The Twins Reside in No Man’s Land
We haven’t spent much time talking about the Twins this offseason. The last post dedicated to the team was published Dec. 8, when this author wrote about two savvy little trades the club had made after losing out on the Ohtani sweepstakes.
But in what has been a quiet offseason, the Twins have quietly been one of the most active teams, bolstering their bullpen by signing ageless wonder Fernando Rodney, left-hander Zach Duke, and most recently, Addison Reed.
They’ve also made a move with an eye toward improving their 2019 rotation by signing Michael Pineda. Pineda is expected to miss most, if not all, of this coming season while recovering from Tommy John surgery. Given his bat-missing upside, though, the $10-million commitment seems like a prudent value play.
Overall, only 21 of Dave Cameron’s top-50 free agents have signed so far this winter. The Twins are responsible for two of them, however, in Reed and Pineda.
It’s understandable why the Twins have been trying to upgrade a bullpen that ranked 18th in reliever ERA (98 ERA-), 22nd in FIP (101 FIP-), and 29th in strikeout rate (19.8%). It’s also understandable why Twins have needed to be active and aggressive in rebuilding their bullpen: it’s the only place teams have been active this winter in free-agent spending. Through Jan. 17, clubs have spent $639.6 million on free agents, according to Spotrac, of which $328.1 million — or just over half — has been spent on relievers.
The Twins rank seventh in free-agent spending so far, having guaranteed free agents $33.4 million to date. In fact, according to Craig Edwards’ estimates, they’re already nearing their payroll ceiling for the offseason. They currently have $104 million in guaranteed contracts for 2018, according to Cot’s Baseball Contracts. They posted a $108 million payroll last season, $106 million in 2016, and $108 million in 2015.
Of course, with franchise values and revenues rapidly growing — including the windfall MLBAM payment — it seems likely that the vast majority of MLB owners can afford to be spending more. Maybe even a lot more.
And while the Twins have been one of the most active teams to date, there is an argument to be made that they ought to continue to be among the most aggressive clubs of the offseason, one which is likely to become more active as the start of spring training looms.
In a landscape that is increasing one of super teams (the Haves) and rebuilding clubs (the Have Nots), the Twins are one of the few organizations to occupy the middle ground. The Twins were 2017’s surprise team, but are projected to finish 81-81 according to our web site. Even with their moves to date, they project as an average team. There is some regression expected from FanGraphs forecasts.
But their position is particularly interesting due to their neighborhood.
If Minnesota were in a loaded division, that would diminish their outlook. That’s not the case at, though. In fact, the 30th-, 29th-, and 26th-ranked teams by our projected win totals — the White Sox (64), Royals (70) and Tigers (72) — also reside in the AL Central. The bottom half of the AL Central appears to be the weakest in baseball. It seems highly unlikely that any of the three aforementioned teams competes for a playoff berth in 2018. As a result, only the Indians — who are, albeit, one of the strongest teams on paper in the game — stand in the Twins’ way of a division title. The Indians are projected to win 93 games, trailing only the Astros and Dodgers.
As for the fallback path to the postseason, the Wild Card play-in game, the Twins are projected at the moment to finish seven games behind the Angels (88 wins), two games behind the Blue Jays (83 wins), and a game ahead of the Mariners (80 wins).
The projections aren’t prescriptions, of course — teams will surprise us and disappoint us — but they provide an informed sketch of the competitive landscape. For a club like the Twins that lives between the Have and Have Nots, that place in the landscape can either be regarded a no man’s land or a place of opportunity.
Minnesota cannot expect much immediate help from their farm system, which has fallen from second (2015) to 10th (2016) to 21st (2017) over the last three years in Baseball America’s organizational talent rankings, mostly due to graduations. While the lower levels of the Twins’ minor leagues are rich in talent, while Stephen Gonsalves and Fernando Romero could help the rotation in 2018, the Twins might still need to look mostly outward for immediate help. And in this ice-cold offseason, with prices for players perhaps on the decline after the New Year, the circumstances might be ideal for the Twins to find value in the market, or at least more manageable prices.
The Twins need pitching. They needed relief pitching help and they still require more starting pitching. The club is projected to rank 23rd in WAR total (8.4) from their starting pitchers.
The good news? The top free-agent arms typically have typically signed at this point in the offseason and yet four of Dave’s top-five free-agent starters remain available — including Yu Darvish, to whom the Twins have been connected, but also Jake Arrieta, Alex Cobb and Lance Lynn. There’s also the trade market to explore.
I argued for ESPN Insider on Thursday that the Twins are among the teams that could most benefit from adding an impact starting arm. They occupy a sort of an in-between place. It’s an area teams have actively avoided in recent years, opting for tanking and rebuilds instead of sustained mediocrity.
This middle ground, however — in an AL Central largely in a downturn cycle — could be a place of opportunity.
The Twins ought to continue to be aggressive, continue to buy. When caught in between, you ought not to stand still.
A Cleveland native, FanGraphs writer Travis Sawchik is the author of the New York Times bestselling book, Big Data Baseball. He also contributes to The Athletic Cleveland, and has written for the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, among other outlets. Follow him on Twitter @Travis_Sawchik.
Sawchick disappoints again. You’re so close to saying what needs to be said.
Finish the thought.
Yu Darvish would be a mistake without Chris Gimenez backing up Jason Castro – start there.
Why would a negative-WAR backup catcher have any impact on a potential Darvish acquisition?
Gimenez caught Darvish for a bit in Texas and knows him. Some people in Minnesota (media and fans) have been playing up this angle, thinking that netting Gimenez will increase the likelihood of getting Darvish.
Also, Twins fans saw the intangibles that Gimenez provided, along with last year being the best season of his career (by WAR) so our perception of him is pretty skewed right now.
If you can see it, it’s not intangible.
(Confucius.)
Literally yes. But you can see if a player is popular amongst his teammates or if he’s a respected member of the teams culture.
There just aren’t any good ways to assign a real world dollar value to those attributes or to know how much if any impact on winning they have.
Most work environments are more productive when employees are happy so it’s plausible that players who make other players happy or reduce stress have a real value in wins and losses.
But it seems unlikely they will ever be quantifiable in any convincing way.
Since when is the backing catcher a major point of focus for an ace–start there.
What a rude thing to say.
I wonder if uncertainty surrounding Sano is making the Twins reluctant to choose a direction. There has been no news (that I’m aware of) since the original story, and no indication of potential MLB investigation or suspension.
I feel the investigation is most likely happening right now. It wouldn’t shock me if a suspension is announced sometime in spring training.
30-50 games I’d expect. They’d likely be starting Eduardo Escobar for the most part. Could see them going for a decent bench bat if they miss one of the bigger pitchers (Todd Frazier?)
Chapman got 30 games for an issue involving an assault involving a gun and law enforcement. I think it’s going to be difficult for an investigation to come up with anything (likely no video from 3 years ago likely) other than her word (which I believe but don’t know how it will be weighed). I wouldn’t be surprised to see him skate, but if he doesn’t, I doubt it would be more than ~15 games.
Chapman’s victim was not participating in the investigation or was actively against it. It also was not sexual in nature. I think there is a lot that goes into these things as far as how certain they are of culpability and also of course how things look. At the end of the day, we would be naive to believe these decisions are about morality rather than business. Don’t be surprised if Sano gets the book thrown at him.
It would make me think about signing Moustakas and Darvish. And maybe Garcia.
There is also uncertainty about Sano’s health. The shin stress fracture he sustained at the end of last season was seemingly relatively innocuous but he only began rehab work on Dec. 12, around 4 months after the initial injury. That is concerning too.
As a Twins fan, I have next to no interest in Lance Lynn unless it’s on a one year deal. Too many question marks of whether he’s going to be the post Tommy John Lynn who lost his Ks and became homer prone in the new hitting environment; or the above average starter who’s Ks were enough to mitigate his above average walk rate.
Like any Twins fan, I dream of Darvish, but I have faith in Falvine’s leadership and their innovative ways find and develop pitching talent (hello Jaime Garcia trade).
There were some rumors brewing about attempting to trade Sano, perhaps in a package for Archer, maybe they had to go back to the drawing board when his trade value took a big hit.
But I agree with the premise of the article. They are entering a competitive window, they have payroll flexibility, and they should be aggressive right now. I think it has been a tactical error not to blow Darvish out of the water with an offer while they could, because every day that passes they are risking having another team join the fray or up their offer. If that means they pay a premium, so be it.
A particular risk is that the Angels decide they need one more rotation guy (they do), and swoop in at the last minute. That’d put the Twins solidly behind yet another team in the AL. This is one of those cases where you have to factor in the value of not having another team using him against you as well.
Also, why hasn’t there even been a whisper about being a fit for Yelich?
Rosario, Kepler, Gordon, Gonsalves, Romero, Kirillof…they have the guys to pull this off without having to include Lewis, and as casually intriguing as Kepler and Rosario are, Yelich would look a whole lot better in one of those spots.
That list didn’t include Acuna so unlikely to move needle
Haha, I would be deeply amused if the Marlins condition for trading for Yelich was “acquire Acuna then trade him to us”
I don’t think any of those guys are highly regarded enough for Miami to accept in a trade for Yelich. I think Royce Lewis would have to be included.
At first I didn’t think Sano would get suspended, but when you have Twins players apologizing to her it certainly gives you pause.
Random stat that amazes me, being a little vintage. In 1963, Mickey Mantle topped Babe Ruth’s lifetime total of 1330K. When Mantle retired he had 1710. Mantle is now 32nd, and Ruth 123rd. Mantle’s lifetime K percentage was 17.3. And Minnesota has a problem because their pitchers were 29th in strikeout rate (19.8%).
Do the predictions take schedule into account? becasue not only do the Twins only really need the Indians to falter, they also get to play a third of their games against three of the worst teams in baseball. If those three teams play to their predicted .424 winning percentage, the Twins win about 31 of those 54 games as opposed to 27 against three teams predicted to go .500. Those four wins could make a difference in a WC race.
this.
to add that the Twins played the Indians very tough last year. The Twins should take care of business vs. Tigers and Royals… the W-Sox could be a the one unknown I’m thinking.
Yes… a place of opportunity!
Other teams also play bad teams. The Angels will play Oakland and Texas about 36 times. Toronto will play Baltimore and Tampa Bay about 36 times. Those teams are not as bad as Chicago, Detroit and KC but LAA and TOR will should get about two wins from playing those teams, which reduces the Twins’ soft schedule advantage to only two wins. Still important, but not as important as four wins.
“Of course, with franchise values and revenues rapidly growing — including the windfall MLBAM payment — it seems likely that the vast majority of MLB owners can afford to be spending more. Maybe even a lot more.”
There’s one of those three things that should really have more than a negligible impact on a team’s 2018 payroll: increasing revenue. Ongoing, expected to recur spending such as team payroll should be financed out of similarly expected to recur revenue / cash flow. Any business – or household – operating with the idea of using asset value increases or one-time gains to finance ongoing spending is showing very poor financial acumen.
Travis is far from the only baseball writer to express similar thoughts – I read some version of this point all the time – so it’s somewhat unfair of me to pick on him specifically for it.
Every time I read something like this, though, I’m left shaking my head and thinking that it’s no wonder this country has such a low personal savings rate and went collectively crazy less than 15 years ago with people borrowing against their homes to finance current consumption. The vast majority of people don’t understand basic finance concepts that are also the bedrock of personal financial planning.
Good point, in a general sense, but this isn’t akin to someone living paycheck-to-paycheck, who then blows the Christmas bonus on some frivolous expenditure. Rather, it’s asking why some of the richest people in America (the MLB owners) wouldn’t pump their new $50M windfall into the luxury item they already own, given that they already have more money than god.
If you have your bills paid, and own a $100k sports car, why in the world WOULDN’T you splurge for the vanity plates and $5k stereo when $10k falls in your lap? I always marvel at how pernicious some owners get with their teams. Politics aside, Mike Ilitch was one of my favorite owners; he bought the Tigers to make him happy, then dumped tons of money into them. Why own a team if you’re not intending to give the GM whatever (within reason) she/he asks for to make the team fun?
Because a lot of owners see their teams as just another financial investment. Not a vehicle for fun.
At the level of people who have capital, asset value and recurring revenue are really just two ways to express the same thing anyway. One can be converted to the other relatively easily.
educate me.
how else does one invest in their business or home/family?
would you suggest borrowing against my lemonade stand?
I seriously doubt owners of MLB teams go all in on those financing decisions… much unlike the poor folks who got suckered into bad loans.
I’ve been making the same case for the Mets all winter… just substitute an IFer for SPer.
What are the Indians 3-5 year outlook? I would assume it’s 1-2 more good years with age and FA.
If true, there could be a few years where 85 wins could win the central. Royals and Tigers are 5+ years away, White Sox probably 3-4.
Twins should definitely sign guys now, especially when FA prices are depressed.