Byron Buxton was drafted second overall in 2012. Between that point and the loss of his rookie eligibility last season, he was eligible for four rounds of preseason prospect lists. Almost universally, he appeared at or near the top of those lists. Consider, for example, his place among the rankings published annually by Baseball Prospectus during that time frame:
Barring injury, the 2017 season is going to be the 23-year-old Buxton’s first full one in the majors. Under traditional circumstances, there would be a round-the-clock coverage of this budding superstar’s march to the top of every relevant leaderboard. Yet we find ourselves in non-traditional circumstances for a couple of important reasons.
To refresh your memory: in the summer of 2013 — Buxton’s first full season as a professional — we were only a year-plus into the Mike Trout experience and we were decidedly not taking it in stride. J.J. Cooper, writing for Baseball America, stoked the fire of comparisons between Trout and Buxton. As baseball fans are wont to do, the crowd took Cooper’s consideration of the subject to another level, and the layman’s impression of Buxton went from “really good outfield prospect” to “might be another Trout.” Buxton built his own hype in 2013, racking up a .944 OPS across multiple levels. In his first full year out of high school, Buxton’s numbers were great and people were giving reports to prospect writers suggesting he was truly elite.
After an injury-plagued 2014 and a very rough 138 plate appearances in the majors in 2015, there was significant brake-pumping heading into last year even as Buxton remained near the top of the prospect lists. For example, here is the blurb from BP’s 2016 list:
It may be an exercise in hyperbole to refer to our no. 2 prospect as a “post-hype sleeper” (especially since he’s been our no. 1 prospect the past two years), but in an industry always on the lookout for the next new hotness, Buxton qualifies as old news. It doesn’t help his Q rating (or for the millennials reading, his Klout score) that he missed most of 2014 with a wrist injury and then a concussion, or that he looked overmatched at times in his first taste of the majors this past season. But as the old scouting adage goes, “tools play,” and Buxton’s selection rivals your local Ace Hardware. He may not be the next Andre Dawson as we opined in 2013, but the first Byron Buxton still looks like an impact major leaguer.
Rather than jumping on the Maybe He’s Mike Trout express, BP suggested Buxton might fall short of Andre Dawson level. That kind of levelheaded optimism was warranted, but Buxton followed it with a truly dreadful April that resulted in another tour of the minors. In 49 plate appearances for the Twins, he hit .156/.208/.289 (27 wRC+). Even with great wheels and good defense, you can’t have a 27 wRC+ in the majors unless you can also throw a slider for strikes.
Dispassionate observers probably still weren’t worried, but at that point Buxton had lost almost a full season to injury and had looked terrible in his first few shots in the majors. He was still young and talented, but it wasn’t going well. Buxton returned to the majors on May 31 after tearing up Triple-A and proceeded to offer another dreadful 106 PAs. From May 31 through July 2, Buxton hit .222/.248/.374 (58 wRC+). If you’re not doing the math in your head, that comes to a 50 wRC+ over his first 293 PA from 2015 to July 2, 2016. He showed below-average power and virtually no control of the zone.
Then on July 5, Buxton hit two doubles and walked once in four trips against Oakland, setting up a second half much more worthy of his previous bona fides. From July 5 to the end of the season, Buxton hit .247/.328/.506 (120 wRC+). He was still striking out more than 30% of the time, but his walk rate was near 10% and his ISO was .260. As far as I can tell, this is an arbitrary line. It’s probably more honest to utilize a rolling average:
In fact, Buxton spent time on the DL and in the minors in August, so if you look only at his September/October numbers, you find a .287/.357/.653 (165 wRC+) line in 113 PA. It’s all small-sample data, but the most recent chunk of games is as impressive as the early chunk was disappointing.
And again, while we’re dealing with very noisy data, it’s hard to ignore this as a matter of first impression: Buxton pulled the ball a lot more late last year. This development is consistent with more power, which is a big part of why his numbers looked so much better down the stretch.
The data reveal other positive developments, as well. Consider: prior to September 1, 2016, Statcast had tracked 168 batted balls in Buxton’s career, over which he averaged an 88.4 mph exit velocity. For the 53 balls tracked after September 1 of last year, that number was 91.9 mph. That’s not enough information to dramatically shift your opinion, but it’s consistent with the same general observation that Buxton was making more authoritative contact late last year.
I think most informed baseball observers and practitioners still have a relatively high opinion of Buxton. You won’t hear any Trout comps — and, to be honest, the ones we heard in 2013 were probably unfair — but if there were a prospect ranking in 2017 for guys who just lost their prospect status, I would suspect Buxton would be near the top of the list. But there is definitely some shine off his apple independent of the Trout comps given his early MLB struggles, and I think that might just be a little unfair.
In a world where Buxton was a top-20 prospect instead of a top-two prospect, or a world in which no one ranked prospects in numerical order, it’s totally plausible that Buxton’s first MLB reps might not have taken place until last last year. Buxton tore up Single-A in 2013, but he missed a ton of time in 2014 with injuries. Other than his two-week stint in the majors in June 2015, Buxton had recorded just 59 plate appearances above Double-A when he was called up in late August of that year. And even in 2016, Buxton had only 209 PA in Triple-A. Phrased differently, Buxton had compiled only 271 PA at Double-A and 268 PA at Triple-A in his entire career. Combined, that’s not even a full season of plate appearances in the minors above A-ball.
Buxton is incredibly talented. That’s obvious to anyone to watches him run or taking batting practice. He’s a gifted individual with a ton of potential, but the Twins offered him very little developmental time and pushed him into major-league games well ahead of the point at which he was probably ready. That’s something they probably wouldn’t have done with even a slightly worse prospect. There’s a world where he spends most of 2015 in Double-A and gets a few late season chances at Triple-A. Then he spends most of 2016 in Triple-A and gets his first major-league time last September. In that world, Buxton likely ranks first or second on 2017’s prospect lists and heads into his age-23 season as a superstar-in-waiting.
Perhaps the Twins’ desire to rush him to the majors has cost him some potential, but it’s also reasonable to think he’s capable of developing even in adverse conditions. If that’s the case, the Buxton we saw down the stretch might be the Buxton we will get when the games begin in earnest in April. We’re living in a golden age of young players, but we shouldn’t cast aside players who don’t bloom immediately. Buxton is still incredibly young and has been given precious little time to find his footing, even though it seems like he’s been around forever.
Interestingly, the FanGraphs audience has picked up on this. Buxton’s FANS projection is much higher than the one offered by Steamer and ZiPS. Steamer has his wOBA at .304. ZiPS says .322. The FANS think .344, as of Sunday. If you run a quick comparison between our blender Steamer/ZiPS and the FANS, you find that the FANS are only more bullish on seven players relative to the blend. The crowd doesn’t think Buxton is going to be an elite hitter in 2017, but it does appear to be more open to the idea that Buxton isn’t the player he was for his first 300 PA. If the crowd is right and Buxton combines a .340 wOBA with great defense and base running, the Twins won’t have their own version of Mike Trout, but they might actually have themselves an Andre Dawson.
Neil Weinberg is the Site Educator at FanGraphs and can be found writing enthusiastically about the Detroit Tigers at New English D. Follow and interact with him on Twitter @NeilWeinberg44.