctly,” said Cubs minor-league hitting coordinator Andy Haines. “If you put a heavy object in their hands, without even coaching them, they have to use their bigger muscles more efficiently. They can’t fire from the top. They naturally get into the ground because they want to move the weight better, they do it in sequence, and let their big muscles distribute energy to their little muscles.”

That sequence is very important. Power distributes from the big muscles to the small muscles in a sequence that many call the “kinetic chain.” “The energy is distributed from the body’s center of mass,” as Haines puts it. In this way, hitting and pitching are similar, and weighted bats and balls offer the same opportunity. Instead of teaching little movements that break apart the swing, these instruments allow hitters and pitchers to retrain their entire sequencing.

So that’s the logic of the overload bat. What about the underload bat, though? How does that work? It seems weird to swing a light bat, and it doesn’t fit our narrative so far. In Erceg’s opinion, baseball has once again learned from another sport here. “Olympic sprinters will train running down hill because it gives them that quick-twitch muscle, the pistons firing, so they keep their feet moving,” the Brewers prospect said in camp this spring. “That’s the same concept with the underload bats.”

Haines, who says that the Cubs are using the over- and underload bats in their minor-league camp, explained further. “Muscles fibers are like pistons. They fire fast, or they fire slower, in the recruitment phase. So the heavier weight, the muscles are firing slower for strength, but with a light bat, they fire fast for quickness. So you get the best of both worlds.”

You’ll hear a professional talk about swinging a fungo in the on-deck circle instead of a weighted bat. That might be to get that “quick” feeling, but it also brings up another important point. There’s evidence that swinging the bat with the donut on it right before an at-bat can actually be detrimental to bat speed. Isn’t there the same risk with weighted bats and in-season work?

“Three or four swings with the overload bat, three or four swings with the underload bat, see how it feels,” is how Erceg describes his in-season work. Haines agreed: “We don’t do a ton of repetition with it in spring training, because of the volume and the workload of the day. Not a lot of chance for recovery. That’s more of an offseason, as far as strength-training thing. It’s more of a cage work, smaller volume, for the mechanics right now.”

What do these maintenance drills look like beside some dry swings in the cage? There’s an “internal / external drill where you separate your top and bottom halves,” according to Erceg. And then… then there’s this Happy drill, which should look familiar to anyone who knows about Driveline’s pitching methods.

According to Ochart, the shuffle swings are about “rhythm, sequencing and separation.” The extra momentum will expose flaws, and the hectic nature of the drill emphasizes feel over specific form. Eventually, this drill starts to sound like a combination of the overload and underload bats: “The extra momentum helps the body move faster and can train the central nervous system to unlock bat speed in the athlete, especially with an underload bat,” but it also “proposes a new challenge to the motor system’s ability to transfer energy via a kinetic link.”

In the end, it’s very much like the “pull downs” we saw with pitching — an effort to bring athleticism and feel back to the mechanical conversation.

We saw some of that with Yonder Alonso’s turnaround. Instead of focusing on details, Alonso changed his mental approach at the plate. He set different targets.

John Mallee, the major-league hitting coach for the Cubs, does the same thing. “We set up the batting cage with markings that show you where the different launch angles are at so you can tell if your hit was good,” Mallee said before a recent spring game. “You have something to aim for.” If you set up a target four feet from the net, 3.5 feet off the ground, and your tee is around 2.7 feet off the ground, you’ve set up a target for 12 degrees — the line drive angle.

Ah, angle. Most of our tools so far have been focused on bat speed, which makes sense because five-sixths of exit velocity comes from the hitter’s own bat speed. But hitting with the right angle is also important. Axe bat, which makes the overload/underload bats you see above, also makes bats that purport to change a hitter’s launch angle via different handles like the two below.

That nonstandard handle was originally designed to help hitters — who often hold the knob of the bat in their palm — avoid the hamate injuries that can come from the traditional bat. A happy discovery recently was that the handle can help the batter alter his launch angle and improve bat speed.

“The comfort benefits were also very clear early on and no doubt opened the doors for conversations and appealed to players recovering from hand or wrist injuries,” said Matt Peterson from Axe bat. “What’s different now compared to just a year or two ago is that we have a rapidly growing contingent of MLB players using the bat and providing feedback on it, as well as more opportunity to collect and analyze data at all levels through sensors, data-capture systems.”

We heard something similar from Mark Trumbo, who said that offseason work in a “flight simulator” helped him feel his way to more fly balls last year. That also echoes something that Mallee said about working with his own son. Working with an Axe bat and a sensor system like Blast Motion and Zepp, Mallee was able to help his son shape the swing he wanted. “I told my son I wanted a positive attack angle, and he was able to look at a number and try to adjust his body to get the right angle.” His son told him that the Axe bat helped him mechanically: “I feel like it doesn’t allow my top hand to turn over and make me cut the ball.”

This author obviously needs a lot of work to get up to speed with Hunter Pence, as his Zepp readout can confirm. “You can learn how to get quicker to the zone” with the Zepp sensor, Pence told me last year, and his bat path confirms he’s found his own way to that outcome using their mapping and data technology. It’s also plain just how much work I’d have to do.

The Axe bat seems to improve launch angle by another means, too — namely, by improving the angle of the hitter’s back. Normally, the bat sorta sticks in a perpendicular manner from the line your back makes. Without the restriction of that knob, though, it’s possible that a batter can change his attack angle without changing the angle of his back. “The handle pre-sets your hand at a natural angle” Haines said of the different Axe handles.

Back to those overload and underload bats: Driveline found that 70% of the users saw increased launch angles using the Axe bats. Add that to the increased exit velocity, and the benefits line up exactly with the changes many major-league hitters are currently trying to make.

A few weighted bats, some targets in the field, maybe a strange bat handle, a sensor or two, and a bunch of hard work, and your bath path may be on its way to optimization. The tools of this revolution will look a little funny. They’ll feel a little funny. But they just might work better.





With a phone full of pictures of pitchers' fingers, strange beers, and his two toddler sons, Eno Sarris can be found at the ballpark or a brewery most days. Read him here, writing about the A's or Giants at The Athletic, or about beer at October. Follow him on Twitter @enosarris if you can handle the sandwiches and inanity.

39 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
aglossmanMember since 2016
9 years ago

Ugh, this is so cool.

SucramRenrutMember since 2017
9 years ago

This is a nice survey of some new technology Eno. You might want to also take a look at the Backspin Tee which grabs the ball from the top and is said to allow for more of an uppercut swing. The axe bat was originally said to be counter to the fly-ball revolution because people assumed you were ‘chopping’ down on the ball, but if you watch any of those logger games, you actually see that they swing hard from underneath as much as from the top which many people don’t realize. Interesting stuff.

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago

Nice article. Ol Ul is definitely a proven concept. I love the work of driveline but I would be careful about the axe bat thing. Kyle has found some evidence but I’m not sure you can generalize that. For flat hands grippers it is probably great but there are also many boxed grip guys and guys that rotate the top hand. For those it might not work.

BTW they are not new I think pedroia has used them already like a decade ago.I know kyle is affiliated with axe so I would be careful to not mix things up (albeit kyle would not promote a crappy product).

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

That is true but they did not invent those bats either, other companies have sold ol Ul bats already 15 years ago.

The axe bats are definitely nicer then most others though because you can hit real balls with them, I remember the first underload bats only being recommended for dry swings and soft balls. The axe bats are super nice but not really a new thing.

BTW I made myself a heavy bat by drilling holes and putting fishing sinkers in it. Make sure to not change the balance though.

LHPSU
9 years ago

Was it Josh Hamilton who used a bat that was heavier than normal?

And to what extent are players allowed to use modified bats in games?

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  LHPSU

You can buy heavier wood bats that are not manipulated. Babe Ruth sometimes used bats at more than plus 10.

Baron Samedi
9 years ago

The human body is marvellous and disgusting.

MGL
9 years ago

Not saying any of these aren’t effective but…

We’ve had new drills, equipment, ways of looking at and doing things in sports and in life since the beginning of time.

Unless we have appropriate multiple, independent studies giving us evidence to support the effectiveness of these devices, techniques and approaches, beyond placebo and other effects which have little to do with the devices, approaches, etc. (like just working out, or just paying attention, having a coach, practicing, etc.), well, these are all just nice sounding and looking words and anecdotes which mean nothing.

Rarely will someone touting some new product or technique (for money) ever put in the time and money necessary to adequately test them. At all. They might say they do, but they don’t.

To channel George Castanza, is that wrong of me to think like that?

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Let me read the study and see what I think. That’s only ONE of thousands of these new techniques and gadgets. Unless ONE study is done flawlessly with overwhelming results, it is usually not enough. At the very least you want independent reproducability before you can say much with any certainty to be honest.

Nothing wrong with the article, Eno. I just think this point needs to be made. I read all these fancy sounding words and anecdotes and I roll my eyes. Everyone should.

Johnston
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

Automatic distrust is just as bad as automatic trust. As Reagan put it, “Trust but verify.”

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  Johnston

It’s not about “trust” and “mistrust.” It’s about accumulating evidence of what’s true and not in order to make better decisions in life.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Well, good luck with reading that article. Going around in circles on “researchgate.” Maybe someone can post a link or send it to me.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

I was able to download the review study (just reviewed other studies) linked at the top of this article. What specific studies were you referring to in the “68 people in two controlled studies?”

For the record, a “study” done by a person, group or company which sells a particular product, device or training technique has zero scientific credibility. As in your first chart of the Ochart “study.”

chuck e
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

I’m really ambivalent about this remark. I think that 0 scientific credibility overstates the situation. A study is a study, and the fact that their is a real danger of bias does not mean it is impossible for a tester with clear conflict of interest to do a fair study. However, what is really puzzling to me is how one could actually construct a test which would essentially, as say doing a fake arthroscopic procedure, create some kind of comparative situation. Anyway, I’m with you on this in principle. Over the years, the number of new improved training regimes, diets, which have been sold to competitive athletes is staggering. And all of them worked. Don’t get me started on ice.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Honestly it’s not a question of good or bad faith. You simply can’t use a study conducted by an entity which has a large stake in the outcome. You can’t. Maybe “commissioned by.” Maybe. Even then it requires intense scrutiny and may or may not be ethical. But not “done by.” There are 8,214 ways that a study can yield bad results without doing it in bad faith. It is so difficult to do a study that produces accurate, reliable results. At the very least it requires an independent entity to conduct it. At the least. I don’t know how to say it other than that.

Chuck obviously it is POSSIBLE for a stakeholder to do a competent study and one that is done by one that appears to be sound doesn’t have zero value, but it simply can’t be taken seriously for the reasons I partially articulated above.

Even if you scrutinized a study done by a stakeholder and it appeared sound (which is not easy to do because it probably won’t have very good protocols) you still have the very real possibility that intentionally or not, the results are faked, skewed, ignored, etc. With an independent tester you almost completely eliminate that.

I mean come on guys. You can’t be that naive. When a company tells you they conducted tests and got these results, I don’t care how honest and trustworthy you think they are, that’s is a huge red flag. At the very least you must put almost no credence in such a “study.” I put “study” in quotes because almost no commercial company is going to have proper scientific protocols. Not even close. 99% of all company produced studies are jokes.

chuck e
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

Clearly a day late on this, and stressing that I am in agreement with your main point, the other small detail is that baseball is not a static sport, and even if this approach works, it may well be possible that pitchers find a way to nullify the benefits of any particular approach. including this one, which would render study results correct only temporarily if indeed they were correct in the first place.

Ancalagor
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Not selling bats is immaterial in this case. They are selling the training regimen. Still doesn’t imply bad faith, but it’s a pretty important distinction.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

Again, I’m criticizing or rebuking any particular company, device, technique, etc. Certainly the credibility of the persons and the company are a significant part of the equation.

eneix907Member since 2022
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Driveline is not the only company to study this type of particular training. Tom House with the NPA has studied overload/underload implements from weighted balls to velocity or “velo” bat training. Our high school travel ball team has been using velo bat training for the last 2 years. Not only have we seen an increase in exit velocity, but we also see slight increases in throwing velocity when training with velo bats. I attribute the increase in throwing velocity to an increase in shoulder hip separation from overload implement use and kinetic chain reinforcement that comes with the happy gilmore aspect. I am not a scientist, just a coach who has seen a ton of fads come and go over the years. I don’t think this trend will go anywhere anytime soon. I know I will not stop using it for my teams.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  eneix907

I attribute it to the fact that your players were doing “something” and that they believed it was going to work. Hey, that’s as good a theory as yours!

eneix907Member since 2022
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

The mental aspect of baseball is the great separator. I do believe that it did help there mental toughness. Yet it didn’t stop there. We chart and document every measurable that we can (pitch velocity, 60 yd dash, 5-10-5, exit velocity off of tee and swing speed over and under load) at several different points during the year. We test for grip strength as well as functional strength (scap strength, standing broad jump etc…) at the beginning and end of the offseason and the beginning and end of any training program they take part in. In the 2 years we have been monitoring these activities, the only people NOT to increase velocity, both exit and throwing, after velo bat training, were those doing it the 2nd time. Any player participating in the velo bat training for the first time, gained 2-6 mph in throwing velocity and 3-8 mph exit velocity. It is not about confidence or thinking your getting better, it shows up on the radar gun time and time again.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

“not criticizing…”

Dominikk85Member since 2020
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

Ol UL training is very proven. It was invented by soviet scientists 50 years ago and used to break speed plateaus in throwers. Baseball is just again very late too the party, partly because it is a conservative sport and partly because it is a reactonary relative sport and not an absolute distance/velocity sport.

Shot putters have used that concept for decades and in fact the bat weights of de renne and also the axe bats is based on those soviet studies (which suggested plus minus 20 percent because they thought bigger differences could hurt mechanics).

I would also be wary of using it as an every day training method. A few swings a day are OK but high volumes at max effort are mentally and physically very taxing. It is more like a method you can use periodically in blocks to break bat speed plateaus that can’t be overcome with strength training, normal med ball plyos and improved mechanics.

When using it for the first time almost anyone will be at such a plateau and gain a lot. About 6 years ago I (adult league player) did a program and went from 65 to 82 mph bat speed after 6 weeks of almost daily (4 to 5 times a week ) use. But I also got mentally very fatigued and in the end it even went down again.

That is an effective method but definitely not something that you can use year round to gain long and steady gains.

BTW the people at driveline also know this, they use it but contrary to what most believe they don’t throw weighted balls all day, they also lift a ton of weights and do a lot of other stuff.

Doing just weighted implements all the time without preparation is a receipt for quick burn out and injury.

bosoxforlifeMember since 2016
9 years ago

Whether the Axe bat handle is the next breakthrough, or properly weighted heavy bats or something else is, it is clear that principles based on Laws of Motion are being applied to the art of hitting. It is compelling to read what J.D. Martinez has to say about his dramatic change in approach and technique and the great results that he his accomplished. He, Josh Donaldson and others are slaughtering the scared cows that have been all too pervasive, based on feel rather than reality. Hit down, get on top of the ball, try to apply backspin are concepts that are attempting to defy the Laws of Motion if the goal is to hit the ball in the air. If not all then at least a growing number of baseball people are looking at the statistics and realizing “The OPS is in the Air”.

JoseF16
9 years ago

Great stuff, Eno.

zwibi
9 years ago

I find it a shame that things can no longer be posted on the internet without having an inane argument follow later in the comments. Eno, great piece and great work as always. What an interesting topic with a lot of information that was presented in a way that was enjoyable to read.

John Autin
9 years ago
Reply to  zwibi

If you’re comparing the comments discussion of scientific validity to average-internet-level inanity, you must not browse much. And if there’s ONE type of argument I’d like to err towards too much of, scientific validity gets the nod.

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  zwibi

I was going to say something similar as Autin below. To be more snark, “Yeah what we need MORE of are unscientific, childish, trolling comments on a site like FranGraphs, which is dedicated to reason and science.”

Chaco ChickenMember since 2017
9 years ago

Eno, do you know or have perhaps a list of MLB/MiLB players that use the axe bat or similarly modified baseball bat?

trevorstockingMember since 2023
9 years ago
Reply to  Chaco Chicken

I’ll have to come back later with a larger list but here are a few of the players swinging the Axe Bat Axe Handle:
Betts, Pedroia, Correa, Springer, Lamb, Travis, Chisenhall, Peralta

Sonny LMember since 2017
9 years ago

Really really enjoyed this.

Anecdotally we used to cut open tennis balls and fill them with pennies, tape them back up and use them to warm up. The size difference threw off your accuracy for the first few throws w the normal ball but damn 1st inning you were 1-2mph faster at least. By pitch 15 you were back to the same extremely hittable velo, but we were told doing anymore with weighted balls would cause injury so never committed to it as part of offseason training.

Glad to see there are communities and facilities embracing new ideas. There’s never been a shortage of guys on the fringes (of any level) open to new ideas to extend their career.

MGL
9 years ago

When I played sports, I used to eat rabbit intestines before every game, and it worked, so what the heck! I’m opening a training center where all we do is advocate rabbit guts for improved performance. And I have the studies to prove it! Who’s in? $595 for a 3-week training program…

MGL
9 years ago
Reply to  Eno Sarris

Are you really that gullible? If so, I vastly overrated your abilities. Not that I’ve given it much thought.

chuck e
9 years ago
Reply to  MGL

I think that you started off with a reasonable point and you are systematically chipping away at your own credibility. It is hard to separate the message from the messenger, and hyperbolic sarcasm seems to be the method you are choosing to sell yourself. Poor choice.