The Yankees Are Good Despite Their Plate Discipline (Or Lack Thereof)

I have some good news about the Yankees. Their collective 120 wRC+ is tied for first among all teams in baseball, an achievement that seems like an amalgamation of skill rather than luck. Case in point: They’re leading the league in every conceivable Statcast metric, including average exit velocity, hard-hit rate, and barrel rate. By hitting baseballs at blistering speeds, the Yankees are turning them into valuable extra-base hits. It’s an ideal process, especially in a season where said hits have been harder to come by.
Next, I have some not-as-good news about the Yankees. It’s something I noticed while looking into Joey Gallo. The lefty slugger recently recorded his first two homers of the season, but his overall batting line is still under water. He’s striking out over 40% of the time, and the little contact he does make hasn’t returned much. You might think this is because Gallo goes after pitches he shouldn’t à la Javier Báez, but last season, he ran one of the best out-of-zone swing rates around. The problem is that even when he’s offered an attractive pitch, he has a gruesome tendency to whiff at it. When Gallo slumps, he doesn’t do so in a manner that’s even the slightest bit flattering.
This season has been different in the worst way possible. Not only is Gallo missing hittable pitches, but he’s also chasing after ones he formerly didn’t. His chase rate has ballooned from last season’s pristine 19.2% mark to a career-worst 30.5%. He’s not the only Yankee to exhibit this backwards progression, though. I smell a graph! Below is a scatterplot containing hitters with at least 300 plate appearances in 2021 and 50 in ‘22. On the x-axis are their chase rates from last year, and on the y-axis are their chase rates from this year:

A metric like O-Swing% (i.e. chase rate) tends to be reliable year-to-year, which is why the points are bunched up to form a linear relationship. But all those disparate yellow dots? They’re all Yankees hitters, and among the eight included, five (besides Gallo, they represent Josh Donaldson, Isiah Kiner-Falefa, Giancarlo Stanton, and Gleyber Torres) are way above the displayed trend line. The other three are Aaron Judge, DJ LeMahieu, and Anthony Rizzo; that they’ve been driving the Yankees offense so far is perhaps not surprising. This plot does leave out Aaron Hicks, who didn’t have enough plate appearances in 2021 to qualify but is currently swinging at just 14.3% of pitches outside the zone. He makes his squad look better. Still, as a whole, no other team is chasing at a higher rate of balls relative to last season:

It’s a puzzling development when you consider recent history. The Yankees offense might have been worse than merely decent (101 wRC+) last season if not for a 24.6% chase rate, good for third behind only the Dodgers and Giants. That represented a continuation from 2020, when the Yankees were second in chase rate, and the year before that, when they were ninth. For a while, this has been a team that’s established an ironclad sense of discipline at the plate. Now, suddenly, the Yankees are headed in the opposite direction. They’re still in great shape, mind you, but this seemingly out-of-nowhere change is another reason baseball doesn’t always totally makes sense.
Now, a stellar lineup doesn’t necessarily need standout discipline – the current Yankees are an example of how that’s possible. But in general, even though swing decisions might not be as important as, say, bat speed, they’re nonetheless integral to a team’s offensive output. While we’re on the subject, we may as well give the relationship between the two a thorough look. First, here’s the basic correlation between team chase rate and wRC+ since 2008:

Swing-happy teams do tend to have poor offenses, but again, the relatively flat trend line demonstrates that there are plenty of exceptions to the rule. The plot doesn’t do the best job of capturing why discipline matters, though. We can easily spot the individual teams but not the overall picture, which is that the absence of discipline has a much greater impact than its presence. Before arriving at that conclusion, I started by sorting the above teams into different groups based on their O-Swing% percentile, then calculated the mean wRC+ of each group. Here’s a table with the resulting calculations. In this case, a higher percentile means that a team swung at more pitches outside the zone:
| O-Swing% Percentile | Sample | Mean wRC+ |
|---|---|---|
| <25th | 95 | 101 |
| 25th to 50th | 92 | 96.5 |
| 50th to 75th | 103 | 95.7 |
| >75th | 100 | 92.9 |
It’s up to one’s own interpretation, but the way I see it, swing decisions are sort of a low-ceiling, high-floor skill set. When chase rate is isolated, we can see that an elite mark only grants teams about a league-average offense (101 wRC+). On the flip side, we can also see that a poor mark limits teams to a sorely below-average offense (93 wRC+). Good teams may not need standout discipline, but it means they’ll be in for an uphill battle. To elaborate, the less-than-25th-percentile group does in fact contain 45 teams that are below-average offensively by wRC+. Swing decisions alone don’t move the needle that much. But when you realize the greater-than-75th-percentile group contains just 15 teams (out of 100!) that are above-average, its value becomes apparent. Refraining from swinging outside the zone won’t return the most bang for a team’s buck, but it’d be foolish not to do so.
Circling back to the Yankees, who belong in the latter group, perhaps they’re in a worse shape than previously thought. Other elements of their offensive game are making up for the fact that Gallo and company are swinging at sliders in the dirt, but how long can they last? The first 10 or so Yankees games this season showed what happens when there’s a lack of discipline without the slugging to cover it up. Moreover, the question remains of why the Yankees have abandoned their patient ways. On that matter, it’s hard to ignore the presence of a possible new philosophy. After spending three years as a minor league hitting coordinator, Dillon Lawson became New York’s primary hitting coach this offseason. I’m not sure what ideas he has in mind, and I doubt anyone but those within the organization know for certain. And for it’s worth, no coach would want his guys to go after pitches outside the zone. Is the uptick in chase rate an unintended consequence of what he’s trying to accomplish? Maybe so.
Of course, this is also a different Yankees squad compared to even last year, so it’s not as if longtime players are adding aggression en masse. A new permutation of hitters could reasonably have an overarching, synergistic influence on an entire lineup. But the fact remains that most Yankees are underperforming their baseline chase rates regardless of how many years they’ve been in pinstripes. And while chase rate alone can’t provide a comprehensive evaluation of a hitter’s swing decisions – a topic explored by Ben Clemens yesterday – how one reacts against pitches outside the zone arguably matters most. If a hitter goes after a pitch outside the zone, he needs to compensate with several swings inside the zone. It’s quite the price to pay.
There’s no reason to panic, though – we’re still in small sample territory here, even when it comes to a metric like O-Swing%. We are at roughly the point when swing-based metrics “stabilize,” but all that means is we can now weigh this year’s numbers more heavily than last year’s to project a player’s performance moving forward. Even then, what a player did before is still going to matter a lot this early in the season, and the Yankees have an extensive track record of prioritizing plate discipline and recruiting hitters who possess it. Gallo has never been this indiscriminate, and the same can be said of Donaldson and Kiner-Falefa. It’s safe to bet on their chase rates going down, despite recent at-bats suggesting otherwise.
If anything, that the Yankees are this good even with an inflated chase rate shows just how scary they are. In a lot of ways, their destruction of opposing teams reminds me of the 2019 Twins. The famed Bomba Squad ran the league’s 19th-best chase rate, but scored runs like no other thanks to a penchant for crushing baseballs. Fittingly, that lineup has the highest wRC+ (116) among the many in that greater-than-75th-percentile group. In an interview earlier this year, Lawson said his approach to hitting could be summed up as “hit strikes hard.” The Yankees are doing exactly that, albeit at the (so far) minor but potentially significant cost of indulging in bad swings. We’ll get to see how this holds up. It’s interesting to think, though, that it just might represent a new normal.
Statistics in this article are through games of May 1.
Justin is an undergraduate student at Washington University in St. Louis studying statistics and writing.
Really interesting article. I grew up in the early aughts when the Yankee philosophy was power and lots and lots of patience; very intriguing to see this data broken out thusly.
Last year the Yankees ranked 28th in z-swing% (swing percentage at strikes), whereas the eventual World Series champion Braves ranked 1st.
The Yankees were far too timid when it came to swinging at strikes, and I’d presume new hitting coach Dillon Lawson has reinforced a more aggressive approach in the Yankees batters this season. I think this aggression has led to swinging at ALL pitches more often, hence the increase in o-swing%. But I don’t think it’s a bad idea to get a lineup that leads the league in every Statcast category to swing more often. Last year’s passivity led to finishing 19th in runs scored.
Edit: Just checked the team’s z-swing% this year and it is not much improved. It’ll be interesting to see how this plays out over a full year.
There are only 3 winning teams with an improved O-Swing rate right now, LAD, LAA and NYM…. LAA and NYM can probably be attributed to new acquisitions…it seems to me like the entire league is chasing a little bit and that probably has to do with the lack of spring training.
I’m curious how this has changed over time, is it even still happening or is this overloaded with bad data from the first 2 weeks?
Great article. Gallo got off to a slow start, hitting into bad luck. Watching the games, it appears that he started chasing pitches outside the zone because he was chasing outcomes and not trusting that his luck would change. Thus began a vicious cycle that is the cause of many a slump. While the analytics say that the hits will come (trust the process) poor results can get into a player’s head. Hoping that Gallo will turn it around when he returns to the line-up. Seems like a good guy, and he’s excellent in the field and on the bases.
I’m not sure how much this has to do with anything, but here are the MLB ranks of the teams the Yankees have been facing in terms of ERA:
11 (Det)
15 (Bos)
16 (Bal)
18 (Tor)
21 (Cle)
27 (KC)
Could be worse, but they haven’t been facing the 1995 Braves
With only ~3 weeks of games though, some of those teams’ ERA is bad partially because they’ve been playing the Yankees. I would expect Toronto, Boston and maybe Cleveland to all be ranked higher 3 months in once schedule difficulty has evened out a bit.
Cleveland might move up but I think there’s reason to be concerned: all the starters except for McKenzie have a significantly decreased fastball velocity this year. Given that several of them weren’t exactly hard throwers to begin with, a decreased fastball velocity is going to make it difficult more them to be effective.
Not for all of them though. Baltimore, Cleveland, and KC have done worse against the Yankees than other teams whereas Toronto and Detroit have done better. Boston is slightly worse but no great difference.
It’s likely that these teams would all rank more highly if they wouldn’t have played the Yankees yet this season…
As others have stated, this doesn’t show the effect that the Yankees’ offense had on the opposing staffs’ numbers. For example, in the games Cleveland has played against non-Yankee opponents, the staff ERA is 3.47, which would place them in the top half of teams.
Gallo is also getting thrown fewer fastballs and curveballs and more sliders and changeups than ever before and hasn’t had nearly as good results against the latter two as the former two. Have to wonder if the league put more effort into figuring him out once he was on a real contender, and then also if he can adapt.
I can tell you there is a zero percent chance that teams didn’t pay attention to Gallo prior because he wasn’t on a contender. Literally zero. Tons of peoples careers depend on it. Sometimes the obv solutions are the right ones. He is pressing and getting unlucky.
They tried being Savages in the Box and it didn’t work. So now they’re just hacking at everything. It’s certainly a less passive way to play.
Joey Gallo is gonna be fine. He’s certainly playing badly but he’s got a 25% barrel rate, which is like 4th in the league. (Stanton is at 20%, which puts up in the same territory). I’d be more worried about Josh Donaldson and Gleyber Torres.
Not really worried about Gallo because this is the player he is. Very streaky and he’ll hit 15 homers in a month or something. Gleyber Torres has the highest exit velocity of his career by 2.5, and has an xWOBA of .367, which would also be a career high. I think he’s fine. Maybe not 2019 Gleyber, but a solid version. Donaldson has looked like he was pressing for a while, but his expected stats are still among the league’s best. I’d be more worried about the Yankees catching situation. I know they like their defense, but they aren’t hitting a lick.
Also, Gleyber Torres is hitting .239/.274/.448 which is a 110 wRC+. Donaldson is at .211/.341/.365 for a 116 wRC+. Bring back the juiced balls.
Houston as a team is at .216/.288/.375, for exactly 100 wRC+. It’s bad out there.
I was wondering the other day if age had caught up to Josh Donaldson when I saw his triple slash: .211/.341/.355. Then I noticed his wRC+ was 116. Yes, that horrible slash like is 16% better than league average. We’ve all hopped into a time machine to visit 1968 the first month of the season.
I am never going to let this go–MLB keeps messing with the ball (and other things, too) to find a magical world that somehow involves short games, fewer strikeouts, more balls in play, fewer homers, and more offense, and it turns out that every single time they mess with stuff they hate it more than what was before. STOP MESSING WITH THE BALL.
Gleyber’s advanced numbers actually look really good. I was surprised to see that when I looked him up earlier this morning.
Donaldson’s advanced numbers aren’t bad, but not great. But he is still walking a ton though, which I’m fine with. He should come around.
If anything this shows that plate discipline might be overrated in 2022 and guys like Justin Choi will have to adjust their thinking and statistics.
There’s no question the Yankees hitting approach has changed under Lawson, and it seems to be working for them so far. They collectively have the ability to be very patient, so perhaps their highly aggressive approach so far is throwing off the opposition. It’ll be interesting to see how it unfolds over the course of the season.