The White Sox’ Rotation Could Be Anything

The Chicago White Sox are projected to win 65 games in 2018 and lose 97. That’s fewer projected wins, and more losses, than are forecast for any other team in the league — including the majors’ new go-to bogeyman, the Miami Derek Jeters Marlins. The 2018 White Sox are projected to be the worst team in baseball.

But pretty soon, the White Sox are going to be pretty good. That’s not just me saying so; you believe it, too. A few weeks ago, when Jeff Sullivan asked readers to project out each team’s next five years, you collectively gave the Sox a little over 81 wins a year for each of the next five years — and that includes 2018, during which you presumably expect the Sox to be terrible.

It’s not that 81 wins is a tremendously impressive total on its own. It does, however, represent the 14th-highest figure readers gave to any of the 30 teams. For the next five years, you expect the Sox to be just above average. And, more than that, you expect the White Sox to trail only the Astros and the Phillies in terms of their performance over the next five years relative to their performance over the last five.

And I agree with you. Since kicking off their rebuild last winter with the Chris Sale trade, the Sox have managed to turn their star pieces of yesterday into a tremendous collection of young talent for tomorrow, sufficient to give them (according to Baseball America) the fifth-best farm system in the game and (according to Kiley and Eric) six of the top-100 prospects in all of baseball. So far, so good.

But there’s more road to travel. The team has gotten itself effectively from Point A to Point B of the rebuild. Getting to Point C, though, is a bit complicated, because it’s really two trips in one. The Sox have to (a) discover which of their young players will actually take a step forward in the next few years (as opposed to those who could potentially take a step forward, which is all of them) and then (b) find free agents who can fill in the gaps left behind by those who don’t advance.

The good news is there’s an awful lot of room to improve. For the purposes of this post, I’ll focus on just the rotation, because it features the most room to improve. The White Sox are currently projected to have the worst group of starters in baseball this year*:

You Aren't a FanGraphs Member
It looks like you aren't yet a FanGraphs Member (or aren't logged in). We aren't mad, just disappointed.
We get it. You want to read this article. But before we let you get back to it, we'd like to point out a few of the good reasons why you should become a Member.
1. Ad Free viewing! We won't bug you with this ad, or any other.
2. Unlimited articles! Non-Members only get to read 10 free articles a month. Members never get cut off.
3. Dark mode and Classic mode!
4. Custom player page dashboards! Choose the player cards you want, in the order you want them.
5. One-click data exports! Export our projections and leaderboards for your personal projects.
6. Remove the photos on the home page! (Honestly, this doesn't sound so great to us, but some people wanted it, and we like to give our Members what they want.)
7. Even more Steamer projections! We have handedness, percentile, and context neutral projections available for Members only.
8. Get FanGraphs Walk-Off, a customized year end review! Find out exactly how you used FanGraphs this year, and how that compares to other Members. Don't be a victim of FOMO.
9. A weekly mailbag column, exclusively for Members.
10. Help support FanGraphs and our entire staff! Our Members provide us with critical resources to improve the site and deliver new features!
We hope you'll consider a Membership today, for yourself or as a gift! And we realize this has been an awfully long sales pitch, so we've also removed all the other ads in this article. We didn't want to overdo it.
2018 White Sox Rotation
Name IP K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BABIP LOB% ERA FIP WAR
James Shields 164 7.2 3.8 1.8 .306 69.8% 5.55 5.58 0.2
Miguel Gonzalez 163 6.1 3.1 1.8 .304 68.5% 5.54 5.52 0.3
Lucas Giolito 143 7.8 4.3 1.4 .304 70.8% 5.00 5.10 0.9
Carson Fulmer 122 6.8 5.3 1.7 .302 69.1% 5.88 5.95 -0.3
Reynaldo Lopez 120 7.8 4.0 1.7 .295 71.0% 5.14 5.30 0.5
Carlos Rodon 112 8.9 3.8 1.3 .307 72.4% 4.35 4.40 1.5
Michael Kopech 83 9.6 5.2 1.4 .299 72.5% 4.77 4.94 0.6
Hector Santiago 27 7.3 4.3 1.9 .294 70.4% 5.59 5.79 0.0
Dylan Covey 9 6.0 4.1 1.5 .311 68.8% 5.49 5.45 0.0

It is not, all things considered, an especially pretty sight. This year, I think, will mostly represent an opportunity for the White Sox to figure out what exactly they have in each of their young hurlers. Chicago seems to think so, too. Don Cooper is still their pitching coach — as he has been since the, uh, don of time — but the Sox have also brought in Dave Duncan as a consultant to provide a second set of eyes and, presumably, help the organization’s young arms along.

So the White Sox have a wide range of possibilities in front of them insofar as their young pitching is concerned, and they’ll attempt to use 2018 as an opportunity to get as many of their pitchers to perform at the top of that range as possible, then fill in the gaps they find left behind them. How wide, precisely, is the range with which they’re working?

Well, thanks to the very kind Jared Cross, who ran these numbers for me whilst in the middle of a family ski trip to Colorado (trips which also, in my experience, have a wide range of possible outcomes), we can take a look at the 10th- and 90th-percentile outcomes, in terms of runs allowed per nine innings (RA9), for each of the Sox’ top seven rotation candidates. All numbers are park neutral, and all columns are sortable.

The Range of What Could Be
Name IP Steamer RA9 Steamer 10th Steamer 90th 10th – 90th
James Shields 164 5.58 7.01 4.28 2.73
Miguel Gonzalez 163 5.57 7.01 4.27 2.74
Lucas Giolito 143 5.09 6.58 3.75 2.83
Carson Fulmer 122 5.92 7.65 4.36 3.29
Reynaldo Lopez 120 5.17 6.78 3.74 3.04
Carlos Rodon 112 4.49 6.06 3.11 2.95
Michael Kopech 83 4.85 6.72 3.22 3.50
SOURCE: Jared Cross, Steamer

The first second- and third-to-last columns are sort of interesting. They teach us some things we already knew (that James Shields can be anywhere between basically fine and truly terrible); some things we didn’t know for sure but could probably have guessed (that the same is true of Carson Fulmer); and some things which, at least, I didn’t know (that the worst-case scenario for Reynaldo Lopez is pretty good for a 24-year-old with fewer than 100 big-league innings under his belt).

But the final column is what highlights just how much uncertainty the Sox currently have surrounding their starting pitching. It’s not just that it’s bad now (although it is), it’s that there’s a pretty solid chance it could be quite good, too. Among starters with as many innings projected as Kopech (83.0), just two have as wide a range of possible outcomes for 2018 — A.J. Griffin and Phil Hughes — and all seven potential Sox starters fall within the top-90 starters league-wide by this metric, which is a little more than 2.3 times as many as you’d expect if this kind of volatility were evenly distributed.

To a certain extent, this is a “young teams are hard to project” story, which isn’t particularly exciting or new. But I hope you’ll also read it as a “rebuilds are hard” story. If everything goes well for the Sox, they’ll look up at the end of the year and feel pretty good about the way their rotation looks for, say, 2020. But if all goes poorly, they’ll spend next winter wondering how they’re going to find pitching to support the big bats they have coming up. It could, honestly, go either way, which is more than can be said for a lot of teams. The 2018 season will be the one where we find out which way it’s headed.

* Not including Hector Santiago, who signed a minor-league deal with the Sox on Valentine’s Day.





Rian Watt is a contributor to FanGraphs based in Seattle. His work has appeared at Vice, Baseball Prospectus, The Athletic, FiveThirtyEight, and some other places too. By day, he works with communities around the world to end homelessness.

32 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago

For comparison purposes, how does this sort of variance compare to other rotations around the league? How about compared to other young players?

sadtromboneMember since 2020
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

If you’re looking for something to write about, this data sounds like a gold mine of interesting nuggets. Looking at means is fun, but I’d be very curious who else was in that top 90 (and conversely, who is in the bottom 90).

johansantana17Member since 2026
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

Consider this comment interest

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  johansantana17

This one too

Johnston
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

(interest)

bunslow
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

Dude this is FanGraphs of course there’s interest in the full PDF, not just the mean

osbtensor
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

yep, more interest here.

TKDCMember since 2016
8 years ago

Jeff asked fans of each team to predict how their teams would do over the next five years. If he’d asked everyone to make a White Sox prediction, it would have likely been more pessimistic. Fans seem to be extremely willing to buy into a massive rebuild. It’s easy to dream of being the next Cubs or Astros. Every team’s fans in the middle of a downturn thinks they will come out great. But that won’t happen. For many teams, the “reward” for watching and cheering for a team that is trying to lose will simply be more mediocrity and more promises of future success.

Fredchuckdave
8 years ago

White Sox Fan here, stunned that a White Sox article was actually written as opposed to whatever other gobbledygook related to the slow offseason.

Bret
8 years ago
Reply to  Fredchuckdave

Cubs fan here, constantly surprised by how little coverage the White Sox get in national media.

MikeSMember since 2020
8 years ago

This goes a little beyond “young teams are hard to project.” Many of the guys on that list just don’t matter. Shields, Gonzalez, and Santiago are only on the team to eat innings and hopefully be good enough to return a prospect at the deadline. Fullmer looks like he is never going to develop enough control and has a ceiling as a high leverage reliever if he can learn to throw at least 1 and a half pitches for strikes, otherwise he is never going to be anything, and I haven’t seen anything out of Dylan Covey to suggest that he is ever going to be a major league pitcher on a good team unless a move to the bullpen gives him a substantial velocity increase.

Next year won’t be much different except that you will have a larger sample size on Giolito and Lopez and maybe Rodon will be healthy?

The same thing will happen with their young hitters when they come along. Moncada is only projected for 1.8 WAR in 130 – 140 games. He put up 0.9 in 54 games and, if healthy, will play 150+ this year. Some of these young guys will never develop, but some will easily outperform projections based on so little data.

Really the only guys that matter now are Rodon, Giolito, and Lopez. Maybe see if Fullmer can take that step. Then wait for Kopech, Cease, Hansen, Dunning, and maybe Clarkin to develop and hope you get four or five guys out of that group by 2020, which is not an unreasonable hope.

mbs2001
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

Carson Fullmer looked confident and pitched well in MLB last season. I’m not sold on him staying as a starter but he looked as though he regained that wacky confidence he had in college.

Rational FanMember since 2025
8 years ago
Reply to  MikeS

You can’t pigeon hole a guy like Fulmer who made a real nice stride with the addition of the cutter late last season. It’s not likely he’s ever very good but it’s certainly possible based on his age and stuff that he figures it out.

jacob2Member since 2020
8 years ago

Seems striking that Steamer projects every one of the starters with the sort-of exception of Rodon to pitch worse this year than last year.

Jorge FabregasMember since 2016
8 years ago

I think the depth charts are a bit off, which is contributing to the league-worst projection. For example: I doubt Matt Davidson and Adam Engel are going to be getting 1100 PAs between them. PECOTA has them with a mid-70s win total, which may be a little rich .

Giolito's changeup
8 years ago

I think the reason for optimism among White Sox fans is not just the thinking that this rebuild will be similiar to the Cubs and Astros. Their last playoff appearance was 2008. Since then it had been trying to acquire sufficient talent via trade and free agent signings to contend to no avail. This was done under Kenny Williams and then Rick Hahn. The change in strategy beginning in the offseason 2016 is also a reason for the optimism. Obviously, only time will tell.

deltaclownMember since 2026
8 years ago

Well now I have to know which team has the least variance. Giants? They’re pretty boring.

ItsPoPtime
8 years ago

Hey great article!

pedeysRSox
8 years ago

any FA’s that the white sox could get that would be cheap and better than their current options (less than $3 million per year)?

bndj88Member since 2017
8 years ago

Love the piece, Rian. I have long felt that error bars around projections are undercovered at FanGraphs, and that there are potentially fascinating angles to look at. In general the 10th percentile – 90th percentile split is such a useful tool.

We could have top 5 variance and bottom 5 variance articles on individual players, which would greatly influence our thinking about team upside and risk. Or, what a cool “season-in-review” series it could be, for example, to determine what “percentile” of their projections a team overall performed at? We all know the Yankees had a unexpectedly great 2017, but comparing performance to projections, did they have an 85th percentile year or 98th? Would influence our expectation for regression.

And etc. I just think we focus too much on means when we’re talking projections on this site. The tails come true all the time and are arguably more interesting anyway!

RoyalsFan#14321Member since 2024
8 years ago
Reply to  bndj88

You’re not the only person who has interest in error bars…

bndj88Member since 2017
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

Great news, looking forward to it Rian!

Robert
8 years ago
Reply to  Rian Watt

I too am all for it. Can’t wait.

FrancoeursteinMember since 2025
8 years ago

Calling it again this year: Carlos Rodon is going to have a monster breakout season

Johnston
8 years ago

Bad Games James Shield is still pitching? No wonder the White Sox are predicted to be the worst team in baseball this year .

rshoovMember since 2020
8 years ago

There seems to be something going on with STEAMER and white sox pitchers. ZIPS has essentially every single starter doing much better by an average of .5 runs off the ERA. I wonder if this study would be greatly altered by using Zips.